As you can tell by now, the theme of this book is that you create more effective messages about yourself and your ideas when you focus less on yourself and more on other people. That’s how you differentiate yourself from most other people in business and in life. Your goal when communicating is to meet the needs of the other person. The only way to know what the other person needs is to ask, and then to truly, deeply, listen. Therefore, communicating effectively isn’t just about the way you send out information. It’s also about the way you take in information.
Listening well is hard work. We tend to think of listening as a passive exercise, as if it requires no energy from us.
“Did you want to share something at today’s meeting?”
“No. I’ll just sit and listen.”
Compared to being the speaker at the meeting, most of us would find being the listener the easier task. But listening well takes energy.
When you’re listening to someone, all of the body language factors mentioned in the chapter on your delivery skills still apply. In addition, there are several body language cues specific to when you are listening.
When we’re talking to someone, we want to know he is engaged with us, that he is processing what we are saying. We feel better when the person gives us some kind of indication that he follows the gist of what we are sharing with him. We appreciate the occasional nod, the thoughtful “um hmm,” the eye contact that conveys a sense of interest. We have all had the experience of talking to someone who sits silent and stone-faced, either staring at the floor or staring right through us, as if he has mentally slipped out of the room or has slipped into a coma. When we listen to others, we want to provide the level of engagement that allows the person to feel he is reaching us, that he has an engaged audience.
Being an engaged listener is especially important when we are speaking with someone on the phone. We have all shared content on the phone with a colleague or client when, after not hearing anything from the other side for a while, we grow concerned that somehow the call was dropped and we’ve been speaking to dead air for a while. We then have to ask that awkward and embarrassing question: “Are you still there?” Don’t put the other person in that position. The occasional “um hmm,” or “okay,” or “sure” is all it takes to let the other person know you are still present.
As mentioned in the previous chapter, maintaining eye contact is a critical communication strategy when delivering information. It is equally important when receiving it.
Let’s say you’re at a board meeting. You’re first on the agenda. You share your content and respond to the group’s questions. You have great eye contact and body language. You gesture well, sound confident about your data, and are emphatic about your recommendation. You do a great job, and the board votes to move forward with your idea. Now it’s someone else’s turn to speak. You think, “Whew! Thank God that’s over.” You slump back in your chair and drop your eyes to your pad. You’ve earned a break. Unfortunately, you’ve now withdrawn from the meeting, and the next speaker has lost her audience. She was present while you spoke. Where are you? You might as well have left the room.
The body language that can be misperceived when you are presenting can be equally misinterpreted when you are listening. A listener’s body language tells the speaker whether the message is getting through. Anyone who has dealt with a teenager knows this.
My wife and I had four kids in five years. The toddler years were exhausting because of the constant physical demands. The teenage years were draining from an emotional perspective. Picture yourself talking to a teenager about an important issue—the need to study harder, the chores that need to get done, the tone of voice he uses with a sibling. He stands slumped, his head to one side, staring at the floor, a scowl on his face. The overall demeanor says, “Can I leave now?” Or she’s staring right at you, arms folded, nodding quickly as if to say, “Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Got it. Gotta go.” Their body language tells you nothing is getting through.
The same happens when we’re talking to someone at work. If we’re having a performance review discussion and the look from the other person is one of complete resignation, or his body language seems to be “yessing” you to death just to get out of the room, we know the message isn’t sinking in. We will have to have the same conversation again in a month. It’s important to remember those conversations when we are on the other side, as the listeners. What body language do you use when listening to someone? Do you convey that you’re present to the person, or that you are listening simply out of courtesy?
My laptop at my desk faces the wall. When Mike, my assistant, comes in the room with a question, my inclination is to keep my fingers on the keyboard, look over my shoulder, and say curtly, “Yeah. Whadda ya need?” It would be very efficient. It would also be rude, dismissive, and undermine any positive relationship that I have built with him. Instead, I turn away from my computer, roll my chair over to the table in my office, motion for him to sit down, and say, “Mike, what can I do for you?”
