References

  1. AAUW (American Association of University Women). (n.d.). Who we are. Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/who-we-are
  2. Achieve, Inc. (2017a). Next Generation Science Standards: DCI Arrangements of the Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/AllDCI.pdf
  3. Achieve, Inc. (2017b). Topic arrangementt of the Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/AllTopic.pdf
  4. Ackoff, R., & Greenberg, D. (2008). Turning learning right side up: Putting education back on track. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  5. ACT, Inc. (2019). Preparing for the ACT test. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/Preparing-for-the-ACT.pdf
  6. Alesch, K. E., & Niblack-Rickard, F. E. (2018). The effect of goal setting and student self-reflection on motivation and on task behavior in the upper elementary public Montessori environment. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1282&context=maed
  7. Allday, R., Bush, M., Ticknor, N., & Walker, L. (2011). Using teacher greetings to increase speed to task engagement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 393–393. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51254238_Using_teacher_greetings_to_increase_speed_to_task_engagement
  8. Allday, R. A. (2011). Responsive management: Practical strategies for avoiding overreaction to minor misbehavior. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(5), 292–298. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.838.1619&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  9. Allday, R. A., & Pakurar, K. (2007). Effects of teacher greetings on student on-task behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 317–320. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.86-06
  10. Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic engagement: An overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41–52. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1121524.pdf
  11. Andrade, H. G. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education, 4(4), 1–22. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=http://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1005&context=etap_fac_scholar
  12. Archaeological Institute of America. (n.d.). Lesson plans. Retrieved from https://www.archaeological.org/programs/educators/lesson-plans
  13. Asari, S., Ma'Rifah, U., & Arifani, Y. (2017). The use of cooperative round robin discussion model to improve students' holistic ability in TEFL class. International Education Studies, 10(2), 139–147. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1130616.pdf
  14. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2011). What is performance assessment? Retrieved from https://pdo.ascd.org/lmscourses/PD11OC108/media/Designing_Performance:Assessment_M2_Reading_Assessment.pdf
  15. Bae, S., & Kokka, K. (2016). Student engagement in assessments: What students and teachers find engaging. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education and Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity. Retrieved from https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/student-engagement-assessments-final.pdf
  16. Bauernfeind, N. M. (2016). The impact of movement on student learning and engagement. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5174&context=hse_all
  17. Bayraktar, A. (2013). Nature of interactions during teacher-student writing conferences: Revisiting the potential effects of self-efficacy beliefs. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 63–86. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059851.pdf
  18. Beach, E. (2018). Hydro power vs solar power advantages. Retrieved from https://sciencing.com/hydro-power-vs-solar-power-advantages-6513.html
  19. Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  20. Berwick, C. (2019, March 12). Keeping girls in STEM: 3 barriers, 3 solutions. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/keeping-girls-stem-3-barriers-3-solutions
  21. Biddle, S. (2012). The 10 greatest (accidental) inventions of all time. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/38870091/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/t/greatest-accidental-inventions-all-time/#.XA2vxWhKhPY
  22. Bigelow, K. E. (2012). Designing for success: Developing engineers who consider universal design principles. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(3), 211–225. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ994287.pdf
  23. Billings, E., & Walqui, A. (n.d.). Topic Brief 3: De-mystifying complex texts: What are “complex” texts and how can we ensure ELLs/MLLs can access them? New York, NY: New York State Education Department. Retrieved from http://www.nysed.gov/bilingual-ed/topic-brief-3-de-mystifying-complex-texts-what-are-complex-texts-and-how-can-we-ensure
  24. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, October, 1–13. Retrieved from https://www.rdc.udel.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/InsideBlackBox.pdf
  25. Blackburn, B. (2008). Rigor is NOT a four letter word. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
  26. Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students' attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. doi:10.3102/0162373716670260
  27. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
  28. Bogaert, N. (n.d.). 4 golden rules of ideation. Retrieved from https://www.boardofinnovation.com/blog/golden-rules-of-ideation
  29. Brownstein, M. (2019). Implicit bias. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicit-bias
  30. BSCS Science Learning. (n.d.). BSCA 5E instructional mode. Retrieved from https://bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model
  31. Burgstahler, S. (2015). Universal design: Process, principles, and applications. Retrieved from https://www.washington.edu/doit/universal-design-process-principles-and-applications
  32. Burnside, O. (2018, May 10). Success in action series: Surviving the implementation dip. Retrieved from https://www.naspa.org/rpi/posts/success-in-action-series-surviving-the-implementation-dip
