Bibliography

Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.

Alkire, S. (2005). “Why the capability approach?” Journal of Human Development 6, no. 1: 115–33.

“All about user experience” (n.d.). http://www.allaboutux.org/ (accessed September 20, 2013).

Aristotle (1893/2004). Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Barry, B. (1995). Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Battarbee, K. (2004). “Co-experience: Understanding User Experiences in Social Interaction.” Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.

Battarbee, K. and Koskinen, I. (2005). “Co-experience: user experience as interaction.” CoDesign 1, no. 1: 5–18.

Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Giannachi, G., Walker, B., Marshall, J., and Rodden, T. (2013). “Uncomfortable User Experience.” Communications of the ACM 56, no. 9: 66–73.

Bentham J. (1824/2004). “An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation.” In Ryan, A. (ed.), John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham—Utilitarianism and Other Essays. London: Penguin Books.

Bevan, N. (1992). “The MUSiC methodology for usability measurement.” Proceedings of ACM CHI’92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 123–4.

Bevan, N. (2009). “Extending Quality in Use to Provide a Framework for Usability Measurement.” Proceedings of HCI International 2009, San Diego. Heidelberg: Springer, 13–22.

Bevan, N. (2010). “Extending the concept of satisfaction in ISO standards.” KEER2010, Paris, March 2–4, 2010.

Bevan, N. and Curson, I. (1999). “Planning and implementing user-centred design.” Proceedings of CHI’99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 137–8.

Bevan, N. and Macleod, M. (1994). “Usability measurement in context.” Behavior and Information Technology 13, no. 1/2: 132–45.

Bevan, N., Kirakowsky, J., and Maissel, J. (1991). “What is usability?” In Bullinger H.-J. (ed.), Human Aspects in Computing: Design and Use of Interactive Systems and Work with Terminals. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 651–5.

Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. (1989). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Binder, M. and Witt, U. (2012). “A critical note on the role of the capability approach for sustainability economics.” Journal of Socio-Economics 41: 721–5.

Boehner, K., Vertesi. J., Sengers, P., and Dourish, P. (2007). “How HCI interprets the probes.” Proceeding of CHI07 Conference. New York: ACM Press.

Borg, G. A. V. (1982). “Psychophysical bases for perceived exertion.” Medicine in Science in Sports and Exercise 14, no. 5: 377–81.

Borning, A. and Muller, M. (2012). “Next Steps for Value Sensitive Design.” Proceedings of CHI’12 Conference. New York: ACM Press, 1125–34.

Burns, C., Cottam. H., Vanstone, C., and Winhall, J. (2006). “Transformation design.” Design Council Red Paper 02. http://www.designcouncil.info/mt/RED/transformation/TransformationDesignFinalDraft.pdf (accessed February 18, 2013).

Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy. London: Earthscan.

Chen, M. J., Fan, X., and Moe, S. T. (2002). “Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis.” Journal of Sports Sciences 20: 873–99.

Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., and Norman, K. L. (1988). “Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human–computer interface.” Proceedings of the CHI 1988 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 213–18.

Cockton, G. (2006). “Designing worth is worth designing.” In Mørch, A. I., Morgan, K., Bratteteig, T., Ghosh, G., and Svanaes, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. New York: ACM Press, 165–74.

Cockton, G. (2008a). “Designing worth—Connecting preferred means to desired ends.” Interactions 15, no. 4: 54–7.

Cockton, G. (2008b). “Revisiting usability’s three key principles.” Proceedings of CHI ‘08 Conference. New York: ACM Press, 2473–84.

Cockton, G. (2012a). “UCD: Critique via Parody and a Sequel.” Proceedings of CHI’12 Conference. New York: ACM Press.

Cockton, G. (2012b). “Refuser (Centered Design)—Moving On, Moving Out, Moving Up.” Interactions (November–December): 8–9.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2011). “Human development or human enhancement? A methodological reflection on capabilities and the evaluation of information technologies.” Ethics in Information Technology 13: 81–92.

