Before reading this chapter you may find it useful to download the treatment for a factual programme from Chapter 8.
If you are doing an interview for either radio or television there are a number of tips which can help you to get the best out of the interview. In previous chapters we talked about the technical aspects of setting up an interview: the location, the shot composition, the ambient noise, the type of microphone, etc. This chapter deals with how you talk and relate to your contributor. The tips relate both to television and to radio; however, it’s worth remembering that radio is a very much more intimate medium. When you listen to the radio you feel much closer to the contributor than you do if you are watching a television programme.
There are a number of different reasons why you might want to interview someone. A lot depends on the kind of programme you are making. If you understand the purpose of your interview it will help you to prepare the questions properly.
It is perfectly possible that the same person could give you different types of interviews or combine some of the above elements in the same interview. The main thing you need to be clear about is what you are looking for in the interview.
Oddly, the most important piece of advice when you are interviewing someone is to listen to what they are saying. This sounds fairly obvious; however, when you have got microphones, cameras to worry about and fretting about the sun or background noises you start to get distracted. Added to this you may start to get worried about what you are going to ask next and whether the next question is still relevant or whether it will sound stupid now. Perhaps the interviewee has answered the second question at the same time as the first, and now you can’t remember the third question; again you will start to get distracted and stop listening to the interview. If you stop listening to the interview you won’t be able to ask follow-up questions. You will simply have to read off your list. The interviewee will pick up on the fact that you are distracted and start to feel a little uncomfortable; they may feel that they aren’t doing a very good job. Your aim is to get a relaxed feel to the interview. Look at the treatment from Chapter 8 and think about the opening interview.
Some interviewees may feel a bit nervous or take a little time to get into their stride. You may find it useful to ask some sort of general question to start with; it should be on the subject but should be a bit of a warm-up question. Sometimes it’s useful to repeat the opening question at the end of the interview; once the interviewee has warmed up a bit they will probably give you a better answer.
A follow-up question is one which arises out of the answer the interviewee has just given. You may want them to elaborate a little or there may a supplementary question you need to ask. It helps put the interviewee at their ease if you pick up on something they said in the interview as a starting point for the next question. For example:
I was interested in the point you just made about litter – can you tell me . . .
You just touched on something there which I’d like to ask you a bit more about.
The interviewee will automatically feel a little more relaxed as he or she realises you have been listening, and encouraged that you have picked up on something and want to know more.
A critical key to a successful interview is to avoid what are known as closed questions. A closed question is one to which the interviewee can answer with a simple yes or no. This is particularly important if the interviewer is not going to appear in vision. Thus, for example:
Question: Mr Smith, you are the environmental officer with responsibility for festival litter?
Answer: Yes.
If the interviewer is not going to appear in vision then the only bit of this interview you can use is the word Yes which isn’t going to be very helpful. Better to use open questions to which you cannot answer with one word. For example:
Question: Mr Smith, can you describe the role of the environmental officer at this festival?
Answer: The environmental officer is responsible for making sure the festival organisers have made adequate provision for the removal of tents. . . .
There are a number of different techniques for asking open questions. One easy one is to make sure your questions start in such a way that it’s impossible for the interviewee to answer yes or no. For example, questions which start:
However, you will need to be careful with these types of questions as they can sometimes be answered too quickly. For example:
Question: Who is responsible for collecting the tents?
Answer: The litter pickers.
Again this is not particularly helpful. A better framing might be:
Question: Can you tell me how you organise the workforce to collect the tents?
It is possible to ask a question which is too open. These questions tend to leave the interviewee a little confused as to what you really want them to answer. For example:
Question: Tell me about waste at festivals ...
The interviewee could be forgiven for feeling a little at sea with this question; it’s so wide they probably won’t know where to start and are more than likely to stumble and ask you for some clarification.
Sometimes, particularly in news and current affairs, the interviewee is giving you one side of an argument. You may have sympathy with his or her view or you may take the opposite view; either way you shouldn’t let your own views be obvious and you shouldn’t, as an interviewer, become involved in the discussion. This does not mean to say that you shouldn’t put the opposing view. You should do this but you need to make it clear that this is not your view. For example:
Question: Mr Smith, the pressure group Tidy Britain has argued that festivals like this should be banned as they cause environmental damage – how would you answer their criticisms?