  33. Byrd, C. M. (2016). Does culturally relevant teaching work? An examination from student perspectives. SAGE Open, 1–10. Online. Retrieved from. doi:10.1177/2158244016660744
  34. Callaway, R. F. (2017). A correlational study of teacher efficacy and culturally responsive teaching techniques in a southeastern urban school district. Journal of Organizational & Educational Leadership, 2(2), 1–27. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1144813.pdf
  35. Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). What is the difference between formative and summative assessment? Retrieved from https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/formative-summative.html
  36. Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  37. Castro, J. (2011, May 24). The learning brain gets bigger – then smaller. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-learning-brain-gets-bigger-then-smaller
  38. Cermele, A. M. (2017). Measuring the impact of three different co-teaching models on student test results in ninth-grade Algebra I. Doctoral dissertation. St. John Fisher College Fisher Digital Publications. (Fisher Paper 300)
  39. Chadiha, K. (2019). State of science on unconscious bias. San Francisco: University of California San Francisco, Office of Diversity and Outreach. Retrieved from https://diversity.ucsf.edu/resources/state-science-unconscious-bias
  40. City University of New York. (n.d.). Engaging students through writing: The case of a science class. Retrieved from https://www.csi.cuny.edu/faculty-staff/resources/writing-resources/science-class
  41. Coley, J. D., Vitkin, A. Z., Seaton, C. E., & Yopchick, J. E. (2005). Effects of experience on relational influences in children: The case of folk biology. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 46, 471–475. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.102.9747&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  42. College Board. (n.d.). Test dates and deadlines. Retrieved from https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/sat-subject-tests/register/test-dates-deadlines
  43. Collins, C. (2019, January 25). Why “both sides” of a story aren't enough. Teaching Tolerance. Retrieved from https://www.tolerance.org/magazine/why-both-sides-of-a-story-arent-enough
  44. Common Core State Standards. (n.d.). Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf
  45. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf
  46. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2019a). English Language Arts standards. Standard 10: Range, quality, & complexity. Measuring text complexity: Three factors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/standard-10-range-quality-complexity/measuring-text-complexity-three-factors
  47. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2019b). Math: Standards for Mathematical Practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content
  48. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2019c). Measurement: Measurement & data. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/MD
  49. Concordia University. (2016). Concordia University welcomes John Maeda. Retrieved from https://www.cu-portland.edu/giving/concordia-university-welcomes-john-maeda
  50. Cook, C. R., Fiat, A., Larson, M., Daikos, C., Slamrod, T., Holland, E. A., et al. (2018). Positive greetings at the door: Evaluation of a low-cost, high-yield proactive classroom management strategy. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 149–159. doi:10.1177/1098300717753831
  51. Costley, K. C. (2014, October 30). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED554557.pdf
  52. Cowan, A. (2013). New science standards emphasize the engineering design process. Retrieved from https://www.sciencebuddies.org/blog/new-science-standards-emphasize-the-engineering-design-process?from=Blog
  53. Culatta, R. (2019). Backward design. Retrieved from https://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/backward_design
  54. Dakin, C. (2013). The effects of comprehension through close reading. Master's thesis. St. John Fisher College, Fisher Digital Publications (237). Retrieved from https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1238&context=education_ETD_masters
  55. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of the species. London, UK: John Murray.
  56. Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 47, 233–279. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285905888_Implicit_Attitudes_and_Beliefs_Adapt_to_Situations_A_Decade_of_Research_on_the_Malleability_of_Implicit_Prejudice:Stereotypes_and_the_Self-Concept
  57. Davenport, K. (2018). The benefits of offering students choice in assessment. Retrieved from https://medium.com/its-literacy/the-benefits-of-offering-students-choice-in-assessment-b7458fa54b8c
  58. Deady, K. (2017, August 11). 5 steps to becoming a culturally responsive teacher. Retrieved from https://www.teachaway.com/blog/5-steps-becoming-culturally-responsive-teacher
  59. Dhanapal, S., & Shan, E. W. Z. (2014). A study on the effectiveness of hands-on experiments in learning science among year 4 students. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 3(1), 29–40. Retrieved from https://umexpert.um.edu.my/file/publication/00001089_139130.pdf
  60. Doggart, S. (2011). Twinkle twinkle little rip-off: The dark secrets of the world's most recognizable tune. The Telegraph. (14 November). Retrieved from www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatlife/8877033/Twinkle-twinkle-little-rip-off-the-dark-secrets-of-the-worlds-most-recognisable-tune.html
  61. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
  62. Dweck, C. S. (2014). On the difference between a fixed and growth mindset. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXyesVD4EJI
  63. Dyer, F. L., & Martin, T. C. (1910). Edison: His life and inventions. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing LLC.
