There are three steps involved in solving a problem collaboratively: the Empathy step, the Define Adult Concerns step, and the Invitation step. In this chapter, you'll be reading quite a bit about each step. Even though you may already be familiar with the three steps, you'll probably find information in this chapter that takes you even further.
The Empathy step is where you'll be gathering information from a student about her concern, perspective, or point of view on a specific expectation she's having difficulty meeting. You'll be doing that proactively most of the time.
Just like adults, kids have important, legitimate concerns: fatigue, fear, a preference for doing (and not doing) certain things, and the tendency to avoid things that are scary or that make them uncomfortable or at which they don't feel competent. Your mission in the Empathy step is to demonstrate to the student that you're really interested in and curious about those concerns.
How do you do that? When you're using Proactive Plan B, the process of information gathering and understanding begins with an introduction to the unsolved problem. The introduction usually begins with the words “I've noticed that …” and ends with the words “What's up?” In between, you're inserting an unsolved problem. The introduction is made much easier—and, as you know, the likelihood that the student will respond is much greater—if you stick with the general guidelines for writing unsolved problems you read about in chapter 4. Here are some examples of what the introduction would sound like, using some unsolved problems from prior chapters:
“I've noticed that you're having difficulty moving from English to social studies. What's up?”
“I've noticed that you're having difficulty moving from recess back into the classroom. What's up?”
“I've noticed that you're having difficulty completing the word problems on the worksheet in math. What's up?”
“I've noticed that you're having difficulty getting started on the geography project in history. What's up?”
Pretty straightforward so far, yes? Before we get to the hard parts, let's review a few points. First, you're not teaching any lessons in the Empathy step. Actually, you're not teaching lessons in any of the three steps. You're not being judgmental either. You're also not saying many of the standard things adults say in response to kids' concerns. So you wouldn't respond to “I don't like sitting next to Alberto” with “Oh, come on, he's not so bad!” You wouldn't respond to “The double-digit division problems are too hard for me” with “Oh, you'll be fine … we just need some more effort here.” And you wouldn't respond to “I don't want to work with Tina on the Galileo project” with “Part of growing up is learning to work with people we don't like.” These are responses that cause kids to feel (often accurately) that their concerns are being ignored, disregarded, dismissed, diminished, or blown off the table. They also cause kids to stop talking. Then you don't have a problem-solving partner, and the problems don't get solved.
We adults often think we already know what's getting in the kid's way on a given problem, which may help explain why we often don't put much energy into finding out.
Some adults have never considered it especially important to gather information about and understand a kid's concern, perspective, or point of view. That's why many kids—perhaps most, unfortunately—are accustomed to having their concerns go unheeded and unaddressed. After all, we adults often think we already know what's getting in the kid's way on a given problem, which may help explain why we often don't put much energy into finding out. As you've read, the bad news is that, quite often, our assumptions about kids' concerns are way off base. That's why our solutions—which are based on those assumptions—often turn out to be ineffective. Still more bad news: kids who are accustomed to having their concerns dismissed tend to be far less receptive to hearing your concerns. The Empathy step doesn't require that you be a skilled mind reader, but you do need to become highly skilled at gathering information from your students.
Another reason adults tend to blow past kids' concerns is that we have concerns of our own, which we're eager to express. And often we've already decided on a solution anyway, one that addresses only our own concerns and that we're busy imposing.
Those are habits that we'll need to break.
Now on to the hard parts. After you ask, “What's up?” one of five things is going to happen:
Possibility 1: She says something.
Possibility 2: She says nothing or “I don't know.”
Possibility 3: She says, “I don't have a problem with that.”
Possibility 4: She says, “I don't want to talk about it right now.”
Possibility 5: She becomes defensive and says something like, “I don't have to talk to you” (or worse).
Let's flesh out each of these possibilities.
If, after the problem is introduced, the student starts talking, that's good. Now you need to keep her talking, because her initial response is unlikely to provide you with a clear understanding of her concern, perspective, or point of view. You're going to need to probe for more information. The probing process—called “drilling for information”—is actually pretty hard for many adults, especially in the beginning, mostly because they're not sure what to say. Difficulty with drilling causes many Plan B ships to run aground, thereby causing many Plan B captains to abandon ship. The good news is that there are some strategies to help you master the drilling process so that the Plan B boat stays afloat.
First, notice, the word is “drill,” not “grill.” The primary goal of drilling is to clarify, whereas grilling tends to be an act of intimidation, or a sign that you anticipate that the student won't be forthcoming or will lie. Your goal is to demonstrate to the student that your attempt to understand her concern or perspective isn't fake or perfunctory. You're really curious … you really want to understand.
Second, drilling is not the same thing as talking. There are educators who frequently talk to their students, but never achieve a clear understanding of students' concerns or perspectives on specific unsolved problems. Drilling is much harder than simply talking.