I behave that way because it’s important to treat everyone with respect. But if that’s not your perspective on work relationships, here’s another reason to behave that way. Because I take the time to give Mike the attention he needs to ask his questions or convey his points, I get better results from him. He feels engaged at work. He puts in the extra effort to do a good job. And, most importantly, I get what I need from him, usually the first time around. By focusing more on what he needs to get out of the exchange, I get what I want, and I get it faster, better, and with a more positive attitude than if I had taken the shortcut and been more wrapped up in my needs. In addition, if I behave that way consistently, then in the occasional instance when I do have to be a bit short with Mike, my behavior comes across as the aberration, and it’s forgiven.
We all lead busy professional lives. We have to juggle competing demands. So while we’re sitting in the meeting listening to our client, we’re also thinking about the email we got in the elevator this morning, the proposal that’s due tomorrow, the conversation we have to have with our boss, and what the office cafeteria is serving for lunch.
How do you keep your mind focused on the meeting you’re in at the moment?
Take notes. Taking notes can convey to a client or colleague that you are fully engaged as a listener.
Unless you are a court stenographer, your job in a meeting isn’t to take dictation. If you’re busy writing down every word the person says, you can’t be listening for meaning, and you diminish yourself in the room. Instead, you should be listening so carefully to what the speaker says that you can jot down a few words for every few sentences, just enough to grasp the kernel of important information.
Your notes will also help you remember what’s been said at the meeting. We’re all capable of remembering the three or four salient points that come out of a half-hour meeting. However, the minute someone says, “Okay, I think we’re done” and closes the meeting, most of us immediately check our phones or BlackBerrys. At the end of the meeting, the key points were at the forefront of your mind. The minute you check your messages, everything in the meeting gets pushed back in your brain, becoming secondary in importance. Then one of the messages prompts you to make a quick phone call. Now everything in the meeting is diminished further. We’ve all looked at our notes a few days after a meeting and said to ourselves, “Well, I knew what that meant when I wrote it, but I haven’t got a clue what it means now.” If you’re like most people, you wrote down nouns. We tend to write down the concrete. When someone says, “Okay, I think we’re done” and ends the meeting, before you look at your messages, look at your notes. Flesh out your notes by adding verbs to the nouns. When you put a verb and a noun together, you have a full thought. Now those notes will make sense to you two days or two weeks after the meeting.
Your note taking also helps the other person feel heard. People feel that you’re paying attention when they see you jot down the occasional word. They also feel like you are more likely to follow through on what needs to be done when they see you write it down.
I was meeting with a colleague once. She was sharing some basic information and a few tasks that needed to be accomplished. I sat politely nodding, knowing that most of the information she was sharing was already in an email she had sent. I also knew, although she didn’t, that I had already done the first three of the five steps she outlined. However, since I wasn’t taking any notes, she felt uncomfortable with whether the tasks would be done. After a few minutes, she stopped speaking, handed me a pad and pen, and said, “Here. Please take some notes. It will make me feel better.”
I’ve mentioned a number of times how important it is to maintain eye contact. Taking notes is another communication strategy that tells the other person that you care and that you are engaged. Don’t worry about dropping your eyes for a few seconds to jot down a few words. Occasionally, I have seen people try to continue staring at a speaker while they simultaneously take notes. Don’t do that. The authenticity of your eye contact is diminished, as is the accuracy of your notes.
Most of us approach a conversation as if it’s a competition. I talk. When I pause, you jump in with your thoughts. When you pause, I jump back in so I can top your story or take over the conversation. It’s a fight for control. Instead of that, when the other person is done talking, say, “That’s really interesting” or “Tell me more about that.” That’s a world-view change on the nature of a conversation for the other person. He doesn’t have to fight to contribute. You’re actually welcoming more from him instead of taking the opportunity to turn the conversation back to you and your ideas. Think about it. When was the last time anyone said to you, “That’s really interesting. Tell me more”?
Listening skills are important not just for creating the right tone in the moment but also for building the right reputation. I mentioned earlier that we at Exec|Comm invested a full year in surveying participants in our programs to understand what people respond to from other people’s communication skills. We surveyed more than 1,800 people across a wide spectrum of professions. We provided a long list of communication skills, everything from a booming voice to a clear message, to a pleasant approach with people, and asked respondents to rank the top three skills they thought were most important for being a strong leader. “Being a good listener” was ranked number 1 by a huge margin over every other skill. When we returned to participants and asked, “Why listening skills?” they responded that a leader needs to be known as a good listener in order “to gain trust and respect.” We have all known people who aren’t good listeners. People tend to avoid them. They are viewed as being wrapped up in themselves. Think of someone at work who is known as a good listener. People seek that person’s advice and guidance because she comes across as looking at the bigger picture, as being able to see beyond herself.