  64. Dyer, K. (2013, August 26). Formative assessment is not for grading. Retrieved from https://www.nwea.org/blog/2013/formative-assessment-is-not-for-grading
  65. The Education Alliance, Brown University. (n.d.). Student-centered instruction. Retrieved from https://www.brown.edu/academics/education-alliance/teaching-diverse-learners/student-centered-instruction
  66. Education Endowment Foundation. 2017. Science: Improving the teaching and learning of science. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/school-themes/science/
  67. Eisenbach, B. B. (2016, February). Student reflection: A tool for growth and development. Weekly reflections guide teaching and learning. AMLE Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.amle.org/BrowsebyTopic/WhatsNew/WNDet/TabId/270/ArtMID/888/ArticleID/586/Student-Reflection-A-Tool-for-Growth-and-Development.aspx
  68. Engineering and Technology History Wiki. (2015). Early light bulbs. Retrieved from https://ethw.org/Early_Light_Bulbs
  69. EurekAlert!. (2015, August 13). New information is easier to learn when composed of familiar elements. Retrieved from https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-08/cmu-nii081315.php
  70. EurekAlert!. (2019). “Doing science” rather than “being scientists,” more encouraging to those underrepresented in the field. Retrieved from https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-05/nyu-sr051319.php
  71. Famous Scientists. (2014). Robert Bunsen. Retrieved from https://www.famousscientists.org/robert-bunsen/
  72. Ferlazzo, L. (2011, April 27). The best resources for learning about the “achievement gap” (or “opportunity gap”). Retrieved from http://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/2011/04/27/the-best-resources-for-learning-about-the-achievement-gap
  73. Ferlazzo, L. (2015, September 14). Strategies for helping students motivate themselves. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/strategies-helping-students-motivate-themselves-larry-ferlazzo
  74. Ferlazzo, L. (2016, May 17). Response: Culturally sustaining pedagogy “increases student engagement & learning.” Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/classroom_qa_with_larry_ferlazzo/2016/05/response_culturally_sustaining_pedagogy_increases_student_engagement_learning.html
  75. Ferlazzo, L. (2019, March 21). New study says student self-assessment effective & it makes one particular useful point. Retrieved from http://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/2019/03/21/new-study-says-student-self-assessment-effective-it-makes-one-particular-useful-point
  76. Ferlazzo, L., & Hull Sypnieski, K. (2018, March 29). Activating prior knowledge with English Language Learners. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/activating-prior-knowledge-english-language-learners
  77. Feynman, R. (1973). Take the world from another point of view. Boston, MA: WGBH Public Broadcasting System.
  78. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2013). Annotation: Noting evidence for later use. Principal Leadership. Retrieved from https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/fisher-and-frey/documents/annotation.pdf
  79. Flaherty, C. (2019, June 7). (More) bias in science hiring. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/06/07/new-study-finds-discrimination-against-women-and-racial-minorities-hiring-sciences
  80. Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2013). Close reading. Principal Leadership. Retrieved from https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/fisher-and-frey/documents/close_read.pdf
  81. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2004). Co-teaching: Principles, practices, and pragmatics. Workshop. Albuquerque: New Mexico Public Education Department, Quarterly Special Education Meeting. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED486454.pdf
  82. Garcia, N. (2019). What is dimensional analysis? Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-dimensional-analysis-definition-examples.html
  83. Gimbel, E. (2019, June 10). The resurgence of 3D printers in modern learning environment. EdTech. Retrieved from https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2019/06/resurgence-3d-printers-modern-learning-environments-perfcon
  84. Ginsburg, D. (2014, February 28). Bell to bell learning: Students' right, teachers' duty. Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/coach_gs_teaching_tips/2014/02/bell_to_bell_teaching_and_learning_students_right_teachers_duty.html
  85. Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56(4). Retrieved from). doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144
  86. Gonzalez, J. (2017, September 24). Retrieval practice: The most powerful learning strategy you're not using. Retrieved from https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/retrieval-practice/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CultOfPedagogy+%28Cult+of+Pedagogy%29
  87. González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.) (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  88. Gonzalez, V. (2017, June 28). My first year as an ESL teacher…it wasn't all roses. Retrieved from https://elementaryenglishlanguagelearners.weebly.com/blog/are-you-practicing-culturally-responsive-teaching
  89. Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A., & Wingfield, L. C. (2010). The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 150(2), 132–147. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20397590
  90. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Heidi_Grant/publication/5995271_Clarifying_Achievement_Goals_and_Their_Impact/links/0c96051afa203385ff000000.pdf
  91. Green Action for Health & Environmental Justice. (n.d.). Environmental justice and environmental racism. Retrieved from http://greenaction.org/what-is-environmental-justice
  92. Green, V. N. (2012). Effects of classroom discussions on student performance and confidene in the science classroom. Master's paper. Montana State University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/1383/GreenV0812.pdf;jsessionid=7CDAC5D78AA1616E6112479CC95B79E3?sequence=1
  93. Greenfield, S., Whelan, B., & Cohn, E. (2006). Use of dimensional analysis to reduce medication errors. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(2), 91–94. Retrieved from https://www.healio.com/journals/jne/2006-2-45-2/%7Bec640cd5-1c72-48d6-8aec-5752a183d166%7D/use-of-dimensional-analysis-to-reduce-medication-errors
  94. Gregory, A., Hafen, C. A., Ruzek, E., Mikami, A. Y., Allen, J. P., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). Closing the racial discipline gap in classrooms by changing teacher practice. School Psychology Review, 45(2), 171–191. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302858
  95. Griss, S. (2013, March 20). The power of movement in teaching and learning. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2013/03/19/fp_griss.html
  96. Gunn, J. (2017, November 3). The evolution of STEM and STEAM in the U.S. Retrieved from https://education.cu-portland.edu/blog/classroom-resources/evolution-of-stem-and-steam-in-the-united-states
  97. Hammond, Z. (2013, March 6). Five things not to do during Black History Month. Teaching Tolerance. Retrieved from https://www.tolerance.org/magazine/five-things-not-to-do-during-black-history-month
  98. Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching & the brain: About. Retrieved from https://crtandthebrain.com/about
  99. Hammond, Z. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching puts rigor at the center. The Learning Professional, 39 (5), 40–43. Retrieved from https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/culturally-responsive-teaching-puts-rigor-at-the-center.pdf
  100. Hardiman, M. M., JohnBull, R. M., Carran, D. T., & Shelton, A. (2019). The effects of arts-integrated instruction on memory for science content. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 14, 25–32. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949317300558
  101. Harmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Wood, K. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 261–280. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10573560590949377?scroll=top&needAccess=true
  102. Harris, W. (n.d.). How the scientific method works. Retrieved from https://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/scientific-experiments/scientific-method9.htm
  103. Hattersley, L. (2016, September 16). Microsoft Excel vs Apple Numbers vs Google Sheets (for iOS). Macworld. Retrieved from www.macworld.co.uk/review/business/microsoft-excel-vs-apple-numbers-vs-google-sheets-3510107
  104. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
  105. Hawking, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time: From the big bang to black holes. London, UK: Bantam.
