Gore Vidal as a Talker
Gore Vidal was a great talker as well as a great writer. Dick Cavett called him “the best talker since Oscar Wilde.” He talked a lot; if you Google “Gore Vidal interview,” you get 40,000 results. But what remains of those is mostly one-liners, quips and zingers, about Truman Capote, William F. Buckley and George Bush. This book offers Vidal in a more sustained mode of conversation: developing arguments, tracing connections between past and present, citing evidence. Of course he provides plenty of one-liners and zingers along the way.
The four interviews here represent Gore talking about politics with me for different audiences: first, 2,000 enthusiastic fans at a book festival in Los Angeles; then sixty academics and writers at the Los Angeles Institute for the Humanities; then listeners at a left wing radio station in L.A.; and finally readers of the Radical History Review. These interviews cover a twenty-year span when he was at his best: we did the first in 1988 and the last in 2007. They are presented in reverse chronological order, with the most recent first.
The 1988 Radical History Review (RHR) interview was where I first met Gore. It’s the most obscure—although after publication in the RHR it was excerpted in Harper’s “Readings” and in a collection of Vidal interviews. He may have been willing to do this one because he had a long-standing critique of the mainstream of the history profession and I think welcomed the chance to speak to younger “radical” historians who were sympathetic to his left-wing vision of the American past. And although the RHR had a tiny readership, it had been running a series of interviews that were significant and prestigious; Pantheon had already published a collection that included the RHR interviews with E. P. Thompson, Eric Hobsbawm, William Appleman Williams, and others with whom Vidal was no doubt familiar.
In all our interviews I think he appreciated the opportunity talk seriously about things he really did care about: the history of the American Empire, the rise of the National Security State, and of course his own life in politics, as a commentator and as a candidate.
Since I asked the questions, I got to bring up things I was interested in. Often we started with things that were going on at the time we spoke, and then moved back to American politics and history earlier in the 20th century. Thus in 1988 I asked him about his novel Empire, which had just been published; in the fall of 2000, Al Gore and George W. Bush were running for president, and so was Ralph Nader, and Vidal’s play The Best Man was being revived on Broadway, so we talked about those; and so on.
All four interviews have been condensed and edited. I have tried to eliminate repetition in Vidal’s answers, but not always in the questions, because one of the interesting things here is to see how Gore answered the same question differently for different audiences. For example, the question “What gets you up in the morning? What keeps you going?”: at the Book Festival in Los Angeles, with an audience of 2,000 fans, he answered “Rage.” At the Humanities Institute in Los Angeles, with an audience of sixty intellectuals and writers, he answered “Stupidity.” When asked who was the worst president, at the Book Festival he said “Bush;” at the Humanities Institute he said “Wilson”—and explained why.
And sometimes Vidal would direct his answer away from my question, and return to a topic that was important to him. Thus he always talked about his grandfather, the blind senator from Oklahoma; about the “rough treatment” he had received from the New York Times book reviewers; his views of how FDR got us into WWII; and of course the American Empire and the National Security State—so these repetitions remain as evidence of his passions and interests.
One thing is missing in these transcriptions: Vidal’s speaking voice. It was marvelous, and unmistakable. He did uncanny imitations of JFK, Nixon, Eleanor Roosevelt, FDR, and of course he did a devastating Truman Capote. None of that is here, alas.
Headnotes to each interview sketch out the particular settings and circumstances.
—Jon Wiener, Los Angeles, September 2012