Chapter 1
Understanding Sainthood
In This Chapter
Defining what it means to be a saint
Looking at the canonization process and how it has changed
Honoring and celebrating the saints
Following the examples set forth by the saints
In this chapter, we discuss the idea of sainthood in general, especially how the Catholic Church understands the notion of holiness in its members. We take you through the canonization process and explain how it has evolved over the centuries. We explain how saints are venerated, and we discuss the unique role patron saints can play in your spiritual life. Finally, we examine the reasons for pursuing a saintly life and the means to achieve it.
Ordinary Saints versus Official Saints
In the Catholic Church, anyone who goes to heaven is considered a saint. Those who make it to heaven but are never canonized are still as saintly as those named so by the pope; in fact, the unnamed and unnumbered saints in heaven are in the majority, and God alone knows who they are and how numerous. These ordinary saints lived normal lives but did so with faith in and love for the Lord. Official saints, on the other hand, are men and women who lived lives worthy of recognition, honor, and imitation.
The following sections explore the making of a saint, from the initial nomination process and early examinations, to everything the Church must consider and the events that must take place after the candidate’s death.
The Canonization Process Then and Now
As we mention in the previous section, any declaration of sainthood must come from the pope. That’s true now, but it wasn’t always so. Before the 12th century, the local bishop was the one who canonized saints — either on his own or in a council or synod of bishops. In very early and ancient times, saints were declared by acclamation, or unanimous consent of the people. If a popular holy person died, usually a martyr, the diocese where he or she lived and died eagerly pushed for sainthood.
The question arose, then: Who gets to be declared a saint? In this section, we look at the development of the formal process by which someone is declared (canonized) a saint.
Centralizing the process with Pope Alexander III
Pope Alexander III was the first to rein in the canonization process. In the late 12th century, he made canonization the exclusive province of the papacy, and he and his successors established elaborate processes and regulations to make sure that every candidate met uniform eligibility guidelines. The result was something very much like a trial. Each investigation involved a promoter for the saint-to-be (sort of a defense attorney) and an opposing side (the equivalent of a prosecuting attorney), called the devil’s advocate, whose job was to expose any heresies in the candidate’s writings or sermons, and/or any immoral behavior in the candidate’s life.
For the next 800 years, those who wanted to advocate a particular person for sainthood had to follow a time-consuming path. First was beatification, a formal decision that a person can be called “Blessed.” Beatification involved a canonical trial with advocates and judges. Those who knew the candidate or witnessed postmortem miracles testified, and the candidate’s writings and teachings were examined and entered into evidence. All this took place in Rome, because one of the regulations that came from Alexander’s centralization policies was that all such trials be held at the Vatican.
Oh, yes, there was also a 50-year waiting period between a person’s death and the earliest date he or she could be considered for sainthood. The purpose of the waiting period was to allow time for emotions to settle, thus reducing the number of grief-induced petitions for sainthood. Fifty years was considered the length of time for one generation to disappear.
Revamping the process with Pope John Paul II
In 1983, Pope John Paul II made major changes to the canonization process. For one thing, he reduced the waiting period from 50 years to 5 years, in large part because, after 50 years, finding witnesses who knew the candidate personally can be difficult.
John Paul II also replaced the trial process with a more scholarly, document-oriented approach. Officials still gather the candidate’s writings and facts about the candidate’s life, but the contentious roles of the devil’s advocate and the trial setting are gone (see the upcoming section “Examining lives and allowing for human nature”). And he returned much of the process to the authority of the local diocese; local bishops and dioceses now do much of the preparatory work and the first phase of research, as they’re the ones on location where the proposed saint lived and worked.
When a bishop accepts a case for review, the candidate is called a “Servant of God,” until a decision is made to send the case on. When that occurs, the proposed saint is considered Venerable, and research focuses on proof of a miracle connected with the candidate (see the “Confirming miracles” section later in this chapter). After a bona fide miracle is established, Rome decides whether the person can be called “Blessed” and formally beatified.
The next phase is one of waiting for another miracle and the documentation on it. Not all beatifications continue to canonization, but as long as a verifiable second miracle exists, there is hope.
Examining lives and allowing for human nature
When people are proposed as possible saints, their lives — their actions and words — are closely examined. No one looks for perfection — just for reassurance that the person in question didn’t lead a notorious or scandalous life. Catholic authorities scrutinize the candidate’s speeches, sermons, books, and other writings to make sure that they contain nothing contradicting defined doctrines or dogmas.
If the candidate’s words and deeds pass muster, examiners then search for heroic virtue — the desire and effort to seriously pursue a life of holiness.