  106. Helmenstine, A. M. (2019, October 3). What chemistry is and what chemists do. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-chemistry-p2-604135
  107. Hill, C. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW. Retrieved from https://www.aauw.org/research/why-so-few
  108. Hooper, L. (n.d.).Formative assessment and instructional intervention. Retrieved from https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/legacy/Formative-Assessment-and-Instructional-Intervention.pdf
  109. Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. A. (2014). Using a technology-enriched environment to improve higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 109–119. Retrieved from. doi:10.1080/15391523.2001.10782338
  110. Hunter, R. (2004). Madeline Hunter's mastery teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  111. International Institute for Restorative Practices. (n.d.). Defining restorative: 5.2 circles. Retrieved from https://www.iirp.edu/defining-restorative/5-2-circles
  112. Irons, A. (2010). An investigation into the impact of formative feedback on the student learning experience. PhD thesis. University of Durham. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/890
  113. Janzen, J., & Stoller, F. L. (1998). Integrating strategic reading into L2 instruction. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(1), 251–269. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/PastIssues/rfl121janzen.pdf
  114. Jensen, P. A., & Moore, R. (2009). What do help sessions accomplish in introductory science courses? Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(5), 60–64. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-219656756/what-do-help-sessions-accomplish-in-introductory-science
  115. JISC. (2015). Student self-reflection. Retrieved from www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/transforming-assessment-and-feedback/self-reflection#
  116. Jordan, L. (2018, January 17). Women report high levels of gender discrimination in STEM fields. Seeker. Retrieved from https://www.seeker.com/culture/women-report-high-levels-of-gender-discrimination-in-stem-fields
  117. Kamehameha Schools. (2007). The writing process: An overview of research on teaching writing as a process. Retrieved from http://www.ksbe.edu/_assets/spi/pdfs/reports/WritingProcessreport.pdf
  118. Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T.-Y., et al. (2008). The hunger for knowledge: Neural correlates of curiosity, Semantic Scholar. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Hunger-for-Knowledge-%3A-Neural-Correlates-of-Kang-Hsu/43b06df4bcef7435a12e22dc8bbfb9891e3e3bf7
  119. Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T.-Y., et al. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 263–273. Retrieved from https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sds/docs/loewenstein/WickCandleLearning.pdf
  120. Khoii, R., & Poorafshari, B. (2018). The impact of cooperative performance on the cloze test on the development of vocabulary knowledge. Paper presented at International Conference “ICT for Language Learning.” Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/2083046/The_Impact_of_Cooperative_Performance:on_the_Cloze_Test_on_the
  121. Kilic, D., Sezen, N., & Sari Uzun, M. (2012). A study of pre-service science teacher's graphing skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2937–2941. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812017223
  122. Knobloch, J. (1994). Xunzi: A translation and study of the complete works (Vol. 3, Books 7–16). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
  123. Kozleski, E. B. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching matters! Retrieved from http://www.equityallianceatasu.org/sites/default/files/Website_files/CulturallyResponsiveTeaching-Matters.pdf
  124. Krueger, A. (2010, November 16). 15 life-changing inventions that were created by mistake. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/these-10-inventions-were-made-by-mistake-2010-11
  125. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  126. Lai, M., Luong, D., & Young, G. (2015). A study of kinesthetic learning activities effectiveness in teaching computer algorithms within an academic term. In Proceedings of international conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (pp. 44–50). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (July 27–30). Retrieved from http://worldcomp-proceedings.com/proc/p2015/FEC2400.pdf
  127. Larson, L., Dixon, T., & Townsend, D. (2013). How can teachers increase classroom use of academic vocabulary? Voices from the Middle, 20(4), 16–21. Retrieved from https://www.bhamcityschools.org/cms/lib5/AL01001646/Centricity/Domain/131/Classroom%20Use%20of%20Academic%20Vocabulary.pdf
  128. Latham, G. P., & Seijts, G. (2006). Learning goals or performance goals: Is it the journey or the destination? Ivey Business Journal. Online. Retrieved from https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/learning-goals-or-performance-goals-is-it-the-journey-or-the-destination
  129. Lee, A. M. I. (n.d.). Instructional intervention: What you need to know. Retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/learning-attention-issues/treatments-approaches/educational-strategies/instructional-intervention-what-you-need-to-know
  130. Lemov, D. (2015a, August 10). Dylan Wiliam advises: Forget the rubric; use work samples instead. Retrieved from https://teachlikeachampion.com/blog/dylan-wiliam-advises-forget-rubric-use-work-samples-instead
  131. Lemov, D. (2015b, December 10). What is “breaking the plane”? Retrieved from http://teachlikeachampion.com/blog/what-is-breaking-the-plane
  132. Lewis, V. (2017). Veroniiiica: Veronica with four eyes. Retrieved from https://veroniiiica.com/2017/08/07/photosensitivity-in-the-classroom
  133. Libarkin, J., & Ording, G. (2012). The utility of writing assignments in undergraduate bioscience. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 39–46. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-07-0058
  134. Liou, D. D.-Y. (2011). Students of color and their teachers' expectations for academic success. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (ProQuest 3486571)
  135. Literary Devices. (n.d.). Definitions and examples of literary terms. Retrieved from https://literarydevices.net/narrative#
  136. Lloyd, R. (1999, September 30). Metric mishap caused loss of NASA orbiter. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02
  137. Ludwig, M. J., Boyle, A., & Lindsay, J. (2017, November 7). Review of evidence: Arts integration research through the lens of the Every Student Succeeds Act. Retrieved from https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Arts-Integration-Research-Every-Student-Succeeds-Act-ESSA.pdf
  138. Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion. In A. S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109–113). College Park, MD: University of Maryland College of Education.