If you want the trust and respect of those around you and if you want to be known as a strong leader, build a reputation for yourself as a good listener.
You’re heading into a meeting. You’re focused on many things—the information for the deal or the initiative, the competing agendas in the room, the relationships you are trying to build. These aren’t all distinct issues. They are interrelated. How do you think about the information in a way that helps you manage the group dynamics and foster better relationships? How do you avoid making assumptions that misdirect you?
Think about information like a pyramid. At the top of the pyramid, the smallest amount of information available is the content that you know that you know. You have complete command over that content. The next part of the pyramid, somewhat larger, is the information that you think you know. You’ll ask some confirming questions to make sure you got it right, but you’re pretty sure of that content already. The next, much broader, part of the pyramid is the information that you know that you don’t know. You have all sorts of questions to ask the other person or group to find out that information because you need it and don’t have it yet. But the huge base of the pyramid, the greatest amount of information out there, is the stuff you don’t even know you don’t know. You don’t have any questions written down to ask your client or your colleague because you don’t even know that content is out there.
Your job in any business meeting is to dig down until you’re uncovering information you didn’t even know you didn’t know. Early in our careers, when we are young and insecure, we tend to stay at the top of the pyramid. We only talk about the stuff that we know for sure or are fairly confident that we understand. This keeps us safe. I won’t make any mistakes if I only talk about the stuff I know inside out. We quickly learn we need to ask questions to make sure we learn. It takes a brave soul, however, to not only ask intelligent questions, but to listen so carefully to the answers that he can ask a follow-up question that delves deeper into an issue than he anticipated was necessary.
Your job when meeting with others is to assume there’s lots of stuff you didn’t know you didn’t know and to drill down to where you are hearing that type of content. That’s when we grow and can be more helpful to others.
Different types of questions elicit different responses, both verbal responses and emotional responses. Most conversations require a combination of open and closed questions. However, we all tend to be more comfortable asking closed questions. This means that in order to create a reputation for ourselves as good listeners, we need to ask more open-ended questions.
Closed-ended questions usually begin with “Did you. . .,” “Can you. . . ,” “Have you. . .,” “Would you. . ..” They can often be answered with a “yes” or a “no.” You receive a very narrow, specific answer.
Open-ended questions, on the other hand, usually begin with, “What,” “Why,” or “How,” and they require the other person to give a more complete and substantive answer.
Closed-ended questions are great if you need to get a specific piece of information and if you want someone to feel the pressure to make a decision. Open-ended questions ask the person to reflect and respond more completely. See the chart for some examples.
Closed | Open |
“Did you finish the memo?” May put pressure to get it done. |
“Where are you with the memo?” Might open a dialogue and facilitate a discussion around challenges completing an assignment. |
“Can you move the meeting to 3:00?” If that’s your only open slot, this is efficient. |
“What’s your schedule this afternoon?” Opens a discussion around options. |
“Have you tried Thai food before?” A “yes” or a “no” could be misinterpreted as “. . . and I’m open to having it again.” |
“How does Thai sound to you?” Gets more to the point and asks for opinion versus experience. |
Giving specific options in a closed-ended question is a closing technique employed in sales situations.
“Would you like to meet again on Tuesday or Wednesday?”
“Do you want the couch in red or blue?”
“When would you like us to start work on this?”
When you are encouraging someone to disclose more information, asking closed-ended questions simply isn’t as effective as asking open-ended questions.
Often when asked a closed-ended question, we will self-censor our answer.
You ask a client or colleague: “Any other challenges with this issue?”
The person responding thinks: “Well, there is that one little problem. . . .” But instead of raising the problem, he decides he’d rather move on and deal with it later or not at all, so he says, “No.” You’ve made it easy for him to dodge the question.
If instead, you ask, “What other challenges are you facing with this issue?” there’s almost a presumption that he is facing other problems, and he will feel compelled to share the challenge.
Asking open-ended questions helps you probe not just for content, but also for the feeling behind the issues. It also helps you avoid making assumptions.
“What are your concerns with this matter?”
“What are your priorities?”
