Manic Street Preachers are an education. No other popular artist of the last quarter-century has done more to inspire academic investigation, whether as an active catalyst (the innumerable cultural, political and historical references in the Manics’ lyrics and record sleeves; the much-vaunted “Richey reading list”) or as passive subject matter themselves (as a case study in Trojan Horse entryism; as an example of the interplay of authenticity and artifice, and so on).

My own 1999 biography, Everything (A Book About Manic Street Preachers), has itself been the topic of several theses, adding yet another layer to this sediment of meta-texts. At the time that I wrote it, I knew that mere dates and facts could never adequately convey the Manics’ importance, so I interrupted the narrative with a series of essays on various aspects of the band, connecting them to broader cultural themes (an approach heavily influenced by American writer Greil Marcus).

In Triptych, Rhian E. Jones, Daniel Lukes and Larissa Wodtke take that process even further, zooming in on just one album — The Holy Bible — with a microscopic intensity that modern rock writing rarely, if ever, attains. (That’s largely because this isn’t “rock writing”, per se. Not in the traditional, hack sense anyway. It is academic writing of the highest calibre. By which I mean, incidentally, that among all its other qualities, it is unfailingly readable, and not prone to deliberate obfuscation.)

That The Holy Bible is the Manics’ masterpiece is beyond question (though one writer in Triptych does directly question that description.) It isn’t only their greatest album, but one of the greatest albums ever made: I personally place it on a pedestal alongside Bowie’s Low and Public Enemy’s It Takes A Nation Of Millions To Hold Us Back.

The exact reasons for its greatness are illuminated with intimidating vividness here. Triptych (the title, of course, being a pun on The Holy Bible’s tripartite cover art, South Face/Front Face/ North Face by Jenny Saville) consists of three mutually-complementary essays, each shining a searchlight onto the album from a different angle.

Rhian E. Jones, herself a product of the same South Wales mining valleys as the Manics, places the band in their correct socio-historical context, frequently (but never self-indulgently) using first-person reminiscences to illustrate her argument. As singular and jarring as The Holy Bible may have seemed in the post-political, carnivalesque Britain of 1994, Jones’ chapter demonstrates that it did not simply drop, unannounced and fully-formed, from a clear blue sky, nor even slate-grey one.

Daniel Lukes begins from the intriguing perspective of an outsider who failed, at first, to recognise the fellow outsiders in the Manics. He then proceeds to apply lit-crit techniques to what is, lest we forget, “just” a rock record, taking the “Richey reading list” to an extreme by venturing deep into the works of Eliot, Mirbeau, Selby, Plath and a host of others. There is, he tacitly acknowledges, a danger that immersing oneself in the Manics’ cultural diet is not always healthy: one section, with lovely selfawareness, is titled “Reading Too Much into The Holy Bible”.

Larissa Wodtke’s contribution, perhaps the most poetic of the three in style, makes the case that The Holy Bible functions as a kind of aural museum (there is, one is reminded, a reason why we call such artefacts “a record”) that would come to define the band’s every action in the decades since its release. Her deconstruction of the album’s lyrics is forensic and fascinating.

Any intellectual analysis of popular music inevitably lays itself open to mockery from those who have yet to shake off the straitjacket of received notions of “high” and “low” culture. (Dare to take pop seriously as an art form and a cultural force, and an appearance in Private Eye’s Pseuds Corner column is an occupational hazard.) But such concerns should be cast aside, especially when dealing with Manic Street Preachers, who reward deep thought more than any other band of their generation.

The very best music writing offers the reader hitherto-unconsidered ways of listening, and new ways of thinking about pop. Triptych achieves that, in considerable style. It’s an insane book, whose very existence seems improbable and oddsdefying. The closest comparison is perhaps Invisible Republic by the aforementioned Greil Marcus, a book about just one album, The Basement Tapes by Bob Dylan (one of the few artists to inspire as much academic endeavour as the Manics). Then again, The Holy Bible is an insane, improbable, odds-defying album.

Triptych is a book I wish I’d written, while knowing, deep down, that I never could. I’m grateful that someone else has, or to be exact, that three other someone-elses have.

Simon Price, 2016