References

  1. Abney, Keith. 2012. Robotics, ethical theory, and metaethics: A Guide to the perplexed. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey, 35–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Adams, Brian, Cynthia L. Breazeal, Rodney Brooks, and Brian Scassellati. 2000. Humanoid robots: A new kind of tool. IEEE Intelligent Systems 15 (4): 25–31. doi:10.1109/5254.867909.
  3. Anderson, Susan Leigh. 2008. Asimov’s “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics. AI & Society 22 (4): 477–493. doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0094-5.
  4. Anderson, Michael, and Susan Leigh Anderson. 2007. Machine ethics: Creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Magazine 28 (4): 15–26. doi:10.1609/aimag.v28i4.2065.
  5. Anderson, Michael, and Susan Leigh Anderson. 2008. EthEl: Toward a principled ethical eldercare robot. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall 2008 Symposium on AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems, 4–11. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
  6. Anderson, Michael, and Susan Leigh Anderson, eds. 2011. Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Anderson, Michael, Susan Leigh Anderson, and Chris Armen. 2004. Toward machine ethics. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2004/WS-04-02/WS04-02-008.pdf.
  8. Aristotle. 1944. Politics. Trans. H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Arkin, Ronald. 2009. Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  10. Asada, Minoru, Karl F. MacDorman, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Yasuo Kuniyoshi. 2001. Cognitive developmental robotics as a new paradigm for the design of humanoid robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 37 (2–3): 185–193. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(01)00157-9.
  11. Asaro, Peter. 2006. What should we want from a robot ethic? International Review of Information Ethics 6 (12): 9–16. http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/006/006_full.pdf.
  12. Asaro, Peter. 2012. A body to kick, but still no soul to damn: Legal perspectives on robotics. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. Patrick Lin, Keith Abney and George A. Bekey, 169–186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Asaro, Peter, and Wendell Wallach. 2016. Introduction: The emergence of robot ethics and machine ethics. In Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics, ed. Peter Asaro and Wendell Wallach, 1–15. New York: Routledge.
  14. Ashrafian, Hutan. 2015a. AIonAI: A humanitarian law of artificial intelligence and robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1): 29–40. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9513-9.
  15. Ashrafian, Hutan. 2015b. Artificial intelligence and robot responsibilities: Innovating beyond rights. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2): 317–326. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9541-0.
  16. Asimov, Isaac. 1981. Asimov on Science Fiction. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  17. Atterton, Peter, Matthew Calarco, and Maurice Friedman, eds. 2004. Levinas and Buber: Dialogue and Difference. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  18. Atterton, Peter, and Matthew Calarco, eds. 2010. Radicalizing Levinas. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  19. Bartneck, Christoph. 2004. From fiction to science—A cultural reflection of social robots. Proceedings of the CHI 2004 Workshop on Shaping Human-Robot Interaction, Vienna.
  20. Bartnek, Christoph, and Jun Hu. 2008. Exploring the abuse of robots. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 9 (3): 415–433. doi:10.1075/is.9.3.04bar.
  21. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1984. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  22. BBC News. 2006. Robots could demand legal rights. BBC News, December 21. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6200005.stm.
  23. Beavers, Anthony F. 1995. Levinas Beyond the Horizons of Cartesianism: An Inquiry into the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Peter Lang.
  24. Beavers, Anthony F. 2012. Moral machines and the threat of ethical nihilism. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. Patrick Lin, Keith Abney and George A. Bekey, 333–344. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. Bekey, George A. 2015. Autonomous Robots: From Biological Inspiration to Implementation and Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  26. Bekoff, Marc. 2007. The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy—And Why They Matter. Novato, CA: New World Library.
  27. Bemelmans, Roger, Gert Jan Gelderblom, Pieter Jonker, and Luc de Witte. 2010. The potential of socially assistive robotics in care for elderly, a systematic review. In Human-Robot Personal Relationships, ed. Maarten H. Lamers and Fons J. Verbeek, 83–89. Heidelberg: Springer.
  28. Benford, Gregory, and Elisabeth Malartre. 2007. Beyond Human: Living with Robots and Cyborgs. New York: Tom Doherty.
  29. Benso, Silvia. 2000. The Face of Things: A Different Side of Ethics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  30. Bensoussan, Alain. 2014. Le droit des robots: Mythe ou réalité? Emile & Ferdinand (October). https://www.alain-bensoussan.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/28743700.pdf.
  31. Bensoussan, Alain and Jérémy Bensoussan. 2015. Droit des robots. [The Law of Robots.] Brussels: Éditions Larcier.
  32. Bensoussan, Alain and Jérémy Bensoussan. 2016. Comparative Handbook: Robotic Technologies Law. Brussels: Larcier Group.
  33. Bentham, Jeremy. 2005. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Ed. J. H. Burns and H. L. Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Beran, Tanya N., and Alejandro Ramirez-Serrano. 2010. Can children have a relationship with a robot? In Human-Robot Personal Relationships, ed. Maarten H. Lamers and Fons J. Verbeek, 49–56. Heidelberg: Springer.
  35. Bertolini, Andrea. 2013. Robots as products: The case for a realistic analysis of robotic applications and liability rules. Law Innovation and Technology 5 (2): 214–247. doi:10.5235/17579961.5.2.214.
  36. Bhuta, Nehal, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiß, Hin-Yan Liu, and Claus Kreß. 2016. Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Binder, O. O. 1957. You will own “slaves” by 1965. Mechanix Illustrated (January): 62–65.
  38. Birch, Thomas. 1993. Moral considerability and universal consideration. Environmental Ethics 15:313–332. doi:10.5840/enviroethics19931544.
  39. Birch, Thomas H. 1995. The incarnation of wilderness: Wilderness areas as prisons. In Postmodern Environmental Ethics, ed. Max Oelschlaeger, 137–162. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  40. Bishop, Mark. 2009. Why computers can’t feel pain. Minds and Machines 19 (4): 507–516. doi:10.1007/s11023-009-9173-3.
  41. Bobbio, Norberto. 1996. The Age of Rights. Trans. A. Cameron. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  42. Boden, Margaret, Joanna Bryson, Darwin Caldwell, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Lilian Edwards, Sarah Kember, Paul Newman, et al. 2011. Principles of robotics: Regulating robots in the real World. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics.
  43. Boden, Margaret, Joanna Bryson, Darwin Caldwell, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Lilian Edwards, Sarah Kember, Paul Newman, et al. 2017. Principles of robotics: Regulating robots in the real world. Connection Science 29 (2): 124–129. doi:10.1080/09540091.2016.1271400.
  44. Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  45. Bostrom, Nick, and Eliezer Yudkowsky. 2014. The ethics of artificial intelligence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, ed. Keith Frankish and William M. Ramsey, 316–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Brahnam, Sheryl, and Antonella De Angeli. 2008. Special issue: Abuse and misuse of social agents. Interacting with Computers 20 (3): 287–291. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.001.
  47. Breazeal, Cynthia L. 2004. Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  48. Broadbent, Elizabeth, Vinayak Kumar, Xingyan Li, John Sollers, Rebecca Q. Stafford, Bruce A. MacDonald, and Daniel M. Wegner. 2013. Robots with display screens: A robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PLoS One 8 (8): e72589.
  49. Brooks, Rodney A. 2002. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon Books.
  50. Bruckenberger, Ulrike, Astrid Weiss, Nicole Mirnig, Ewald Strasser, Susanne Stadler, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2013. The good, the bad, the weird: Audience evaluation of a “real” robot in relation to science fiction and mass media. In Social Robotics. ICSR 2013, vol. 8239. Ed. Guido Herrmann, Martin J. Pearson, Alexander Lenz, Paul Bremner, Adam Spiers, and Ute Leonards, 301–310. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_30.
  51. Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2011. Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.
  52. Bryson, Joanna. 2000. A proposal for the humanoid agent-builder’s league (HAL). In Proceedings of The AISB 2000 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and (Quasi-)Human Rights, ed. John Barnden and Mark Lee, 1–6. Hove, UK: AISB. http://www.aisb.org.uk/publications/proceedings/aisb2000/AISB00_Ethics.pdf.
