22

ON VOWS

Most of the Visitation Sisters I know joined the convent when they were young: nineteen, twenty, twenty-five. At the same age when their peers were getting married and starting families, these women were taking lifelong vows to celibacy, to live in community, to submit their own wills and desires to a rule of life devised by Saint Francis and Saint Jane over four hundred years ago.

But one morning in early May, Sister Karen invited me to come to something unusual: a first profession of vows for a woman in her fifties. Sister Brenda was formally entering the community. She had an unusual story: after living for decades as a Baptist missionary in Asia, Brenda had been confirmed in the Catholic Church just five years before, when she came to live and pray with the sisters at Visitation Monastery. She was an anomaly, an outlier, and a full twenty years younger than the next older sister in the community.

The first vows service was held at Ascension Catholic Church, where I had kissed the cross on Good Friday and where the sisters went to church each Sunday. I walked over from my house, making my way down Fremont to Broadway, passing empty lots and the newly opened gas station on the corner. The grass was a luminous green. A group of kids biked back and forth on the sidewalk while music blared from an open window. Trees were just starting to leaf out, their branches bobbing with mini leaves. The snow had finally melted and new life was emerging everywhere.

After walking past Broadway’s bus stops and storefronts and honking traffic, I turned right on Bryant Avenue. Already I could see the red brick and sandstone of the church, the towering white spire looming over the intersection a few blocks away. When it was founded in 1890, Ascension Catholic Church was home to Irish and German immigrants who lived in the surrounding Old Highland neighborhood. Now the Gothic-style church holds Masses in both English and Spanish, serving more recent immigrants to this area.

What would a first vows ceremony be like? I wondered. And what had led Brenda from a life as a Baptist missionary to a life as a Catholic nun?

I marched my way up the concrete stairs of the church, opened the heavy wooden doors, and walked into the sanctuary, which was about half full. Someone played a piano prelude in the background amid rumbles of chatter. Middle-aged people in church clothes—pastels and suit jackets, skirts and nylons—greeted one another, they hugged and shook hands. I looked down at my jeans, trying to smooth the wrinkles in my blouse before sliding into a pew behind two older women I recognized from Wednesday Mass at the monastery. The front of the church was decorated with potted flowers, all lavenders and pinks and cheerful mums. On a small table covered with a white cloth sat cut pink flowers in a glass vase, a white pillar candle, and a stand holding a heavy-looking, brown book.

Sister Mary Frances, dressed in a smart white pantsuit, welcomed the crowd. Processional music began, and a stream of people walked down the center aisle led by a woman carrying a tall, bronze crucifix. People carried candles, and one man in a white alb swung a bronze ball of incense back and forth, leaving a smoky perfume in the air.

Brenda appeared next, wearing a crimson brocade jacket and a corsage of roses and baby’s breath. She walked down the aisle with her mother. Next, her two biological sisters walked down the center aisle, followed by the Visitation nuns, two by two: Suzanne and Katherine, Mary Virginia and Karen. Finally, Mary Francis wheeled in Mary Margaret, who looked fragile and thin framed in the chair. It was the first time I had laid eyes on this founding sister of the monastery, who I often heard referred to as the “resident mystic.” She had just celebrated her ninetieth birthday and was mostly confined to her upstairs bedroom in the Girard House following a debilitating stroke. The sisters hired a skilled caregiver to come in the mornings, and they took turns sitting with her, acting, they said, as “Mary Margaret’s afternoon angel.”

The Visitation Sisters filed into the front pew, like seven beads on a string. I watched Brenda’s mother and sisters settle into a row behind them, and I wondered what her Protestant family thought of all this Catholic business, of the porcelain stations of the cross that ringed the sanctuary, of the statue of Mary in the alcove, of the dramatic white spires behind the altar, of the life-sized, bloody Jesus hanging on a wooden cross off to the side.

Had her mother instead imagined a wedding for her child, processing down the aisle someday in a humble Baptist church with no graven images of God, no special veneration of Mary or suspicious medieval saints, as a mother of the bride? Had she prayed for her Brenda’s spouse since she was a little girl, just as Josh’s mother once told me she had done for him?

The parallels to a wedding were inescapable: the corsage, the procession down the aisle, the vows. Presiding over the Mass was Father Dale, who remarked that there had not been a vow ceremony for a religious vocation at Ascension Church in decades.

Brenda had been a novice for two years prior, spending her novitiate studying the Visitation vows and living as a fully integrated member of the monastic community. Her experience is a very different one than many of the other Catholic sisters in the community, most of whom were novices before Vatican II when they wore special habits and didn’t see their family members for months upon entering the enclosure. In those days, first vows were even more like a wedding—some women wore wedding dresses as they became the brides of Christ.