  139. Lynch, M. (2015, November 8). Culturally responsive teaching starts with students. Retrieved from https://www.teachthought.com/pedagogy/culturally-responsive-teaching-starts-with-students
  140. Manoli, P., & Papadopoulou, M. (2012). Graphic organizers as a reading strategy: Research findings and issues. Creative Education, 3(3), 348–356. Retrieved from https://file.scirp.org/pdf/CE20120300011_69910750.pdf
  141. Martinez, M. (2016, January 28). Flint, Michigan: Did race and poverty factor into water crisis? Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2016/01/26/us/flint-michigan-water-crisis-race-poverty
  142. Marzano, R. J. (2004). The importance of background knowledge. In R. J. Marzano (Ed.), Building background knowledge for academic achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/104017/chapters/The-Importance-of-Background-Knowledge.aspx
  143. Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  144. Marzano, R. J. (2010). The art and science of teaching/summarizing to comprehend. Educational Leadership, 67(6), 83–84. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar10/vol67/num06/Summarizing-to-Comprehend.aspx
  145. Marzano, R. J. (2013). Art and science of teaching/targets, objectives, standards: How do they fit? Educational Leadership, 70(8), 82–83. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may13/vol70/num08/Targets,-Objectives,-Standards@-How-Do-They-Fit%C2%A2.aspx
  146. Marzano, R. J. (n.d.). Tips from Dr. Marzano: The highly engaged classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Retrieved from https://www.marzanoresearch.com/resources/tips/hec_tips_archive#tip25
  147. Marzano, R. J., Carbaugh, B., Rutherford, A., & Toth, D. (2013). Marzano Center observation protocol for the 2014 Marzano teacher evaluation model. Retrieved from https://www.learningsciences.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2014-Protocol.pdf
  148. Mastromonaco, A. (2015). Exit tickets' effect on engagement and concept attainment in high school science. Master's thesis. Dominican University of California Graduate Master's Theses, Capstones, and Culminating Projects, 184. Retrieved from https://scholar.dominican.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1185&context=masters-theses
  149. Mathes, J. C. (2017). History of the University of Michigan College of Engineering 1940–1970. In The University of Michigan, an encyclopedic survey supplement (pp. 123–136). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from http://um2017.org/History_of_Engineering_1940-1970.html
  150. Matulka, R., & Wood, D. (2013). History of the light bulb. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/articles/history-light-bulb
  151. McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., & Huelser, B. J. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399–414. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/780e/e39bcd30d72dd4702eee9245f725922838d9.pdf
  152. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–378. Retrieved from https://thinkingtogether.educ.cam.ac.uk/publications/journals/Mercer_Dawes_WegerifandSams2004.pdf
  153. Miller, A. (2011, December 15). Courageous conversation: Formative assessment and grading. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/courageous-conversation-andrew-miller
  154. Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children's gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. draw-a-scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955 Retrieved from. doi:10.1111/cdev.13039
  155. Minahan, J. (2017). Helping anxious students move forward. Educational Leadership, 75(4), 44–50. Retrieved from https://jessicaminahan.com/wp-content/uploads/Helping-Anxious-Students-Move-Forward-Red-Work-Avoidance-Minahan_EL_1218.pdf
  156. Mindset Scholars Network. (2015). Learning mindsets: Purpose and relevance. Retrieved from https://mindsetscholarsnetwork.org/learning-mindsets/purpose-relevance#
  157. Mindset Works. (2017). Decades of scientific research that started a growth mindset revolution. Retrieved from https://www.mindsetworks.com/science
  158. Mitchell, K. (2018, January 10). Women in STEM experience discrimination more than women in non-STEM fields & here are ways to fix that. Bustle. Retrieved from https://www.bustle.com/p/women-in-stem-experience-discrimination-more-than-women-in-non-stem-fields-here-are-ways-to-fix-that-7845715
  159. Naidu, B., Briewin, M., & Embi, M. A. (2013). Reading strategy: Tackling reading through topic and main ideas. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 60–64. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/31108
  160. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2014). International system of units: The metric measurement system. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/offices/oce/functions/standards/isu.html
  161. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2018). Characteristics of public school teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_clr.asp
  162. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2019). Projections of education statistics to 2027 (46th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019001.pdf
  163. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2015). The metric system. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/The-Metric-System
  164. National Education Association (NEA) Foundation. (n.d.). Writing tutorial. Retrieved from https://www.neafoundation.org/for-educators/grant-resources/writing-tutorial
  165. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  166. National Research Council. (1997). Misconceptions as barriers to understanding science. In National Research Council, Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook (Chapter 5). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/5287/chapter/5