The following drilling strategies should help in the Knowing What to Say Department:
Drilling Strategy 1—Use Reflective listening
This is where you're simply mirroring or repeating back whatever the student just said to you. Let's say you inquired about a student having difficulty sitting next to her classmate, Alberto, during circle time. If the student responds with, “I just don't like it,” your response would be, “Ah, you just don't like it.” Then you'd add a clarifying question or statement, such as “How so?” or “I don't quite understand” or “I'm confused” or “Can you say more about that?” or “What do you mean?” If this sounds a little basic, maybe so. But reflective listening is your default drilling strategy. It helps kids feel heard. It helps kids feel understood. It clarifies and validates their concerns. And it keeps them talking. You could ask for nothing more from a drilling strategy. If you're in the midst of the Empathy step and you're not sure what to say or which drilling strategy to use, reflective listening is always a safe bet.
Reflective listening is your default drilling strategy. It helps kids feel heard. It helps kids feel understood. It clarifies and validates their concerns. And it keeps them talking.
Drilling Strategy 2—Ask “W questions” (who, what, or where/when)
These questions are another good way to demonstrate that you're really listening and need additional information. Examples: “Who's been giving you a hard time on the school bus?” “What's making it hard for you to complete your science homework?” “Where/when is Kyle teasing you?” Remember, drilling is about gathering information, and “W questions” are a straightforward way to do so. Notice that there's another W question—Why?—that you should not be asking very often; that question often elicits the kid's theory, and quite possibly one that the child inherited from an adult.
Drilling Strategy 3—Ask about the situational nature of the unsolved problem
At times, it may appear as though the student is actually capable of meeting a given expectation because she sometimes does. This often leads adults to jump to the conclusion that the kid can meet the expectation when she feels like it, and that she doesn't meet the expectation when she doesn't feel like it. The reality is that there may be nuanced, subtle differences between similar expectations that explain the inconsistency. Rather than jump to conclusions related to poor motivation—“I know she can do the math when she wants to! She did it yesterday!”—you'd be better off seeking clarification from the student. Remember, when you're drilling, you're off the hook for mind reading or figuring things out on your own. Here's what this strategy might sound like: “So, help me understand how you're able to do the math homework sometimes and sometimes you can't.” Or “So, sometimes you're on time for school and other times you're not. Help me understand that.”
Drilling Strategy 4—Ask the student what she's thinking in the midst of the unsolved problem
This is an outstanding drilling strategy. “So, when you're sitting at your desk trying to do the double-digit division problems, what are you thinking?” Notice, you're not asking her what she's feeling. It's not that asking a student what she's feeling is a crime; it's just that the answer (happy, sad, frustrated, embarrassed, bored) won't generally provide you with the information you're seeking about her concern, perspective, or point of view. Also notice that you're not asking her what she needs … that question is more likely to prompt her to offer a solution rather than a concern, and you're not ready to start thinking about solutions until the Invitation step.
Drilling Strategy 5—Break the unsolved problem down into its component parts
Most unsolved problems have multiple components. For example, coming into the classroom to get started with the school day has different components (hang up your coat, take off your snow boots, sit down at your desk, start your morning reading assignment, and so on). And getting ready to go home at the end of the day has components (reviewing homework assignments, packing up your backpack with the necessary materials for homework, putting on snow boots and coat, going to the school bus, and so on). But kids sometimes need help identifying those components so that they can tell which component is causing them to struggle:
Good. That's better than not understanding.
Here's what a discrepant observation might sound like: “I know you're saying that you and Felicia are getting along fine these days, but yesterday at recess you two weren't getting along very well at all. What do you think was going on with that?”
Example: “So if you didn't leave things in Mrs. Cassidy's room, and if you knew whether the things you need for homework were in your locker, and if Tim was giving you back the things he borrowed … would there be anything else that would make it difficult for you get ready to go home at the end of the day?”
Example: “Let me make sure I understand everything you've said. It's hard for you to ride on the school bus because it's too loud, and because they're making you sit three to a seat so it's really crowded, and because you never get to sit on the aisle, and because Steve is picking on you and the bus driver always blames you. Is there anything else that's hard for you about riding on the school bus?”
By the way, these eight strategies are summarized on the Drilling Cheat Sheet. In your first twenty Plan Bs, you may want to have it in front of you for easy reference.
Here's an example of what drilling might sound like, with examples of some of the different drilling strategies, with a younger student:
OK, so you didn't see every drilling strategy there, but you saw a lot of them. Don't worry, examples of Plan B with older, less congenial students are coming up soon. And the next two steps of Plan B on this problem are coming up soon too. In the meantime, let's think about what was accomplished in that Empathy step. First, the teacher had a fairly standard experience: she obtained new information that differed from her original theory (Lara comes from a tough neighborhood where shoving people is the norm). She also learned why her stopgap solution (having Lara stand in the back of the line with her) won't solve the problem durably: the solution doesn't address Lara's concerns. Because she's solving this problem collaboratively—in partnership with Lara—the teacher has increased the likelihood that Lara will partner with her in solving other problems. And maybe, just maybe, the solution to this problem will be applicable to other circumstances in which Lara is having similar problems keeping her hands to herself when she's standing in line. Nice work.