Some nuns really get into the nuptial metaphors—their marriages to Jesus, their identity as Christ’s brides. But when I asked Sister Katherine later if she feels married to Jesus, she scoffed. Some people, she said, have this overly romantic idea when they make their monastic vows. (I later read in a book about the Visitation Sisters’ vocation stories that Sister Mary Frances, who once had a young man very interested in her romantically, heard God say to her: “I want you for myself.” This voice confirmed for her that she should join the convent instead.)

There is no theology in my tradition that encourages women to eschew marriage. Yet in one of Paul’s letters, he recommends Christ followers not to marry. Even Jesus says so in Luke’s gospel. When did that clear biblical admonition fall out of favor with evangelicals? Is there something very Protestant about rejecting celibacy as an honored way to serve God?

When I interviewed Brenda a few months later, she spoke to me about how hard it was to be a single woman in the Baptist church. “They didn’t know what to do with me,” she laughed, then described the tediously titled “Spares and Pairs” social groups in Texas churches where single women like her were essentially compared to extra parts. Even in the missionary community, it was hard to be single when most others were married with children. It’s no wonder that the monastery, with its rhythms of daily prayer, would be compelling in comparison.

Joining a monastic order is more than heeding the call to singleness, she told me. It’s about making vows to God and committing to live them out in community.

A few years back, Josh and I attended a different kind of vows ceremony—a wedding. We borrowed a minivan and drove to a family wedding in North Carolina, placating our antsy children with audiobooks and dry Cheerios during the long drive from my in-laws’ home. It had been threatening rain and stormy weather from the high winds at the coast that caused flooding in Louisiana. The sky was mottled with dark clouds. I leaned across the seat to where my husband was driving, touching his arm. “Look at the sky! Those clouds are brooding.”

“You’ve always loved a moody sky,” he said, grinning. He was right. “Let’s just hope it doesn’t rain.”

The wedding was at one of those farms-turned-event venues complete with a grain silo, distressed wooden fences, and a red vintage tractor. Everything was Pinterest worthy, from to the hand-lettered bulletins to the engagement photos framed in old windowpanes. Four-year-old Eliza snatched several of the complimentary sunglasses in delight, skipping down the mowed path to the wedding site. We sat on benches toward the back as we waited for the wedding to start, letting then-toddler Rowan wander to the edges where tall grass stood. Menacing clouds loomed overhead, but the rain held off.

One thing I can appreciate about a Baptist wedding is that ceremonies are generally short, cutting down the number of times we had to scary-whisper “be quiet” to our kids. The preacher didn’t give a sermon but rather facilitated something called the unity cross. The bride and groom each held parts of a cross: he, a metal cross outline and she, a curlicue wrought-iron piece that fit inside his. The preacher explained that the groom’s piece of the cross represents the protection, strength, and leadership he provides his bride, while the bride’s piece of the cross represents the beauty and many capabilities of the woman that fit inside her husband’s protection.

When they fit the pieces together to complete the cross, I fidgeted with my program and glanced over at Eliza, who was too busy poking her cousin and fiddling with her new sunglasses to pay attention. The preacher continued by placing three pegs in the completed cross, representing the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, to hold the sculpture—and marriage—together.

“Marriage is only possible through God,” the preacher said. “And God is the only foundation that can support a lasting commitment.”

That statement, plus the male headship theology in the unity cross, made me want to run for the hills. I leaned over to Josh again and gave his hand a desperate squeeze. He squeezed back.

The couple turned to look at each other and made their vows. Benedictine sister and feminist Joan Chittister once wrote that vows, whether in marriage or in monasticism, are intended to be a “public witness to Gospel values.” I softened as the couple spoke their solemn promises, which they had written themselves. They were beautiful. Vows are something, Chittister writes, to “take heart from, take hope from.”

After the ceremony, we walked over to the barn for the reception—our children now going rogue and plowing through tall prairie grasses, looking for grasshoppers to catch—and I briefly wondered if we were doing it all wrong. We also got married outdoors at a farm-turned-wedding venue; we also pledged to make God the foundation of our marriage covenant. What if the preacher was right, that God is the only foundation that can support a lasting commitment? Did the vows Josh and I had made still reflect Gospel values? Would they last?

Our wedding ceremony was not short. No less than three clergy officiated: Josh’s Baptist pastor grandfather (gave the welcoming prayer), my Presbyterian pastor mother (preached the homily and officiated our vows), and our Episcopalian priest at the time (celebrated Communion). Given the trinity of presiding pastors, who represented a mishmash of Christian traditions, we simplified by using a-straight-out-of-the-book liturgy.

