Behold, I tell you a mystery.
—1 Corinthians 15:51
As noon approached on January 20, 2017, Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas summoned Michael Richard Pence before him at the lectern on the West Front of the United States Capitol. Surrounding the two men were politicians, public officials, family, and assorted dignitaries arrayed to form a tableau of democratic tradition. Allies and adversaries, their conflicts and contests set aside for the moment, bore witness to the transition of power.
Pence had chosen one of the most conservative Supreme Court justices in U.S. history to administer his oath of office as vice president of the United States. The symbolism was complete when Thomas directed Pence to place his left hand on Ronald Reagan’s Bible, which was held by Pence’s wife, Karen. Reagan had been Pence’s midwestern hero and role model, even before he had met him briefly twenty-eight years earlier.
“Mr. Vice President elect, would you raise your right hand,” said Thomas, though Pence had already done so. The justice grimaced slightly. Known for rarely speaking from the bench or in public at all, Thomas appeared ill at ease. After a pause, he summoned a resonant baritone voice and said, “Repeat after me.” The vice president elect did as instructed, swearing that he would “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.… So help me God.”
After he finished the oath, the vice president embraced his family, shook hands with some of the assembled luminaries, and then retreated from the center of attention. As he stood beside his wife, Pence struck his humility pose—brow furrowed, mouth downturned, eyes focused on some distant point—as he had on countless public occasions.
For decades, Pence had presented himself as a humble servant who could be entrusted with power because he was, at heart, a mild-mannered midwesterner. Friends and foes alike said his major character trait was extreme niceness. When given the opportunity, Pence described himself as a true “Hoosier” son of Indiana who was “a Christian, a conservative, and a Republican in that order.” This is how he had introduced himself to the country at the Republican National Convention six months earlier. The list contrasted with the usual pledge politicians make to put country first. This is what President Obama did after the 2016 election when he said, “We are not Democrats first. We are not Republicans first. We are Americans first.” 1
The vice president’s self-declared identity revealed both his priorities and the source of his power. For thirty years he had helped lead the Republican Party into a closer alliance with preachers who were turning evangelical Christianity from a religion into a political crusade that engaged in a culture war against nonbelievers. The aim of many was to destroy abortion rights, roll back the equality gained by gay citizens, and prepare the nation for the Second Coming of Christ.
Pence and others used martial metaphors and considered themselves warriors of the Christian Right, both besieged and called upon to fight. “Those who would have us ignore the battle being fought over life, marriage and religious liberty have forgotten the lessons of history,” said Pence in 2010. “America’s darkest moments have come when economic arguments trumped moral principles.”2
Pence’s allies in his war included hugely wealthy donors who, despite their vast wealth, accumulated at a time of historic inequality, also posed as victims. As libertarians in the mold of Ayn Rand’s cardboard characters they felt inhibited in the pursuit of even greater riches by a government that imposed foolish regulations and would redistribute their wealth to the supposedly indolent poor. Starting with this perspective they denied the science behind environmental protection, demanded tax cuts for themselves, and insisted on massive reductions in programs serving anyone who wasn’t rich.
The victimhood claimed by both the libertarians and the Christian Right permitted the construction of an alternate reality that denied their own power and masked their ambition to make politics and culture conform to an ideology that included white Christian supremacy and predatory capitalism. It also denied the progress they had made in their construction of their own political might. With his oath of office Vice President Pence became both the free-marketeers’ hero and the most successful Christian supremacist in American history.
Most of Pence’s life had been preparation for this moment, and possibly one more. His lifelong goal, set when he was a boy, was the Oval Office itself. Remarkably, he had reached this point by tying his fate to Donald J. Trump, a man whose immorality in the form of lying, cheating, and deceiving in every aspect of his life, from his marriage to his businesses, had made him a living exemplar of everything that Christianity and conservatism abhorred. However, this record also suggested that Pence was more likely to assume the highest office in the land than most vice presidents who had come before. To put it bluntly, Trump was vulnerable to impeachment. If this occurred, Pence would see the hand of God at work in his elevation to the presidency. In the meantime, he would wait, and watch.