  167. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13165/a-framework-for-k-12-science-education-practices-crosscutting-concepts
  168. National Science Teaching Association. (2014). Science and engineering practices. Retrieved from https://ngss.nsta.org/PracticesFull.aspx
  169. National Science Teaching Association. (2015). NSTA position statement: Safety and school science instruction. Retrieved from https://www.nsta.org/about/positions/safety.aspx
  170. National Science Teaching Association. (n.d.). Crosscutting concepts. Retrieved from https://ngss.nsta.org/crosscuttingconceptsfull.aspx
  171. Nevid, J. S., Pastva, A., & McClelland, N. (2012). Writing-to-Learn assignments in introductory psychology: Is there a learning benefit? Teaching of Psychology, 39(4), 272–275. doi:10.1177/0098628312456622
  172. Next Generation Science Standards. (2017). DCI arrangements. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/AllDCI.pdf
  173. NGSS. (2013a). “All standards, all students”: Making the next generation science standards accessible to all students. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states (contents and research background of the standards). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Appendix%20D%20Diversity%20and%20Equity%206-14-13.pdf
  174. NGSS. (2013b). Science and engineering practices in the next generation science standards. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/18290/chapter/12
  175. NGSS. (2013c). Crosscutting concepts. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Appendix%20G%20-%20Crosscutting%20Concepts%20FINAL%20edited%204.10.13.pdf
  176. NGSS. (2013d). Engineering design in the NGSS. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Appendix%20I%20-%20Engineering%20Design%20in%20NGSS%20-%20FINAL_V2.pdf
  177. NGSS. (2013e). Connections to the common core state standards for mathematics. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Appendix-L_CCSS%20Math%20Connections%2006_03_13.pdf
  178. NGSS. (2013f). Case study 1: Economically disadvantaged students and the next generation science standards. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states (contents and research background of the standards). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/%281%29%20Economically%20Disadvantaged%206-14-13_0.pdf
  179. NGSS. (2013g). Three-dimensional learning. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/three-dimensions
  180. NGSS. (2013h). MS-PS2 motion and stability: Forces and interactions. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/ms-ps2-motion-and-stability-forces-and-interactions
  181. NGSS. (2013i). HS energy. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/topic-arrangement/hsenergy
  182. NGSS. (n.d.). FAQs. In National Research Council. (Ed.), Next generation science standards: For states, by states (contents and research background of the standards). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/faqs##Contents1
  183. NGSS Life Sciences. (2018). Classroom procedures. Retrieved from https://www.ngsslifescience.com/science.php/science/classroom_management_procedures
  184. Nicholson, K. (2011, January 3). Brief #4: Outcome-based education. Retrieved from http://www.archive.jfn.ac.lk/OBESCL/MOHE/OBE-Articles/Academic-documents-articles/4.OBE-Brief-4.pdf
  185. Novak, M. A. (2017). Case studies listening to students using kinesthetic movement while learning to graph linear functions. Doctoral dissertation. Ohio LINK Electronic Theses & Dissertations Center. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=kent1498162366548228&disposition=inline
  186. Okonofua, J. A., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26(5), 1–8. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/youth_at_risk/Okonofua%20%20Eberhardt%20-%20Two%20Strikes%20-%20Race%20and%20the%20Disciplining%20of%20Young%20Students%20(1).authcheckdam.pdf
  187. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). New approach needed to deliver on technology's potential in schools. Paris, France: OECD .Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/new-approach-needed-to-deliver-on-technologys-potential-in-schools.htm
  188. Pare, D. (2017). Grouping students by ability: Homogeneous versus heterogeneous classrooms. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (ProQuest 10618052)
  189. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915. doi:10.1037/a0019545
  190. PBLWorks. (2019). Project-based learning. Retrieved from https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl
  191. Performance Assessment Resource Bank. (n.d.). Physics. Retrieved from https://www.performanceassessmentresourcebank.org/tags/physics
  192. Phillips, K. W. (2014). How diversity makes us smarter. Scientific American, 311(4), 42–47. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1014-42
  193. Pious, S. (n.d.). The psychology of prejudice: An overview. Retrieved from https://secure.understandingprejudice.org/apa/english/page24.htm
  194. Pope, D., Brown, M., & Miles, S. (2015). Overloaded and underprepared: Strategies for stronger schools and healthy, successful kids. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  195. PowerSchool. (2016). How to isolate skill gaps for corrective instruction. Retrieved from https://www.powerschool.com/resources/blog/how-to-isolate-skill-gaps-for-corrective-instruction
  196. Prince, J. M., & Felder, M. R. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123–138. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
  197. Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2005). The process approach to writing instruction: Examining its effectiveness. Retrieved from https://www.nwp.org/cs/public/download/nwp_file/8500/Writing_Research_-_Chapter_19_-_Reduced.pdf?x-r=pcfile_d