No matter how fast or slow the Empathy step, you're still saving time. That's because solved problems always take a lot less time than unsolved problems.
By the way, that was a quick Empathy step. Many early Empathy steps—with kids who have many concerns but haven't been provided a forum for expressing them—may last up to thirty minutes. Later Empathy steps tend to be faster. But no matter how fast or slow the Empathy step, you're still saving time. Again, that's because solved problems always take a lot less time than unsolved problems.
This is another possible way in which a student might respond to your initial introduction to an unsolved problem. There are lots of reasons a kid might say nothing or “I don't know.”
If you don't word unsolved problems according to the guidelines in chapter 4, you'll increase the likelihood of silence or “I don't know,” often because the kid doesn't completely understand what you're inquiring about or believes that she's in trouble or that you're mad. Perhaps you've only been talking with her about problems when you are mad or she is in trouble, so you'll want to reassure her that you're actually just trying to understand her concerns and solve the problem together.
Remember, Emergency Plan B adds heat and time pressure to the mix. Doing Plan B proactively so that the student isn't surprised by your desire to have a discussion—and giving her some advance notice of the topic—can reduce the likelihood of “I don't know” and silence as well.
Perhaps you've never inquired about her concerns before, at least not in this way. Perhaps she's never given the matter any thought. Perhaps she's become so accustomed to having her concerns dismissed that she hasn't given thought to her concerns for a very long time.
You'll have to prove to her—by solving problems collaboratively rather than unilaterally—that you're not riding that horse anymore. By the way, mere reassurance about that won't get the job done … the proof's in the pudding.
Perhaps history has taught her that if she says what she thinks, you'll simply disagree or take offense, and it'll cause conflict. Perhaps your reaction to the problem is at the root of her concern, and she's reluctant to say that. Your goal in the Empathy step is to suspend your emotional response to what the student is saying, knowing that if you react emotionally to what you're hearing, she'll clam up, and you won't end up hearing anything. You badly want to understand her concerns, even if her concerns involve you. If you don't know what her concerns are, those concerns won't get addressed, and the problem will remain unsolved. And she'll remain convinced that you're not listening.
Many kids say “I don't know” instead of “Umm” or “Give me a second” or “Let me think about that a minute.” Since you're not in a rush, you'll be able to give her a second and let her think about it a minute. Many kids say nothing because they're collecting their thoughts or because they're having difficulty putting their thoughts into words. Unfortunately, adults often respond to silence by filling the void with their own concerns, theories, or solutions. In such instances, you've strayed quite far from the main goals of the Empathy step (information gathering and understanding) and made it even more difficult for the student to think. You may need to grow more comfortable with the silence that can occur as a kid is giving thought to her concerns.
Your goal in the Empathy step is to suspend your emotional response to what the student is saying. … If you react emotionally to what you're hearing, she'll clam up, and you won't end up hearing anything.
If you've given a student the chance to think and it's clear that she really has no idea what her concerns are or is simply unable to put her thoughts into words, your best option is to do some educated guessing or hypothesis testing. Here, finally, your theories may actually come in handy. Suggest a few possibilities, based on experience, and see if any ring true:
Another very nice haul of information, though there are still some concerns that require further clarification. But the student's concerns are now one step closer to getting addressed … and the problem is now one step closer to getting solved.
As you're in the midst of hypothesizing, bear in mind that you're proposing possibilities rather than divining the kid's concern. Here's what divining sounds like (this is an example of what not to do):
Many adults think that if a kid says, “I don't have a problem with that,” the game is over. After all, how can they talk with the kid about a problem if the kid doesn't have a problem with the problem? But this response isn't a dead end at all; indeed, it's usually the jumping-off point for learning more about her concern, perspective, or point of view. While it's entirely possible that she isn't as concerned about the problem as you are, that doesn't mean you can't proceed with Plan B. The first drilling strategy (reflective listening) should serve you well as an initial response. Here's what it would sound like with an older, more reluctant participant:
She talked. And it sounds like she has some concerns that have gone unaddressed for a long time. We'll have to learn more about them. Don't worry, we'll come back to that one later in the chapter, too.
Fortunately, she doesn't have to talk about it right now, and it's a good idea to let her know that. Many kids start talking the instant they're given permission not to talk. If she truly doesn't want to talk about it right now, it's likely she has a good reason; maybe she'll talk about that. A lot of kids will talk about why they don't want to talk about something, which is very informative in its own right. Then, after they're through talking about that, they're comfortable enough to start talking about what they didn't want to talk about in the first place.
Many adults respond to a kid's reluctance to talk by insisting harder that the kid talk. But you don't want to try so hard to get the student to talk today that you lose your credibility for tomorrow. There's always tomorrow.
Regrettably, many adults respond to a kid's reluctance to talk by insisting harder that the kid talk. But you don't want to try so hard to get the student to talk today that you lose your credibility for tomorrow. There's always tomorrow. And problem solving is an incremental process.