You may have heard it before. It begins “Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today . . .” The vows from a “Celebration and Blessing of a Marriage” in the Book of Common Prayer are simple, traditional, and direct. We promised to have and to hold, in sickness and in health, till death us do part. As egalitarians, we committed to mutual submission in our union.

After we made our vows, the pastor prayed a blessing over us, asking for God’s assistance and grace “that with true fidelity and steadfast love they may honor and keep the promises and vows they make.” True fidelity. Steadfast love. Honoring and keeping promises and vows. In the photos from our ceremony, you can see the pillar-like clouds over our heads that some guests told us were a sign of the Holy Spirit.

Back in North Carolina, as we inched through the buffet line, greedily heaping our plates with pulled pork, coleslaw, and cornbread with honey butter, my brother and sisters-in-law chatted excitedly about the fact that this wedding—unlike any of the other family weddings they’d attended—had a dance floor and DJ. The small, independent Baptist church where Josh’s grandfather ministered for decades didn’t allow dancing in its fellowship hall.

After we ate too much barbecue and drank our sugary sweet teas, our table of “young marrieds” jumped up to watch the first dance between the new husband and wife. They slow danced to some top-40 love song that I was too out-of-touch to recognize, and Eliza stood on the sidelines, her hands clasped together, a shy smile on her face as she watched them sway and kiss.

Other married couples were then invited to join in the dancing. At one point the DJ announced, “Will all the couples who have been married for one year or less please exit the dance floor.” After a few moments he continued, dismissing couples who had been married two, five, ten years, and so on. Finally, only my husband’s grandparents were left. The DJ kept counting until he reached sixty years.

“Wow, folks, sixty years,” the DJ said, stepping out on the dance floor and approaching the couple with his microphone.

“Do you have any marital wisdom that you can share with this new couple?” he asked, pointing the microphone in Josh’s grandfather’s face.

He looked around, then said, “The only advice I have is adjust, adjust, adjust!” Everyone laughed.

When Josh first deconverted, a friend asked me if I thought this was grounds for dissolving the marriage. “Isn’t this a violation of the vows?” she asked me. The traditional Episcopal liturgy, which we used in our wedding, was centered on God through Jesus Christ our Lord. If Josh was no longer a Christian, did that nullify our marriage? Her question caught me off-guard.

Not all marriages can (or should) survive a faith-shift; sometimes people can’t make their love “free of religious conditions,” as my friend Caroline had said. Sometimes people change in unhealthy or destructive or abusive ways, and the vows need to be broken.

Still, I want to believe that our vows are holy despite the ways we have changed. That marriage is not a dated institution but a means for God to refine us into better versions of our selves. That adjust, adjust, adjust is like a polishing rag, not a pounding cleaver. Some days I’m not so sure. I don’t want to resent Josh for not being a Christian. In our most honest moments, Josh has told me that he wishes I had lost my faith too.

I will never know what the experience of living a lifelong monastic calling is like, of entering a convent at age nineteen or even fifty, but I do know something about honoring vows. I wore a white dress and held Josh’s hands and we made promises to each other at age twenty-five that we had no idea how to keep. In her book Acedia and Me, Kathleen Norris wrote: “The very nature of marriage means saying yes before you know what it will cost. Though you may say the ‘I do’ of the wedding ritual in all sincerity, it is the testing of that vow over time that makes you married.”

There is no doubt that vows are what hold marriages and monastic communities together; they make stability possible. But vows can be costly; our partners and institutions change, we change, and sixty years is a long time to live with someone you fell in love with at age eighteen.

Maybe how we understand those vows needs to change as well.

Benedictine Sister Joan Chittister has written extensively about the vows of religious life, criticizing their outdated framework. She wrote: “What the world needs now, respects now, demands now, understands now is not poverty, chastity and obedience. It is generous justice, reckless love and limitless listening.” I love the way Chittister reimagines the commitments she and her fellow sisters have made, expanding their definitions to make room for a new era.

Later when I ask Sister Brenda about her vow ceremony, she tells me that many religious women rearticulate their vows when they celebrate twenty-five, fifty, or sixty years. “While each congregation has a vow formula that they recite at first vows, we often rewrite them for ourselves and our own understanding,” she said.

Maybe Josh and I will rewrite our vows using new language that reflects who we are now, like my friend Caroline and her husband, Jake, did. But even if we do, we don’t need a ceremony to renew our vows. We renew them each time we give each other permission to change or when we reject fear. We renew them each time we choose to connect beyond our spiritual identities, when we have empathy for each other’s struggles.

Regardless of what words we use to articulate our vows, it’s our stability, our fidelity, that “makes growth possible by forcing us to choose and choose again.” Our vows are only as strong as the way we live them, day after day.