  53. Bryson, Joanna. 2010. Robots should be slaves. In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, ed. Yorick Wilks, 63–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  54. Bryson, Joanna. 2012. A role for consciousness in action selection. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 4 (2): 471–482. doi:10.1142/S1793843012400276.
  55. Bryson, Joanna. 2015. Clones should NOT be slaves. Adventures in NI (4 October). https://joanna-bryson.blogspot.com/2015/10/clones-should-not-be-slaves.html.
  56. Bryson, Joanna. 2016a. Patiency is not a virtue: AI and the design of ethical systems. AAAI Spring Symposium Series. Ethical and Moral Considerations in Non-Human Agents. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS16/paper/view/12686.
  57. Bryson, Joanna. 2016b. Robots are owned. Owners are taxed. Internet services cost Information. Adventures in NI (June 23). https://joanna-bryson.blogspot.com/2016/06/robots-are-owned-owners-are-taxed.html.
  58. Bryson, Joanna, and Philip P. Kime. 2011. Just an artifact: Why machines are perceived as moral agents. In the Proceedings of The Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Barcelona, Spain. https://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~jjb/ftp/BrysonKime-IJCAI11.pdf.
  59. Bryson, Joanna J., Mihailis E. Diamantis, and Thomas D. Grant. 2017. Of, for, and by the people: The legal lacuna of synthetic persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3): 273–291. doi:10.1007/s10506-017-9214-9.
  60. Calarco, Matthew. 2008. Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.
  61. Callicott, J. Baird. 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  62. Calo, Ryan. 2011. The sorcerer’s apprentice or: Why weak AI is interesting enough. The Center for Internet and Society. August 11. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2011/08/sorcerers-apprentice-or-why-weak-ai-interesting-enough.
  63. Calo, Ryan, A. Michael Froomkin, and Ian Kerr, eds. 2016. Robot Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  64. Calverley, D. 2005. Toward a method for determining the legal status of a conscious machine. In Proceedings of the AISB 2005 symposium on next generation approaches to machine consciousness: Imagination, development, intersubjectivity, and embodiment, ed. R. Chrisley, R. Clowes and S. Torrance. Hatfield, UK: University of Hertfordshire. http://www.aisb.org.uk/publications/proceedings/aisb2005/7_MachConsc_Final.pdf.
  65. Campaign Against Sex Robots. 2016. https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org.
  66. Campbell, T. J. 1907. Asceticism. In The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church. Vol. I. Ed. Charles G. Herbermann, Edward A. Pace, Conde B. Pallen, Thomas J. Shahan, and John J. Wynne, 767–773. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  67. Campbell, Tom. 2006. Rights: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
  68. Camus, Albert. 1983. The Myth of Sisyphus, and Other Essays. Trans. J. O’Brien. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  69. Čapek, Karel. 2009. R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots). Trans. D. Wyllie. Gloucestershire, UK: The Echo Library.
  70. Čapek, Karel. 1935. The author of robots defends himself—Karel Čapek. Lidove Noviny 43 (290), June 9. Collected in Karel Čapek. 1986. O Umení a Kulture III (Spisy XIX), 656–657. Trans. by Cyril Simsa. Prague: Ceskoslovensky spisovatel. http://www.depauw.edu/sfs/documents/capek68.htm.
  71. Carpenter, Julie. 2015. Culture and Human-Robot Interaction in Militarized Spaces: A War Story. New York: Ashgate.
  72. Casey, Bryan James. 2017. Amoral machines, or: How roboticists can learn to stop worrying and love the law. Northwestern University Law Review Online 111: 231–250. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1248&context=nulr_online.
  73. Channell, David F. 1991. The Vital Machine: A Study of Technology and Organic Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  74. Chella, Antonio, and Riccardo Manzotti. 2009. Machine consciousness: A manifesto for robotics. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 1 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1142/S1793843009000062.
  75. Chicago Manual of Style (CMS). 2017. FAQ—Pronouns. http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Pronouns/faq0020.html.
  76. Chu, Seo-Young. 2010. Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep? A Science-Fictional Theory of Representation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  77. Chude-Sokei, Louis. 2015. The Sound of Culture: Diaspora and Black Technopoetics. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  78. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2010a. Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3): 209–221. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9235-5.
  79. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2010b. Moral appearances: Emotions, robots, and human morality. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3): 235–241. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9221-y.
  80. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2011. You, robot: On the linguistic construction of artificial others. AI & Society 26 (1): 61–69. doi:10.1007/s00146-010-0289-z.
  81. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2012. Growing Moral Relations: Critique of Moral Status Ascription. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  82. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2014. Robotic appearance and forms of life: A phenomenological-hermeneutical approach to the relation between robotics and culture. In Robotics in Germany and Japan: Philosophical and Technical Perspectives, ed. Michael Funk and Bernhard Irrgang, 59–68. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  83. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2016a. Is it wrong to kick a robot? Towards a relational and critical robot ethics and beyond. In What Social Robots Can and Should Do, ed. Johanna Seibt, Marco Nørskov, and Søren Schack Andersen, 7–8. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  84. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2016b. Why care about robots? Empathy, moral standing and the language of suffering. Keynote address at The Third International Conference on Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Issues. December 14–16. Lisbon, Portugal. http://lisbonicpos.campus.ciencias.ulisboa.pt/keynote-speakers.
  85. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2016c. Alterity ex machina: The encounter with technology as an epistemological-ethical drama. In The Changing Face of Alterity: Communication, Technology and Other Subjects, ed. David J. Gunkel, Ciro Marcondes Filho and Dieter Mersch, 181–196. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  86. Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2017. Using Words and Things: Language and Philosophy of Technology. New York: Routledge.
  87. Coeckelbergh, Mark, and David J. Gunkel. 2014. Facing animals: A relational, other-oriented approach to moral standing. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 27 (5): 715–733. doi:10.1007/s10806-013-9486-3.
  88. Coeckelbergh, Mark, and David J. Gunkel. 2016. Response to “the problem of the question about animal ethics” by Michal Piekarski. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 29 (4): 717–721. doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9627-6.
  89. Cohen, Richard A. 2000. Ethics and cybernetics: Levinasian reflections. Ethics and Information Technology 2:27–35. doi:10.1023/A:1010060128998.
  90. Cohen, Richard A. 2003. Introduction. In Humanism of the Other, trans. Nidra Poller, vii—xliv. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  91. Cohen, Richard A. 2010. Ethics and cybernetics: Levinasian reflections. In Radicalizing Levinas, ed. Peter Atterton and Matthew Calarco, 153–170. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  92. Collins, Kate. 2015. What the death of HitchBOT teaches us about humans. Wired. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/hitchbot-death-robot-ethics-human-psychology.
  93. Committee on Legal Affairs. 2016. Draft report with recommendations to the commission on civil law rules on robotics. European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-582.443%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0//EN.
  94. Cookson, Clive. 2015. Scientists appeal for ethical use of robots. Financial Times, December 10. https://www.ft.com/content/fee8bacc-9f37-11e5-8613-08e211ea5317.
  95. Culler, Jonathan. 1982. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  96. Cushman, Fiery, Kurt Gray, Allison Gaffey, and Wendy Berry Mendes. 2012. Simulating murder: The aversion to harmful action. Emotion (Washington, D.C.) 12 (1): 2–7.
  97. Danaher, John. 2016. Robots, law and the retribution gap. Ethics and Information Technology 18 (4): 299–309. doi:10.1007/s10676-016-9403-3.
  98. Danaher, John. 2017a. Robotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: Should they be criminalised? Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1): 71–95. doi:10.1007/s11572-014-9362-x.
  99. Danaher, John. 2017b. Should robots have rights? Four perspectives. Philosophical Disquisitions. http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2017/10/should-robots-have-rights-four.html.
  100. Danaher, John, and Joanna Bryson. 2017. Bryson on why robots should be slaves. Philosophical Disquisitions, podcast #24. http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2017/06/episode-24-bryson-on-why-robots-should.html.