On Inauguration Day, with Pence looking on, a slightly stooped Donald Trump stepped forward when it was his turn to face the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts. Beside Trump stood his wife, Melania, the former fashion model, who held two Bibles—Lincoln’s and Trump’s own. At the stroke of noon, the president-elect raised his right hand and placed his left on the Bibles. As he did this, Trump’s family members and hundreds of political and government figures strained to view the moment.
Trump and Pence were a study in contrasts. At age fifty-eight, Pence appeared trim, perhaps even athletic, and could have passed for a man ten years younger. His jacket was neatly buttoned. His hands were clasped at his waist, and his smooth face was set in a half smile. In sum, he resembled a small-town pastor or even a funeral director. Mere feet away, a stern-faced, seventy-year-old Trump stood with his coat hanging open, like a kaftan, to reveal a long red necktie. Despite much cosmetic intervention, he looked old and tired.
At the conclusion of the presidential oath, which had been voiced by forty-four presidents before him, Trump said the words “so help me God” and accepted the congratulations of those closest to him with a thin-lipped, toothless grin. He then delivered a fifteen-minute speech replete with the distortions and falsehoods that were his hallmark. He declared that America was awash with crime and despair and under constant attack. “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now,” said Trump. It was the most remembered phrase of the address.
“That was some weird shit,” former president George W. Bush was heard to remark as he left the inaugural stand.
Weird was the mildest word one could attach to the forty-fifth president of the United States as he launched an administration that would be stained by scandal and corruption so broad it defied a citizen’s effort to grasp. Cronyism, secrecy, and nepotism would flourish. Presidential lies, duly catalogued by The Washington Post and others, would come at the rate of more than 150 per month.
From the moment of his oath, Mike Pence, the vice president, faced the historic—some would say daunting—challenge of dealing with an erratic and undisciplined commander in chief. From the start, he would seek to be a stabilizing force in a government rocked by presidential whims and mood swings. Pence intended to do this while preserving his own image as a man of calm judgment and rectitude who would be ready to take over as commander in chief should Trump ever leave office.
Fourteen previous vice presidents had risen to the top office. In eight cases, a sitting president died in office. Five vice presidents were elected to the higher office after serving as number two. One, Gerald Ford, took office when Richard Nixon resigned to end the Watergate crisis. Given the strange reality of the Trump presidency, no one could put odds on the chance of a Pence presidency. However, among those who knew Pence, the refrain was “Mike will be ready.”
To be ready to succeed the chief executive is a vice president’s main duty and one of just three prescribed by the Constitution. The others include presiding over and breaking tie votes in the United State Senate and conducting the quadrennial meetings of the electoral college. Otherwise, vice presidents serve by handling duties assigned to them by the president and sometimes develop their own areas of interest that they pursue with the president’s blessing. Al Gore was concerned with technology and environmental policy. Dick Cheney was deeply engaged in national security. The portfolio taken up by Pence would be more wide ranging and include functioning as a kind of minder for a notoriously undisciplined commander in chief.
Throughout his first year at Trump’s side, Pence would be a constant, attentive presence who generally spoke only when the president requested it. For weeks at a time, he seemed to have just one major public assignment: admiring Donald Trump. He performed this duty consistently despite the fact that the bellicose and chaotic Trump—he of the infamous “grab ’em by the pussy” videotape—was so personally objectionable that Pence had considered trying to replace him at the top of the ticket as the 2016 election neared.3 (A Pence aide denied that he had considered doing that.)