Cooper, R. (2010). “Ethics and altruism: what constitutes socially responsible design?” Design Management Review 16, no. 3: 10–18.

Corbett, M., Macleod, M., and Kelly, M. (1993). “Quantitative usability evaluation—the ESPRIT MUSiC project.” In Smith, M. J. and Salvendy, G. (eds.), Human Computer Interaction: Applications and Case Studies. Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics, 19 A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 313–18.

Corning, P. (2012). The Fair Society: The Science of Human Nature and the Pursuit of Social Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Daly, E. (2010). “Personal autonomy in the travel panopticon.” Ethics and Information Technology 12, no. 2: 97–108.

Davis, F. D. (1993). “User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user performance and behavioral impacts.” International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 38: 475–87.

Design for Wellbeing (n.d.). http://www.designforwellbeing.org/ (accessed February 18, 2013).

Desmet, P. M. A. and Hekkert, P. (2007). “Framework of product experience.” International Journal of Design 1, no. 1: 57–66.

Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., and Oswald, A. (2003). “Preferences over inflation and unemployment. Evidence from surveys of happiness.” American Economic Review 91: 335–341.

Dong, A. (2008). “The policy of design: a capabilities approach.” Design Issues 24, no. 4: 76–87.

Dong, A., Sarkar, S., Nichols, C., and Kvan, T. (2013). “The capability approach as a framework for the assessment of policies toward civic engagement in design.” Design Studies 34, no. 3: 326–44.

Dorst, K. (2011). “The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application.” Design Studies 32: 521–32.

Doyal, L. (1998). “A theory of human need.” In Brock, G. (ed.), Necessary Goods: Our Responsibilities to Meet Other’s Needs. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 157–72.

Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. Houndmills: Macmillan.

Dreyfuss, H. (1955/2003). Designing for People. New York: Allworth Press.

Dugueney, P. and Thimbleby, H. (1999). “Justice and Design.” In Sasse, A. M. and Johnson, C. (eds.) Proceedings of Human–Computer Interaction—Interact ’99. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 281–6.

Eason, K. D. (1984). “Towards the experimental study of usability.” Behaviour and Information Technology 3, no. 2: 357–64.

Fitzgerald, L. and van Hooft, S. (2007). “A Socratic dialogue on the question ‘what is love in nursing?’” Nursing Ethics 7, no. 6: 481–92.

Forlizzi, J. and Battarbee, K. (2004). “Understanding experience in interactive systems.” Proceedings of DIS’04 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. New York: ACM Press, 261–8.

Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury Fever: Weighing the Cost of Excess. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Friedman, B. and Freier, N. G. (2005). “Value sensitive design.” In Fisher, K. E., Edrelez, S., and McKechnie, E. F. (eds.), Theories in Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide. Medford: Information Today, 268–372.

Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., and Borning, A. (2006). “Value sensitive design and information systems.” In Zhang, P. and Galetta, D. (eds.), Human–Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 348–72.

Gallagher, V. J., Martin, K. N., and Ma, M. (2011). “Visual wellbeing: intersections of rhetorical theory and design.” Design Issues 27, no. 2: 25–39.

Gasper, D. (2007). “What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers.” Journal of Socio-Economics 36: 335–59.

Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B. (2004). “Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty.” Interactions (September–October): 53–6.

Gaver, W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. (1999). “Cultural probes.” Interactions 6, no. 1: 21–9.

Gose, M. (2009). “When Socratic dialogue is flagging: questions and strategies for engaging students.” College Teaching 57, no. 1: 45–9.

Gould, J. D. and Lewis, C. (1985). “Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think.” Communications of the ACM 28, no. 3: 300–11.

Greenbaum, J. M. and Kyng, M. (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gutman, J. A. (1982). “Means–ends chain model based on consumer categorization process.” Journal of Marketing 46: 60–72.

Hallnäs, L. and Redström, J. (2001). “Slow technology—designing for reflection.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, no. 3: 201–12.

Hanington, B. (2003). “Methods in the making: a perspective on the state of human research in design.” Design Issues 19, no. 4: 9–18.