  101. Danaher, John, and Neil McArthur. 2017. Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  102. Darling, Kate. 2012. Extending legal protection to social robots. IEEE Spectrum. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/extending-legal-protection-to-social-robots.
  103. Darling, Kate. 2015. Ethical issues in human-robot interaction. Media Evolution / The Conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3gp4LFgPX0.
  104. Darling, Kate. 2016a. Extending legal protection to social robots: The effects of anthropomorphism, empathy, and violent behavior toward robotic objects. In Robot Law, ed. Ryan Calo, A. Michael Froomkin, and Ian Kerr, 213–231. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  105. Darling, Kate. 2016b. What are the rules of human-robot interaction? SBS Seoul Digital Forum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7NNK-nQquo.
  106. Darling, Kate. 2017. “Who’s Johnny?” Anthropomorphic framing in human-robot interaction, integration, and policy. In Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, ed. Patrick Lin, Ryan Jenkins, and Keith Abney, 173–191. New York: Oxford University Press.
  107. Darling, Kate, and Sabine Hauert. 2013. Giving rights to robots. RobotsPodcast #125. http://robohub.org/robots-giving-rights-to-robots.
  108. Darling, Kate, and Shankar Vedantam. 2017. Can robots teach us what it means to be human? Hidden Brain (NPR Podcast). http://www.npr.org/2017/07/10/536424647/can-robots-teach-us-what-it-means-to-be-human.
  109. Darling, Kate, Palash Nandy, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2015. Empathic concern and the effect of stories in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ed. IEEE, 770–775. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333675. Also available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2639689.
  110. Dashevsky, Evan. 2017. Do robots and AI deserve rights? PC Magazine, February 16. https://www.pcmag.com/article/351719/do-robots-and-ai-deserve-rights.
  111. Dautenhahn, Kirsten. 1998. The art of designing socially intelligent agents: Science, fiction, and the human in the loop. Applied Artificial Intelligence 12 (7–8): 573–617. doi:10.1080/088395198117550.
  112. Davoudi, Salamander. 2006. UK report says robots will have rights. Financial Times, December 19. https://www.ft.com/content/5ae9b434-8f8e-11db-9ba3-0000779e2340.
  113. Davy, Barbara Jane. 2007. An other face of ethics in Levinas. Ethics and the Environment 12 (1): 39–65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40339131.
  114. De Angeli, Antonella, Sheryl Brahnam, and Peter Wallis. 2005. Abuse: The dark side of human—computer interaction. Interact 2005. http://www.agentabuse.org.
  115. De Angeli, Antonella, Sheryl Brahnam, Peter Wallis, and Alan Dix. 2006. Misuse and abuse of interactive technologies. Proceedings of the CHI ‘06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 22–27 April 2006, Montreal, Québec, Canada. http://www.agentabuse.org.
  116. Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Trans. P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.
  117. Dennett, Daniel. 1978. Why you can’t make a computer that feels pain. Synthese 38 (3): 415–456. doi:10.1007/BF00486638.
  118. Dennett, Daniel. 1996. Kinds of Minds. New York: Basic Books.
  119. Dennett, Daniel C. 1997. When HAL kills, who’s to blame? Computer ethics. In Hal’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality, ed. David G. Stork, 351–366. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  120. Dennett, Daniel C. 1998. Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  121. Dennett Daniel, C. 2001. Are we explaining consciousness yet? Cognition 79 (1–2): 221–237. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00130-X.
  122. Dennett Daniel, C. 2009. The part of cognitive science that is philosophy. Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2): 231–236. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01015.x.
  123. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  124. Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Positions. Trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  125. Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  126. Derrida, Jacques. 1991. Letter to a Japanese friend. Trans. D. Wood and A. Benjamin. In A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds, ed. Peggy Kamuf, 270–276. New York: Columbia University Press.
  127. Derrida, Jacques. 1993. Limited Inc. Trans. S. Weber and J. Mehlman. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  128. Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Paper Machine. Trans. R. Bowlby. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  129. Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am . Trans. David Wills. Ed. Marie-Louise Mallet. New York: Fordham University Press.
  130. Dix, Alan. 2008. Response to “sometimes it’s hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents.” Interacting with Computers 20 (3): 334–337. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.003.
  131. Dix, Alan. 2017. I in an other’s eye. AI & Society. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-017-0694-7.
  132. Douzinas, Costas. 2000. The End of Human Rights: Critical Thought at the Turn of the Century. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  133. Dowling, Conor M., and Michael G. Miller. 2014. Super PAC!: Money, Elections, and Voters After Citizens United. New York: Routledge.
  134. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Cannot Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  135. Duffy, Brian R. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (3–4): 177–190. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3.
  136. Duffy, Brian R., and Gina Joue. 2004. “I, robot being,” in Intelligent Autonomous Systems Conference. Amsterdam, Netherlands. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.59.2833.
  137. Duncan, Roger. 2006. Emmanuel Levinas: Non-intentional consciousness and the status of representational thinking. In Logos of Phenomenology and Phenomenology of the Logos, Book Three, ed. Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, 271–281. Analecta Husserliana: The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, vol. 90. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
  138. Dworkin, Ronald. 1997. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  139. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). 2005. Walking with Robots EP/D05656X/1. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101109054809/http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/ViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=EP/D05656X/1.
  140. Epley, Nicolas, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114 (4): 864–886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
  141. Ess, Charles. 1996. The political computer: Democracy, cmc, and Habermas. In Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. Charles Ess, 196–230. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  142. Ess, Charles. 2009. Digital Media Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  143. Ess, Charles. 2016. What’s love got to do with it? Robots, sexuality, and the arts of being human. In Social Robots: Boundaries, Potential, Challenges, ed. Marco Nørskov, 57–79. Farmham, UK: Ashgate.
  144. Eyssel, Friederike, and Dieta Kuchenbrandt. 2012. Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (4): 724–731. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x.
  145. Faragó, Tamás, Ádám Miklósi, Beáta Korcsok, Judit Száraz, and Márta Gácsi. 2014. Social behaviours in dog–owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 15 (2): 143–172. doi:10.1075/is.15.2.01far.
  146. Feenberg, Andrew. 1991. Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  147. Fisher, Richard. 2013. Is it OK to torture or murder a robot? BBC Future. http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20131127-would-you-murder-a-robot.
  148. Floridi, Luciano. 2008. Information ethics: Its nature and scope. In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, ed. Jeroen van den Hoven and John Weckert, 40–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  149. Floridi, Luciano. 2013. The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  150. Floridi, Luciano. 2017. Robots, jobs, taxes, and responsibilities. Philosophy & Technology 30 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0257-3.
  151. Floridi, Luciano, and J. W. Sanders. 2004. On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines 14:349–379. doi:10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d.
  152. Flynn, Clifton P. 2008. Social Creatures: A Human and Animal Studies Reader. New York: Lantern Books.
  153. Ford, Martin. 2015. Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. New York: Basic Books.
  154. Freitas, Robert A. 1985. End note—can the wheels of justice turn for our friends in the mechanical kingdom? Don’t laugh. [Also available under the title “Legal Rights of Robots” at http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/LegalRightsOfRobots.htm.] Student Lawyer (Chicago, Ill.) 13 (5): 54–56.
  155. Frey, Carl Benedikt, and Michael A. Osborne. 2017. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114:254–280. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
  156. Garreau, Joel. 2007. Bots on the ground: In the field of battle (or even above it), robots are a soldier’s best friend. Washington Post, 6 May 6, 2007. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050501009.html.
  157. Gartner. 2013. Gartner says the Internet of Things installed base will grow to 26 billion units by 2020. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2636073.
  158. Gaus, Gerald, and Fred D’Agostino. 2013. The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
  159. Geraci, Robert M. 2010. Apocalyptic AI: Visions of Heaven in Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  160. Gerdes, Anne. 2015. The issue of moral consideration in robot ethics. ACM SIGCAS Computers & Society 45 (3):274–280. doi:10.1145/2874239.2874278.