  198. Quote Investigator. (n.d.). I have gotten a lot of results! I know several thousand things that won't work. Retrieved from https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/07/31/edison-lot-results/#more-4181
  199. Rasinski, T., Padak, N., & Newton, J. (2017). The roots of comprehension. Educational Leadership, 74(5), 41–45. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb17/vol74/num05/The-Roots-of-Comprehension.aspx
  200. Rea, S. (2015, June 8). Researchers find everyone has a bias blind spot. Retrieved from https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2015/june/bias-blind-spot.html
  201. Reardon, S. F., Kalogrides, D., Fahle, E. M., & Zárate, R. C. (2018). The relationship between test item format and gender achievement gaps on math and ELA tests in 4th and 8th grade. Educational Researcher, 47(5), 284–294. Retrieved from https://cepa.stanford.edu/content/relationship-between-test-item-format-and-gender-achievement-gaps-math-and-ela-tests-4th-and-8th-grade
  202. Reichelova, M., & Teleki, A. (2013). The role of dimensional analysis in teaching physics. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256187138_The_Role_of_Dimensional_Analysis_in_Teaching_Physics
  203. Robb, L., & Lewis, J. P. (2007). Poems for teaching in the content areas: 75 powerful poems to enhance your history, geography, science, and math lessons. New York, NY: Scholastic.
  204. Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19. Retrieved from https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Rosenshine.pdf
  205. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02322211
  206. Rossiter, M. J., Abbott, M. L., & Kushnir, A. (2016). L2 vocabulary research and instructional practices: Where are the gaps? The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 20(1), 1–25.
  207. Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 43–50. Retrieved from https://www.scoe.org/blog_files/Budd%20Rowe.pdf
  208. Salustri, F. A. (2003). An extremely abbreviated history of engineering design. Retrieved from http://deseng.ryerson.ca/~fil/t/history0.html
  209. Sample, K. (2019). Central American farmers head to the U.S., fleeing climate change. New York Times, April 13. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/13/world/americas/coffee-climate-change-migration.html
  210. Settles, I. H. (2014). Women in STEM: Challenges and determinants of success and well-being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2014/10/women-stem
  211. Shapiro, J. (2014, June 27). Games in the classroom: What the research says. KQED News. Retrieved from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/36482/games-in-the-classroom-what-the-research-says
  212. Sharp, L. (2012). Stealth learning: Unexpected learning opportunities through games. Journal of Instructional Research, 1, 42–48. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1127609.pdf
  213. Silverstein, S. (1974). Where the sidewalk ends. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  214. Silverstein, S. (1981). A light in the attic. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  215. Society of Women Engineers. (2016). What drives female attrition in STEM professions? Highlights from the Society of Women Engineers' National Gender Culture Study. Retrieved from https://research.swe.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/08/16-SWE-029-Culture-Study-10_27_16-Final-CP.pdf
  216. Society of Women Engineers. (2019). 2019 research update: Percentage of female engineers and college graduates broken down by state. Retrieved from https://alltogether.swe.org/2019/02/2019-research-update-percentage-of-female-engineers-and-college-graduates-broken-down-by-state/
  217. Solis, M., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & McCulley, L. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49(5), 498–510. doi:10.1002/pits.21606
  218. Sparks, S. D. (2015, March 31). Middle students find success tutoring peers, in N.Y.C. Study. Education Week, 34(9). Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/04/01/middle-students-find-success-tutoring-peers-in.html?cmp=ENL-EU-NEWS2-RM
  219. Staats, C. (2015–2016). Understanding implicit bias: What educators should know. American Educator, 39(4), 29–33. Retrieved from https://www.aft.org/ae/winter2015-2016/staats
  220. Stacho, T. J. (2013). My students have trouble with transitions…What can I do? Retrieved from http://www.behaviorinschools.com/My_Students_Have_a_Hard_Time_with_Transitions.pdf
  221. Stembridge, Y. (2017, April 14). 3 lessons learned when bringing to life culturally responsive practices. Retrieved from http://www.myreflectionmatters.org/3-lessons-learned-when-bringing-to-life-culturally-responsive-practices/
  222. Stroessner, S., & Good, C. (n.d.). Stereotype threat: An overview. Excerpts and adaptions from Reducing Stereotype Threat.org. Retrieved from https://diversity.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/stereotype_threat_overview.pdf
  223. Swearingen, R. (2002). A primer: Diagnostic, formative, & summative assessment. Retrieved from http://www.ewcupdate.com/userfiles/assessmentnetwork_net/file/A%20Primer_%20Diagnostic,%20Formative,%20&%20Summative%20Assessment.pdf
  224. Tarasawa, B. (2018, September 27). Three research-based culturally responsive teaching strategies. Retrieved from https://www.nwea.org/blog/2018/three-research-based-culturally-responsive-teaching-strategies/
  225. Taylor, A. (2017). Guest post: How to help students overcome misconceptions. Retrieved from http://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2017/7/25-1