Let's think about why a kid would become defensive in response to adult requests for information on a particular unsolved problem. We've actually covered some of them already. Maybe she's accustomed to having adults impose solutions (Plan A), and her experience is that those solutions haven't addressed her concerns and therefore haven't worked and she doesn't see the point in going down that road anymore. Maybe she thinks that if a problem is being raised, she must be in trouble, so she's anticipating excoriation and punishment. Maybe she doesn't really see the point in contemplating or voicing her concerns because she's become accustomed to having them swept off the table.
Fortunately, we're trying to break the patterns of communication and adult responses that would cause a kid to feel that talking is not her best option. Your best approach to defensive statements is not reciprocal defensiveness or threats of adult-imposed consequences but rather honesty. A good response to “I don't have to talk to you” would be “You don't have to talk to me.” A good response to “You're not my boss” would be “I'm not trying to boss you.” And a good response to “You can't make me talk” would be “I can't make you talk.” Some reassurance that you're not using Plan A might be helpful, too, as in “I'm not telling you what to do” (you're not), “You're not in trouble” (she's not), “I'm not mad at you” (you're not), and “I'm just trying to understand” (you are). Statements like “I'm doing this [imposing this solution] because it's what's best for you” would not be ideal.
You're ready to move on to the Define Adult Concerns step when you have a clear understanding of the student's concern or perspective on a given unsolved problem. How do you know when you've reached that point? Keep summarizing and asking for more information (drilling strategy 8) until she has no additional concerns.
The student is not the only one with concerns, and often not the only one whose concerns need to be clarified and articulated. You have concerns as well, and you want those concerns to be heard and addressed. Your time has come.
This step is made difficult primarily by the fact that adults often rush past their concerns and start proposing (and often imposing) their solutions. But solutions that are proposed before identifying the concerns of both parties won't work, since they can't possibly address those respective concerns. If the student reciprocates with solutions of her own, then you and she are now engaged in an all-too-common state of affairs called a power struggle. Power struggles result when two parties (for example, you and a student, but that's not the only possible combination of players) are proposing competing solutions that do not address the concerns of both parties. There's no such thing as competing concerns, by the way, only different concerns that need to be addressed. The concerns of one party don't trump the concerns of the other, and the goal isn't to establish whose concerns are “right” and whose are “wrong.” The concerns of both parties are of exactly equal legitimacy. That doesn't mean the kid is your equal. But if you want to solve problems collaboratively with her, then her concerns are no less valid and meaningful than yours.
You'll need to give some careful thought to your concerns, and you can do that ahead of time if you're finding it hard to think about them in the moment. Simply restating the expectation the student is having difficulty meeting—“I really want to see more science homework coming in”—would not be an expression of your concerns. Rather, your concerns will almost always fall into one or both of two categories:
Expressions of adult concerns usually begin with the words “The thing is …” or “My concern is “…” but most defi nitely not “That is all well and good, but …”
Expressions of adult concerns usually begin with the words “The thing is …” or “My concern is …” but most definitely not “That is all well and good, but …” Let's see what some typical adult concerns might be for some of the problems we've been discussing. At the end of each example, you'll see which of the two categories the concerns fall into.
Difficulty moving from English to social studies: “My concern is that if you're late for social studies, you'll miss some of the lesson, and it'll be hard for you to understand what's going on.” (1)
Difficulty completing the word problems on the worksheet in math: “My concern is that you're missing out on some important practice in math.” (1)
Difficulty getting to school: “My concern is that if you don't come to school, then there's no way I can help you with the things you've been struggling with … and that if you don't get a high school diploma, it's going to make it harder for you to get a job … and that when you do come to school, you're way behind in class and sometimes distract your classmates.” (1 and 2)
Difficulty going to recess: “My concern is that if you don't go to recess, you'll miss out on the fun … and that it's good for you to have a break from what we're doing in class.” (1)
Difficulty keeping hands to self in line for lunch: “My concern is that someone could get hurt, and I want to make sure everyone in our class feels safe, including you.” (2)
You'll see more of the Define Adult Concerns step when we return to some of our earlier dialogues after we cover the Invitation.
This final step involves considering potential solutions that will address the concerns of both parties, concerns that have been identified and clarified in the first two steps. It's called the Invitation step because you're actually inviting the student to collaborate on solutions. The Invitation lets the student know that solving the problem is something you're doing with her (collaboratively) rather than to her (unilaterally). Notice you're not collaborating on coming up with a consequence; consequences don't solve problems.
To start this step, you could simply say something like, “Let's think about how we can solve this problem” or “Let's think about how we can work that out.” But to facilitate the consideration of solutions that will address the concerns of both parties, it's usually better to recap the concerns that were identified in the first two steps, usually starting with the words “I wonder if there's a way …” So, for one of our previous examples, that would sound something like this: “I wonder if there's a way for us to make sure no one gets hurt in the line for lunch [that was the teacher's concern] and also make sure that you're first in line sometimes and that Kenny doesn't step on the back of your shoe [those were the kid's concerns].”