  161. Ginway, M. Elizabeth. 2011. Brazilian Science Fiction: Cultural Myths and Nationhood in the Land of the Future. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
  162. Gips, James. 1991. Towards the ethical robot. In Android Epistemology, ed. Kenneth M. Ford, Clark Glymour and Patrick Hayes, 243–252. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  163. Goertzel, Ben. 2002. Thoughts on AI morality. Dynamical Psychology: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal of Complex Mental Processes (May). http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2002/AIMorality.htm.
  164. Gray, Heather M., Kurt Gray, and Daniel M. Wegner. 2007. Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315 (5812): 619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475.
  165. Guizzo, Erico, and Evan Ackerman. 2016. When robots decide to kill. IEEE Spectrum 53 (6): 38–43. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2016.7473151.
  166. Gunkel, David J. 2001. Hacking Cyberspace. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  167. Gunkel, David J. 2007. Thinking Otherwise: Philosophy, Communication, Technology. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
  168. Gunkel, David J. 2010. The real problem: Avatars, metaphysics, and online social interaction. New Media & Society 12 (1): 127–141. doi:10.1177/1461444809341443.
  169. Gunkel, David J. 2012. The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  170. Gunkel, David J. 2014a. A vindication of the rights of machines. Philosophy & Technology 27 (1): 113–132. doi:10.1007/s13347-013-0121-z.
  171. Gunkel, David J. 2014b. The other question: The issue of robot rights. In Social Robots and the Future of Social Relations, ed. Johanna Seibt, Raul Hakli, and Marco Nørskov, 13–15. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  172. Gunkel, David J. 2015. The rights of machines: Caring for robotic care-givers. In Machine Medical Ethics, ed. Simon Peter van Rysewyk and Matthijs Pontier, 151–166. New York: Springer.
  173. Gunkel, David J. 2016a. Of Remixology: Ethics and Aesthetics After Remix. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  174. Gunkel, David J. 2016b. Other problems: Rethinking ethics in the face of social robots. In What Social Robots Can and Should Do, ed. Johanna Seibt, Marco Nørskov, and Søren Schack Andersen, 9–12. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  175. Gunkel, David. J. 2016c. Another alterity: Rethinking ethics in the face of the machine. In The Changing Face of Alterity: Communication, Technology and Other Subjects, ed. David J. Gunkel, Ciro Marcondes Filho, and Dieter Mersch, 197–218. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  176. Gunkel, David J. 2017a. The other question: Can and should robots have rights? Ethics and Information Technology. Published ahead of print, October 17. doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9442-4.
  177. Gunkel, David J. 2017b. O sintoma da ética ou: Os mecanismos da filosofia moral. Trans. F. Fernandez and V. Prates. In Sintoma e Fantasia no Capitalismo Comunicacional, ed. Luiz Aidar Prado José and Vinicius Prates. São Paulo: Estação das Letras e Cores.
  178. Gunkel, David J. 2018. Gaming the System: Deconstructing Video Games, Game Studies and Virtual Worlds. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  179. Gunkel, David J., and Billy Cripe. 2014. Apocalypse not, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the machine. Kritikos 11. http://intertheory.org/gunkel-cripe.htm.
  180. Gunkel, David J., and Paul Taylor. 2014. Heidegger and the Media. New York: Polity Press.
  181. Günther, Jan-Philipp. 2016. Roboter und Rechtliche Verantwortung: Eine Untersuchung der Benutzer- und Herstellerhaftung. München: Herbert Utz Verlag.
  182. Güzeldere, Güven. 1997. The many faces of consciousness: A field guide. In The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates, ed. Ned Block, Owen Flanagan, and Güven Güzeldere, 1–68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  183. Haddadin, Sami. 2014. Towards Safe Robots: Approaching Asimov’s 1st Law. Heidelberg: Springer.
  184. Hagendorff, Thilo. 2017. Animal rights and robot ethics. International Journal of Technoethics 8 (2): 61–71. doi:10.4018/IJT.2017070105.
  185. Hajdin, Mane. 1994. The Boundaries of Moral Discourse. Chicago: Loyola University Press.
  186. Hall, J. Storrs. 2001. Ethics for machines. KurzweilAI.net, July 5. http://www.kurzweilai.net/ethics-for-machines.
  187. Hall, J. Storrs. 2011. Beyond AI: Creating the Conscience of the Machine. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  188. Hammond, Kris. 2016. Ethics and artificial intelligence: The moral compass of a machine: The question of robotic ethics is making everyone tense. Recode, 13 April. https://www.recode.net/2016/4/13/11644890/ethics-and-artificial-intelligence-the-moral-compass-of-a-machine.
  189. Hampton, Gregory Jerome. 2015. Imagining Slaves and Robots in Literature, Film, and Popular Culture: Reinventing Yesterday’s Slave with Tomorrow’s Robot. New York: Lexington Books.
  190. Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  191. Hardy, Rod, dir. 2005. Battlestar Galactica. Season 2, episode 5, “The Farm.” Aired August 12 on the Sci-Fi Channel. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0519788.
  192. Harman, Graham. 2002. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Chicago: Open Court Press.
  193. Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  194. Hearne, Vicki. 2000. Adam’s Task: Calling Animals by Name. New York: Akadine Press.
  195. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.
  196. Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. W. Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row.
  197. Heider, Fritz, and Marianne Simmel. 1944. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology 57 (2): 243–259. doi:10.2307/1416950.
  198. Hemmersbaugh, P. A. 2016. NHTSA letter to Chris Urmson, director, self-driving car project, Google, Inc. https://isearch.nhtsa.gov/files/Google%20--%20compiled%20response%20to%2012%20Nov%20%2015%20interp%20request%20--%204%20Feb%2016%20final.htm.
  199. Henderson, Mark. 2007. Human rights for robots? We’re getting carried away. The Times (April 24). https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/human-rights-for-robots-were-getting-carried-away-xfbdkpgwn0v.
  200. Hernéndez-Orallo, José. 2017. The Measure of All Minds: Evaluating Natural and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  201. Heyn, E. T. 1904. Berlin’s wonderful horse. New York Times, September 4.
  202. Hill, Kashmir. 2014. Are child sex-robots inevitable? Forbes (July 14). https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/07/14/are-child-sex-robots-inevitable.
  203. Himma, Kenneth Einar. 2009. Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: What properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent? Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1): 19–29. doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9167-5.
  204. Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1979. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Penguin.
  205. Hofstadter, Douglas R. 2001. Staring emmy straight in the eye—And doing my best not to flinch. In Virtual Music: Computer Synthesis of Musical Style, ed. David Cope, 33–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  206. Hohfeld, Wesley. 1920. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  207. Hubbard, F. Patrick. 2011. “Do androids dream?”: Personhood and intelligent artifacts. Temple Law Review 83: 405–474. http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/law_facpub.
  208. Hudson, W. Donald. 1969. The Is/Ought Question: A Collection of Papers on the Central Problem in Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan.
  209. Hume, David. 1980. A Treatise of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
  210. Hymel, Alicia M., Daniel T. Levin, Jonathan Barrett, Megan Saylor, and Gautam Biswas. 2011. The interaction of children’s concepts about agents and their ability to use an agent-based tutoring system. In Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Applications, ed. Julie A. Jacko, 580–589. New York: Springer.
  211. Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  212. Inayatullah, Sohail, and Phil McNally. 1988. The rights of robots: Technology, culture and law in the 21st century. Futures 20 (2): 119–136. Also available at http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-rights-of-robots-technology-culture-and-law-in-the-21st-century.
  213. Inayatullah, Sohail. 2001. The rights of your robots: Exclusion and inclusion in history and future. KurzweilAI.net. http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-rights-of-your-robots-exclusion-and-inclusion-in-history-and-future.
  214. International Federation of Robotics (IFR). 2015. Industrial robot statistics. http://www.ifr.org/industrial-robots/statistics.
  215. Ipsos MORI. 2006. Robo-rights: utopian dream or rise of the machines? https://web.archive.org/web/20070207230831/http://www.sigmascan.org:80/ViewIssue.aspx?IssueId=53.
