Amy Y.-Y.1 and ChenAmit Garg2
1Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Canton, CT, USA
2Department of Dermatology, Hofstra NSLIJ School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, USA
This chapter addresses principally non-inflammatory acquired disorders of subcutaneous fat with an emphasis on acquired lipodystrophy, fat hypertrophy, subcutaneous lipomatosis and lipoedema. While some of the entities discussed are very common, such as cellulite and obesity, most are much more rare. Panniculitis and genetic disorders of subcutaneous fat are addressed in Chapters 99 and 74, respectively.
Acquired lipodystrophy refers to a heterogeneous group of disorders in which there is localized, partial or generalized loss of subcutaneous fat (lipoatrophy), in certain cases accompanied by fat accumulation in other body sites.
Acquired generalized lipodystrophy (AGL) is a rare disease characterized by a selective loss of adipose tissue from large regions of the body, occurring after birth [1].
After its initial report by Ziegler in 1928 [2], AGL was described in more detail through autopsy findings by Lawrence in 1946 [3]. Although loss of adipose tissue in AGL most often occurs during childhood and adolescence, a few cases report AGL in individuals over the age of 65 years [4, 5]. The pattern and extent of fat loss in AGL is variable. Most patients have generalized loss of fat, though fat may be spared in some areas, such as retro-orbital fat. In addition to the loss of adipose tissue, patients often develop severe hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, severe insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia and low serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels [6–9].
Acquired generalized lipodystrophy is a rare disease and thus its incidence and prevalence are difficult to estimate. Less than 100 cases were identified in a literature review published in 2003 [10]. More recently, in 2012, it was estimated that AGL affects approximately one in 100 000 people in the European Union.
Most patients with AGL present during childhood or adolescence.
Women are affected three times more often than men [10].
The majority of patients have been white, although AGL has also been reported in Hispanic and East Asian patients [10, 11].
Most AGL patients have some degree of metabolic derangement, including fasting and/or postprandial hyperinsulinaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, low serum levels of HDL, and low leptin and adiponectin [6–9, 10]. Diabetes most often occurs subsequent to the onset of AGL, though in some it may present before or at the time of onset [10]. AGL patients usually do not develop diabetic ketoacidosis [12]. Patients may also have increased basal metabolic rate and complain of fatigue and voracious appetite [10].
Hepatomegaly occurs in 70–100% of AGL patients. Hepatic steatosis or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis results in mild to moderate elevation of serum transaminases. Splenomegaly may result from portal hypertension and cirrhosis [10].
Cardiomyopathy may be associated with AGL. In a 2011 study of left ventricular mass in 13 patients with AGL, three had mild and three had moderate ventricular hypertrophy. Abnormalities were seen in five of 11 AGL patients whose electrocardiogram was available for analysis [13].
Muscle and neurological involvement have rarely been reported [5, 11].
Reproductive capacity is normal in male patients with AGL. Female AGL patients may have normal reproduction although irregular menses are common [10]. Primary or secondary amenorrhoea rarely occurs [10, 14, 15]. Single [16] or multiple [17, 18] bone lucencies and cysts have been reported in AGL patients, though the clinical significance of these lesions is not clear [18]. Lymphadenopathy has also been reported in some [7, 18–20].
The mechanism of fat loss in AGL is unknown. Despite reports of a variety of preceding infections, it is not clear that these infections directly cause AGL [21, 22]. The classic complement pathway is postulated to be involved in the pathogenesis among AGL patients with autoimmune hepatitis and low serum complement [23, 24]. Antibody-mediated destruction or cell-mediated lysis of adipocytes has also been considered [25].
The consequences are that there is an insufficient mass of adipose tissue to store excess energy, which is stored instead as triglyceride in the liver and skeletal muscle, and that there is a perpetual elevation of plasma free fatty acid (FFA), resulting in an impaired β-cell response to glucose and insulin resistance [26–29]. Low serum leptin and adiponectin levels, reflecting the low amount of body fat in these patients, may further contribute to severe insulin resistance and the metabolic complications observed in AGL [30–33].
Acquired generalized lipodystrophy is a clinical diagnosis, though histopathology may help confirm the diagnosis. Tissue examination demonstrates a complete or near-complete absence of subcutaneous fat, with the dermis and fascia in direct apposition. If adipocytes are present, they are markedly reduced in number and size and they are arranged in small groups surrounded by abundant connective tissue [34].
No known genetic mutation or familial cluster has been identified.
In contrast to congenital lipodystrophy, patients with AGL have normal fat density and distribution at birth. The onset of fat loss is typically insidious over months to years (Figure 100.1), although rapid progression over weeks has been observed [10]. Rarely, the process of fat destruction may occur rapidly in one area and stay quiescent over months to years, only to become active again later and result in generalized fat loss [2, 10]. The extent and degree of fat loss is variable. Usual sites of involvement include the face (Figure 100.1a), trunk, abdomen and extremities. Underlying veins and musculature become prominent with severe fat loss (Figure 100.1b). In some, loss of fat may also involve the palms, soles and abdominal cavity. Generally, marrow and retro-orbital fat are preserved.
Acanthosis nigricans of the axillae, groin, neck, umbilicus and nipples is noted in 45–64% of AGL patients [10]. Other less common dermatological findings include localized [35, 36] or generalized hyperpigmentation [37, 38], telangiectasia [19] and hyperkeratosis of the palms and soles [16]. Women with AGL may have mild hirsutism [10, 37, 39, 40]. Rarely, virilization with temporal recession of hair and acne have been reported [14, 41]. Alopecia [6] and curly hair [7, 10, 16, 21, 37, 40, 42] have also been observed. Acromegaloid facial features with large hands and feet may rarely be seen [9, 10].
In 2003, Misra and Garg proposed new diagnostic criteria applicable to the broad spectrum of AGL patients. Essential criteria include selective loss of body fat affecting large regions of the body, beginning after birth but usually before adolescence. Supportive clinical criteria include loss of subcutaneous fat from the palms and soles, a preceding history of tender subcutaneous nodular swellings, histological confirmation from involved tissue, acanthosis nigricans, hepatosplenomegaly and the presence of other autoimmune diseases.
Supportive laboratory criteria include impaired glucose tolerance, severe fasting and/or postprandial hyperinsulinaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, low serum HDL, low serum leptin and/or adiponectin, and evidence by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of fat loss from large regions of the body with preserved bone marrow fat [10]. The number of these secondary clinical or laboratory criteria needed to support a diagnosis of AGL has not been formally established.
Acquired generalized lipodystrophy is subdivided into three types. Type I AGL, in which initially localized panniculitis precedes generalized fat loss, accounts for approximately 25% of cases [1]. Type II AGL, which accounts for another 25% of cases, is associated with autoimmune diseases including haemolytic anaemia, chronic autoimmune hepatitis, Hashimoto thyroiditis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile dermatomyositis and vitiligo [6, 23, 35, 36, 43, 44, 45]. Juvenile dermatomyositis may have the strongest association with AGL [10]. The remaining patients have the most common subtype, type III (idiopathic) AGL, in which no triggers or associated diseases are identified.
Some AGL patients may initially present with localized or partial lipodystrophy and hence may be misclassified as having acquired partial lipodystrophy or localized lipodystrophy.
AGL patients are differentiated from congenital generalized lipodystrophy (CGL) patients who have near-complete generalized fat loss at birth (see Chapter 74). Furthermore, CGL patients have advanced bone age and mental retardation. As with AGL, CGL patients may have acromegaloid features, lytic bone lesions and cardiomyopathy [10]. Lytic bone lesions are, however, more common and the cardiomyopathy more severe in CGL [10, 13]. MRI studies of CGL patients show an absence of ‘metabolically active’ fat in intra-abdominal and intrathoracic regions, and in bone marrow, while marrow fat is preserved in AGL patients [10, 46]. Genetic analysis for known mutations may aid in the confirmation of CGL.