You may think you know what their concerns are or should be because you have worked on similar issues on other deals or projects. But you don’t know what this particular client’s or colleague’s concerns actually are unless you ask.
“How has this issue affected you?”
“How did this problem begin?”
Both are better ways of delving into the issue than to ask:
The problem began with Q. Q isn’t even on your radar screen. It’s the stuff at the bottom of the pyramid. You are never going to ask about Q because you don’t know it exists. It’s much more efficient to just ask, “How did the problem begin?”
“Why do you think this problem is happening?”
Many people ask a wonderful, wide-open question like this, and then ruin it at the end.
“Why do you think this problem is happening? Is it because of A or B?”
Well, if the real answer is C, but you didn’t give me that as an option, then I answer “B” because that option is closest to the truth. Now I have given you misinformation, because you specifically asked me to give you misinformation. Instead, ask, “Why do you think this problem is happening?”
Have you ever been two weeks or three months into a project when the client shares a fundamental piece of information with you? Most of us with any significant work tenure have had that happen. You bite your tongue, smile weakly, and say to the client: “Well that’s important, so thanks for sharing it.” In your head, however, you’re screaming, “Well, if you’d told me that two weeks ago, we would have saved a lot of time!” or “If you’d shared that three months ago, we would have done this whole thing differently!”
Chances are the client didn’t know what was important. From today forward, think about turning around the burden implicit in that statement. Instead of thinking: “It would have been nice if you shared that,” think: “It would have been nice if I had asked the right questions three months ago.” That burden is on us as good listeners.
Our job, regardless of our role or career, is to be helpful to other people. If what you do at work isn’t helpful to someone else, your role won’t exist for long. So how do we make sure we’re being truly helpful to others? We could ask.
Here are three helpful questions to keep in mind. Note that two are open-ended and one is closed-ended.
Let’s examine each.
How can I help? It’s the most basic question, and yet all too often we don’t ask it. We want to show how smart we are by assuming we know what another person wants. We don’t. We can’t. We’re better off asking. If you routinely start conversations with “How can I help?” and then do what the person instructs, you build a reputation for yourself as a good listener and someone focused on the needs of the other person.
What would be most helpful to you? “Most,” “helpful,” and “you,” all in the same sentence. You’ll be surprised how people react to this question. I taught a program for 60 in-house lawyers at a global chemical company two years ago. We engaged in several exercises on listening skills. Then I distributed to each person a small card with these three questions printed on one side and suggested they keep them by their phones to encourage better questioning. After we returned from a short break, I started to address the next topic, but I was interrupted by one of the participants. He said, “I just need to share something with the group.” Turning to his colleagues he said, “During the break, I had to call the head of the business unit I support. We have been battling back and forth on a key issue for weeks, without any progress. I had this card in my hand, so I just asked, ‘Jack, what would be most helpful to you?’ And would you believe it, he paused, relaxed, and said, ‘Well, since you asked,’ and then he told me what would work for him. I think we would have gotten there eventually, but it certainly saved us a lot of back and forth and some nasty conversations.”
Would it be helpful to you if I . . .? Sometimes we can tell from a person’s tone that they are wandering in the wilderness. They have no idea what to do with the situation they are in. In that case, “What would be most helpful to you?” will only frustrate them. They haven’t got a clue. Instead, offering an option based on your own experience allows you to be more helpful. However, it’s done not as a directive or because you like to pontificate. It’s done because you want to be helpful, which is why it’s important to start with, “Would it be helpful to you. . . .” You are making it clear that you only want to go down a certain path if it’s genuinely helpful to the other person.
I started using these questions years ago when my kids were much younger. I would walk in the house after work. My wife, Mary, would be standing at the stove making dinner. Two kids would be at the kitchen table doing homework. The other two would be off doing God-knows-what. I like to be helpful, so I would assess the situation, see a sink full of mixing bowls, measuring spoons, and spatulas, and start washing dishes. Within a few minutes Mary would say, “Honey, I really appreciate you doing that, but John has to get to Scouts, Sam needs help on his science project, Teresa needs to be in here doing her homework, and Maggie needs to be in the bathtub.”
I learned very quickly that I was much more helpful if, instead of making assumptions about what needed to be done, I just asked, “Honey, what would be most helpful to you?”
Even with excellent listening and probing skills, you can’t guarantee every conversation will help you gather useful information. Everyone with teenagers knows this all too well.