Confirming miracles
The definition of an accepted miracle varies almost as widely as those proposed for sainthood. Traditional miracles involve unexpected healing that’s immediate and complete, as well as inexplicable to modern science.
Incorruptibility: A phenomenon in which the dead person’s body doesn’t decay, no matter how many years have elapsed since death. Only non-embalmed bodies are considered for evidence of incorruptibility.
The odor of sanctity: A sweet smell of roses exuding from the dead body, despite rigor mortis and the number of years since death. Again, only non-embalmed bodies are considered for this miracle.
Signs of stigmata: Marks resembling one or more of the five wounds Christ suffered upon crucifixion, present only while the person was alive.
Bilocation: Being in two places at the same time. Because this only happens before death, while the saint candidate is still alive, only the most reliable testimony from unimpeachable witnesses can be used. Levitation also can be used as evidence.
Intercession (Patron Saints)
You have mediators and intercessors in your lives every day; you just don’t call them “mediator” and “intercessor.” Sometimes you call them “doctor” and “nurse,” or “store manager” and “clerk.” The intercessor is the person you turn to in order to seek help from someone higher up: The nurse relays your information to the doctor; the clerk relays requests or concerns to the store manager.
That’s how it is with God and saints. Jesus is the mediator in our lives, the one who can speak on behalf of an entire group and who has the authority to negotiate, make agreements or treaties, and represent both parties. The saints are those who make requests to the one and only mediator on behalf of someone else. Their role is optional — not everyone turns to an intercessor, or saint, to address God.
Patron saints serve as intercessors for particular areas. For example, St. Lucy was a martyr in the ancient Church who died a horrible death when her Roman persecutors gouged out her eyeballs (see Chapter 6). She is invoked as the patron saint for ailments of the eye.
Venerating the Saints
Just because saints have their own days on the Church calendar doesn’t mean they’re to be worshipped — that’s held for God alone. Rather, saints are worthy of public honor or veneration, called dulia in Latin. Holy men and women in heaven deserve honor just as our nation honors those who died defending our country.
Do you have a picture of a deceased loved one in your wallet or hanging on the wall at home? Those images aren’t idols. The pictures of saints displayed in church or in homes are the same thing: a visible reminder of someone you honor and appreciate.
Following the Saints’ Examples
By canonizing many new saints, Pope John Paul showed the world that sanctity and holiness don’t belong to a clerical minority. Heaven is open to anyone who wants it and is willing to live a good and holy life.
Sainthood is a reminder that perseverance and dedication to one’s faith can bring us to our goals. As Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta often said, “God does not call us to be successful; he calls us to be faithful.” We know we aren’t perfect and, save for the grace of God, won’t be; as such, we should stop trying to reach for that which is out of our grasp. Instead of trying to be perfect, we are called to be faithful in our efforts to do and be better.
Sainthood is also a reminder that even the most hardened sinner isn’t without help or hope. Through God’s grace, anyone can turn his life around and return to the faithful.
In this section, we look at the moral, everyday life of the hopeful saint-to-be. Because the saints are normal human beings, they have the same wounded human nature all men and women are born with, thanks to original sin. And because they have the same moral weaknesses we all do, their ability to overcome them by God’s grace is also available to everyone else.
Setting a moral and ethical foundation with the four cardinal virtues
St. Thomas Aquinas, a brilliant theologian of the 13th century, taught that “grace builds upon nature.” This means that before anyone can hope to live a holy life worthy of sainthood (being in heaven), he or she must have a solid moral and ethical foundation upon which the life of grace is built. Being a holy or saintly person is no accident. You must intend and want to be holy. One must first pursue goodness before holiness. The former lays the groundwork for the latter.
The moral or cardinal virtues have been known and discussed since antiquity. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, and the Stoics, just to name a few, were philosophers who lived centuries before Christ and who were Greek or Roman pagans. They had no revealed religion like the Jews and Christians. But they had the use of human reason and saw that there were four cardinal (from the Latin word cardo, meaning “hinge” — that is, the hinges to a good moral life) virtues. The ancient philosophers realized that prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance were the underpinnings of an ethical life and would bring peace and happiness to the individual person and to the community and society at large. Faith complements reason, so religion continues the process by adding to the cardinal or moral virtues the three theological virtues of faith, hope, and love.
The moral (cardinal) virtues can and ought to be practiced by anyone and everyone. They’re good for you and help you to be and to do good, as each one is considered a habit you must acquire through effort and practice. The theological virtues come via divine grace through the sacraments, especially Baptism, which is the gateway to the other sacraments (Penance, Eucharist, Confirmation, Matrimony, Holy Orders, and Anointing of the Sick).
The following sections give a closer look at each of the cardinal virtues.