  216. ISO. 2012. ISO 8373: Robots and robotic devices—Vocabulary. https://www.iso.org/standard/55890.html.
  217. Introna, Lucas D. 2010. The “measure of a man” and the ethos of hospitality: Towards an ethical dwelling with technology. AI & Society 25 (1): 93–102. doi:10.1007/s00146-009-0242-1.
  218. Isaac, Alistair, and Will Bridewell. 2017. White lies on silver tongues: Why robots need to deceive (and how). In Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, ed. Patrick Lin, Ryan Jenkins, and Keith Abney, 157–172. New York: Oxford University Press.
  219. Jacobs, Harriet Ann. 2001. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. New York: Dover.
  220. Jaeger, Christopher B., and Daniel T. Levin. 2016. If asimo thinks, does roomba feel? The legal implications of attributing agency to technology. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 5 (3): 3–25. doi:10.5898/JHRI.5.3.Jaeger.
  221. James, Edward. 1990. Yellow, black, metal and tentacled: The race question in american science fiction. In Science Fiction, Social Conflict and War, ed. Philip J. Davies, 26–49. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  222. James, Matt, and Kyle Scott, eds. 2008. Robots & rights: Will artificial intelligence change the meaning of human rights? Symposium Report. London: BioCentre. http://www.bioethics.ac.uk/cmsfiles/files/resources/biocentre_symposium_report__robots_and_rights_150108.pdf.
  223. Jibo. 2014. https://www.jibo.com.
  224. John, Robert. 2007. Haftung für Künstliche Intelligenz: Rechtliche Beurteilung des Einsatzes Intelligenter Softwareagenten im E-Commerce. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.
  225. Johnson, Barbara. 1981. Translator’s introduction. In Jacques Derrida, Disseminations, vii–xxxiii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  226. Johnson, Brian David. 2011. Science Fiction Prototyping: Designing the Future with Science Fiction. Williston, VT: Morgan and Claypool Publishers. doi:10.2200/S00336ED1V01Y201102CSL003.
  227. Johnson, Deborah G. 2006. Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics and Information Technology 8: 195–204. doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9111-5.
  228. Jones, Raya. 2016. Personhood and Social Robotics: A Psychological Consideration. New York: Routledge.
  229. Jones, Meg Leta, and Jason Millar. 2017. Hacking metaphors in the anticipatory governance of emerging technology: The case of regulating robots. In The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology, ed. Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, and Karen Yeung, 573–596. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  230. Jordan, John. 2016. Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  231. Kahn, Peter H., Hiroshi Ishiguro, Brian T. Gill, Takayuki Kanda, Nathan G. Freier, Rachel L. Severson, Jolina H. Ruckert, and Solace Shen. 2012. “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology 48 (2): 303–314. doi:10.1037/a0027033.
  232. Kang, Minsoo. 2011. Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  233. Kant, Immanuel. 1983. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. J. W. Ellington. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
  234. Kant, Immanuel. 1985. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. L. W. Beck. New York: Macmillan.
  235. Kaye, Lydia. 2016. Challenging sex robots and the brutal dehumanisation of women. Campaign Against Sex Robots. https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/2016/02/10/challenging-sex-robots-and-the-brutal-dehumanisation-of-women.
  236. Keynes, John M. 1963. Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In Essays in Persuasion, 358–373. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
  237. Klein, Wilhelm E. J. 2016. Robots make ethics honest—and vice versa. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 45 (3): 261–269. doi:10.1145/2874239.2874276.
  238. King, Edward. 2013. Science Fiction and Digital Technologies in Argentine and Brazilian Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  239. Kleeman, Jenny. 2017. The race to build the world’s first sex robot. The Guardian, April 27. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/27/race-to-build-world-first-sex-robot.
  240. Knight, Heather. 2014. How humans respond to robots: Building public policy through good design. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/research/how-humans-respond-to-robots-building-public-policy-through-good-design.
  241. Koops, Bert-Jaap. 2008. Criteria for normative technology: The acceptability of code as law in light of democratic and constitutional values. In Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes, ed. Roger Brownsword and Karen Yeung, 157–174. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
  242. Kramer, Matthew H. 1998. Rights without trimmings. In A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries, ed. Matthew H. Kramer, N. E. Simmonds, and Hillel Steiner, 7–112. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  243. Kramer, Matthew H., N. E. Simmonds, and Hillel Steiner, ed. 1998. A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  244. Krishnan, Armin. 2016. Killer Robots: Legality and Ethicality of Autonomous Weapons. New York: Routledge.
  245. Kriz, Sarah, Toni D. Damera, Pallavi Damera, and John R. Porter. 2010. Fictional robots as a data source in HRI research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations. Paper presented at the 19th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Viareggio, Italy, September 12–15, 458–63. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598620.
  246. Kurzgesagt–In a Nutshell. 2017. Do Robots Deserve Rights? What if Machines Become Conscious? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHyUYg8X31c
  247. Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking.
  248. LaChat, Michel R. 1986. Artificial intelligence and ethics: An exercise in the moral imagination. AI Magazine 7 (2): 70–79. doi:10.1609/aimag.v7i2.540.
  249. LaGrandeur, Kevin. 2013. Androids and Intelligent Networks in Early Modern Literature and Culture. New York: Routledge.
  250. LaGrandeur, Kevin, and James J. Hughes. 2017. Surviving the Machine Age: Intelligent Technology and the Transformation of Human Work. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  251. Lalji, Nur. 2015. Can we learn about empathy from torturing robots? This MIT researcher is giving it a try. Yes! Magazine. http://www.yesmagazine.org/happiness/should-we-be-kind-to-robots-kate-darling.
  252. Larriba, Ferran, Cristóbal Raya, Cecilio Angulo, Jordi Albo-Canals, Marta Díaz, and Roger Boldú. 2016. Externalising moods and psychological states in a cloud based system to enhance a pet-robot and child’s interaction. Biomedical Engineering Online 15 (Suppl 1): 187–196. doi:10.1186/s12938-016-0180-3.
  253. Lavender, Isiah. 2011. Race in American Science Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  254. Lee, Jason. 2017. Sex Robots: The Future of Desire. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  255. Leenes, Ronald, and Federica Lucivero. 2014. Laws on robots, laws by robots, laws in robots: Regulating robot behaviour by design. Law, Innovation and Technology 6 (2) 194–222. doi:10.5235/17579961.6.2.193.
  256. Lehman-Wilzig, Sam. (1981) Frankenstein unbound: Towards a legal definition of artificial intelligence. Futures 13 (6): 442–457, December. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(81)90100-2.
  257. Leopold, Aldo. 1966. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  258. Leroux, Christophe, Roberto Labruto, Chiara Boscarato, Franco Caroleo, Jan-Philipp Günther, Severin Löffler, Florian Münch, et al. 2012. Suggestion for a Green Paper on Legal Issues in Robotics. euRobotics—The European Robotics Coordination Action. https://www.unipv-lawtech.eu/files/euRobotics-legal-issues-in-robotics-DRAFT_6j6ryjyp.pdf.
  259. Leveringhaus, Alex. 2016. Ethics and Autonomous Weapons. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  260. Levin, Daniel T., Stephen S. Killingsworth, and Megan M. Saylor. 2008. Concepts about the capabilities of computers and robots: A test of the scope of adults’ theory of mind. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual IEEE International Workshop on Human and Robot Interaction, 57–64. Amsterdam: ACM.
  261. Levin, Daniel T., Stephen S. Killingsworth, Megan M. Saylor, Stephen M. Gordon, and Kazuhiko Kawamura. 2013. Tests of concepts about different kinds of minds: Predictions about the behavior of computers, robots, and people. Human-Computer Interaction 28 (2): 161–191.
  262. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University.
  263. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1981. Otherwise Than Being, Or Beyond Essence. Trans. A. Lingis. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  264. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1985. Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Trans. R. A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
  265. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Collected Philosophical Papers. Trans. A. Lingis. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
  266. Levy, David. 2005. Robots Unlimited: Life in a Virtual Age. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  267. Levy, David. 2007. Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. New York: Harper Perennial.