Inside the administration, amid the turmoil caused by a record number of dismissals and resignations, Pence proved to be as unflappable as a monument. Like a regent charged with humoring a temperamental boy king, Pence conducted himself in a way that he clearly felt was necessary to maintain the president’s trust and preserve his own status. This was a difficult task as the scandal of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, which was being investigated by Congress and special counsel Robert Mueller, grew ever larger and raised obvious questions. What did Pence himself know of the Russian scandal and all the efforts made by the president to stop the investigations? Was he one of Mueller’s targets? Could Pence survive scrutiny if a scandal or crime forced Trump out? Within weeks of Mueller’s appointment, Pence hired a criminal defense lawyer to represent him in the probe.4
As the year passed and Trump bellowed and brayed, Pence told Republican Party leaders, everyday Americans, and allies abroad that all was well. At the same time, he massaged Trump’s ego in a way that was so undignified that it was at once comic and sad. This self-abasement reached a low point on December 20, 2017, when the president invited TV cameras to record the start of a cabinet meeting. The setting was the White House Cabinet Room, where the president’s department heads and top advisors gathered around a huge table. The light pouring through the crystalline windows evoked a church in the countryside. After remarking on his own successes and how little credit he had received for them, President Trump sat back in his chair, folded his arms across his chest, and stared at the members of his cabinet like a less-eloquent Lear. Ben Carson, secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said a prayer that expressed his gratitude “for a president and for cabinet members who are courageous, who are willing to face the winds of controversy in order to provide a better future for those who come behind us.”
When Carson finished, Trump looked across the table at Pence, unfolded his arms, and said, “Mike, would you like to say a few words?”
Pence offered about three minutes of impromptu praise in which The Washington Post discovered one expression of gratitude or admiration every twelve seconds. Among them were:
“I’m deeply humbled, as your vice president, to be able to be here.”
“You’ve restored American credibility on the world stage.”
“You’ve unleashed American energy.”
“You’ve spurred an optimism in this country that’s setting records.”
When Pence concluded his praise, President Trump offered up a verbal pat on the head, saying, “Thank you, Mike. That’s very nice. I appreciate that.”
Pence replied, “Thank you, Mr. President, and God bless you.”5
The vice president’s cringeworthy display, broadcast live on television, prompted an avalanche of mockery. The nonpolitical website Dictionary.com used Pence’s remarks in a tweet to illustrate the definition of the word sycophant. Late-night TV talk-show host Seth Meyers imagined Pence as a lovesick suitor and Trump telling him, “Dude, I’m married.” Conservative pundit Matt Lewis confessed his utter revulsion at Pence’s offensive “slavish hero worship.” As he puzzled out the vice president’s motivation, Lewis considered two possible explanations for Pence’s behavior. The first assumed he was so eager to ascend to the presidency that he was willing to humiliate himself to get ahead. According to the other option Lewis contemplated, Pence was so committed to public service, and thus to soothing the dangerously mercurial—some would say unstable—Trump that he considered self-abnegation a patriotic act. Lewis wrote:
Could it be that praising Trump is but a small price to pay for keeping the president on the straight and narrow? Perhaps Pence is making the ultimate sacrifice (his dignity!) in order to keep Trump’s agenda from veering into the fever swamps of nationalism. James Carville and Paul Begala once observed that “you never stand so tall as when you stoop to kiss an ass.” If that’s the case, then Mike Pence is a giant among men.6
Lewis’s analysis overlooked a significant signal in the final phrase—“and God bless you”—offered by the vice president when he spoke at the cabinet meeting. Easy to regard as a kind of rhetorical tic, like the “God bless America” that presidents tack on to the end of formal addresses, Pence’s call to the deity reminded conservative Christians that their champion was alert to his duty. In fact, as one of Pence’s closest aides would explain, the vice president actually believed he could bring Trump to Jesus and, like Jesus, he was willing to do whatever was necessary to help save Trump’s soul.
Pence was also calling attention to his own piety, which his supporters valued above all his other qualities. Long disappointed by Republicans who appeared to share their faith but failed to create the society they desired, many Christian Right voters had supported Trump—the most profane candidate in modern times—because of Mike Pence. Like them, the vice president imagined America’s conservative Christians to be the modern equivalent of ancient Jews exiled to a wilderness that just happened to look like a comfortable, modern society. This is why Pence said, “No people of faith today face greater hostility or hatred than followers of Christ,” he said in 2017.