While patients with mandibuloacral dysplasia may have generalized fat loss, these patient also have skeletal anomalies (see Chapter 72). The identification of associated genetic mutations can help to confirm this diagnosis.
Family histories as well as genotyping will also help differentiate AGL from autosomal dominant familial partial lipodystrophy (see Chapter 74) [1].
Patients with AGL may suffer complications from metabolic disturbances and other associated co-morbid conditions in association with type II AGL. Retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy are common complications because of the patients’ longstanding diabetes. Hypertriglyceridaemia may lead to eruptive xanthomas, lipaemia retinalis and acute pancreatitis [10]. These metabolic abnormalities also predispose AGL patients to premature atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease [6, 10].
The loss of subcutaneous fat tissue in AGL patients is permanent. The prognosis of AGL patients largely depends on the course and management of co-morbidities.
Laboratory and ancillary testing is pursued to establish the presence and monitor the course of co-morbid diseases. While serum leptin is not useful for establishing the diagnosis, it may predict response to replacement therapy with the synthetic recombinant analogue of human leptin, metreleptin [1].
There is no established management algorithm for AGL. Subcutaneous fat loss is irreversible. To the extent feasible, cosmetic procedures such as filler injections, autologous adipose tissue transfer and muscle tissue transfers may help correct volume losses [1, 47, 48]. Optimal management of co-morbid conditions requires collaboration between primary care physicians and several specialists.
In one trial, which included three AGL patients among others with various lipodystrophies, 4 months of twice-daily subcutaneous metreleptin injections were shown to be safe and effective. There was a significant decrease in fasting blood glucose level and glycosylated haemoglobin in two patients. In three patients with hypertriglyceridaemia, fasting levels of plasma triglycerides decreased by 83%. In these patients, fasting plasma triglycerides increased soon after discontinuation of the injections and were corrected once again after reinitiation of the therapy [49]. Furthermore, liver volume and serum transaminases decreased significantly during metreleptin therapy, suggesting that it reduced hepatic steatosis [50]. Metreleptin has been approved under the orphan designation for the treatment of AGL in the European Union since July 2012; it remains investigational in the USA.
Acquired partial lipodystrophy (APL) is a rare disease characterized by symmetrical fat loss, usually occurring before the age of 15 years [1, 2].
Acquired partial lipodystrophy was first reported by Mitchell [3] and later by Barraquer [4] and by Simons [5]. Although rare, APL is the most common of the non-localized lipodystrophies, other than HIV-associated lipodystrophy. It is characterized by symmetrical and insidious although progressive fat loss starting from the face and scalp and gradually progressing downward to involve the neck, shoulders, upper extremities, thoracic region and upper abdomen. Involvement of the lower extremities is uncommon [1, 2].
Because it is rare, the incidence and prevalence of APL is difficult to estimate. By 2000, there were approximately 250 cases reported in the English literature [1].
Onset is typically before the age of 15 years, with a median of 8 years [1, 2].
Women are affected approximately three times more commonly than men [1].
Most reported patients have been white.
Approximately one-third of patients develop mesangiocapillary glomerulonephiritis (MCGN), usually more than 10 years after the onset of lipodystrophy [1]. Systemic lupus erythematosus has been associated with APL and has occurred 2–28 years after the onset of lipodystrophy [6–9]. Other autoimmune diseases, such as dermatomyositis [10], leukocytoclastic vasculitis [11], dermatitis herpetiformis and coeliac diseases [12], hypothyroidism, pernicious anemia [13], rheumatoid arthritis [8] and temporal arteritis, have also been reported. More recently, APL has been reported in the setting of chronic sclerodermatous graft-versus-host-disease, POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy and skin changes) syndrome and extrinsic allergic alveolitis, as well as central nervous system (CNS) disorders including epilepsy, sensorineural deafness and mental retardation (see Chapter 148) [14–17].
There is evidence to support an autoimmune-mediated destruction of adipocytes in APL. Approximately 80–90% of APL patients have a serum immunoglobulin G named C3 nephritic factor [18, 19]. This blocks the degradation of the enzyme C3 convertase, which leads to excessive consumption of C3. As a result, serum C3 levels are low in more than 80% of APL patients [20]. Levels of C1q, C4, C5 and C6 and factors B and P are usually normal, suggesting selective activation of the alternative complement pathway [21]. Lysis of adipocytes may be related to the expression of several complement proteins such as factors D (adipsin), B, H and P [22, 23, 24]. For example, in vitro studies suggest that the C3 nephritic factor causes lysis in adipocytes expressing factor D [22]. Heterogeneity of factor D expression in adipose tissue in different anatomical locations has been postulated to explain the selective loss of upper body fat in APL [23].
In those APL patients without C3 nephritic factor, other immune abnormalities are postulated to be relevant pathogenetic factors. In a paediatric APL patient without C3 nephritic factor, serum tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were noted to be elevated [25]. TNF-α has been shown to cause apoptosis in adipocyte cultures, and IL-6 stimulates lipolysis in human adipocytes [26, 27]. TNF-α also influences the complement pathway by controlling factor D production in adipocytes [25].
Acquired partial lipodystrophy is a clinical diagnosis based on the presentation and progression of disease. Histopathology, in common with AGL, shows complete or near-complete absence of subcutaneous fat, with the dermis and fascia in direct apposition. If adipocytes are present, they are markedly reduced in number and size, and they are arranged in small groups surrounded by abundant connective tissues [28].
Although fat loss has been preceded by infection in some reported cases of APL, the relationship between APL and infection is unclear [23].
LMNB2 mutations have been reported in five patients with APL, although some of these had atypical presentations [29].
Fat loss in APL occurs symmetrically, starting on the face and scalp, then gradually spreading to involve the neck, shoulders, upper extremities, thoracic region and upper abdomen (Figure 100.2). Involvement of the inguinal region or thighs is uncommon. Fat in the hips and lower extremities is unaffected. In fact, affected women frequently accumulate excess fat in these regions after puberty. Fat loss typically progresses over a period of about 18 months, although it may continue for several years. Orbital, mediastinal, gluteal, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, perirenal and bone marrow fat is usually unaffected [1, 2].
Three phenotypic subtypes have been recognized: (i) upper body fat loss; (ii) upper body fat loss with hypertrophy of adipose tissue in the lower half of the body; and (iii) hemi-lipodystrophy in which only one side of the face or body is affected.
Acquired partial lipodystrophy is differentiated from familial partial lipodystrophy in which there is a family history of similar lipodystrophy, variations in clinical presentation of fat loss and identified genetic mutations. A history of trauma and medication history can help differentiate other forms of acquired lipodystrophy from APL. APL is differentiated from AGL based on the extent of involvement as well as sparing of the intra-abdominal fat.
Unlike in patients with AGL, insulin resistance, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, acanthosis nigricans, hirsutism or menstrual abnormalities are less common in APL patients [1].
Fat loss is irreversible in APL. Overall prognosis is driven by the presence of co-morbidities.
The initial evaluation of APL patients should include serum C3 level and C3 nephritic factor, as well as baseline screening for metabolic derangements with a comprehensive metabolic panel, fasting glucose, lipid panels and insulin level. Evaluation should also include assessment of associated co-morbid conditions. Periodic and continued monitoring for renal disease and autoimmunity is warranted. MRI may demonstrate the extent of fat loss if needed.
There is no established management algorithm for AGL. Subcutaneous fat loss is irreversible. To the extent feasible, cosmetic procedures such as filler injections, autologous adipose tissue transfer and muscle tissue transfers may help correct volume losses. However, the durable efficacy and safety of these approaches have not been extensively investigated. The identification of neutralizing antibodies against C3 nephritic factors in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has led to treatment of patients who have C3 nephritic factors and type II MCGN with IVIg with encouraging results [30, 31]. Optimal management of co-morbid conditions requires collaboration between primary care physicians and several specialists.
