A week after that seven-hour interview at the police house in Hailsham, Gemma announced that she had more information that she wanted to share with the police. I didn’t press her about what this information was, I just duly went along with her.
It turned out that she was starting to get angry about what she was hearing about Forrest’s past. She wanted to tell the police that she wouldn’t have started any relationship had she known he was still having a relationship with his wife. She isn’t that type of person and she had believed everything he had told her. She didn’t add anything that would support the evidence the police already had, but she took the opportunity to express her feelings. The interview lasted five hours and I wouldn’t say she felt better afterwards by any means. She was confused and hurt, and the one person she could ask for confirmation in all of this was in prison.
On one hand, social media was saying she was part of an amazing love story. On the other, she was being told ‘lies’ about her boyfriend. She wanted a chance to put the record straight about the love they had for each other. As before, she once again insisted it wasn’t an infatuation, it was real.
I had hoped the interview would reveal more information, but it didn’t. The police were very understanding, however. They wanted Gemma to feel comfortable to be able to speak to them.
At home, things were starting to be fractious between us. I was trying to monitor what Gemma was eating and drinking, and how much sleep she was getting, but I also had to give her plenty of space. She was very defensive if anyone was horrible about me on social media, but there was an increasingly bigger barrier growing between us. Quite honestly, I didn’t know how to deal with it.
Sarah, the family social worker, had been absolutely brilliant with all of us. Gemma was already having sessions with a therapist, and Sarah suggested that the rest of the family should get some counselling as well. It would be a safe, controlled environment allowing us all to speak freely about our feelings. This could only be positive, right?
It ended up backfiring really badly. We were only a couple of sessions into our therapy when Gemma and Lee took it upon themselves to annihilate me as a mother. It was just an onslaught of the most horrible things. They claimed that I had got together with Paul too quickly after splitting up with Max and that we had decided to have a baby together without thinking it through. They also said I had been working so hard and didn’t have enough time for them.
It was all my fault.
I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. We are the type of family that regularly has family conferences if any of us has something on our mind. When I first met Paul, I made sure that I told the children all about him before I allowed them to meet, and we talked about the two of us having a baby with the rest of the children, as a family.
All these allegations from Gemma and Lee were completely new to me. I wanted the ground to open up and swallow me. It was a completely venomous attack.
I remember leaving the session feeling totally shell-shocked. No one said a word in the car on the way home.
I was distraught. When I told Sarah about what had happened, she said she wasn’t surprised at all. She told me that they obviously had so much anger about the way their worlds had been torn apart that they had to deflect it on to someone – and I was a safe person for them to release their feelings on.
As their mother, there was no way that I was going to stop loving them for what they said to me. There would never be any consequences about what they said and I would never throw it back at them, so in a way I was the natural target. Sarah said it was part of the process that they were going through, but maybe it had been too soon to start counselling. It was still all just too raw.
And Sarah was right. When I speak to Gemma and Lee about those meetings now, they are full of remorse and find it extremely difficult to talk about what happened.
Meanwhile, the local education authority was concerned about the amount of school that Gemma was missing – especially as it was her GCSE year – so it was arranged for Gemma, Sarah and me to meet someone from the East Sussex Department of Education. What they proposed astounded me.
They said that the best way forward for Gemma would be for her to return to Kennedy High School, arguing that she needed to reconnect with her old friends and teachers, and that it would be the easiest way for her to get back to her studies. I couldn’t believe it. ‘Over my dead body! If I allow her to go back to Kennedy High School, it would be like feeding her to a pack of wolves!’ I declared.
I hadn’t disagreed with anything the police or the Child Protection Services had suggested before this, but there was no way I was going to let that happen.
Amazingly, Gemma wanted to go back to Kennedy High School and said she would not be prepared to go to any other senior school in the area. As far as she was concerned, it would all blow over once the initial curiosity had worn off.
Luckily, there was another option – FLESS, which stands for Flexible Learning Educational Support Service. It is a stepping stone for secondary school children who have spent time out of school for one reason or another, and was perfectly suited to Gemma’s situation. The nearest centre to us was in Seaford, about an hour’s round trip away. Gemma would have to be taken and picked up from the school, as that was one of the conditions of attendance. It was quite limited in the amount of subjects it offered on its curriculum, but the school was happy to accommodate anything that she required. They offered Skype sessions, but we agreed that Gemma should go there three days a week from 9am until 3pm, starting in November. Her attendance would be extended to a full week once she had settled in.
We knew we were in for a long stretch but, bit by bit, it felt like life was getting back on an even keel.
On Monday, 12 November, Forrest appeared in Hastings Magistrates’ Court via videolink from Lewes Prison and was given another chance to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Once again, he refused. As before, we just couldn’t work out what was going on. I didn’t understand what he was playing at.
The ongoing complications regarding adding the additional charge of sexual activity with a minor meant there was a chance of there being two separate trials. If this second charge continued to go back and forth through the European appeal courts, as it appeared was going to be the case, it could be years before the nightmare was over for us. The plan was to proceed with the original abduction charge and do everything we could to get through the red tape in time to include the sexual activity with a minor charge at the same trial.
We could be facing years with this heavy burden upon us, but all the evidence I had seen had convinced me beyond any shadow of a doubt that Forrest was a sex offender. He had to pay for his crime, and I had to find a way to get my family through all of this.