Pence’s hope for the future resided in his faith that, as chosen people, conservative evangelicals would eventually be served by a leader whom God would enable to defeat their enemies and create a Christian nation. Devoted to the dream of a nation guided by Christian Right beliefs, his preternaturally serene presence reminded the devout that Trump was the instrument of God and that they—the Jews of this era—were closer to their goal than ever before. This pursuit would be aided by a host of allies, including Trump’s election guru, Stephen Bannon, who would use Facebook and other social media as weapons in a “culture war.”
Backed by reclusive billionaires Robert and Rebekah Mercer and their firm, Cambridge Analytica (CA), Bannon would disseminate vast amounts of false information intended to motivate conservative Christian voters and discourage their opponents. The ultimate aim of this information warfare (as described by former CA employee Christopher Wylie) was the election of Trump and Pence, who would then roll back the rights of women and gays while empowering religious conservatives and businesses. In the world at large, Trump and Pence were expected to disengage America from broad agreements on trade, environmental protection, and security.7
Key to his election, more than 80 percent of evangelical Christians had voted for Trump. This support perplexed those who considered his lifelong record of sex scandals, bankruptcies, and public displays of cruelty, who wondered how this group could stand with him. The question confounded those who assumed that politically active conservative evangelicals applied conventional morality in a consistent way. In fact, their kind of Christianity placed a higher value on the professions of faith and relied on supernatural assumptions to justify political expediency. Descendants of Luther and Calvin, their emphasis on statements of belief over evidence of personal conduct (with faith, all is forgiven) made it possible to overlook the president’s massive and widely publicized record of immorality. At the same time, they yearned for protection, as they lived in what they considered to be the wilderness of national affairs.8
Among white conservative Christians of Pence’s sort, modern developments such as marriage equality for gay and lesbian citizens, made possible by recent Supreme Court decisions, marked them as latter-day versions of the exiled Israelites of the Bible. Despite their vast numbers and influence and their sense that, like the Jews, they were God’s “chosen” people, they saw themselves as victims. Their champions were politicians like Pence, who proclaimed their faith as the basis for their policies. Consistent with Luther’s theology, they believed that faith made their actions righteous. This contrasted with Aristotle, whose Ethics said good deeds make a good man.
Although these leaders could only do so much against the powerful—as governor, Pence had tried but failed to enact policies to permit antigay discrimination—they were nevertheless revered by the faithful. In the White House, Pence could act on their behalf. As the pastor of Pence’s church back home in Indiana once explained, the wily Daniel occupied a place “like the vice presidency” and served both God and the king of Babylon. As the king, Trump could be dangerous and disturbing, but the threat was less frightening with Daniel, or rather, Mike, by his side. Besides, if the worst comes to pass, and the world is engulfed by the apocalypse of Bible prophecy, the chosen will be saved.9
For more than a century, American evangelicals of various stripes had forecast the arrival of the apocalypse, often on specific dates, only to find life continuing, and even improving, for most people long after the appointed time. Though others would view these missed deadlines as evidence of errors, the mistaken prophets would be forgiven by believers who consider a profession of faith far more important than any accurate predictions about the end of days. In this way, faith became a substitute for facts and permitted believers to assert their superiority even as they proclaimed their humility. In the same way that President Trump insisted his genes made him better than others, this type of Christian assumed extra insights on an ontological basis: faith, rather than might, makes right. Such a belief permitted the faithful to claim humility in the shadow of God’s grace while also feeling just a little (or a lot) superior to others.10
Humble superiority had been Pence’s default setting during his twelve years in Congress and four as Indiana’s governor, where his blending of religion and politics had alienated fellow Republicans, who noted he could be harsh in his treatment of his opponents and stubborn in his beliefs. When Pence denied climate change or questioned the fact that smoking causes cancer, they saw unseemly and irrational arrogance. His disregard for science and other realms of expertise made him more like President Trump than many Americans understood. It was also consistent with the habits of mind that allowed him to tolerate the scandals that plagued the president and those he brought into his administration.