Then you give the student the first opportunity to propose a solution by asking, “Do you have any ideas?” This is not an indication that the burden of solving the problem is placed solely on the student. The burden of solving the problem is placed on the Problem Solving Team (the adult and student). But giving the student the first crack at thinking of a solution is a good strategy for letting her know you're actually interested in her ideas. It also gives her practice at thinking of solutions. Too often adults take on the responsibility of coming up with solutions, thereby depriving kids of the opportunity for practice. Although there is a chance that the student won't be able to think of any solutions, it's actually quite likely that she can think of solutions, and even ones that will take your combined concerns into account. There's also a good chance that she has been waiting, perhaps not so patiently, for you to give her the chance.
Many adults enter Plan B with a preordained solution. In other words, they already know where the Plan B plane is landing before it takes off. If you already know where the plane is landing before it takes off, you're not using Plan B; you're using a “clever” form of Plan A. Plan B is not just a clever form of Plan A. Plan B is collaborative. Plan A is unilateral.
Many adults enter Plan B with a preordained solution. … If you already know where the Plan B plane is landing before it takes off, you're not using Plan B; you're using a “clever” form of Plan A.
The reality is that there is no flight plan. The Plan B plane will head wherever the crosswinds of your combined concerns take you. But you do have some gauges in the cockpit to help you and your problem-solving partner (the student) know where to land the plane: the solution must be realistic (meaning that both parties can actually do what they're agreeing to do) and mutually satisfactory (meaning that the solution truly and logically addresses the concerns of both parties). If a solution isn't realistic and mutually satisfactory, alternative solutions should be generated and considered. By the way, the solution “try harder” is never viable.
The realistic part is crucial because Plan B isn't an exercise in wishful thinking. If you can't execute your part of a solution that's under consideration, don't agree to it just to end the conversation. Likewise, if you don't think the student can execute her part of a solution that's under consideration, then try to get her to take a moment to think about whether she can actually do what she's agreeing to do. (“You sure you can do that? Let's make sure we come up with a solution we can both do.”)
The mutually satisfactory part is crucial, too, and requires that you and the student give conscious, deliberate thought to the concerns that the solution is intended to address. In other words, all proposed solutions are evaluated on the basis of whether they address the concerns identified in the first two steps of Plan B. The mutually satisfactory aspect is a great comfort to adults who fear that in using Plan B, their concerns will go unaddressed and no limits will be set. You're “setting limits” if your concerns are being addressed. And if a solution is mutually satisfactory, then by definition your concerns have been addressed. In other words, if you thought that Plan A is the only mechanism by which adults can set limits and help students meet expectations, you were mistaken.
The mutually satisfactory part also helps the kid know that you're as invested in ensuring that her concerns are addressed as you are in making sure that yours are addressed. That's how you lose an enemy and gain a problem-solving partner. That's how you move from adversary to teammate, from stopgap solutions to durable ones, and from dealing with one incident after another to solving problems.
Early on, the student may come up with solutions that address her concerns but not yours. (And you may have a tendency to propose solutions that address your concerns and not hers.) That doesn't mean that she's come up with a bad idea—or that she doesn't care about your concerns or is unable to take them into account—only that she's not yet highly skilled at coming up with solutions that are mutually satisfactory. Simply remind her that the goal is to come up with a solution that works for both of you, perhaps by saying, “Well, that's an idea, and I know that idea would address your concern, but I don't think it would address my concern. Let's see if we can come up with an idea that will work for both of us.”
One last thing. If multiple concerns are expressed in the Empathy step and the Define Adult Concerns step, there's a pretty strong likelihood that the same solution won't address them all. So before considering solutions, it's often necessary to decide which concerns will be addressed in the current discussion and which will be addressed in a later Plan B.
Many adults, in their eagerness to solve the problem, forget the Invitation step. This means that just as they are at the precipice of actually collaborating on a solution, they impose a solution. Not good. The kid thought you were partnering with her in solving a problem and then you went back to being unilateral and pulled the collaborative rug out from under her. She's likely to have major reservations about participating in the process again the next time.
Let's see how the three ingredients would go together, assuming that things are going smoothly. Again, forgive the redundancy, but it's helpful to see the process unfold from start to finish.
Are you thinking that our first example of all three steps went rather seamlessly? Yes, it was pretty smooth sailing. It's good to see an initial example of all three steps without major glitches. We'll be getting around to glitches in the next chapter. But let's return now to our reluctant participant to see how that discussion turned out too.
So that problem isn't quite solved, not yet anyway. Students who aren't showing up at school often have large piles of accumulated unsolved problems, and they aren't all going to get solved in the first Plan B. On the bright side, the student did participate in the discussion; the teacher obtained a lot of information; and the student stayed engaged as they discussed potential solutions. Will she show up on Friday for the next discussion? Maybe, maybe not. Will the discussion continue the next time she does show up? Yes. All problem solving is incremental. Plan B is a process.
Question: It's a Plan A world. How does Plan B help a kid live in The Real World?