Lipodystrophy in patients affected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens containing protease inhibitor (PI) or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). It is now the most prevalent type of lipodystrophy, in which both lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy may be observed (see Chapter 31).
The first report of fat redistribution in an HIV-infected individual undergoing antiretroviral therapy including a PI was in 1997 [1]. Lipodystrophy in HIV-infected patients usually appears after patients have been receiving PI- or NRTI-containing HAART regimens for at least 2 years [2]. Currently, there is no consensus on the definition or diagnostic criteria for lipodystrophy in the HIV-infected patient [3]. In 2003, Carr et al. established a diagnostic model that included the variables of age, sex, known duration of HIV infection, HIV disease stage, waist to hip ratio, anion gap, serum HDL cholesterol level and trunk to peripheral fat ratio [4]. Although follow-up prospective studies confirmed its high diagnostic sensitivity, the complexity of the model is thought to impede its use in daily clinical practice [5].
Lipodystrophy in HIV-infected patients is the most prevalent among lipodystrophies. Due to limitations in the definition, selection of study population and duration of follow-up, there are considerable differences in its reported incidence and prevalence. Prevalence ranges from 8% to 84% with an average of 42% [6]. Average incidence ranges from 7.3 to 11.7 per 100 patient-years [7, 8]. Generally, higher prevalence is reported among patients receiving long-term therapy. In pooled analyses, the prevalence is 17% among adults treated with PI-containing therapy for less than 1 year and 43% in those treated for more than 1 year [6]. Each additional 6 months of treatment with HAART is associated with a 1.57 times increased risk of lipodystrophy [7]. It is expected that the prevalence will increase in the future with longer follow-up and continued use of HAART [6].
The risk of developing HIV-associated lipodystrophy increases with age [6, 9]. Children receiving PI-containing HAART therapy exhibit a similar redistribution of body fat and metabolic derangements, although children may have a relatively smaller increase in visceral fat in the trunk [10–13].
Female sex is associated with an increased risk in some studies [3].
White and East Asian races have been linked to having an increased risk of HIV-associated lipodystrophy [14].
Patients with HIV-related lipodystrophy may develop hypertriglyceridaemia, although diabetes is less common [2]. There may also be a predisposition to coronary artery disease [15].
While the exact cause of HIV-associated lipodystrophy is unknown, both PIs and NRTIs are implicated in the pathogenesis. Because these drug classes are often given together as part of HAART, the individual effects of these drugs on the specific lipodystrophy phenotype remains unclear. It is speculated that while PIs induce peripheral lipodystrophy and metabolic abnormalities, NRTIs may be responsible for the fat accumulation in certain regions such as the buffalo hump [2].
First and second generation PIs have been shown to inhibit adipocyte differentiation and lipogenesis in vitro [16]. PIs may also induce insulin resistance by inhibiting glucose transporter-4 expressions [17]. NRTIs, especially zidovudine and stavudine, have been proposed to induce fat loss by inhibiting mitochondrial polymerase γ and causing mitochondrial toxicity [18, 19]. This results in production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which have been linked to lipoatrophy [20]. Excess adipocyte apoptosis was also observed in ex vivo fat samples from lipoatrophic areas [21].
The mechanism for the increased amounts of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) observed in HIV-associated lipodystrophy is also unclear. VAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) differ in their metabolism, gene expression and inflammatory status [22]. As a result, adipocytes or other cells in VAT and SAT may respond to stimuli (e.g. PIs) in different ways, resulting in hypertrophy in one area and atrophy in another [3].
Several factors have been postulated to influence the risk of developing HIV-associated lipodystrophy, including age, gender, ethnicity, duration and status of HIV infection, as well as exposure to both PI- and non-PI-containing HAART [3, 6]. Both high and low CD4 counts have been reported in affected patients [23–25].
There is some evidence that first generation unboosted PIs, such as indinavir, are associated with a higher risk of lipodystrophy than are booster PIs [3]. In one study, the incidence of lipoatrophy was lower in patients treated with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir than in those who received unboosted atazanavir [14]. In another study, patients treated with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir developed lipodystrophy by 96 weeks of treatment less frequently than those who received efavirenz, regardless of the type of NRTI used [26].
Polymorphisms in genes involved in adipocyte apoptosis and metabolism have also been implicated [3], including ones involved in the pyrimidine pathway or encoding potentially relevant enzymes, cytokines or peptides such as polymerase γ, matrix metalloproteinase 1, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, resistin and mitochondrial haplogroups.
Most patients present with a gradual loss of subcutaneous fat from the face, arms and legs. Facial involvement is present in 38–52% of HIV patients with lipodystrophy [3]. Fat loss from the suprazygomatic and temporal regions of the face can be severe enough to impart a stigmatizing emaciated appearance. Patients may also accumulate excess fat over the chin, breasts and waist, as well as over the upper back, producing a so-called ‘buffalo hump’ (Figure 100.3) [6].
Generalized loss of body fat is commonly seen in HIV-infected patients with AIDS wasting syndrome. Patients with AIDS wasting syndrome have decreased body weight and lean body mass, without accumulation of excess fat over the chin, upper back, breasts or waist. Those with AIDS wasting syndrome also do not develop glucose intolerance or hyperinsulinaemia, although they may have hypertriglyceridaemia [6]. Other differential diagnoses to consider include Cushing syndrome and iatrogenic lipodystrophy related to testosterone therapy.
Scoring systems have been developed to quantify facial lipoatrophy. In one, the score ranges from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe), depending on the degree of malar depression, presence or absence of buccal extension and defined melolabial ridge [27]. Other scoring methods involve the use of various imaging modalities which may not be practical in the clinical setting [3].
Complications are related to co-morbidities, including dyslipidaemia, impaired glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and coronary artery disease.
Lipodystrophy is progressive with ongoing HAART therapy [2]. While the possibility of subcutaneous fat recovery exists, it is typically slow and incomplete [3].
There is no established algorithm for the management of HIV-associated lipodystrophy. Management is challenging and requires multidisciplinary input from infectious disease specialists, endocrinologists, nutritionists and primary care physicians. The stigma associated with facial lipodystrophy in particular may have a profound psychosocial impact and psychological support may be required.
Modification of previously successful antiretroviral therapy may increase the risk of treatment failure and must be done in consultation with an infectious disease specialist. Modest improvement in lipoatrophy has been reported with the removal of NRTIs [28]. While metabolic derangements such as dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance seem to be partly reversible if PI therapy is discontinued, lipodystrophy is usually unchanged [3].
Low-calorie or low-fat, high-fibre diets combined with aerobic exercise may improve central fat accumulation [29], although there is little evidence that diet or exercise significantly improves lipoatrophy [29, 30, 31]. Thiazolidinediones, which have been shown to induce adipocyte differentiation and increase subcutaneous fat mass, have been tried as pharmacological agents to treat lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients with inconsistent results [32]. Uridine and pravastatin have been reported to improve lipoatrophy in small randomized trials, but these results need further confirmation [33, 34]. Facial fillers such as injectable poly-l-lactic acid as well as autologous fat transfers have both been used to correct severe facial lipoatrophy [35, 36].
Switching or discontinuing antiretroviral therapy has not been shown to reduce VAT [37, 38]. Since growth hormone deficiency has been associated with visceral adiposity in the general population as well as in HIV patients with lipodystrophy, growth hormone supplementation with doses ranging from 0.33 to 6 mg daily has been tried [39, 40]: patients with abdominal lipohypertrophy achieved a 10–20% reduction in VAT and 6–7% reduction in SAT in two studies involving the administration of growth hormone [41, 42]. The improvement was lost once therapy was discontinued. Treatment with tesamorelin, a growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue that closely mimics the physiological dose and function of its physiological counterpart, showed a 15.2% reduction in VAT, compared with a 5% increase in VAT in the placebo group (P <0.001), at 6 months in a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [43].
