^* See David Bohm’s sense of “the implicate order (from a Latin root meaning ‘to enfold’ or ‘to fold inward’). In terms of the implicate order one may say that everything is enfolded into everything. This contrasts with the explicate order now dominant in physics in which things are unfolded in the sense that each thing lies only in its own particular region of space (and time) and outside the regions belonging to other things” (Wholeness and the Implicate Order, 177). Pertinent to the implicate order is the fold—Le Pli in the title of a book on Gottfried Leibniz by Gilles Deleuze—delectably deployed by Steve McCaffery as an approach to the work of Robin Blaser. “The great architectural fold is the labyrinth, whereas the ontolinguistic fold requires a plication of the subject into the predicate. The Self—itself—is not a Subject but a ‘fold’ of force. Souls are folds upon corporeal surfaces provoking dialogues, not syntheses. A new consciousness is a fold in the old and a dream a fold in waking life” (“Blaser’s Deleuzean Folds,” 374).