Dogged by three separate investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible connections to his campaign, Trump had seen four close associates charged with crimes. White House staff had been fired and replaced at an alarming rate. Amid the churn and uncertainty, the unflappable Pence reassured many that should Trump leave office, someone with a steady temperament would be there. Although it was never stated openly, he was already functioning as a kind of shadow president, taking on so many domestic, foreign, and partisan political assignments that he seemed more engaged in serious matters than the TV-addicted president himself.
With few connections in Washington or to the broader Republican establishment, Trump had relied on Pence to populate his administration. The vice president began this work as he headed the group that managed the transition with the Obama administration. Wherever possible, Pence supported the appointment of like-minded Christians such as Scott Pruitt, who was plucked from his post of attorney general of Oklahoma, to be administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Pruitt had proved his Christian Right bona fides as a state lawmaker who twice proposed laws that would give fathers property rights over fetuses in the mothers’ wombs. These efforts failed in the Oklahoma legislature but succeeded in establishing Pruitt as an antiabortion extremist. In his subsequent position as Oklahoma’s attorney general, he repeatedly sued the EPA to challenge its regulation of air and water pollution. Like so many on the Trump team, Pruitt would soon be engulfed by controversy over his spending and relationships with lobbyists. However, he was protected by his Christian Right allies and kept signaling his faith by joining Pence at regular Bible study meetings organized for cabinet members. The sessions were organized by Ralph Drollinger, a seven-foot-two-inch former NBA player turned evangelist who had said women with young children didn’t belong in state office and that Catholicism “is one of the primary false religions in the world.” Among the other regulars at the prayer meetings were Department of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson, Department of Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, and Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar. Azar, DeVos, and Perdue were longtime Pence allies.11
The prayer meetings demonstrated to the faithful that their votes had produced real change. Likewise, whenever possible, Pence returned to the theme he had sounded during the campaign—that Trump was God’s instrument. The theology behind this notion depended on the Calvinist belief that God elects those who will prosper on earth and that their successes prove they are His favorites. Perfectly circular, this idea credits the powerful with spiritual superiority that cannot be called into question. It also indicates that suffering—poverty, illness, et cetera—is a matter of a destiny determined before one’s birth. Of course, determining how God works through a person would depend on when one decides to consider an individual. Viewed at the height of his power, Richard Nixon would have seemed to be blessed. Soon after, God’s displeasure would have been there for all to see.
Believers who assume that God chooses winners and losers before they are born typically cite a verse from the Bible’s book of Jeremiah: “‘For I know the plans I have for you,’ declares the Lord, ‘Plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.’” The verse is Pence’s favorite bit of scripture, and it is written on a plaque he hung over the fireplace in the vice president’s residence in Washington. Depending on the day, he could look at it and take solace in the fact that God had plans for him to prevail after a momentary setback or find support for his belief that a given triumph fulfilled His plan. Either way, he comes out on top without bearing much responsibility.
Although it wasn’t likely that Donald Trump could cite Jeremiah, Calvinism dovetailed with his long-standing belief that he was born to greatness. Conservative Christianity gave him the chance to put a less egoistic gloss on this assumption, and whenever he could, Trump tried to demonstrate piety. At Pence’s urging, Trump declared May 3, 2018, as a National Day of Prayer and signed an executive order to ensure that the federal government was partnering with faith-based organizations. This initiative stemmed from the belief promoted by Pence and other conservatives that religious freedom was under attack from the Left. Trump’s executive order included a dubious passage that also played up a right-wing theme—that the Founding Fathers had sought to protect America as a Christian nation, that “religious people and institutions were free to practice their faith without fear of discrimination or retaliation by the federal government.”