Surgical interventions such as liposuction have been used to remove excess fat from the anterior neck, breasts and abdominal compartment [44, 45, 46]. However, liposuction cannot remove intra-abdominal visceral fat. Furthermore, approximately 25% of patients will experience recurrence of lipohypertrophy after liposuction.
Localized lipoatrophy and/or lipodystrophy is a heterogeneous group of disorders presenting as one or multiple depressions of various sizes, ranging from a few centimetres to greater than 20 cm in diameter.
Semicircular lipoatrophy (SL) is characterized by localized, often bilateral, symmetrical, transverse, semicircular depressions across the anterolateral aspects of the thighs due to atrophy of the underlying subcutaneous fat.
First described in the German literature in 1974 [1], SL is characterized by localized, symmetrical and often bilateral, transverse, semicircular depressions over the anterolateral thighs [1, 2, 3].
Semicircular lipoatrophy is probably commoner than the small number of reported cases (about 100) would suggest. [2, 4, 5].
Most SL cases present in the third or fourth decades of life [6], although it has also been reported among children and the elderly [4].
The majority of cases occur in women [3].
The aetiology of SL is unclear. An older theory related the presence of SL to impaired circulation in the upper leg as a consequence of a congenital abnormality in the lateral femoral circumflex artery [7]. However, patients with arteritis or those whose quadriceps artery has been ligated do not develop SL [8]. An anomaly of fat metabolism in these patients has also been proposed [8, 9].
A current and more plausible explanation associates SL with repeated mechanical pressure as a form of microtrauma to the thighs [10, 11]. Suggested mechanisms include repeatedly standing or sitting in an unvarying position in which the affected area is constantly compressed by or knocked against various objects [1, 12]. Wearing constricting jeans or use of an elastic girdle has also been implicated [3, 13–15].
In cases where clusters of co-workers are affected in the same company, repetitive pressure against desk furniture has been identified. In those cases, the height of the depression on the leg measured from the floor plus the height of the shoe heel were constant and the same as the height of the desk [12, 16]. In a recent company-wide case–control study, the only statistically significant variables for SL development are female sex and leaning of thighs against the edge of the table [6].
The histopathology findings in SL are non-specific. There is partial or complete loss of fat in the affected area with replacement by newly formed collagen [5, 17].
Semicircular lipoatrophy is characterized by localized, transverse, semicircular depressions, 2–4 cm in width, that are often symmetrical and bilateral. These depressions may also appear band-like, and when more than one is present, they may appear in a parallel arrangement [2, 3]. There is no preceding inflammation and the overlying skin is normal. The anterolateral thighs are commonly affected bilaterally. Unilateral cases have been described as well [2, 10, 11, 18]. Multilocular and progressive lesions affecting the trunk and limbs were seen in one patient [19]. Although SL is usually asymptomatic, some patients complained of heavy legs, a burning sensation, cramps or pain after exercising [2, 10, 18, 20].
The differential diagnosis of SL includes other forms of localized lipoatrophy or lipodystrophy as described elsewhere in this chapter.
Semicircular lipoatrophy has an excellent prognosis as most cases resolve gradually upon withdrawal of repetitive trauma.
Semicircular lipoatrophy is a clinical diagnosis and further investigation is rarely required [3, 6].
There are no established management guidelines for SL. However, lesions usually regress spontaneously after the removal of microtrauma over months to as long as 8 years [12]. Recurrences are possible, however [7, 9].
Localized loss of subcutaneous fat can occur after intradermal, subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of certain drugs. The two most commonly implicated agents are insulin and corticosteroids and these are discussed in detail. Other injected medications or substances that have been implicated as causes of localized lipoatrophy include benzathine penicillin, vasopressin, human growth hormone, methotrexate, iron dextran and diphtheria–pertussis–tetanus (DPT) vaccine [1–4].
Insulin-induced localized lipoatrophy is the loss of subcutaneous fat at the site of insulin injection [1].
Insulin-induced localized lipoatrophy was a common complication of insulin therapy prior to the development of purified insulin in the 1970s [2, 3]. With the advent of human insulin, the incidence lipoatrophy has decreased dramatically [4].
Prior to the introduction of purified human insulin, lipoatrophy occurred in 25–55% of patients using insulin. Since the introduction of highly purified insulin, it is estimated that less than 10% of patients are affected [5, 6], although lipoatrophy is still reported with the use of recombinant human insulin, rapid-acting insulin analogues and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].
Insulin-induced lipoatrophy occurs predominantly in children and young adults [13, 14, 15].
The risk is greater in females than males [16, 17].
The pathogenesis of insulin-induced lipoatrophy is not completely understood. Lipolytic components or impurities in certain insulin preparations may have resulted in local allergic or immunological reactions. For example, a local immune reaction to insulin crystals with resultant dedifferentiation of adipocytes has been suggested [14, 18]. An immune-mediated inflammatory process with release of lysosomal enzymes promoting lipoatrophy has also been proposed [19]. It has also been suggested that mast cells may play a pathogenetic role [12]: in one case series involving five patients with human insulin analogue-induced lipoatrophy, an elevated number of tryptase-positive, chymase-positive degranulated mast cells were seen in the subcutaneous tissue.
This form of lipoatrophy is more common among those with prior dermal reactions to insulin [1]. The use of older, less purified forms of insulin such as bovine or porcine insulin conveys a higher risk of lipoatrophy [20]. Repeated use of the same injection site also increases the risk.
Histopathology shows lobules of small adipocytes and lipomembranous changes [21]. A discrete lymphoid infiltration abutting the blood vessels in the hypodermis may also be observed [22].
Insulin-induced lipoatrophy presents as a depressed plaque due to loss of subcutaneous fat at the site of insulin injection. The overlying and surrounding skin appear normal. Lipoatrophy normally presents after 6–24 months of insulin treatment [1]. Interestingly, there is concomitant lipohypertrophy in approximately 25% of patients [23].
Other forms of localized lipoatrophy should be considered.
Because insulin absorption from the lipoatrophic area is erratic, continued injection of insulin into affected areas may result in poor glycaemic control [22].
The risk of lipoatrophy may be reduced by regular rotation of insulin injection sites. The importance of this should be explained to all patients who require insulin. Once lipoatrophy develops, continued injection into the lipoatrophic site should be avoided due to erratic absorption of insulin. Spontaneous resolution of established insulin-induced localized lipoatrophy is rare.
There is no generally agreed management algorithm but, if feasible, a change to purified human insulin is recommended. Several authors describe success in restoring fat by co-administration of a corticosteroid such as dexamethasone with the insulin [4, 18, 24, 25]. Other strategies have included using an insulin jet-injection device [26] or a continuous insulin infusion pump [27], although lipoatrophy with the latter has also been reported [7, 8]. Twice-daily application of 4% sodium cromoglycate prepared in petrolatum has been claimed to reverse early lipoatrophy and prevent new lesions in one small case series [12].
Localized lipoatrophy due to injected corticosteroid is the localized loss of subcutaneous fat that occurs after intramuscular or intralesional injection of corticosteroids [1].
Injected depot preparations of corticosteroids have been widely used for their sustained systemic antiallergic and anti-inflammatory action for more than half a century. It was recognized at an early stage that they were capable of producing profound lipoatrophy if they were injected into subcutaneous fat.
An overall incidence of local reactions following intralesional corticosteroid injection is reported to be 0.5%. These reactions include pain, panniculitis, haemorrhage, secondary infection, pigment alteration, hypersensitivity and atrophy [2]. Of all the persistent local reactions due to corticosteroids, atrophy is the most common [3].
Women appear to be at significantly greater risk than men [1, 4]. In one early study, it was observed that lipoatrophy occurred in six of 14 women but in none of 13 men who received repeated intramuscular or deep subcutaneous injections of triamcinolone diacetate [4].