  268. Levy, David. 2009. The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1 (3): 209–216. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0022-6.
  269. Lin, Patrick. 2016. Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, ed. Markus Maurer, J. Christian Gerdes, Barbara Lenz, and Hermann Winner, 69–86. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_4.
  270. Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey. 2012. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  271. Lin, Patrick, Ryan Jenkins, and Keith Abney. 2017. Robot Ethics 2.0: New Challenges in Philosophy, Law, and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
  272. Llewelyn, John. 1995. Emmanuel Levinas: The Genealogy of Ethics. London: Routledge.
  273. Løgstrup, Knud Ejler. 1997. The Ethical Demand. Trans. H. Fink and A. MacIntyre. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  274. Loughlin, Martin. 2000. Sword and Scales: An Examination of the Relationship between Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  275. Lovgren, Stefan. 2006. A robot in every home by 2020, South Korea says. National Geographic News, September 6. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060906-robots.html.
  276. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  277. MacCormick, Neil. 1982. Legal Right and Social Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  278. Marks, Paul. 2007. Robot rights. New Scientist Blog (April 24). https://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/2007/04/robot-rights.html.
  279. Matarić, Maja J. 2007. The Robotics Primer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  280. Markus, Hazel R., and Shinobu Kitayama. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98 (2): 224–253.
  281. Marx, Karl. 1977. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Ben Fowkes. New York: Vintage Books.
  282. Marx, Johannes, and Christine Tiefensee. 2015. Of animals, robots and men. Historical Social Research (Köln) 40 (4): 70–91. doi:10.12759/hsr.40.2015.4.70-91.
  283. McCarthy, John. 1999. Making robots conscious of their mental states. In Machine Intelligence 15, ed. Koichi Furukawa, Donald Michie and Stephen Muggleton, 3–17. Oxford: Oxford University.
  284. McCauley, Lee. 2007. AI armageddon and the three laws of robotics. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2): 153–164. doi:10.1007/s10676-007-9138-2.
  285. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. 2017. Robot. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/robot.
  286. Miller, Lantz Fleming. 2015. Granting automata human rights: Challenge to a basis of full-rights privilege. Human Rights Review (Piscataway, N.J.) 16 (4): 369–391. doi:10.1007/s12142-015-0387-x.
  287. Miller, Lantz Fleming. 2017. Responsible research for the construction of maximally humanlike automata: The paradox of unattainable informed consent. Ethics and Information Technology. Published ahead of print, July 8. doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9427-3.
  288. Minsky, Marvin. 2006. Alienable rights. In Thinking about Android Epistemology, ed. Kenneth M. Ford, Clark Glymour, and Patrick J. Hayes, 137–46. Menlo Park, CA: IAAA Press. Originally published in Discover Magazine, 1993.
  289. Muehlhauser, Luke, and Nick Bostrom. 2014. Why we need friendly AI. Think (London, England) 13 (36): 41–47. doi:10.1017/S1477175613000316.
  290. Nagenborg, Michael, Rafael Capurro, Jutta Weber, and Christoph Pingel. 2008. Ethical regulations on robotics in Europe. AI & Society 22 (3): 349–366. doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0153-y.
  291. Nass, Clifford, Youngme Moon, John Morkes, Eun-Young Kim, and B. J. Fogg. 1997. Computers are social actors: A review of current research. In Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, ed. Batya Friedman, 137–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  292. Nass, Clifford, and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56 (1): 81–103. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153.
  293. Nealon, Jeffrey. 1998. Alterity Politics: Ethics and Performative Subjectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  294. Neely, Erica L. 2012. Machines and the moral community. In The Machine Question: AI, Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Proceedings of the AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012 (Birmingham, UK, July 2–6), ed. Joanna Bryson, David J. Gunkel, and Steve Torrance, 38–42. http://events.cs.bham.ac.uk/turing12/proceedings/14.pdf.
  295. Neely, Erica L. 2014. Machines and the moral community. Philosophy & Technology 27 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1007/s13347-013-0114-y.
  296. Neuhäuser, Christian. 2015. Some skeptical remarks regarding robot responsibility and a way forward. In Collective Agency and Cooperation in Natural and Artificial Systems: Explanation, Implementation, and Simulation, ed. Catrin Misselhorn, 131–148. New York: Springer.
  297. Nourbakhsh, Illah. 2013. Robot Futures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  298. Nørskov, Marco. 2016. Social Robots: Boundaries, Potential, Challenges. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
  299. Nyholm, Sven, and Jilles Smids. 2016. The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: An applied trolley problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5): 1275–1289. doi:10.1007/s10677-016-9745-2.
  300. O’Regan, J. Kevin. 2007. How to build consciousness into a robot: The sensorimotor approach. In 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence: Essays Dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of Artificial Intelligence. Ed. Max Lungarella, Fumiya Iida, Josh Bongard, and Rolf Pfeifer, 332–346. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  301. Orwell, George. 1993. Animal Farm. New York: Random House/Everyman’s Library.
  302. Oxford English Dictionary. 2017. Robot. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/robot.
  303. Pagallo, Ugo. 2013. The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. New York: Springer.
  304. Perkins, Franklin. 2004. Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  305. Pfungst. Oskar. 1965. Clever Hans (The Horse of Mr. von Osten): A Contribution to Experimental Animal and Human Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  306. Piekarski, Michał. 2016. The problem of the question about animal ethics: Discussion with Mark Coeckelbergh and David Gunkel. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 29 (4): 705–715. doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9626-7.
  307. Plato. 1977. Plato IV: Cratylus, Parmenides, Greater Hippias, Lesser Hippias. Trans. H. N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  308. Plato. 1981. Plato IX: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus, Epistles. Trans. R. G. Bury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  309. Plato. 1982. Plato I: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Trans. H. N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  310. Plato. 1987. Plato V & VI: Republic. Trans. P. Shorey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  311. Prescott, Tony J. 2017. Robots are not just tools. Connection Science 29 (2): 142–149. doi:10.1080/09540091.2017.1279125.
  312. Prescott, Tony J., and Michael Szollosy. 2017. Ethical principles of robotics. Con­nection Science 29 (2): 119–123. doi:10.1080/09540091.2017.1312800.
  313. Putnam, Hilary. 1964. Robots: Machines or artificially created life? Journal of Philosophy 61 (21): 668–691. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2023045.
  314. Randerson, James. 2007. Forget robot rights, experts say, use them for public safety. The Guardian, April 23. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2007/apr/24/frontpagenews.uknews.
  315. Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  316. Raz, Joseph. 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  317. Read, Brock. 2007. The wrong take on “robot rights”? The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/the-wrong-take-on-robot-rights/2984.
  318. Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  319. Reeves, Byron, and Clifford Nass. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  320. Richards, Neil M., and William D. Smart. 2017. How should the law think about robots? In Robot Law, ed. Ryan Calo, A. Michael Froomkin, and Ian Kerr, 3–24. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  321. Richardson, Kathleen. 2015. The asymmetrical “relationship”: Parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. SIGCAS Computers & Society 45 (3): 290–293. https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/the-asymmetrical-relationship-parallels-between-prostitution-and-the-development-of-sex-robots.
  322. Richardson, Kathleen. 2016a. Sex robot matters: Slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 35 (2): 46–53. doi:10.1109/MTS.2016.2554421.
  323. Richardson, Kathleen. 2016b. Are sex robots as bad as killing robots? In What Social Robots Can and Should Do, ed. Johanna Seibt, Marco Nørskov, and Søren Schack Andersen, 27–31. Amsterdam: ISO Press.
  324. Richardson, Kathleen. 2017. Rethinking the I-you relation through dialogical philosophy in the ethics of AI and robotics. AI & Society. Published ahead of print, March 9. doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0703-x.
  325. Ricœur, Paul. 2007. Reflections on the Just. Trans. D. Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  326. Riek, Laurel D., Tal-Chen Rabinowitch, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, and Peter Robinson. 2009. How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. HRI ‘09 Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (La Jolla, CA, March 9–13), 245–246. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1514095.1514158.