  226. Taylor, M. A., Wirth, O., Olvina, M., & Alvero, A. M. (2016). Experimental analysis of using examples and non-examples in safety training. Journal of Safety Research, 59, 97–104. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.002
  227. Taylor, W. (2019, January 10). Enrichment in the classroom. Retrieved from https://learningessentialsedu.com/enrichment-in-the-classroom/
  228. The Teacher Toolkit. (n.d.). Exit ticket. Retrieved from http://www.theteachertoolkit.com/index.php/tool/exit-ticket
  229. Teaching Science as Inquiry. (2019). Exploring our fluid Earth: Scale, proportion, and quantity. Retrieved from https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/standards-alignment/next-generation-science-standards-ngss/crosscutting-concepts/scale-proportion-and-quantity
  230. Terada, Y. (2019, May 22). 50 years of children drawing scientists. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/50-years-children-drawing-scientists
  231. Tewksbury, B. (n.d.). What are jigsaws? Retrieved from https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/teaching_methods/jigsaws/why.html
  232. Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  233. To, J., & Carless, D. (2015). Making productive use of exemplars: Peer discussion and teacher guidance for positive transfer of strategies. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(6), 746–764. doi:10.1080/0309877x.2015.101431
  234. Torres, T. (2016, February 4). Why brainstorming doesn't work (and what to do instead). Retrieved from https://www.inc.com/teresa-torres/why-brainstorming-doesnt-work-and-what-to-do-instead.html
  235. Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  236. UCD Neuropsychology Lab. (2018). Why is the prefrontal cortex so important? Retrieved from https://ucdneuropsychologylab.wordpress.com/2018/12/17/why-is-the-prefrontal-cortex-so-important/
  237. The Understood Team. (2019). The difference between accommodations and modifications. Retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/learning-attention-issues/treatments-approaches/educational-strategies/the-difference-between-accommodations-and-modifications
  238. University of Arizona, Office of Instruction & Assessment. (n.d.). Backward design. Retrieved from https://oia.arizona.edu/content/290
  239. University of Leicester. (2010, October 28). Two's company but three's a crowd: Two people can learn to cooperate intuitively, but larger groups need to communicate. Science Daily. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101027202505.htm
  240. University of Washington, Center for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Constructing tests. Retrieved from http://www.washington.edu/teaching/teaching-resources/preparing-to-teach/constructing-tests
  241. von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574–588. Retrieved from https://www.hungrymindlab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/von-Stumm-et-al-2011.pdf
  242. Wade-Leeuwen, B., Vovers, J., & Silk, M. (2018, June 10). Explainer: What's the difference between STEM and STEAM? The Conversation, online. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/explainer-whats-the-difference-between-stem-and-steam-95713
  243. Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Using technology wisely: The keys to success in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  244. Wenglinsky, H., & Silverstein, S. C. (2006–2007). The science training. Educational Leadership, Dec.–Jan., 24–29. Retrieved from http://web.nmsu.edu/~susanbro/educ451/docs/The_science:training_of_teachers.pdf
  245. Wieman, C. E. (2014). Large-scale commentary of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 111(23), 8319–8320.
  246. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  247. Williams, D. H., & Shipley, G. P. (2018). Cultural taboos as a factor in the participation rate of native Americans in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(17), 1–8. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-018-0114-7#citeas
  248. Witkin, R. (1983). Jet's fuel ran out after metric conversion errors. New York Times (July 30). Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/1983/07/30/us/jet-s-fuel-ran-out-after-metric-conversion-errors.html
  249. Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2018). The first days of school: How to be an effective teacher (5th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications.
  250. Wong, H. K., Wong, R. T., & Jondahl, S. F. (2014). The classroom management book. Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications.
  251. Woods, J. (2017). Assessments 101: A policymaker's guide to K-12 assessments. Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from https://www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/Assessments-101_A-policymakers-guide-to-K-12-assessments.pdf
  252. World Meteorological Organization. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/ccl/faq/faq_doc_en.html
  253. Wormeli, R. (2007). Differentiation: From planning to practice, grades 6–12. Portsmouth, NH: Stenhouse Publishers.
  254. Wormeli, R. (2016). Teaching students responsibility. Association for Middle Level Education. Retrieved from http://www.amle.org/BrowsebyTopic/WhatsNew/WNDet/TabId/270/artmid/888/articleid/639/Teaching-Students-Responsibility.aspx
  255. The Writing Center. (2019). Argument. Retrieved from https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/argument/
  256. Your Dictionary. (n.d.). Examples of informative essays. Retrieved from https://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-informative-essays.html
  257. Zupko, R., & Chisholm, L. J. (2019). Measurement system. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/science/measurement-system