Hassenzahl, M. (2005). “The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product.” In Blythe, M. A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. F., and Wright, P. C. (eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 31–42.

Hassenzahl, M. (2008). “User experience: Towards an experiential perspective on product quality.” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme–Machine. New York: ACM Press, 11–15.

Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N. (2006). “User experience—a research agenda.” Behaviour and Information Technology 25, no. 2: 91–7.

Hassenzahl, M., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., Laschke, M., Lenz, E., and Kim, J. (2013). “Designing moments of meaning and pleasure: Experience design and happiness.” International Journal of Design 7, no. 3: 21–31.

Hayek, F. A. (1969/2011). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heikkinen, T. (2013). “Design Credo: The Making of Design Tools as a Personal Theory Building Process.” Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki: Aalto ARTS Books.

Helliwell, J. (2003). “How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being.” Economic Modelling 20: 331–60.

Hertzum, M. (2010). “Images of usability.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 26, no. 6: 567–600.

Hornbæk, K. (2006). “Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 64, no. 2: 79–102.

Hulkko, S., Mattelmäki, T., Virtanen, K., and Keinonen, T. (2004). “Mobile probes.” Proceedings of NordiCHI’04. New York: ACM Press, 43–51.

ICSID (n.d.). http://www.icsid.org/ (accessed February 14, 2013).

Ilstedt Hjelm, S. (2004). “Making Sense—Design for well-being.” Doctoral thesis. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

ISO (1991). International Standard ISO 9126: Information technology—Software product evaluation—Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

ISO (1998). International Standard ISO 9241. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11, Guidance on usability. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

ISO (2010). International Standard ISO 9241. Ergonomics of human system interaction – Part 210, Human-centered design for interactive systems. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

Jaggard, A. M. (2006). “Reasoning about well-being: Nussbaum’s methods of justifying the capabilities.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 3: 301–22.

Jespersen, J. L., Albrechtslund, A., Øhrstrøm, P., Hasle, P., and Albretsen, J. (2007). “Surveillance, persuasion, and panopticon.” Proceedings PERSUASIVE’07. Heidelberg: Springer, 109–20.

Jokela, T. (2004). “Evaluating the user-centredness of development organisations: conclusions and implications from empirical usability capability maturity assessments.” Interacting with Computers 16, no. 6: 1095–132.

Jokela, T., Sipponen, M., Hirasawa, N., and Earthy, J. (2006). “A survey of usability capability maturity models: implications for practice and research.” Behaviour and Information Technology 25, no. 3: 263–82.

Jones, J. C. (1970/1992). Design Methods. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.

Jordan, P. (2002). Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. London: Taylor & Francis.

Kaasinen, E. and Norros, L. (eds.) (2007). Älykkäiden ympäristöjen suunnittelu—Kohti ekologista systeemiajattelua [Design of Intelligent Environments—Towards An Ecological System Approach]. Helsinki: Teknologiateollisuus.

Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., and Sarin, R. (1997). “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (May 1997): 375–405.

Keinonen, T. (1998). “One-dimensional usability—Influence of usability on consumers’ product preference.” Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.

Keinonen, T. (2009a). “User need—a fuzzy link between design and use.” IASDR’09 Conference, Seoul, October 18–22, 2009.

Keinonen, T. (2009b). “Design method—Instrument, competence or agenda? Multiple ways to design research.” Swiss Design Research Network Symposium 09, Lugano, Switzerland, November 12–13, 2009.

Keinonen, T. (2009c). “Design contribution square.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 23: 142–8.

Keinonen, T. (2009d). “Immediate and remote design of complex environments.” Design Issues 25, no. 3: 62–74.

Keinonen, T. (2013). “Design, wellbeing and design for wellbeing.” In Keinonen, T., Vaajakallio, K., and Honkonen, J. (eds.), Designing for Wellbeing. Helsinki: Aalto ARTS Books, 9–25.