  327. Robertson, Jennifer. 2007. Robo sapiens japanicus: Humanoid robots and the posthuman family. Critical Asian Studies 39 (3): 369–398. doi:10.1080/14672710701527378.
  328. Robertson, Jennifer. 2014. Human rights vs. robot rights: Forecasts from japan. Critical Asian Studies 46 (4): 571–598. doi:10.1080/14672715.2014.960707.
  329. Robertson, Jennifer. 2017. Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Robots, Gender, Family, and the Japanese Nation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  330. Roh, Daniel. 2009. Do humanlike machines deserve human rights? Wired. https://www.wired.com/2009/01/st-essay-16.
  331. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Astrid M., Nicole C. Krämer, Laura Hoffmann, Sabrina Sobieraj, and Sabrina C. Eimler. 2013. An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. International Journal of Social Robotics 5: 17–34. doi:10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8.
  332. Ross, P. E. 2016. A Google car can qualify as a legal driver. IEEE Spectrum. http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/self-driving/an-ai-can-legally-be-defined-as-a-cars-driver.
  333. Rubin, Charles T. 2011. Machine morality and human responsibility. New Atlantis (Washington, D.C.) 32:58–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43152657.
  334. Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Random House.
  335. Samani, Hooman Aghaebrahimi, Adrian David Cheok, Mili John Tharakan, Jeffrey Koh, and Newton Fernando. 2010. A design process for lovotics. In Human-Robot Personal Relationships, ed. Maarten H. Lamers and Fons J. Verbeek, 118–125. Heidelberg: Springer.
  336. Sandoval, Eduardo Benitez, Omar Mubin, and Mohammad Obaid. 2014. Human robot interaction and fiction: A contradiction. In Social Robotics: 6th International Conference, ICSR 2014, Sydney, Australia, 27–29 October, ed. Michael Beetz, Benjamin Johnston, and Mary-Anne Williams, 54–63. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  337. Sandry, Eleanor. 2015a. Re-evaluating the form and communication of social robots: The benefits of collaborating with machinelike robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (3): 335–346. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0278-3.
  338. Sandry, Eleanor. 2015b. Robots and Communication. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  339. Santosuosso, Amedeo. 2016. The human rights of nonhuman artificial entities: An oxymoron? Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik 19 (1): 203–238. doi:10.1515/jwiet-2015-0114.
  340. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. W. Baskin. London: Peter Owen.
  341. Scheutz, Matthias. 2012. The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey, 205–221. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  342. Schurz, Gerhard. 1997. The Is-Ought Problem: An Investigation in Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Springer.
  343. Schweighofer, Erich. 2001. Vorüberlegungen zu künstlichen personen: Autonome roboter und intelligente softwareagenten. In Auf dem Weg zur ePerson: Aktuelle Fragestellungen der Rechtsinformatik, Nr. 3 der Reihne Schriftenreihe Rechtsinformatik, ed. Erich Scheighofer, Thomas Menzel, and Günther Kreuzbauer, 45–53. Wien: Verlag Österreich.
  344. Schwitzgebel, Eric, and Mara Garza. 2015. A defense of the rights of artificial intelligences. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 39 (1): 89–119. doi:10.1111/misp.12032.
  345. Scott, Robert L. 1967. On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal 18: 9–17. doi:10.1080/10510976709362856.
  346. Scott, Robert L. 1976. On viewing rhetoric as epistemic: Ten years later. Central States Speech Journal 27 (4): 258–266. doi:10.1080/10510977609367902.
  347. Searle, John R. 1964. How to derive “ought” from “is.” Philosophical Review 73 (1): 43–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2183201.
  348. Searle, John R. 1980. Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417–57. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00005756.
  349. Searle, John. 1997. The Mystery of Consciousness. New York: New York Review of Books.
  350. Searle, John. 1999. The Chinese room. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. eds. R. A. Wilson,, and F. Keil, 115–116. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  351. Seibt, Johanna. 2017. Towards an ontology of simulated social interaction: Varieties of the “as if” for robots and humans. In Sociality and Normativity for Robots—Philosophical Investigations , ed. Raul Hakli and Johanna Seibt, 11–39. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53133-5.
  352. Seibt, Johanna, Raul Hakli, and Marco Nørskov. 2014. Sociable Robots and the Future of Social Relations: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2014. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  353. Seibt, Johanna, Marco Nørskov, and Søren Schack Andersen. 2016. What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  354. Sharkey, Noel E. 2012. The inevitability of autonomous robot warfare. International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 787–799. doi:10.1017/S1816383112000732.
  355. Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel E. Sharkey. 2010. The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 11 (2): 161–190. doi:10.1075/is.11.2.01sha.
  356. Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel E. Sharkey. 2012. Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1): 27–40. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6.
  357. Sharkey, Noel E., and Eduard Fosch-Villaronga. 2017. FRR highlights new European commission report on robot law. Foundation for Responsible Robotics, 20 February. http://responsiblerobotics.org/frr-highlights-ec/f.
  358. Sharkey, Noel E., Aime van Wynsberghe, Scott Robbins, and Eleanor Hancock. 2017. Our sexual future with robots: A foundation for responsible robotics consultation report. Foundation for Responsible Robotics. https://responsible-robotics-myxf6pn3xr.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/FRR-Consultation-Report-Our-Sexual-Future-with-robots-1-1.pdf.
  359. Sherry, John L. 2001. The effect of violent video games on aggression: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research 27 (3): 409–431. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00787.x.
  360. Sherry, John L. 2006. Would the great and mighty Oz play doom? A Look behind the curtain of violent video game research. In Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication, ed. Paul Messaris and Lee Humphreys, 225–236. New York: Peter Lang.
  361. Shneiderman, Ben. 1989. A nonanthropomorphic style guide: Overcoming the humpty–dumpty syndrome. The Computing Teacher 16 (7): 5–7.
  362. Simon, Matt. 2017. What is a robot? Wired, August 24. https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-a-robot.
  363. Singer, Peter Warren. 2009. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Penguin Books.
  364. Singer, Peter. 1975. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: New York Review of Books.
  365. Singer, Peter. 1989. All animals are equal. In Animal Rights and Human Obligations, ed. Tom Regan and Peter Singer, 148–162. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  366. Singer, Peter, and Agata Sagan. 2009. When robots have feelings. The Guardian, December 14. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/dec/14/rage-against-machines-robots.
  367. Siracusa, John, and Jason Snell. 2015. Robot or not? https://www.theincomparable.com/robot.
  368. Sloman, Aaron. 2010. Requirements for artificial companions: It’s harder than you think. In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical, and Design Issues, ed. Yorick Wilks, 179–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  369. Smith, Wesley J. 2015. AI machine: Things not persons. First Things. https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/04/ai-machines-things-not-persons.
  370. Solaiman, S. M. 2017. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: A quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2): 155–179. doi:10.1007/s10506-016-9192-3.
  371. Solum, Lawrence B. 1992. Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carolina Law Review 70 (4): 1231–1287. http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol70/iss4/4.
  372. Sparrow, Robert. 2004. The turing triage test. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4): 203–213. doi:10.1007/s10676-004-6491-2.
  373. Sparrow, Robert. 2007. Killer robots. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1): 62–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x.
  374. Sparrow, Robert. 2012. Can machines be people? Reflections on the turing triage test. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. Patrick Lin, Keith Abney and George A. Bekey, 301–316. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  375. Sparrow, Robert, and Linda Sparrow. 2006. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind and Machine 16 (2): 141–161. doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6.
  376. Stanley. 2015. Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc v Stanley. NY Slip Op 25257 [49 Misc 3d 746]. http://www.courts.state.ny.us/REPORTER/3dseries/2015/2015_25257.htm.
  377. Steiner, Hillel. 1994. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
  378. Steiner, Hillel. 1998. Working rights. In A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries, ed. Matthew H. Kramer, N. E. Simmonds, and Hillel Steiner, 113–232. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  379. Steiner, Hillel. 2006. Moral rights. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, ed. David Copp, 459–479. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  380. Stone, Christopher D. 1974. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.