“How was school today?”
“Fine.”
“What did you do in class?”
“Nothing.”
“What did you learn?”
“I don’t know.”
“Who did you talk to?”
“No one.” Sigh. “Why do you ask me the same questions every day?”
“Because I care. What else are you doing this afternoon?”
“Nothing. Can I go now?”
“Sure.”
Sometimes we ask because just asking is the important part.
When you listen effectively, you don’t just learn new information; you challenge the perspective you already had. You learn to make fewer assumptions.
We all hear “buzz” words when someone else is talking—words that have a certain meaning for us, but may not be the meaning the speaker intends. During a conversation, you want to confirm what you have heard from the speaker so that you stay on track. We call these “you statements.” There are three components to an effective you statement:
The introductory phrase lets the person know you are about to parrot back his or her own idea. Some examples:
“So, if I’m hearing you correctly. . . .”
“Based on your comments, you believe. . . .”
“I think you’ve shared. . . . .”
When restating the person’s opinion, you can restate her comment almost verbatim, summarize a few of her points, or reframe her comments in language that you think mirrors her underlying intent. This restatement lets the speaker know you were paying attention.
Finally, you want to end with a question that conveys to the speaker that your only intent on reframing her statement is to make sure you understood her.
“So, if I’m hearing you correctly, your biggest concern with this initiative is ‘X.’ Is that right?”
By ending with “Is that right?” you reinforce that you aren’t co-opting or twisting the speaker’s words for your own needs, but that you truly want to understand her.
I was once teaching listening skills at an accounting firm. We ran an exercise wherein participants would work in pairs to ask each other open-ended questions. The topic for each person was “What’s the toughest job you ever had?” We hadn’t yet discussed the idea of confirming and clarifying the speaker’s statements. I overheard the following exchange.
The conversation progressed a bit further, but soon I could see they were both in trouble, so I interrupted. I turned to the speaker and said, “These organs you’re talking about, they’re similar to player pianos, right?”
“Yes,” he replied.
“Oh!” the listener said. “I thought you were selling, like, kidneys!”
The listener heard the word “organs” and made an assumption. He traveled down a path that seemed reasonable to him. (I didn’t bother to tell him that selling human organs is illegal in this country.) While both participants in the class laughed about the exchange, if this had been a real client conversation on a substantive business topic and the accountant had completely misconstrued the speaker’s intent, he would have wasted a huge amount of time and the client’s money researching a topic or investigating an issue that was moot. We all make assumptions. Confirming what you think you heard is an important part of being a more effective and efficient communicator.
In order to foster the sense that you are focused on the needs of the other person, you must manage your tone when confirming what someone has said to you.
The introductory phrase is important.
“You think the most important issue we’re facing is ‘X’!,” with the emphasis at the start of the sentence, conveys “Are you nuts?” or “Do you not understand the issues?”
By adding an introductory clause, you emphasize that your focus is on grasping the message: “So, if I understand you correctly, you think the most important issue we’re facing is ‘X.’ Is that right?”
After you have listened well, probed for more details and deeper understanding, and then confirmed what you have heard, you can finally share your thoughts. When you share your opinion, to the extent it differs from the other person’s opinion, you will need to justify why you disagree. We do this all the time in our personal lives.
The “why” behind the second person’s response helps provide a rationale and avoids a flat-out disagreement.
We all have these discussions frequently at work. If we voice a different opinion without a rationale, we have a stalemate.
Now it’s a faceoff. The only matter before us is the fact that we disagree. Depending on our history of working together or our individual approach to a disagreement, we either dig in our heels and insist on having our way, or we put off the decision until we can rally more people to our side. Neither is a particularly healthy nor productive approach.
But when you explain the basis for your opinion, you and your colleague have something to talk about. If you don’t explain why you believe in a certain course of action, the other person will make assumptions. He or she has no choice but to do so since you aren’t explaining yourself. There’s also a good chance he or she will misinterpret your intent. Since we can’t get inside other people’s heads, we can only project our own motivations onto them, which leads to further confusion. Also, by providing a rationale, we can look for common ground from which to work together.
Now we have a conversation. The rationales behind the opinions and not the disagreement itself become the focus of the discussion. Identifying the common ground creates a sense of kinship and a commitment to solving the problem.