Answer: It's not a Plan A world. Although The Real World most definitely has expectations, it doesn't impose solutions anywhere nearly as often as people think it does. More often, The Real World demands that a person identify and articulate her concerns, take the concerns of others into account, generate alternative solutions, and solve problems in a realistic and mutually satisfactory manner. Those are skills trained with Plan B. The reason you're using Plan B is to teach the kid the skills she lacks so that she can handle problems she'll face in The Real World, just as you would with any other developmental delay. Plan A doesn't do that.
The reason you're using Plan B is to teach the kid the skills she lacks so that she can handle problems she'll face in The Real World, just as you would with any other developmental delay. Plan A doesn't do that.
Question: I guess I've been thinking—or at least acting like—the most important role I can play in the lives of my students is to push them harder if they aren't meeting my expectations. But a lot of them just push back. I'm starting to recognize that although there's been a lot of pushing, there hasn't been much problem solving going on. Safe to assume that pushing isn't my best role?
Answer: Not if you're interested in figuring out what's been making it hard for some of your students to meet your expectations and helping them overcome those hurdles. Having high expectations is a wonderful thing, especially if your students can meet those expectations. But if a student is having difficulty meeting an expectation, pushing won't help you identify why, won't help you partner with the student in solving the problem, and won't solve it. Your best role as a helper is problem solver, not pusher.
Question: For how long do we have to do Plan B with a kid?
Answer: Plan B isn't a temporary fix to help you eventually return to Plan A. It's a way to engage kids in solving the problems that affect their lives. It's a way to help them meet the expectations of The Real World. Why would you stop doing Plan B?
Question: Is it OK to have a specific behavior be the focus of Plan B? Like, for example, hitting?
Answer: It's not ideal. Remember, if you try to talk with a student about her challenging behavior, she's likely to think she's in trouble, likely to become defensive, and less likely to participate in the discussion. Also, if you talk with her about a behavior, you are, in effect, simultaneously talking with her about all the unsolved problems that cause that behavior. Better to figure out what unsolved problems are setting the stage for the student to hit and try to solve those problems. Then she won't be hitting in response to them anymore.
Question: What if the kid doesn't follow through on her part of the solution?
Answer: It probably wasn't realistic and/or mutually satisfactory in the first place. Back to Plan B to figure out why the solution didn't accomplish the mission so that it can be refined or replaced with a solution that comes closer to the mark. Remember, you don't want to sign off on a solution until you and the student have given conscious, deliberate thought to whether it's truly realistic and truly addresses the concerns of both parties. Don't get so excited that a solution has been proposed that you sign off on it instantaneously. All solutions are evaluated on the basis of whether they're realistic and mutually satisfactory. That's the litmus test.
Question: What if the solutions a kid proposes are not realistic or mutually satisfactory?
Answer: That's not an uncommon scenario for people—not just kids—who haven't had a whole lot of practice coming up with realistic and mutually satisfactory solutions and may be accustomed to power struggles. So she'll need some feedback along those lines. Such feedback might sound like this: “Hey, there's an idea. The only problem is, I don't know if it's truly realistic for us to assume that you'll be able to make it through the entire school year without interacting with Catherine. Let's see if we can come up with a solution that you can really do.” Or “Well, I suppose one option would be for you to just skip doing your math homework. And I guess that would address your concerns. But it wouldn't really address my concern that I really want you to get some extra practice at what we're covering in math. Let's see if we can come up with a solution that works for both of us.” In general, kids don't respond badly at all to such feedback, especially since it's being delivered in the context of a collaborative partnership.
Question: I agreed on a solution with one of my students, and it was working well for a few weeks; then it stopped working. What happened?
Answer: Although it could be that the solution you and the kid agreed on wasn't as realistic and mutually satisfactory as it originally seemed, it could also be that the original solution addressed only the concerns you heard about in the initial Plan B, but didn't (and couldn't) address concerns you didn't hear about. Head back to Plan B to see if you missed something. And it could also be that your initial success was due more to the quick burst of relationship enhancing that often occurs with Plan B. So it wasn't the solution working for you, it was the improved relationship. Although improved relationships are certainly a wonderful thing, realistic and mutually satisfactory solutions are even more wonderful.
Question: Should a student be punished if the solution doesn't work?
Answer: Why would you punish the student? Didn't you both agree on the solution?
Question: What if the kid says she doesn't care about my concern?
Answer: You need to find out what she means. Maybe she's had a lot of her concerns blown off the table and is now responding in kind. Maybe “I don't care” is something the kid says almost automatically in response to perceived criticism or when she feels like she's in trouble or on the spot. The long-term answer to a kid not caring about your concerns is to find out and care more about hers.
The long-term answer to a kid not caring about your concerns is to find out and care more about hers.
Question: I have a classroom full of kids whose unsolved problems have been stacked up for a long time. I get that now. And I get that I need to do an ALSUP and that I need to get my priorities straight for each of them. And I get that solving those problems is going to take time. But what do I do about all the other problems while I'm working on my priorities?