Pence also wanted to leave the impression on his religious base that he was drawing Trump toward a life of faith. Pence, who was not very accessible in general media forums, readily discussed Trump’s turn to prayer in an interview on the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN). “There’s prayer going on on a regular basis in this White House,” Pence said. “And it’s one of the most meaningful things to me, whether it’s public meetings or not, I’ve lost count of the number of times that the president has nudged me, or nudged another member of the cabinet and said, ‘Let’s start this meeting with prayer.’” Pence sat down for the CBN interview on the same day that Trump acknowledged that he had lied about porn actress Stormy Daniels and that he did know his lawyer Michael Cohen had paid a $130,000 hush payment to her just before the presidential election.12
* * *
In addition to helping Trump name his team, Pence served as a guide on Capitol Hill. Like Joe Biden before him, who complemented Barack Obama’s charisma with a deep understanding of Washington’s ways, Pence knew the key figures in the House and Senate and could help Trump navigate toward his goals. The Biden comparison reassured those who feared the worst from Trump, but the example broke down when the two men were examined more closely. Both were lawyers, but while Biden had practiced as a public defender and founded his own firm, Pence had worked in the law only briefly on minor civil cases without distinction. Prior to being elected vice president, Biden had been a senator for thirty-six years, during which he chaired both the Foreign Affairs and Judiciary Committees, becoming highly expert in these two areas of government. A tireless worker, Biden sponsored hundreds of pieces of legislation that became law, including the landmark Violence Against Women Act. Pence was a five-term member of the House who had focused on climbing the ladder of party leadership but never chaired a major committee or authored a single successful piece of legislation. Just as many evangelicals believed that worldly success was a matter of God’s favor rather than individual effort, Pence made his choice to become a conservative, pro-business, antiabortion Republican, and he trusted God would make him successful.
As politicians, Biden and Pence established vastly different records, but they were even more distinct as personalities. Biden was an openly emotional man who made his feelings plain at every occasion, and he walked Capitol Hill as if it were his hometown neighborhood. He might have been the most popular senator in the chamber in the time when he served and was beloved by Republicans as well as his fellow Democrats. In the House, Pence was considered likeable enough, but he was not personally popular. His guarded manner combined with his assertive push for a leadership post inside the GOP caucus, despite scant accomplishments, caused some members of his own party to keep him at arm’s length. Democrats, even those who were on the Indiana delegation, found him inscrutable. When we spoke, Baron Hill, who served with Pence in Congress for four years, struggled to describe the man. “He was never disagreeable,” said Hill in 2018. “He was always nice,” he added, echoing comedian George Carlin’s bitter riff about people who cover their true personalities with a veneer of niceness. “But I can’t say I ever saw past the surface to the real Mike Pence.”
The real Mike Pence has been elusive, even to many who support him, throughout three decades of public life. Indeed, the word that is used over and over again when people talk about Pence—“nice”—may be the least distinct descriptor that could be attached to any person, place, or thing on earth. However, according to those who know him well, it does apply. Pence is also well practiced at striking a kindly pose. Study a hundred photos of Mike Pence and you’ll see the consistent image of a man who has spent a lifetime learning to avoid offense. It is a style that has permitted him to advance generally unpopular political positions—privatization of Social Security, opposition to gay rights, climate change denial—without alienating too many voters.
A pleasing demeanor made Pence popular in some corners of Indiana politics, where recent history is full of congenial characters, but it’s certain that the majority of Americans had little knowledge of Pence, let alone of his political views, prior to the 2016 campaign. Even after Donald Trump selected him as a running mate, Pence was recognized primarily for his demeanor and not his policy priorities. Anyone seeking to know more would have to dig into the public record he had established, and even there, the truth of the man would be difficult to see. Except for a nasty losing campaign for Congress, which he openly regretted, and an ill-fated attempt to legalize discrimination against gay and transgender people, Pence had steered clear of controversy. And though he received thousands of notices in Indiana’s press, he had submitted to very few extensive interviews. No major magazine or television show had profiled him in depth. No documentarian had recorded his rise. Instead, for years, Pence controlled and executed the construction of his reputation. This he accomplished as the folksy and well-spoken host of The Mike Pence Show, airing daily on statewide talk radio, and as an interviewer on a weekly TV program by the same name. Through these broadcasts, which put him on the public airwaves for thousands of hours each year, he won the trust of people for whom he represented not politics or policies but an indistinct country-kitchen, biscuits-and-gravy kind of comfort.
