Nietzsche as Philosopher grew out of a long essay on Nietzsche, originally written as a contribution for A Critical History of Western Philosophy, edited by D. J. O’Connor, and published in 1964. The authors were not historians of philosophy so much as philosophers who, for one reason or other, had some particular interest in a figure from the past. It was a moment when analytical philosophers had begun to think of the canonical texts of our discipline as something more than nonsense, which meant that the largely iconoclastic views of philosophy, militantly espoused by logical positivism, were at last losing their charm. I was invited to contribute to the O’Connor volume by the general editor of the series in which it appeared, Paul Edwards, largely because my philosophical credentials passed muster and because I was the only one he happened to know who met that criterion and also seemed to know anything about Nietzsche. Admittedly, I did not know a lot—but I had read Nietzsche as an undergraduate at Wayne University in Detroit with Marianna Cowan, who later published a superb translation of Beyond Good and Evil. I accepted the invitation chiefly out of brashness and wrote the essay in Rome. I had moved there from the south of France, where I had completed a draft of my first major book, The Analytical Philosophy of History. As it turned out, my essay was too long, but Edwards offered me a contract for a book on Nietzsche if I would agree to shorten the article. The Analytical Philosophy of History and Nietzsche as Philosopher were published in the same year, 1965.
A recent study by the Italian scholar, Tiziana Andini—Il volto Americano di Nietzsche (The American face of Nietzsche)—addresses the singular quantity of writings on Nietzsche that American philosophers produced in the second half of the twentieth century; she speculates that Nietzsche answered to something deep in the American grain. What I can claim credit for, I think, is that my book opened Nietzsche up for young analytical philosophers, for my effort had been to show that Nietzsche had written boldly and imaginatively on the very questions that defined analytical philosophy as a movement—questions in the philosophy of science, of language, and of logic—and that he was not some marginal kook who stood for something alternative to philosophy as we understood it. My book showed that it was possible to write on Nietzsche without losing ones philosophical credibility. One could in at least this one case have one’s cake and X eat it too. And this secured an intellectual annuity for the book, which has remained part of the growing literature it helped validate at the beginning and to which I contributed from time to time with essays on this or that aspect of Nietzsche’s thought.
When my wonderful German publisher, Axel Kortendeick—alas now dead—raised the question of a German translation of Nietzsche as Philosopher, I proposed that it appear together with these supplementary writings. The result was that readers of Nietzsche als Philosoph (Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1998) had access to a broader picture of my thought on Nietzsche than was easily available in English. I cannot say how grateful I am to Wendy Lochner, the philosophy editor at Columbia University Press, for welcoming the suggestion of bringing out a new edition that would incorporate this added material. There is no way in which I could rewrite a text that reflects that moment, nearly forty years ago, in the history of contemporary philosophy. But the book continues to be read and taught in the growing number of courses and seminars devoted to Nietzsche, and since it is part of the history it has helped shape, and since I still stand by its interpretation of its subject, nothing much could be gained by tweaking it to deal with the criticisms it has naturally generated: no response is a response in its own right. The added materials, meanwhile, enrich the reading of Nietzsche’s writing from the perspective the book first opened.
I would like to acknowledge here some of the philosophers who have not only contributed to the history Dr. Andini traces but have in one way or another engaged my subsequent reflections on Nietzsche. These include Maudemarie Clark, Kathleen Higgins, Robert Solomon, Alexander Nahamas, Bernd Magnus, and Richard Schacht. The short note on Nietzsche’s “Artistic Metaphysics” was delivered as a response to an excellent presentation by Birgit Recky, of Hamburg Universität, at a session, organized by Paul Guyer on “Ethics and Aesthetics,” at the 2003 meeting of the American Society for Aesthetics.