Prudence
The premiere of all virtues, prudence is the ability to make good decisions and to have the ability to practice tact — knowing when, where, and how something is appropriate. You wouldn’t ask a friend to repay a debt at the friend’s mother’s funeral. In the same vein, prudence is knowing how to approach a delicate situation with sensitivity and charity.
St. Thomas More (16th century) was a most prudent man. As Lord Chancellor of England and a wealthy nobleman, Thomas always weighed his words and deeds before he said or did them. Some may have called him cautious, but prudent best summarizes his life as a Catholic layman. During his conflict with King Henry VIII, Thomas prudently kept quiet when needed and spoke eloquently and boldly when needed as well. Never rash or impetuous, Thomas prayed and gave deliberation to every aspect of his political, social, and private life. Being wise in knowing the right time and place and the right word and action is what prudence is about.
Justice
Justice is doing the right thing for the right reason; quid pro quo (this for that), the Romans used to say. There are three kinds of justice: commutative, distributive, and social, each defined by the people involved.
Commutative justice involves just two parties: the buyer and seller, teacher and student, neighbor and neighbor. It involves equity and fairness between the two parties.
Distributive justice is the balance between the individual and the group, such as between a resident and a government, or a union member and the union. A resident pays taxes and votes in elections; in return, the government provides for safety and well-being.
Social justice is the responsibility everyone has to preserve natural resources for future generations and look out for one another. When one government oppresses its people, for example, social justice drives other governments and citizens to stand up in defense of the oppressed.
St. Joseph (first century) is literally called a “just” man in the Gospel, and he epitomizes the virtue of justice. He knew what was the right thing to do, and he sought to be fair at all times. His protection of his wife Mary and her son Jesus was motivated out of love, to be sure, but it was his practice of justice that enabled him to be the husband and foster father he needed to be for his family. Being fair to everyone and doing the right thing — and not for reward or recognition — is what justice is all about.
Fortitude
Everyone has been in the position of wanting or needing to do or say something that’s necessary, although not easy. Fortitude is having the courage to do or say it anyway.
Blessed Teresa of Calcutta (20th century) is certainly the poster child for fortitude and courage. She was unflinching in her determination to do what had to be done and to say what had to be said, no matter how powerful her opponents. Whether it was helping the poorest of the poor or defending the lives of the unborn in the womb, this little Albanian nun became very familiar with the virtue of fortitude, and hence, she never gave up and never quit. She spoke with charity and kindness but also with firmness of conviction — to leaders of the First, Second, and Third Worlds; the UN; Congress and the White House. Having the guts to do the job (God’s will, that is) and not be influenced by ambition or fear is what fortitude is about.
Temperance
Temperance is knowing when enough is enough. Temperate people set limits on their own legitimate pleasures and activities. You may allow yourself a glass of wine, for example, but temperance keeps you from overindulging.
St. Josemaria Escriva (20th century) was a very temperate man. He practiced moderation in his work and in his play (leisure and recreation). No party pooper, Josemaria would enjoy parties and responsibly partake of alcoholic beverages, such as wine. But he knew there had to be limits, and he didn’t overindulge. He balanced work with rest. Temperance taught him the value of moderation in pleasures so as not to abuse himself or others. Josemaria also practiced some self-denial called mortification, but again in moderate ways so as not to incur injury or harm. A healthy balance is what temperance is about.
Building on moral virtues with the theological virtues
The road to sainthood involves not only the moral virtues but also the theological virtues. These virtues are bestowed at Baptism but can be enhanced throughout one’s lifetime. Baptism remits original sin and makes a person an adopted “child of God.” Sanctifying grace is given at Baptism, which makes a person holy and thus able to enter the holiness of heaven. Along with sanctifying grace, Baptism also makes the soul pliable and ready for actual grace, which is the supernatural gift from God that enables you to do holy things (like pray, forgive your enemies, endure hardships, make sacrifices for others, have courage in the midst of difficulties, and so on).
Faith is believing what God says simply because it comes from God.
Hope is trusting in promises that God has yet to fulfill, knowing that those promises one day will come to fruition, at a time and place that is right for God.
Love, theologically, is a spiritual love, wanting what is best for someone else, putting others above one’s self. It’s not a sexual love or a biological love; it’s seeking to love God and to love your neighbor.
The theological virtues build on what the moral, cardinal virtues hopefully establish as a foundation. Faith, hope, and love empower you to believe what God has revealed, to trust in his mercy and providence, to love God with your whole heart and soul, and to love your neighbor as yourself. The daily struggle to live a holy life is made possible by the theological virtues. Hence, people want and need more faith, more hope, and more love every day of their lives until they finally get to heaven, where there is the fullness of grace and the total joy without end.