Keinonen, T., Vaajakallio, K., and Honkonen, J. (eds.) (2013). Designing for Wellbeing. Helsinki: Aalto ARTS Books.

Khan, C. H. (1998). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kinnunen, K., Kivelä, K., and Tyyri-Pohjonen, S. (eds.) (2013). Living+ For Better Living Environments. Helsinki: Aalto ARTS Books.

Kirakowski, J. and Corbett, M. (1993). “SUMI: The software usability measurement inventory.” British Journal of Educational Technology 24: 210–12.

Knezic, D., Wubbels, T., Elbers, E., and Hajer, M. (2010). “The Soctaric dialogue and teacher education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 1104–11.

Kola, J.-P. (2013). “We have always been here before: on design courting real disciplines.” In Keinonen, T., Vaajakallio, K., and Honkonen, J. (eds.), Designing for Wellbeing. Helsinki: Aalto ARTS Books, 38–56.

Koskela, H. (2008). “Mobile probes informing the design of clinical communication systems.” Proceedings of CHI 2008. New York: ACM Press.

Koskinen, I., Mattelmäki, T., and Battarbee, K. (2003). Empathic Design: User Experience in Product Design. Helsinki: IT Press.

Kramer, M. A. M., Reponen, E., and Obrist, M. (2008). “MobiMundi: exploring the impact of user-generated mobile content—the participatory panopticon.” Proceedings MobileHCI ‘08. New York: ACM Press, 575–7.

Kumar, V. and Whitney, P. (2007). “Daily life, not markets: Customer-centered design.” Journal of Business Strategy 28, no. 4: 46–58.

Kurosu, M. and Kashimura, K. (1995). “Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability.” Proceedings of CHI’95 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 292–3.

Kuutti, K. (2009). “Artifact, Activities and Design Knowledge.” In Poggenpohl, S. and Sato, K. (eds.), Design Integrations: Research and Collaboration. Bristol: Intellect.

Larson, C. E. and LaFasto, F. M. J. (1989). Teamwork: What Must Go Right, What Can Go Wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Law, E. L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., and Kort, J. (2009). “Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach.” Proceedings of CHI’09 Conference. New York: ACM Press, 719–28.

Lawson, B. (1997). How Designers Think. 3rd edn. New York: Architectural Press.

Lawson, B. and Dorst, K. (2009). Design Expertise. Oxford: Elsevier.

Layard, R. (2005). Happiness Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press.

Lee, S. and Koubek, R. J. (2010). “Understanding user preferences based on usability and aesthetics before and after actual use.” Interacting with Computers 22, no. 6: 530–43.

Lévi-Stauss, C. (1966). Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Liao, T. (2013). “Designing wellbeing through story telling.” In Keinonen, T., Vaajakallio, K., and Honkonen, J. (eds.), Designing for Wellbeing. Helsinki: Aalto ARTS Books, 72–86.

Lindgaard, G. (2007). “Aesthetics, visual appeal, usability and user satisfaction: What do the user’s eyes tell the user’s brain?” Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 5: 1–14.

Lindgaard, G. and Kirakowsky, J. (2013). “Introduction to the Special Issue: The Tricky Landscape of Developing Rating Scales in HCI.” Interacting with Computers 25, no. 4: 271–7.

Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., and Brown, J. (2006). “Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression!” Behaviour and Information Technology 25, no. 2: 115–26.

Loch, C. H., DeMeyer, A., and Pich, M. T. (2006). Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to Managing High Uncertainty and Risk in Projects. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. (2007). Thoughtful Interaction Design—A Design Perspective on Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Luojus, S. (2010). “From a momentary experience to a lasting one – The concept of and research on expanded user experience of mobile devices.” Doctoral dissertation. Oulu: University of Oulu.

MacIntyre, A. (1981/2011). After Virtue. 3rd edn. London: Bloomsbury.

Mäkelä, A. and Fulton-Suri, J. (2001). “Supporting users’ creativity: design to induce pleasurable experiences.” In Helander, M. G., Khalid, H. M., and Tham, M. P. (eds.), Proceedings of The International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design. London: Asian Academic Press, 387–91.