The exact pathogenesis is not clear but several factors are thought to be involved. It is believed that intramuscular injection of triamcinolone has a direct traumatic and a hormonally mediated destructive effect on fat cells [5]. In addition, decreased type I collagen and glycosaminoglycan synthesis has been noted following the injection of corticosteroid [6]. One common finding from histological analyses is the identification of a granular basophilic material in the dermis, thought to represent altered ground substance associated with deposits of corticosteroid crystals [5, 7, 8]. Cutaneous atrophy has been noted to resolve in parallel with the gradual disappearance of corticosteroid crystals from the tissue [7].
Compounds with low solubility, such as triamcinolone acetonide, injected at higher concentrations appear to be associated with greater risks of atrophy. One group of investigators noted that intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide at concentrations above 5 mg/cm3 were associated with increased risks of cutaneous atrophy [9]. However, no lipoatrophy was observed at 6 and 12 weeks after injection in a series of 14 patients with dermatological conditions who had received one or two 30 mg or 60 mg doses of intramuscular triamcinolone acetonide [10].
In addition to the presence of granular basophilic material associated with the deposition of corticosteroid, other histological findings include epidermal atrophy, homogenization of collagen, degeneration of sebaceous glands, decreased elastin and involution of subcutaneous fat lobules with small lipocytes separated by hyaline material [1, 5, 7, 8,]. Inflammatory cells are not usually prominent although a sparse mononuclear cell infiltrate can be observed. There is no vascular inflammation [1].
Patients present with an oval or circular depressed plaque at the site of prior injection (Figure 100.4). The overlying epidermis is usually normal, although telangiectasia, hypopigmentation or alopecia may occur [3]. There is no associated erythema or tenderness. Atrophy generally begins within weeks to 3 months after injection. The time course and extent of the atrophy depend on several factors, including the solubility and concentration of the corticosteroid used and the depth and anatomical location of the injection [5].
Other forms of localized lipoatrophy should be considered.
The lipoatrophy may resolve spontaneously over the course of 1–2 years [11–14], although it may persist for longer in some cases [15].
There is no established management guideline. In one small case series, four patients were treated by infiltration of the affected area with normal saline. All four patients demonstrated complete resolution of lipoatrophy and restoration of surface contour after 4–8 weekly injections. The injected volume ranged from 5 to 20 cm3 per treatment session, depending on the size to be treated. The authors speculated that the efficacy of the treatment may be due to resuspension and redistribution of the poorly soluble corticosteroid crystals by saline solution [3].
Localized lipodystrophy may be secondary to inflammation of the subcutaneous fat, of which there are several aetiologies (see Chapter 99).
Centrifugal lipodystrophy (CLD) is a form of localized lipodystrophy in which atrophic plaques extend centrifugally.
Centrifugal lipodystrophy is characterized by localized lipoatrophy that expands centrifugally. Most cases of CLD have been reported from a single region of Japan. The condition predominantly affects children who are otherwise well. Because there have been a few cases of adult onset as well as of involvement of areas other than the abdomen, the term CLD may be more appropriate than lipodystrophia centrifugalis abdominalis infantilis.
Centrifugal lipodystrophy is rare: approximately 170 cases have been described [1] since its initial report in 1971 by Imamura et al. [2].
The majority (90%) of CLD patients develop the condition in the first 4 years of life with a mean of 2.4 years and a median of 2 years [1]. Very few patients have developed their initial lesions as an adult [1, 3].
Girls outnumber boys by approximately 2 : 1 [1].
Centrifugal lipodystrophy is reported almost exclusively among children of Asian descent, especially of Japanese origin [1, 4, 5, 6]. There have been a few white patients reported from the USA [7], the UK [8, 9], France [10], Italy [11], Germany [12] and Spain [13].
Most CLD patients exhibit no other signs or symptoms of systemic illness. However, immunological abnormalities that have been reported include positive antinuclear antibodies [1], rheumatoid factor [10], antigliadin antibodies [12] and partial IgA deficiency [10, 12].
The cause of CLD is unknown. It has been suggested that apoptosis may play a part in the fatty tissue degeneration of CLD but it is unclear if this is a primary event [14]. Fibrous long-spacing collagen has been observed on ultrastructural studies of lesional skin, although the relation of their presence to disease pathogenesis remains to be elucidated [15]. So far, no abnormalities of serum leptin levels have been reported [1].
The epidermis and dermis in CLD are unaffected but there is markedly reduced or absent subcutaneous tissue in the affected areas. In the inflamed periphery of the plaque, the loss of subcutaneous fat is accompanied by a moderate mononuclear cell infiltrate. Rarely, multinucleated giant cells, foam cells, swelling of blood vessels, vasculitis and thrombosis have been observed [1].
Centrifugal lipodystrophy has occurred in one pair of dizygotic twins and in one pair of affected siblings, which has raised the possibility of a genetic component of the disease [1].
Although various external factors such as hernia, congenital dislocation of the hip, external pressure, injection or previous skin infection at the sites were reported in about 10% of the cases, no clear relationship has been established between CLD and environmental insults [1].
Most cases of CLD begin with a single depressed plaque involving the groin (80%), axillae (20%) or neighbouring regions. Interestingly, in all reported non-Japanese cases, the initial plaque developed exclusively in or near the groin [1]. Less common areas of involvement include the neck, lower chin, retroauricular area or scalp [16, 17]. The periphery of the atrophic plaque is typically erythematous while the centre is of normal colour or may have a violaceous or bluish hue. Ulceration of the plaques has been reported to occur rarely [1, 18]. Plaques beginning in the groin area may expand to involve the genital region, abdominal wall or even the chest wall. Plaques developing in the axillary region may extend to the chest wall and abdominal wall. During the initial enlargement period, the atrophy may be multifocal. Although most lesions are asymptomatic, some patients report mild discomfort or tenderness [1]. Regional lymph nodes are enlarged in 65% of cases. When the lesion stops expanding, the erythematous rim and lymphadenopathy tend to resolve.
Differential diagnosis of CLD includes other localized lipodystrophies.
Patients with CLD usually do not suffer from any complications and co-morbidities, except for rare instances of ulceration involving plaques [1, 18]. A case of angioblastoma developing in a non-regressing CLD lesion lasting into adulthood has been reported. The angioblastoma responded to resection followed by radiation therapy [19].
The atrophic area slowly enlarges centrifugally for 3–8 years, often stopping with the onset of puberty. By 13 years, 82% of cases show no residual inflammation at the periphery and 65% no longer have regional lymphadenopathy.
The atrophic portion may subsequently improve but may remain depressed [1]. Hair regrowth has been observed in cases of scalp involvement [16, 17].
Results of routine laboratory tests are unremarkable.
There is no established guideline for the management of CLD. Many topical therapies have been tried including topical steroids, pimecrolimus, vitamin A cream and dimethyl sulfoxide. Various systemic therapies have been attempted including corticosteroids, chloroquine, penicillin, vitamin E and ibuprofen. None of these have been effective in preventing enlargement, although topical and systemic steroids occasionally reduced the inflammation at the periphery of the plaque [1]. Psoralen with UVA was reported to be effective in softening the skin and preventing further enlargement in one case [4].
Fat hypertrophy is a circumscribed expansion of subcutaneous fat and is particularly associated with insulin injection sites. Fat hypertrophy is distinguished from lipomatosis in that the latter involves the formation of multiple foci of proliferating adipocytes.
Insulin-induced fat hypertrophy is a circumscribed increase in subcutaneous fat at the site or sites of repeated insulin injection by insulin-dependent diabetics.
Insulin-induced fat hypertrophy was, and still is, the most common cutaneous complication of insulin therapy [1]. It is thought to be due to the direct local anabolic and lipogenic effects of insulin on adipocytes.
With highly purified human insulin, the prevalence of fat hypertrophy is approximately 30% in patients with type 1 diabetes and less than 5% in patients with type 2 diabetes [2].