Even if you can’t attribute the counter-argument to a specific person you should always keep a distance from it. For example:
Question: Mr Smith, some people have suggested that it would be better to ban festivals like this because of the environmental damage. How would you respond to them?
Sometimes it’s tempting to ask the question How do you feel ... about something. This can be a tricky question to answer. It can put the interviewee on the spot and they might just answer with a few rather banal adjectives. For example:
Question: How to you feel about so much waste at these festivals?
Answer: Well I think it’s terrible really, I think it should stop . . .
When you come to the edit, the only usable bits are Well it’s terrible really, I think it should stop. Again that’s not going to be very helpful. It might help to be a little more specific:
Question: What are the consequences for you personally, having to deal with so much waste?
Answer: Well for me personally it means a great deal of time is spent and it’s awful to watch so much stuff being destroyed when I know there are people out there with very little; I find it quite hard to deal with.
In either television or radio you want your interviews to be engaging and colourful. Your viewer or listener will be much more engaged with your interviewee if they can give examples and anecdotes rather than just rather bland comments. They may not tell you any anecdotes to begin with but this is something you need to winkle out of them with your follow-up questions. For example:
Question: Mr Smith, what are the consequences for you personally having to deal with so much waste?
Answer: Well for me personally it means a great deal of time is spent, and it’s awful to watch so much stuff being destroyed when I know there are people out there with very little, I find it quite hard to deal with.
Question: Can you tell me the worst instances of waste you have come across?
Answer: Well yes, I remember there was one family, they had a six-berth tent and when we found it, it was still set up for supper – all the plates and cups were laid out – there was a pot of tea on the table and salad and condiments all laid out – it was a bit spooky, it looked as if they had just suddenly disappeared – but what had happened is that they had been called away to deal with their vehicle which was sinking in the mud and they had got so fed up by the time they got the car out of the quagmire, they just wanted to get home, so they just left everything and drove off – clothes, sleeping bags, everything was just lying there waiting for this family who were never going to come back.
Make sure that you ask just one question at a time. Long, wordy questions which are really about three questions rolled into one will become confusing to all but the most experienced interviewee. They won’t know which question you really want them to answer and the answer is likely to be a bit rambling, or they will probably just answer the last question and forget about the others. So, for example:
Question: Mr Smith, we’ve heard about the problem you have with the number of tents you’ve got left over at the end of a festival; can you tell us a bit about how you deal with the tents, who picks them up and what happens to them after you have collected them all?
You’ve really asked three questions here: how do you deal with the tents, who does the work and what happens to the tents after they have been collected. Your interviewee will be confused about which of the three questions to answer first; they will more than likely pick on one and forget about the others, but even if they don’t, the answers will become rather confused and difficult to edit later. It’s better just to ask one of the three questions and then use the other two as supplementary questions.
This stands for the Latin Vox Populi (voice of the people). It tends to be used when you want to achieve a range of popular opinion on a subject. It is also used in some contexts to give eye witness reports on an event. In this case your interviewees won’t necessarily be experts and they won’t have been briefed. The questions therefore need to be fairly simple; you are really asking for a quick reaction to something. If the subject is controversial you should make an effort to get a range of opinions to reflect both sides of the argument. You shouldn’t be using Vox Pops selectively to support an argument you want to make, particularly if it is a news and current affairs type of programme; you should fairly reflect what you are hearing.
It can be useful to brief your interviewee to include a little bit of the question in the answer. Again, when you come to edit the piece together it will make much more sense and will avoid you having to use clunky commentary. For example:
Question: Mr Smith, can you tell me about the methods you have for getting rid of the 5000 tents you have left here?
Answer: Well, first we go through and check that the tents are empty and there are no stray festival-goers.
This is not a particularly bad question but it may be easier in your edit if you brief the interviewee to add in a little of the question at the top of the answer. For example:
Answer: Well we have strict procedures for getting rid of tents at this festival, first we go through and check that the tents are empty.
When you get to the edit you will find that the second answer gives you more flexibility. You will have less work to do in your commentary to set up what the contributor is talking about.
Good interview technique is a combination of good research, knowing the types of questions to ask, listening to the answers and developing a good rapport with the interviewee. You will need to have all these elements in place to achieve an effective interview which will engage your audience.