Answer: Great question. Don't forget about Plan C. Early on, you may need to structure your classroom so that a meaningful number of expectations are set aside, at least for now. Doing that may not sound feasible, but your other option is even less appealing: continuing to have lots of expectations that a meaningful number of your students can't meet. Remember, you inherited many of those unsolved problems. The reason the unsolved problems are stacked so high is that they haven't been solved—or even identified—previously. It's going to take a while to shake things out, and that's not going happen in one fell swoop. You're doing your students an enormous favor by structuring your classroom in a way that permits lots of problem solving and doesn't impose expectations that your students can't meet. And, eventually, a lot of those unmet expectations will start getting met.
Question: I'm having trouble imagining doing Plan B with kids younger than seven or eight years old.
Answer: Don't sell those preschoolers short! They have unsolved problems, they have concerns about those unsolved problems, and they are frequently able to participate in the process of solving the problems that affect their lives. The key variable is language-processing skills, not chronological age. I've worked with three-year-olds who were able to participate in Plan B more easily than some of the seventeen-year-olds with whom I've worked.
Question: Does CPS help with kids on the autism spectrum? The ones who almost always get applied behavior analysis (ABA)?
Answer: The autism spectrum represents an extraordinarily wide range of functioning. The term “autism spectrum” tells us nothing about a student's capacity to participate in the process of solving the problems that affect her life. Again the most common obstacle is communication skills, and there are kids with communication skill delays who aren't on the autism spectrum. There are many ways (besides verbal give-and-take) to help a kid communicate about her concerns and participate in the process of contemplating and selecting solutions: pictures, sign language, hand signals, and so forth. If we're only relying on adult observations and solutions, we're depriving kids of the opportunity to practice solving problems, which makes them completely dependent on adults for solutions to those problems, and deprives adults of information about the kids' concerns. No matter how “low functioning” a child may be, we should always be cognizant of opportunities to engage her in solving problems. Dependence on adults is not a characteristic we want to promote. By the way, there's a lot more similarity between CPS and some forms of ABA than you might think. The key is whether adults are seeking information from the child (rather than relying solely on observations of behavior to draw conclusions) and involving the child in the process of arriving at solutions (rather than having adults assuming total responsibility for deciding on solutions and incentivizing compliance).
Question: Are there kids Plan B won't help, who really need to be placed in programs outside of public schools?
Answer: There will always be kids who, despite our best efforts, will need to be placed in such programs. But the reason so many kids are being placed in such programs these days—at great cost—is the large piles of unsolved problems and the extreme behaviors that are being caused by those unsolved problems. Plan B is free and, in combination with Plan C, has kept a lot of kids in their home schools.
Question: Aren't there some behaviorally challenging kids who need meds?
Answer: Yes, though nowhere near as many as are actually on meds. There are some things medication can be expected to address and things medication should not be expected to address. If we aren't aware of that differentiation, we'll see a lot of kids end up on medication for things that medication doesn't address, often because caregivers aren't sure what else to do. Now you know what else to do. Medicine is effective at reducing hyperactivity and poor impulse control, improving attention span, enhancing mood, reducing obsessive-compulsive behaviors and anxiety, reducing tics, inducing sleep, and helping volatile, aggressive kids be less reactive. There are some kids for whom medication is an indispensable aspect of treatment and who are unable to benefit from Plan B without pharmacological help. But medicine does not teach skills, and medication does not solve problems.
There are some kids for whom medication is an indispensable aspect of treatment. … but medicine does not teach skills, and medication does not solve problems.
“So much of what we do as educators is assess the situation and decide on a solution … that's what teachers are accustomed to doing. And what we've learned is that we're not always accurate in what we assume to be the reasons behind why kids do things. Having those conversations with the kids has been a huge eye-opener. The essence of solving problems collaboratively is that the student has voice and choice in the situation. Look at the process. First we listen to them. We gather information. It's about listening, but it's also about asking the right questions. And then the adult shares his or her concerns, and then the two work together to solve problems. That parallels a lot of the cutting-edge work on academic instruction these days. So I've been lucky to see this kind of unique connection between CPS and very progressive, research-based, modern instruction.”
—Tom, Assistant Superintendent
“Once you really start using CPS, you realize how much it's connected to the curriculum and to classroom management techniques. You can read anything on curriculum and instruction, and the research is talking about things that are connected to CPS. It's been wonderful to see—that all parts of the school are connected with CPS's philosophy that kids do well if they can. Getting kids' perspective is the overarching goal for all of us.”
—Nina, Principal
“When we actually began doing Plan B with kids, really putting it into action, some found it a bit intimidating because people aren't used to having those real, deep conversations with kids about what the child is experiencing.”