No specific age of onset has been identified, although the condition is generally believed to be associated with a young age [2].
The fat hypertrophy is thought to be secondary to the anabolic and lipogenic effect of insulin [1, 2]. Although insulin antibodies are associated with fat hypertrophy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, it is not known whether they play a role in its pathogenesis [3, 4].
Several factors have been associated with the development of the fat hypertrophy. These include recent insulin initiation, low body mass index (BMI), use of the abdomen as the injection site and infrequent rotation of the injection site [2].
Histological examination shows lobules of large mature adipocytes. Electron microscopy has revealed discrete populations of small adipocytes, suggesting differentiation or proliferation [5].
The disorder presents as soft subcutaneous swellings at the sites of insulin injection (Figure 100.5) The overlying epidermis is normal. Because the involved skin tends to be hypoaesthetic relative to uninvolved skin, patients often continue to inject insulin preferentially into affected sites [1].
Localized cutaneous amyloidosis has been associated with insulin injection sites and may be mistaken for insulin-induced fat hypertrophy [6]. Furthermore, insulin per se has been identified as one of the proteins that can form amyloid fibrils [7]. Affected skin feels firmer on palpation than that overlying insulin-induced fat hypertrophy and is unlikely to improve after changing the insulin injection site [1].
Because the lipohypertrophic nodules have decreased vascularity, impaired insulin absorption at these sites may result in poor glycaemic control [1, 8–10].
Regression of insulin-induced lipohypertrophy is possible once management is instituted.
To prevent the development of fat hypertrophy, patients requiring insulin injections should be advised of the importance of changing injection sites regularly [2]. No universal treatment guideline has been established in the management of this problem. Rotation of injection sites is recommended with the anticipation that existing nodules will regress [1]. Most patients requiring insulin will nowadays be prescribed biosynthetic human insulin analogues, which carry a lower risk of inducing fat hypertrophy. If they are not, changing to human insulin, particularly the short-acting, rapidly absorbed preparations, may help to reverse the condition [11]. Changing the insulin delivery method from injection to continuous subcutaneous infusion using a pump has also been advocated. This method of administration reduces overall insulin requirements and is therefore thought to lessen the overall stimulus to lipogenesis [1]. If the above strategies fail, some patients will demand removal of the excess fat. Liposuction has achieved good cosmetic results [12, 13].
Benign symmetrical lipomatosis (BSL) is an uncommon condition characterized by multiple, symmetrical, unencapsulated fatty tissue deposits throughout the body.
What subsequently came to be known as Madelung disease was first mentioned by Brodie in 1846 [1]. Madelung described a series of patients with the lipomatosis in 1888 [2] and Launois and Bensaude reported it again 10 years later [3]. More recently, the term benign symmetrical lipomatosis has been preferred for this uncommon condition. It is characterized by multiple, symmetrical, unencapsulated fatty tissue deposits involving multiple areas of the body, particularly the neck, shoulder girdle and the proximal upper and lower extremities.
The exact incidence and prevalence of BSL is not known. The incidence in Italy has been estimated to be 1 : 25 000 [4]. There are, however, less than 300 cases reported in the literature since its initial description [5].
The age of onset ranges from 30 to 60 years old [6]. However, a few paediatric cases have been reported [7, 8].
Benign symmetrical lipomatosis is a disorder that predominantly affects males, with a reported male : female ratio as high as 31 : 1 [1, 6, 9–11].
Historically, BSL has been linked to people of Mediterranean descent [1]. However, cases from non-Mediterranean ethnicities have been described [5, 12, 13].
Many conditions are associated with BSL. These include alcohol abuse, chronic hepatic disorders possibly related to the underlying alcohol abuse, lipid abnormalities, arterial hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gynaecomastia, hypothyroidism, peripheral neuropathy, diabetes, hyperuricaemia and myoclonic epilepsy and ragged red fibres (MERRF) syndrome [1, 7, 8, 10, 14, 15, 16]. In one study of 22 patients from Spain, 95.5% of the patients had high alcohol intake and 59.1% had some form of hepatic disease. Furthermore, 77% of these patients were reported to be regular smokers. Statistics of reported associations include 41% with dyslipidaemia, 27% with gynaecomastia, 23% with arterial hypertension, 23% with COPD, 14% with hyperuricaemia, 9% with hypothyroidism and 4.5% with type 2 diabetes [1].
Peripheral neuropathy, polyneuropathy and autonomic dysfunction are also common findings among BSL patients [11, 17–19, 20] and it may be the presenting symptom in some [21]. However, there is controversy as to whether these neurological manifestations are directly related to BSL or are the result of alcoholism.
Compression symptoms affecting the respiratory and digestive tracts are thought to be directly due to fatty masses in the anterior neck and, in one case series, were the symptoms that in all cases occasioned their patients’ initial consultation [1].
While many theories on the pathogenesis of BSL exist, a role for brown fat in BSL has garnered attention. Although, grossly and histologically, the accumulated adipose tissue in BSL is indistinguishable from mature fat [1], ultrastructural analysis of adipose tissue deposits in BSL suggests that it resembles brown fat [22]. Further support for the role of brown fat in BSL came from another study that demonstrated mRNA expression of brown adipose tissue-specific uncoupling protein-1 (UCP-1) in a lipoma of a patient with BSL, but not in the normal subcutaneous fat from the same patient [23]. Brown fat hypertrophy has been proposed to result from functional sympathetic denervation [22], or from alterations in the synthesis of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) under noradrenergic stimulation [24].
Lipomatous tissue in BSL consists of small adipocytes with no atypical features and a slight increase in vascular and fibrous elements. The lipomas are typically not encapsulated and may infiltrate across fasciomuscular and neurovascular planes [25].
Genetic alternations in mitochondrial DNA have been demonstrated in BSL patients [18, 26]. Most reported BSL cases have been sporadic, although a very small number of familial cases exist for which autosomal recessive inheritance has been proposed [27].
Fatty masses develop most commonly on the neck (Figure 100.6), shoulder girdle and proximal upper and lower extremities. Other less common locations include the retroauricular and submandibular areas [28], tongue [21], mammary region [22], abdomen [7] and perineum or scrotum [29]. Although rare, laryngeal involvement resulting in a compromised airway has been described [12, 30–33]. The fatty deposits are slow growing and progressive over many years. In contrast to Dercum disease, the fatty growths in BSL are not tender or painful.
Enzi's classification of BSL is the most widely accepted [6]. In type I BSL, fatty deposits are mainly distributed around the neck, shoulders, supraclavicular fossa and proximal regions of the upper extremities. In type II BSL, more caudal regions of the body are involved, while the neck is unaffected. As a consequence, type II BSL patients may appear similar to obese patients.
Differential diagnosis of BSL includes obesity, Dercum disease and familial multiple lipomatosis. Genetic syndromes presenting with multiple lipomas such as Cowden syndrome, Bannayan–Riley–Ruvalcaba syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and Gardner syndrome can be differentiated from BSL by the presence of other disease-specific clinical features.
Respiratory or digestive symptoms may develop if the lipomatosis from the anterior neck is significant enough to compress vital structures. There have been a few cases of head and neck cancer, especially squamous cell carcinoma, reported in patients with BSL [9, 34]. However, it is possible that this simply reflects the increased alcohol and tobacco consumption observed among BSL patients. Malignant transformation of lipoma into liposarcomas in BSL has been reported only twice [35, 36].
The lipomatous masses are slow growing and progressive. There are few long-term follow-up data on BSL patients. In one study, however, in which 31 BSL patients were observed for up to 26 years, three of the eight deaths observed were sudden and occurred in patients with autonomic neuropathy in the absence of coronary artery disease or history of cardiac disease [20].
The diagnosis of BSL is based on clinical presentation and disease history. Chest radiographs may show abnormal symmetrical mass lesions due to accumulations of adipose tissue. MRI is the best diagnostic tool in evaluation of the spread of adipose tissue, presence of tracheal compression, vascular topography within the fat mass and exclusion of synchronous malignant disease [36, 37].
