Since this series of Best-of-the-Year anthologies debuted, back in the dear, dim, vanished days of 1984, we’ve run through twenty-three annual collections, and 7,309,939 words of fiction by more than two hundred different authors.
A lot of those words took the form of short novels—or novellas, as they’re usually referred to in the science fiction field. Outside of science fiction, the novella is rarely encountered these days, being, in fact, something of a literary endangered species. The novella is still alive and well in the science fiction world, though, and it’s a rare year that doesn’t see at least eight or ten of them published, often more.
Perhaps this is because, in many ways, the novella or short novel is a perfect length for a science fiction story: long enough to enable you to flesh out the details of a strange alien world or a bizarre future society, to give such a setting some depth, complexity, and heft . . . and yet, still short enough to pack a real punch, some power and elegance and bite, unblunted and unobscured by padding. Unlike many of today’s novels, all too many of which strike me as novellas grossly padded-out to be five hundred pages long, there are rarely any wasted words in a good novella, a quality that they share with good short stories. A good novella is no longer than it needs to be. It does what it has to do, what it is designed to do, and then it stops. That novellas need to be as long as they are, long enough to justify the alternative term “short novels,” is a measure of just how complicated and difficult are the tasks that they are designed to do: to create a whole fictional world, a universe that no one has ever explored before, to set that world forth in intricate detail, to people it with living characters, and then to use the tumbling interactions of that world and those people to tell a story that could not be told without both those elements being present. This is a formidable task to accomplish even in the space of a five-hundred-page novel, yet a good novella accomplishes it in the space of twenty or thirty thousand words—the novellas here are marvels of compression, in spite of the amount of ground they have to cover, and it would be hard to find a page of slack to cut out of any of them, or to end them one page earlier than they do.
As you can probably tell by now, I like novellas, and I’ve used a lot of them in my Best-of-the-Year anthologies over the past twenty-three years—more than a hundred of them, in fact. When I edited a retrospective look-back last year over the run of The Year’s Best Science Fiction series, 2005’s The Best of the Best: 20 Years of the Year’s Best Science Fiction, I included as many novellas as I had room to use and still have space for anything else in the book—Nancy Kress’s “Trinity,” Brian Stableford’s “Mortimer Gray’s History of Death,” Ted Chiang’s “Story of Your Life,” David Marusek’s “The Wedding Album,” Ian R. MacLeod’s “Breathmoss”—but that left so many excellent novellas unused that I decided that there was justification for another retrospective anthology, the one that you’re (presumptively; you might, I suppose, have telekinetic powers, and be floating the book in midair) holding in your hands at this moment, an anthology dedicated exclusively to the many first-rate novellas or short novels that have appeared in The Year’s Best Science Fiction series over the years.
Or as many of them as we could fit in, anyway. Even with a huge anthology such as this one, there’s no way that more than a small percentage of the more than a hundred (almost a hundred and twenty, actually) novellas that we’ve published in the Best could be made to fit into the amount of space that was physically possible. I quickly came to the realization that there was no list of deserving novellas that I could draw up that wouldn’t exceed the space available by at least six or seven stories (and indeed, when I did finalize the line-up you see in this book, there were at least six or seven other novellas I wished I had room to use; we’ll have to wait for the multidimensional, infinitely expansible version of this anthology to do the job right). I also quickly became aware, from talking to fans and readers on the Asimov’s online forum and elsewhere, that there was no possible line-up I could come up with that was going to please everyone; no matter how many stories I included, since there wasn’t room to include all of them, there was always somebody who was going to be disappointed that their favorite story was left out.
The brute fact was, though, that since there wasn’t room for everything, or even everything that deserved to be in the book, that something was going to have to go. That called for hard decisions.
The first and in some ways most important decision I had to make was whether I should use novellas, such as Joe Haldeman’s “The Hemingway Hoax” and Nancy Kress’s “Beggars in Spain,” that were later expanded into novels, or whether I should stick with less-famous stand-alone novellas that weren’t subsequently turned into novels. After a great deal of soul-searching, I decided that to justify a title such as The Best of the Best: 20 Years of the Year’s Best Science Fiction Short Novels, I had to include stories such as “The Hemingway Hoax” and “Beggars in Spain,” even if they are available elsewhere in other forms—the anthology just wouldn’t live up to its name otherwise. (Practical considerations did force a few exceptions: for instance, David Marusek’s “We Were Out of Our Minds with Joy,” otherwise a shoo-in, would be available on bookstore shelves at about the same time this anthology would be as the opening chapter of his excellent novel Counting Heads . . . and Tony Daniel’s “Grist,” another obvious choice, was being reprinted in a competing, big retrospective anthology that would also be on those same shelves at about the same time.) While I hoped to include lesser-known novellas that weren’t as readily available and perhaps hadn’t been seen or weren’t findable by newer readers, it was clear that the only fair determining characteristic was literary quality: If it couldn’t justifiably be called “The Best of the Best,” it wasn’t going to get in, all other practical and demographic considerations aside. (Don’t bother to tell me that there are too many stories from Asimov’s here; I know that already . . . and if I didn’t have to give at least some consideration to demographics, there’d probably be more of them. In defense of that, though, Asimov’s was one of the premier markets for novellas throughout the ’80s and ’90s, and, along with markets such as The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, Interzone, and Analog, remains one of the prime sources for novellas to this day . . . plus, not all the Asimov’s stories here were bought by me. It also quickly became clear that there was no way that every year that the Best has been published could be represented; first-rate novellas tend to clump, for some reason, and thus there were inevitably going to be two or three novellas from the same year, and none from others.)
Having decided that everything was eligible (for symmetry with 2005’s The Best of the Best: 20 Years of the Year’s Best Science Fiction, I decided to limit myself to the first twenty volumes; in the unlikely event that I live long enough, maybe we’ll get another retrospective out of the series ten years down the road), even the best-known stories and novellas that had been turned into novels, I then had to re-read everything, all hundred-plus novellas, a hefty percentage of those 7,309,939 words. Although a few of them turned out, unsurprisingly, to be too heavily dated to use after twenty years or more, most of them held up amazingly well, even some of the oldest stories. Eliminating most of them turned out to be one of the hardest editorial jobs I’ve ever undertaken; the quality of the available pool of novellas was so high that I drew up list after list after list (complicated by the fact that some authors had two or three excellent novellas that would have served my purposes just as well as the one I ended up actually using) right up until the last possible moment, and you could make as good an argument for most of them as for the one I ended up with; in fact, if I’d finalized on Tuesday rather than Monday, you’d have probably ended up with a different list altogether. Chances are, it still would probably have lived up to the title, though. The quality of the pool of novellas there was to draw upon was so high that, even if I’d closed my eyes, stabbed out a finger, and picked stories at random, you’d probably still be getting a pretty good anthology out of it.
In closing, I’d like to thank the often-unsung acquisitions editors who had the good taste to buy these stories in the first place: Ellen Datlow, Shawna McCarthy, Peter Crowther, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, Deborah Beale, Patrick Nielson Hayden, as well as all the editors over the last twenty years who bought all the stories in those twenty volumes that didn’t happen to make the cut for this particular retrospective. I’d like to thank the writers, who labored long into the night over keyboards in lonely rooms to write all the stories in this anthology, and all the other stories in the twenty volumes of the Best, and all the good stories that didn’t make it into any of them in the first place—because there’ve always been more good stories than we have room to use, every year from the beginning to now.
And lastly, I’d like to thank you, the readers, for buying and appreciating the volumes of this series, and thus making it a success. May you continue to enjoy future volumes, and may you enjoy this one as well!
—Gardner Dozois