Mattelmäki, T. (2005). “Applying probes—from inspirational notes to collaborative insights.” CoDesign 1, no. 2: 83–102.

Mattelmäki, T. (2006). “Design Probes.” Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.

Mattelmäki, T. and Battarbee, K. (2002). “Empathy probes.” Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2002, Malmö, Sweden, 266–71.

McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. (2004). Technology as Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McNamara, N. and Kirakowski, J. (2006). “Functionality, usability, and user experience: three areas of concern.” Interactions 13, no. 6: 26–8.

Melles, G., de Vere, I., and Misic, V. (2011). “Socially responsible design: thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design.” CoDesign 7, no. 3–4: 143–54.

Mill, J. S. (1871/2004). “Utilitarianism.” In Ryan, A. (ed.), John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham—Utilitarianism and Other Essays. London: Penguin Books.

Morrell, K. (2004). “Socratic dialogue as a tool for teaching business ethics?” Journal of Business Ethics 53: 383–92.

Mulgan, T. (2007). Understanding Utilitarianism. Stocksfield: Acumen.

Murphy, C. and Gardoni, P. (2010). “Assessing capability instead of achieved functionings in risk analysis.” Journal of Risk Research 13, no. 2: 137–47.

Naves Pinheiro, P. (2013). “Self-initiated design business: Prevalent actions in design entrepreneurship.” Masters thesis. Aalto University, Department of Design.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press.

Nielsen, J. and Mack, R. L. (1998). Usability Inspection Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Niinimäki, K. (2011). “From Disposable to Sustainable—The Complex Interplay between Design and Consumption of Textiles and Clothing.” Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki: Aalto ARTS Books.

Norman, D. A. (1993). The Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer Is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.

Norman, D. A. (2005). “Human-centered design considered harmful.” Interactions 12, no. 4: 14–19.

Norman, D. A. and Draper, S. W. (1986). User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human–Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capability Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

O’Brien, H. L. (2010). “The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences.” Interacting with Computers 22, no. 5: 344–52.

Oosterlaken, I. (2009). “Design for development—a capability approach.” Design Issues 25, no. 4: 91–102.

Oosterlaken, I. (2013). “Taking a Capability Approach to Technology and Its Design; A Philosophical Exploration.” Doctoral dissertation. Delft: Centre for Ethics and Technology.

Papanek, V. (1971/2006). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. 2nd edn. London: Thames & Hudson.

Paulsson, G. (1919/1995). Vackrare vardagsvara. Stockholm: Svenska Skjöldföreningen.

Petroski, H. (2006). Success Through Failure: The Paradox of Design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Petroski, H. (2012). To Forgive Design: Understanding Failure. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Pogge, T. (2003). “Can the Capability Approach be justified?” Philosophical Topics 30, no. 2: 167–228.

Randall, D., Harper, R., and Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. London: Springer.

Rasmussen, J. and Jensen, A. (1974). “Mental procedures in real-life tasks: a case study of electronic troubleshooting.” Ergonomics 17: 293–307.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reader, S. (2006). “Does a basic needs approach need capabilities?” Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 3: 337–50.

Reader, S. (2007). Needs and Moral Necessity. New York: Routledge.

Reckwitz, A. (2002). “Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5, no. 2: 243–63.

Redström, J. (2006). “Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design.” Design Studies 27: 123–39.

Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. (1973). “Planning problems are wicked problems.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–69.

Robeyns, I. (2005). “The capability approach—a theoretical survey.” Journal of Human Development 6, no. 1: 93–114.

Robeyns, I. (2006). “The capability approach in practice.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 3: 351–76.

Ryan, A. (ed.) (2004). John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham—Utilitarianism and Other Essays. London: Penguin Books.

Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What’s the Right Thing To Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Sandel, M. J. (2012). What Money Can’t Buy—The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Schatzki, T. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schön, D. (1983). Reflective Practitioner—How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schulman, P. R. (1993). “The negotiated order of organizational reliability.” Administration and Society 25: 353–72.

Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland.

Sen, A. (1993). “Capability and Wellbeing.” In Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 30–50.

Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

Sen, A. (2010a). The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.

Sen, A. (2010b). “Reflections from and on the forum: The mobile and the world.” Information Technologies and International Development 6: 1–3.

Shackel, B. (1991). “Usability—context, framework, design and evaluation.” In Shackel, B. and Richardson, S. (eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–38.

Sheldon, K. M. and Elliot, A. J. (1999). “Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, no. 3: 482–97.

Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., and Kasser, T. (2001). “What Is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.” Journal of Personality and Soclal Psychology 80, no. 2: 325–39.

Simon, H. (1996). The Science of the Artificial. 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Skordoulis, R. and Dawson, P. (2007). “Reflective decisions: the use of Socratic dialogue in managing organizational change.” Management Decision 45, no. 6: 991–1007.

Smith, A. (1776/2004). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Stigler, G. J. (1950a). “The development of utility theory: I.” Journal of Political Economy LVIII: 307–27.

Stigler, G. J. (1950b). “The development of utility theory: II.” Journal of Political Economy LVIII: 373–96.

Sun, H., Fang, Y., and Hsieh, J. J. P.-A. (2014). “Consuming information systems: An economic model of user satisfaction.” Decision Support Systems 57 (January): 188–99.

Sundblad, Y. (2009). “From utopia 1981 to utopia 2008.” In Binder, T., Löwgren, J., and Lone Malmborg, L. (eds.), (Re)searching the Digital Bauhaus. London: Springer: 13–42.

Tenner, E. (1997). Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintented Consequences. New York: Vintage Books.

Teschl, M. and Comim, F. (2005). “Adaptive preferences and capabilities: Some preliminary conceptual explorations.” Review of Social Economy 58, no. 2 (June): 229–47.

Thackara, J. (2005). In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thomson, G. (1987). Need. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Tiger, L. (1992/2008). The Pursuit of Pleasure. 3rd edn. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Tractinsky, N. (1997). “Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues.” Proceedings of the CHI’97 Conference. New York: ACM Press, 115–22.

Tractinsky, N. and Zmiri, D. (2006). “Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI.” In Fishwick, P. A. (ed.), Aesthetic Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press, 405–22.

Tuch, A. N., Roth, S. P., Hornbæk, K., Opwis, K., and Bargas-Avila, J. A. (2012). “Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI.” Computers in Human Behavior 28, no. 5: 1596–1607.

Tullis, T. and Albert, B. (2008). Measuring User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

United Nations (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Annex to document A/42/427, Development and International Co-operation: Environment and Development. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm (accessed July 21, 2013).

Van Hooft, S. (1999). “Socratic Dialogue as collegial reasoning.” Practical Philosophy 2, no. 2: 22–31.

Veblen, T. (1899/2003). The Theory of the Leisure Class. A Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication. http://www.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/jimspdf.htm (accessed November 7, 2013).

Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. (2000). “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies.” Management Science 46, no. 2: 186–204.

Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Verganti, R. (2009). Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Law, E. L.-C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. (2010). “User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs.” Proceedings of NordiCHI’10 Conference, Reykjavik. New York: ACM Press, 521–30.

von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Boston: MIT Press.

Warde, A. (2005). “Consumption and theories of practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 5, no. 2: 131–53.

Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the Unexpected. 2nd edn. San Francisco: Wiley.

Whiteley, N. (1993). Design for Society. London: Reaktion Books.

Wolff, J. and De-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

Woolrych, A., Hornbæk, K., Frøkjær, E., and Cockton, G. (2011). “Ingredients and meals rather than recipes: A proposal for research that does not treat usability evaluation methods as indivisible wholes.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 27, no. 10: 940–70.

Wright, P. and McCarthy, J. (2008). “Empathy and experience in HCI.” Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 637–46.

Ylirisku, S. and Buur, J. (2007). Designing with Video: Focusing the User-Cented Design Process. London: Springer.