There is no established guideline for the management of BSL. A thorough clinical review, especially for respiratory symptoms, should be carried out at each visit to check for signs of compression or for the rare occurrence of malignant transformation.
Medical treatments have been tried with generally poor results. Oral salbutamol, which induces lipolysis by adrenergic stimulation, has been tested on BSL patients but the results have been disappointing [24]. Fibrate has been claimed to stop the growth or even reduce the volume of fatty masses in BSL patients [38]. Among BSL patients who reported alcohol abuse, abstinence from alcohol has had mixed results in preventing the progression or recurrence of the lesions after surgical treatment [1, 39]. General weight loss does not seem to be effective in reducing fatty masses [1].
Open surgery, lipectomy and liposuction, with or without ultrasound assistance, have been tried with varying success rates. Liposuction is less traumatic, has a lower complication rate and produces less scarring than open surgery [40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45]. However, because the fatty deposits are unencapsulated and diffusely infiltrate muscles and vessels without a clear plane for dissection, open surgery with direct observation of important structures is a safer approach in certain anatomical regions where liposuction may be too dangerous [1, 45]. Some authors advocate ultrasound-assisted liposuction which can treat multiple areas in a single session and produces limited scarring.
Regardless of the mode of surgical intervention, multiple procedures are often required, especially given the high rates of recurrence [1, 46, 47]. In one study, BSL patients underwent an average of 3.3 open surgical procedures with a 51% recurrence rate. Isolated lipoaspiration had a 95% recurrence rate in the same study. Recurrence rates vary by anatomical site and are highest following procedures on the arms and pectoral region. The average time taken for fat to reaccumulate after a surgical intervention is approximately 21 months [1].
Emergency intervention is needed when compression symptoms develop. In rare cases where the fatty tissue deposits extend to the mediastinum and compress the trachea, a tracheostomy may be required [20].
Dercum disease is a rare disease characterized by generalized overweight status or obesity and pronounced pain in the adipose tissue with or without the presence of lipomas.
Dercum disease was first described in 1888 [1]. The disease is characterized by diffuse or localized pain involving adipose tissue, usually affecting those who are overweight or obese. Patients experience a number of other somatoform symptoms, and management of the condition is a challenge.
The exact incidence and prevalence of Dercum disease is not known.
Dercum disease most commonly presents between the ages 35 and 50 years [2, 3]. While it was initially proposed that Dercum disease affects postmenopausal women, a recent survey revealed that 86% of patients developed their symptoms prior to the menopause [3].
Dercum disease is 5–30 times more common in women than in men [3, 4].
No known ethnic predilection has been identified.
Although various symptoms or diseases have been observed in these patients, none are consistently associated. These include easy bruising, sleep disturbances, impaired memory, depression, difficulty concentrating, anxiety, rapid heart beat, shortness of breath, diabetes, bloating, constipation, fatigue, weakness and joint and muscle aches [3, 5].
While the exact aetiology of Dercum disease is not known, many theories have been proposed. A local defect in lipid metabolism has been considered. One study showed a difference in the formation of long-chain mono-unsaturated fatty acids between the painful adipose tissue and the unaffected adipose tissue in the same patient [6]. Another study showed that the proportion of mono-saturated fatty acids was significantly higher in Dercum disease patients than in healthy controls [7].
Painful adipose tissue from a Dercum disease subject was found to have significantly lower conversion rate of glucose to neutral glycerides than non-painful adipose tissue from the same subject [8]. In vitro analysis demonstrated that painful adipose tissue had reduced responsiveness to norepinephrine and lack of response to the antilipolytic effect of insulin compared with non-painful adipose tissue [9].
Roles of various inflammatory factors have also been investigated. Higher levels of IL-13 and significantly lower macrophage inflammatory protein 1β and fractalkine expression were seen in Dercum disease patients. Fractalkine is a unique chemokine that is constitutively expressed by neurons. When fractalkine receptors are occupied, pain and resistance to opioid analgesia are promoted, which is in concordance with symptoms in Dercum disease [10].
Other theories for pain in Dercum disease have included endocrine dysfunction [9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] as well as autonomic nervous system dysfunction [17] and stretching of and pressure on nerves by the growing fatty masses [18, 19].
The significance of these observations is, however, unclear and their contribution to disease pathogenesis remains to be elucidated.
When lipomas are present, they show the typical histological features of lipomas without inflammation or vascular abnormalities [20].
The majority of cases occur sporadically [5]. An autosomal dominant inheritance with variable expression has also been reported [2, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. HLA typing has not been revealing [9]. A to G mutation at position A8344 of mitochondrial DNA, which is sometimes associated with familial multiple lipomas, is not detected [24, 26].
The main symptom in Dercum disease is the either abrupt or indolent onset of pain in adipose tissue [1]. Lipomas may or may not be present in these patients, who are typically obese. Patients have most commonly described the pain as burning or aching of the subcutaneous tissue. Some experience spontaneous paroxysmal attacks of pain [5, 27]. The most common locations of painful fat and lipomas are the extremities (Figure 100.7), trunk, pelvic area and buttocks [3]. The head and neck are spared [27]. Interestingly, patients experience more pain in the medial aspects of the involved extremities [5]. Lipomas, when present, vary in size and firmness [3].
While fatigue and psychiatric manifestations were initially included as cardinal symptoms of Dercum disease [28], subsequent literature has not supported this claim. Certainly, not all patients with Dercum disease exhibit psychiatric symptoms [29, 30]. More recently, an association between BMI and anxiety and personality disorders has been noted [31]. It has also been proposed that pain and obesity in Dercum disease may contribute to the psychiatric manifestations seen in some patients [5].
Various classifications have been proposed over the years [5, 16, 27, 28]. In 2012, Hansson and colleagues proposed the following classification [5]:
Many diseases have similar symptoms to those of Dercum disease. For the generalized diffuse form, fibromyalgia, lipoedema, panniculitis and primary psychiatric disorders may be considered in the differential.
Other types of Dercum disease must be differentiated from conditions that may include solitary or multiple lipomas, as they may also sometimes be painful. These include multiple symmetrical lipomatosis, familial multiple lipomatosis, adipocytic tumours, neurofibromatosis type 1, MEN1 and MERRF syndrome. MERRF syndrome is a disease of mitochondria which is sometimes accompanied by non-painful lipomas.
The lipomas in Dercum disease may in rare instances become necrotic [32] or may compress visceral organs [33, 34]. Other co-morbidities are mostly related to the associated obesity or the psychiatric morbidity.
Very little is known about the natural progression of Dercum disease. Several case reports suggest that the pain gets worse over time [25]. However, in one long-term study of patients with the condition, pain seemed to be relatively constant over the 5-year study period [35].
Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria after a thorough physical examination and exclusion of the differential diagnoses discussed earlier [5]. There are no laboratory markers for the condition and laboratory tests for inflammatory and autoimmune disease are typically negative [3, 36–38].
Overall, there is little evidence on which to base treatment of Dercum disease. Management may be best achieved through a multidisciplinary approach involving multiple specialists including dermatologists, surgeons, pain specialists, psychiatrists and psychologists.
Pain in this setting has been observed to be refractory to traditional analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [8, 20, 23, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46]. However, this experience has been challenged recently after a study found that pain diminished in 89% of patients when treated with NSAIDs and in 97% when treated with narcotics [3].
Topical lidocaine with or without prilocaine [38, 47, 48], intralesional lidocaine [49] and intravenous lidocaine [8, 36, 40, 42, 50, 51, 52] have also been tried with varying degrees of success. Pain relief from intravenous lidocaine infusion lasted from 10 h [50] to 12 months [40].