—RYAN, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL
“One of my kids last year was having difficulty moving on to a different math station. She kept going back to working again on whatever the activity was in the last station. So I just said, ‘Well, you know, I noticed that you had some difficulty during math yesterday. What's up?’ She said, ‘I wasn't good at it. I got it wrong. I'm not the best at math anymore.’ And I said, ‘Oh. So missing the problem made you think that you weren't good at math?’ And she said, ‘Yeah.’ I asked her for more, and she said, ‘Well, I don't like that people think I can't do it.’ I said, ‘So what I'm hearing is that when you miss something, you think people will think that you can't do it?’ She said, ‘Yeah, they won't think I'm smart.’ So eventually we got to talking about solutions. She likes challenging problems. So we talked about the fact that she could do math work that's easy for her or math work that's challenging, but that if she does the challenging work, it's probably going to be harder, and she's probably going to make some mistakes. And she agreed that she still wanted to do the challenging work, but that she'd let me know if she needed help instead of putting her head on the desk because she's worried that people won't think she's smart. I was surprised, because I thought she was going to just say she was frustrated when she couldn't get it. I was really surprised to learn she was worried people weren't going to think she was smart.”
—Kathy, Teacher
“We're usually wrong about kids' concerns.”
—Katie, Learning Center Teacher
“I did Plan B with a student on his difficulties coming into school in the morning. He was having trouble separating from his mom. I remember thinking that he needed a checklist in the morning; you know, like, ‘Put my backpack up. Check. Take my boots off. Check.’ But that solution made no sense once we heard what his concerns were. I think he said something like, ‘There's just too many people in the classroom in the morning.’ I had never even thought of that! I learned that when you do Plan B, you hear things you didn't expect. And the solution was as simple as him just saying that it would work better for him if he could just wait for a little bit for everyone else to come into the classroom. And then as soon as the other kids went in, he would go in and do everything. He didn't need that checklist.”
—Katie, Learning Center Teacher
“And sometimes the kids' solutions don't make sense to adults either. I was doing Plan B with two kids who were fighting over the same doll. The solution they came up with was that one of them would play with it for ten minutes and the other would play with it for fifteen. It wasn't equal. But they were good with the solution, even though it made no sense to me.”
—Vicki, Director of Communications
“There was another student who had difficulty coming to school, and he was basically pretty oppositional about doing anything all day. And so I started off Plan B with, ‘I've noticed that it's been difficult for you to come to school. What's up?’ What I learned is that he didn't want to leave his Legos. Did I expect to hear that? No. Turns out he'd been working on the Legos all summer, and he was in the middle of a project and didn't want to leave the Legos. So we agreed that when he was finished with the project, he'd either bring it in or bring in some pictures to share with the class. He brought in some pictures, and that was the start of hooking him in. We did a lot of Plan B that year. His dad came in at the end of the school year and said to me, ‘We can't believe how he's getting up in the morning and he wants to go to school. He's talking at the dinner table about his school day. It's such a change!’ I said, ‘He's worked really, really hard, and I'm so glad to hear this.’ And then his dad got teary-eyed and said, ‘I wish that I'd had this when I was in school, because I think it would have made all the difference for me.’ Then he gave me a big hug, and I realized this is really about changing people's lives.
The student doesn't need much Plan B anymore. It sounds awful to be excited about that, but there haven't been very many problems to solve anymore. The reason that's exciting is that everybody was worried that kids would become dependent on the help. You know, how's he going to make it in the real world? But once the skills are taught, the kids have a better shot at making it in the real world.
His parents were so frustrated about what was going on at school in the beginning. I can remember the earlier meetings, and they were at a total loss for what to do. They were trying everything. They were being really strict. They were taking things away. And we said, ‘Oh, please don't do that.’ They came to trust us.”
—Katie, Learning Center Teacher
“We had a kid who was like a caveman in the beginning. He barely spoke. His hair was always over his face. Didn't have much language. Just grunting. He was just like the Tasmanian Devil. Just running around, bumping into things, ripping things apart—completely out of control. His mom had drug abuse issues. She told us at an IEP meeting that she didn't do discipline, or structure, or whatever. He told me that his dad was in jail for murdering someone, which wasn't correct. It was for domestic abuse. But this kid was completely out of control. The student just hadn't been socialized at all. People told me, ‘You need to get shin guards or something because you're getting kicked,’ and everything like that. But we nurtured him, and we accepted him, and slowly but surely we started to have some expectations for him. And gradually he started meeting them. He began to trust us.”
—Susan, Educational Technician
“This is a kid that everyone said needed to be placed out of district. Everyone said that this kid should not be in public school. He should be in residential care or day treatment. Now that we know him, we know how smart he is. Now, 99 percent of his time is in class. He's able to verbalize when he needs help. And it was a transformation for the mother. She's working with us. She trusts us completely.”
—Nina, Principal
“What's been fantastic about CPS is it's been helping us with those kids that we couldn't figure out. You don't understand why they continue to make the same mistakes again and again—you're not sure what the concerns are. This process has been unbelievably helpful with those kids.”
—Ryan, Assistant Principal
“Something that struck me the most about CPS is how, over time, it took the tension and anger away from kids that I worked with when teachers referred them to the office for help. Students knew that I cared for them, that I would listen to them, and that they had a voice in the process. At the same time, they also knew that the school has expectations and concerns for them and all students. They still had lagging skills, which could still make life challenging, but their ‘calmness’ allowed for more productive and solution-based interactions between everyone to address those problems.”
—Ryan, Assistant Principal