* * *
To sort the pieces of Mike Pence and assemble a clear political picture, one must begin with the understanding that in this age of media proliferation, when vast amounts of information are available about most public figures, his comparatively thin record could only be achieved through a series of deliberate choices. Indeed, Pence was, starting in the 1990s, a careful architect of his own bland image. On his statewide radio show, for which few transcripts or recordings could be found, Pence spoke directly to his audience in such a pleasant way that he called himself “Rush Limbaugh on decaf.”
In fact, Pence shared many political views with Limbaugh and other talkers who blustered and bullied their ways across the airwaves, but he was so measured and so respectful of others that even his political opponents seemed to forget that he had smeared Democratic incumbent Phil Sharp in a failed attempt to win his congressional seat and used his campaign’s checkbook to pay his own personal bills. That Mike Pence seemed all but forgotten, replaced by an agreeable fellow whose hair had turned a premature but distinguished white and who, with each broadcast and chamber of commerce luncheon speech, became a more perfect—perhaps the most perfect—Republican candidate for national office, one who could appeal to libertarian economic conservatives as well as right-wing Christian social issue voters without fully alienating those independents and Democrats who might vote for a Republican who doesn’t scare them.
Pence’s demeanor made him appealing to activists who, beginning in the late 1970s, put together large and well-funded efforts to identify, train, fund, and promote future leaders who would dominate politics and policy on the local, state, and national levels. In the beginning, these programs could be divided into distinct parts. One, symbolized by Rev. Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority, pushed a religious agenda—antiabortion, anti–gay rights, pro–school prayer—and organized through churches and religious broadcasters. Funding for this activity and for favored candidates came from TV viewers, church members, and rich family foundations like the Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation, which was built on the Amway home products company. In explaining their giving, Betsy DeVos noted, in 1997:
I have decided to stop taking offense at the suggestion that we are buying influence. Now I simply concede the point. They are right. We do expect something in return. We expect to foster a conservative governing philosophy consisting of limited government and respect for traditional American virtues. We expect a return on our investment.13
The second part of the modern right-wing movement advocated extreme free-market capitalism that would most benefit the megarich companies, business associations, and individuals who financed them. They wanted to slash taxes and social programs, eliminate regulations, and crush labor unions. The leading figures in this part of the right-wing movement were the billionaires Charles and David Koch, who had become two of the richest people in the world via growing family interests in oil, chemicals, agriculture, and other industries. Long-term political activists, the Kochs and their allies pursued political influence on a scale not seen in America since the start of the twentieth century, when corporate trusts so dominated politics that some members of the United States Senate were presumed to represent industries—oil, railroads, steel, and so on—rather than their constituents.
The modern influence game involves entities with names that are not immediately associated with a vested interest like an oil company. Instead, candidates and officeholders are supported in various ways by such organizations as the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, the American Legislative Exchange Council, and the State Policy Network, which all happen to have been supported by the Kochs. As described by historian Clayton Coppin, who was hired by Koch Industries to research the family and its activities, entities were given “obscure and misleading names” so that their true purpose would be hidden.14
Despite concerted effort and substantial spending, neither the economic Right nor the Christian conservatives got what they wanted in the 1980s. Eventually, those with libertarian leanings, who objected to the freedom-limiting social agenda of the religious activists, made an uneasy alliance with them in the interest of victory. This accommodation saw both sides stress areas of agreement and downplay points of difference. Election wins at the state level allowed for gerrymandering of congressional districts, which, in turn, put more federal offices within reach. However, no matter how much organizing and support the advocates provided, they still required presentable candidates who could win.