  381. Stork, David G., ed. 1997. Hal’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  382. Sudia, Frank W. 2001. A jurisprudence of artilects: Blueprint for a synthetic citizen. Journal of Future Studies 6 (2): 65–80. Also available at http://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/062-A04.pdf and http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-jurisprudence-of-artilects-blueprint-for-a-synthetic-citizen.
  383. Sullins, John P. 2005. The ambiguous ethical status of autonomous robots. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Fall Symposia, Arlington, Virginia (4–6 November). https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/2005/FS-05-06/FS05-06-019.pdf.
  384. Sullins, John P. 2012. Robots, love, and sex: The ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3 (4): 398–409. doi:10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.31.
  385. Sumner, L. W. 1987. The Moral Foundation of Rights. Oxford: Charenden Press.
  386. Sumner, L. W. 2000. Rights. In The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, ed. Hugh LaFolletee, 288–305. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  387. Sung, Ja-Young, Lan Guo, Rebecca E. Grinter, and Henrik I. Christensen. 2007. “My roomba is rambo”: Intimate home appliances. In Proceedings of UbiComp 2007, ed. John Krumm, Gregory D. Abowd, Aruna Seneviratne, and Thomas Strange, 145–162. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  388. Sunstein, Cass R. 2003. The rights of animals. University of Chicago Law Review 70 (1): 387–401. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1600565.
  389. Suzuki, Yutaka, Lisa Galli, Ayaka Ikeda, Shoji Itakura, and Michiteru Kitazaki. 2015. Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography. Scientific Reports 5: 15924. http://www.nature.com/articles/srep15924.
  390. Szollosy, Michael. 2017. EPSRC principles of robotics: Defending an obsolete human(ism)? Connection Science 29 (2): 150–159. doi:10.1080/09540091.2017.1279126.
  391. Taylor, Mark. 1997. Hiding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  392. Taylor, Mark. 1999. About Religion: Economies of Faith in Virtual Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  393. Teubner, Gunther. 2006. Rights of non-humans? Electronic agents and animals as new actors in politics and law. Journal of Law and Society 33 (4): 497–521. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00368.x.
  394. Thimbleby, Harold. 2008. Robot ethics? Not yet: A reflection on Whitby’s “sometimes it’s hard to be a robot.” Interacting with Computers 20 (3): 338–341. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.006.
  395. de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1899. Democracy in America. Trans. H. Reeve. New York: The Colonial Press.
  396. Torrance, Steve. 2003. Could we, should we, create conscious robots? Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues 4 (2): 43–46. https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/3001/1/vol4_no2.pdf.
  397. Torrance, Steve. 2008. Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents. AI & Society 22 (4): 495–521. doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0091-8.
  398. Turkle, Sherry. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  399. Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
  400. Turkle, Sherry, Cynthia Breazeal, Olivia Dasté, and Brian Scassellati. 2006. First encounters with kismet and cog. In Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication, ed. Paul Messaris and Lee Humphreys, 313–330. New York: Peter Lang.
  401. Turing, Alan M. 1999. Computing machinery and intelligence. In Computer Media and Communication, ed. Paul A. Mayer, 37–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  402. Vallor, Shannon. 2015. Moral deskilling and upskilling in a new machine age: Reflections on the ambiguous future of character. Philosophy & Technology 28 (1): 107–124. doi:10.1007/s13347-014-0156-9.
  403. Velmans, Max. 2000. Understanding Consciousness. London: Routledge.
  404. Versenyi, Laszlo. 1974. Can robots be moral? Ethics 84 (3): 248–259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2379958.
  405. Veruggio, Gianmarco. 2005. The birth of roboethics. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Workshop on Robo-Ethics. Barcelona, Spain, April 18. http://www.roboethics.org/icra2005/veruggio.pdf.
  406. Veruggio, Gianmarco. 2006. EURON Roboethics Roadmap. http://www.roboethics.org/atelier2006/docs/ROBOETHICS%20ROADMAP%20Rel2.1.1.pdf.
  407. Veruggio, Gianmarco, and Fiorella Operto. 2008. Roboethics: Social and ethical implications of robotics. In Springer Handbook of Robotics, ed. Bruno Siciliano and Oussama Khatib, 1499–1524. New York: Springer.
  408. Vize, Brendan. 2011. Do androids dream of electric shocks? Utilitarian machine. Master of Arts Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington. http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/1686/thesis.pdf?sequence=2.
  409. Vladeck, David C. 2014. Machines without principals: Liability rules and artificial intelligence. Washington Law Review 89 (1): 117–150. http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1322.
  410. Wallach, Wendell, and Colin Allen. 2009. Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  411. Warwick, Kevin. 2012. Robots with biological brains. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. Patrick Lin, Keith Abney and George A. Bekey, 317–332. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  412. Wenar, Leif. 2005. The nature of rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (3): 223–252. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3557929.
  413. Wenar, Leif. 2015. Rights. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/rights.
  414. Weng, Yueh-Hsuan, Chien-Hsun Chen, and Chuen-Tsai Sun. 2009. Toward the human—robot co-existence society: On safety intelligence for next generation robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1:267–282. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0019-1.
  415. Whitby, Blay. 2008. Sometimes it’s hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents. Interacting with Computers 20 (3): 326–333. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.002.
  416. Whitby, Blay. 2010. Oversold, unregulated, and unethical: Why we need to respond to robot nannies. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 11 (2): 290–294. doi:10.1075/is.11.2.18whi.
  417. Whitby, Blay. 2011. Do you want a robot lover? The ethics of caring technologies. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. Patrick Lin, Keith Abney and George A. Bekey, 233–248. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  418. White, Trevor N., and Seth D. Baum. 2017. Liability for present and future robotic technology. In Robot Ethics 2.0: New Challenges in Philosophy, Law, and Society, ed. Patrick Lin, Ryan Jenkins, and Keith Abney, 66–79. New York: Oxford University Press.
  419. Wiener, Norbert. 1954. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. New York: Da Capo Press.
  420. Wiener, Norbert. 1996. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  421. Winfield, Alan. 2007. The rights of robots. Alan Winfield’s Web Log. http://alanwinfield.blogspot.com/2007/02/rights-of-robot.html.
  422. Winfield, Alan. 2011a. Roboethics—For humans. New Scientist 210 (2811): 32–33. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(11)61052-X.
  423. Winfield, Alan. 2011b. An interview: Alan Winfield. Science Museum Blog, 30 November. https://blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk/in-interview-alan-winfield.
  424. Winfield, Alan. 2012. Robotics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  425. van Wynsberghe, Aimee. 2016. Healthcare Robots: Ethics, Design, and Implementation. New York: Routledge.
  426. Yampolskiy, Roman V. 2013. Artificial intelligence safety engineering: Why machine ethics is a wrong approach. In Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence, ed. Vincent C. Müller, 389–396. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  427. Yampolskiy, Roman V. 2016. Artificial Superintelligence: A Futuristic Approach. London: CRC Press.
  428. Yonck, Richard. 2017. Heart of the Machine: Our Future in a World of Artificial Emotional Intelligence. New York: Arcade Publishing.
  429. Yudkowsky, Eliezer. 2001. Creating Friendly AI 1.0: The Analysis and Design of Benevolent Goal Architectures. The Singularity Institute. San Francisco, CA. June 15.
  430. Zeifman, Igal. 2017. Bot traffic report 2016. Incapsula. https://www.incapsula.com/blog/bot-traffic-report-2016.html.
  431. Žižek, Slavoj. 2003. The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  432. Žižek, Slavoj. 2006a. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  433. Žižek, Slavoj. 2006b. Philosophy, the “unknown knowns,” and the public use of reason. Topoi 25 (1–2): 137–142. doi:10.1007/s11245-006-0021-2.
  434. Žižek, Slavoj. 2008a. For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso.
  435. Žižek, Slavoj. 2008b. In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.