PART I THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF HEGEL’S APPROACH TO POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
1 Robert Stern (2006), ‘Hegel’s Doppelsatz: A Neutral Reading’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44, pp. 235–66.
2 Terry Pinkard (1986), ‘Freedom and Social Categories in Hegel’s Ethics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 47, pp. 209–32.
3 Robert B. Pippin (2001), ‘Hegel and Institutional Rationality’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 39 (Supplement), pp. 1–25.
4 Michael O. Hardimon (1992), ‘The Project of Reconciliation: Hegel’s Social Philosophy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21, pp. 165–95.
PART II HEGEL ON WILL AND ABSTRACT RIGHT
5 Stephen Houlgate (1995), ‘The Unity of Theoretical and Practical Spirit in Hegel’s Concept of Freedom’, Review of Metaphysics, 48, pp. 859–81.
6 Steven B. Smith (1992), ‘Hegel on Slavery and Domination’, Review of Metaphysics, 46, pp. 97–124.
7 Robert B. Pippin (2000), ‘What is the Question for which Hegel’s Theory of Recognition is the Answer?’, European Journal of Philosophy, 8, pp. 155–72.
8 Alan Patten (1995), ‘Hegel’s Justification of Private Property’, History of Political Thought, 16, pp. 576–600.
9 Peter G. Stillman (1989), ‘Hegel’s Analysis of Property in the Philosophy of Right’, Cardozo Law Review, 10, pp. 1031–72.
10 Jami L. Anderson (1999), ‘Annulment Retributivism: A Hegelian Theory of Punishment’, Legal Theory, 5, pp. 363–88.
11 Dudley Knowles (2001), ‘Hegel on the Justification of Punishment’, in Robert R. Williams (ed.) Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism: Studies in Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’, Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 125–45.
PART III HEGEL’S PHILOSOPHY OF ACTION AND CRITICISM OF KANT
12 Allen W. Wood (1989), ‘The Emptiness of the Moral Will’, Monist, 72, pp. 454–83.
13 Kenneth R. Westphal (2005), ‘Kant, Hegel and Determining our Duties’, in S. Byrd and J. Joerden (eds), Philosophia Practica Universalis. Festschrift für Joachim Hruschka, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law & Ethics, 13, pp. 335–54.
14 David Rose (2007), ‘Hegel’s Theory of Moral Action, its Place in his System and the “Highest” Right of the Subject’, Cosmos and History, 3, pp. 170–91.
15 Frederick Neuhouser (1998), ‘Ethical Life and the Demands of Conscience’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 37, pp. 35–50.
PART IV ETHICAL LIFE: FAMILY, CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE STATE
16 Benjamin R. Barber (1988), ‘Spirit’s Phoenix and History’s Owl or the Incoherence of Dialectics in Hegel’s Account of Women’, Political Theory, 16, pp. 5–28.
17 Alexander Kaufman (1997), ‘Community and Indigence: A Hegelian Perspective on Aid to the Poor’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 5, pp. 69–92.
18 Paul Franco (1997), ‘Hegel and Liberalism’, The Review of Politics, 59, pp. 831–60.
19 Joseph J. O’Malley (1987), ‘Hegel on Political Sentiment’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 41, pp. 75–88.
20 James Bohman (2001), ‘Hegel’s Political Anti-Cosmopolitanism: On the Limits of Modern Political Communities’, Southern Journal of Philosophy: Supplementary Volume, 39, pp. 65–92.