In an era when the political parties wielded less power than they had enjoyed historically, highly motivated individuals who could connect with voters on a personal level and were willing to align themselves with interest groups outside of the party represented the future of politics. When he entered politics, Mike Pence was one of a handful of men and women with the profile—ambitious, conservative Christian, free-market oriented, open to unconventional alliances—that made him an ideal Republican of the modern era. When he eventually made it to Congress in 2000, Pence was remarkable as one House GOP freshman who ticked off all of the Christian Right and economic conservative boxes. More typical was Darrell Issa of California, who came from a traditional Republican businessman background and supported gay rights. However, in the years that followed, Pence’s Christian brand of GOP politics would gain against Issa’s secular type until, by 2018, Issa would announce his retirement from politics and Pence would hold the second-highest office in the land.15
* * *
Understanding Mike Pence requires an exploration of his origins, a true sense of how he developed into a political figure, and a grasp of the changing context of his time. He defines himself by his religion, his family life, his politics, and his attachment to his home state of Indiana. When assessing his own personality, he often references an old-fashioned sensibility. On a number of occasions, he has called himself “the frozen man.” Although he offered the term as a proud description of a person with unwavering respect for eternal values, it also suggests an icy rigidity he has shown with attempts to impose his values, including some associated with America’s bigoted past.16
Although Pence presents himself as a deeply moral man, his record indicates both a ruthlessness and a comfort with aggression that belie this pose. It is telling that Pence has claimed Charles Colson as his mentor. Colson was the convicted Watergate conspirator who wrote a so-called enemies list for Richard Nixon and proposed firebombing a Washington think tank in order to obtain documents it held. Pence may have embraced Colson as a “dear friend and mentor” because he had undergone a religious conversion, but it is just as likely that Pence was drawn to Colson’s lingering aggressive tendencies. In 1996, decades after Watergate, Colson wrote that a “showdown between church and state may be inevitable” in order to thwart a secular government that was becoming intolerable for conservative Christians.17
Colson wrote of the looming showdown as Mike Pence was growing into the role of conservative Christian politician. Pence was helped in this project by many of the same forces—big donors, activist organizations, and new forms of media—that were changing the overall political landscape. He also benefited from the anger and fear of white conservative Christians who felt their status under threat. These Americans saw demographic trends that were rapidly making them into one minority group like so many others, and they felt alienated in a way that activated them as voters. They hungered for the America of an imagined past—more white, rural, heterosexual, and homogeneous—and which Pence seemed to represent. Put simply, Mike Pence might have been able to rise in another time, but the conditions that prevailed when he decided to make politics his life were especially favorable and became even more congenial as time passed.18
Pence’s religious beliefs impelled his effort to outlaw abortion and to limit equality for gay Americans. It allowed him to smile while embracing political allies whom others found morally repugnant. According to his faith, everything on earth is predestined by God’s will. If God chose to make Trump president, then it was fine for Pence to say and do just about anything to support him. It is the self-justifying theology that also enabled Pence to praise former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio’s commitment to “the rule of law” as he offered support for Arpaio’s bid to become his state’s next United States senator. He also said he was “humbled” by Arpaio’s presence at the rally where he spoke.
Unmentioned by Pence was the fact that Arpaio’s sheriff’s department had been notoriously aggressive about detaining Hispanics on the suspicion that they were in the United States illegally, and it was abusive to those who were arrested. Arpaio even operated an outdoor prison where conditions were so bad that he once called it a “concentration camp.” When a federal court ordered him to cease detaining people on the basis of their appearance, Arpaio failed to comply and was convicted of criminal contempt. President Trump had officially pardoned him, and this meant that Pence was happy to stand by the former sheriff, who was the living emblem of hostility toward immigrants, and sing his praises.
The occasion moved Washington Post columnist George Will, a conservative icon, to declare Pence “America’s most repulsive public figure.” After noting how Pence was “oozing unctuousness from every pore,” Will warned of the danger in his right-wing Christian populism, adding, “Pence, one of evangelical Christians’ favorite pin-ups, genuflects at various altars, as the mobocratic spirit and the vicious portion require.” (His reference to the “vicious portion” was borrowed from Abraham Lincoln, who had used it to describe those who threatened the institutions of democracy.)19
As noted by Will, Pence represented the epitome of religion joined with politics in service to an extreme partisan faction. The combination was the basis for his self-confidence and righteousness, and it served his ambition. By 2017, he was one of the most effective politicians of the twenty-first century, and a contender to one day be president himself. Mike Pence was all these things, and thus a more complex and consequential figure than either his supporters or detractors knew.