Systemic corticosteroids have been reported to improve pain in some [15, 23, 53], while worsening it in other patients [54]. Two patients with juxta-articular Dercum disease treated with intralesional corticosteroids experienced dramatic improvement of pain [55]. Methotrexate alone [25] and in combination with infliximab [56], pregabalin or oxacarbazepine [16, 37, 57, 58] has also been used. Two patients with concurrent Dercum disease and hepatitis C were successfully treated with interferon α-2b [59].
A more recent small pilot study involving 10 patients showed that rapid cycling hypobaric pressure may decrease pain [60].
Procedure-based approaches with suction-assisted liposuction [35] and lipectomy [4, 18, 19, 20, 61, 62, 63] have also been tried. However, pain often recurs after these procedures.
Infiltrating lipomatosis of the face is a disorder where the unilateral overgrowth of unencapsulated benign and mature but invasive adipocytes involves the lower two-thirds of the face.
Infiltrating lipomatosis of the face (IL-F) is a disorder characterized by unilateral overgrowth of unencapsulated benign and mature but invasive adipocytes involving the lower two-thirds of the face. Although it usually presents at birth (congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face) it may present in adolescence or early adulthood. It is associated with soft tissue and bony hypertrophy [1, 2]. IL-F patients have normal psychomotor development [3].
Infiltrating lipomatosis of the face is a rare disorder with approximately 50 cases reported in the world literature [1–4, 5–12, 13, 14–26].
Although most cases present at birth, adolescent and early adulthood presentations have also been reported. All reported cases presented during the first three decades of life [23].
There is no gender predilection [3].
There is no racial predilection.
The pathogenesis of IL-F is unknown. Given the tissue overgrowth, IL-F has been postulated to be part of the spectrum of overgrowth syndromes. PTEN and RET mutations have been excluded. Though no mutation has been found, IL-F is generally considered to be the result of secondary somatic mutation at some point in early development [13].
A study evaluating the expression of angiogenic and vasculogenic factors refuted a role for neovascularization in the pathogenesis of IL-F [27].
In the initial case description, Slavin et al. described the histopathological features of IL-F, which include infiltration of mature benign adipocytes into adjacent soft tissue with hypertrophy of the underlying skeleton. They also emphasized the absence of malignant characteristics and lipoblasts but found an increase in fibrous elements with focal fibrosis affecting nerve bundles and vessels with unifocally thickened muscular walls [2].
Two patients with IL-F have been found to have cytomegalovirus inclusions within the secretory cells of the parotid gland. However, the relationship between cytomegalovirus and IL-F remains unclear [6, 8].
Patients with IL-F present with unilateral facial swelling that is typically present at birth or in early childhood although it may be delayed until early adult life [23]. The facial swelling is due to the proliferation of unencapsulated benign and mature adipocytes as well as associated soft tissue and bony hypertrophy. There is a wide range of clinical presentations depending on the extent of involvement of the underlying tissue. The lower two-thirds of the face is most commonly involved [1].
Macroglossia and mucosal neuromas on the tongue and buccal mucosa have also been reported [13, 19, 21], as have dental abnormalities such as abnormal tooth formation[7], root hypoplasia [23] and early eruption of deciduous and permanent teeth on the affected side [13, 20, 21, 23]. A cutaneous capillary blush, usually occurring after resection, has also been reported [13].
Differential diagnosis of IL-F includes other hamartomatous or overgrowth syndromes such as Proteus syndrome, vascular or lymphatic malformations and trauma, as well as benign and malignant neoplasms of the bone and/or soft tissue. MEN2b, Bannayan–Riley–Ruvalcaba syndrome and Cowden syndrome should be considered since they are also associated with mucosal neuromas [13, 21]. Congenital hemifacial hyperplasia shares some features with IL-F but this condition does not involve lipocytic infiltration [13, 21]. Conditions causing contralateral hypoplasia, such as hemifacial microsomia and progressive hemifacial atrophy (Romberg syndrome) should be excluded [20]. Other disorders of fat tissue infiltration such as liposarcoma or lipoblastomatosis may be ruled out based on histological findings [15, 16].
Complications and co-morbidities arising from IL-F depend on the extent of involvement of the underlying soft tissue and bone. The lipomatosis itself is benign, although cosmesis may be significantly altered. Resection of IL-F risks injury to vital structures such as the facial nerve.
Imaging with MRI provides the best delineation [13].
Management of IL-F involves resection of the tumour followed by reconstruction. The resection is almost always subtotal due to the infiltrative nature of the tumour into vital structures and carries a risk of injury to the facial nerve. On average, IL-F patients undergo at least three surgical procedures [9] with a recurrence rate that is as high as 62.5% with surgical resection alone [14].
The timing of surgery remains controversial. While earlier reports advocated early and wide local excision to prevent extensive lipomatous infiltration [2, 9], more recent literature favours delayed resection with temporizing measures such as liposuction, excision of mucosal neuromas and surgery to the upper lip to restore facial symmetry [13]. By delaying the resection until early adulthood it is believed that the chances of facial nerve damage and the total number of debulking procedures required are diminished [5]. It has also been conjectured that growth hormone may play a role in recurrences, implying that mass reduction attempts prior to the end of adolescence may be more likely to fail [13]. Recently, a case of IL-F demonstrating C-KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor oncogene expression was treated with imatinib after subtotal surgical resection. At 18 months follow-up, the patient showed no disease progression [1].
Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis (ECCL) is a rare, neurocutaneous syndrome characterized by profound mental retardation, early onset of seizures, unilateral temporofrontal lipomatosis, ipsilateral cerebral and leptomeningeal lipomatosis, cerebral malformation and calcification, and lipomas of the skull, eye and heart.
Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis is a rare, sporadic, neurocutaneous syndrome involving tissues of ectodermal and mesodermal origin. It is associated with profound mental retardation, early onset of seizures, unilateral temporofrontal lipomatosis, ipsilateral cerebral and leptomeningeal lipomatosis, cerebral malformation and calcification, and lipomas of the skull, eye and heart [1, 2]. The hallmark skin finding is naevus psiloliparus, a fatty hamartomatous malformation, of the scalp [3]. The condition is typically present at birth or shortly after birth.
Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis is a rare disorder with about 60 cases reported in the English literature.
Cutaneous and eye findings are usually present at or shortly after birth. Neurological manifestations may present at a later time.
There is no gender predilection.
There is no racial or ethnic predilection.
The pathogenesis of ECCL is unknown. Most tissues affected in ECCL are of neural crest origin. In addition, because all the CNS anomalies are caused by a mesenchymal defect affecting tissues surrounding the brain or the vessels, and since no primary structural brain malformation is observed, it is postulated that a gene involved in vasculogenesis and the development of multiple mesenchymal tumours may be involved [4, 5].
The histopathology of naevus psiloliparus shows focal dermal fibrosis with subcutaneous fat in the reticular dermis.
Patients with ECCL present with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Naevus psiloliparus of the scalp is the most common skin finding and was present in 44/54 patients studied [6]. Unilateral or bilateral subcutaneous fatty masses are often seen in the frontotemporal or zygomatic region, and they are rarely seen outside the craniofacial region. Patchy or linear alopecia which is typically non-scarring is commonly observed: it may follow the lines of Blaschko or occasionally be scarring. Fibromas, lipomas and fibrolipomas present typically as ipsilateral skin tag-like cutaneous polyps on the eyelid or following a line from the outer canthus to the tragus. Less common cutaneous manifestations include irregular or disrupted eyebrows and café-au-lait macules [6].
Choristomas, with or without other eye anomalies, were observed in 43/54 patients [6] but other ocular abnormalities may also be seen.
Brain anomalies primarily involve the tissue surrounding the brain including blood vessels [4]. Intracranial lipomas are the most prominent feature; other features include meningeal and meningovascular anomalies and spinal cord lipomas, which may be extensive. CNS findings are frequently confined to the same body side as the cutaneous lesions. The spectrum of neurological manifestations of ECCL patients is broad, ranging from normal development to mental impairment of various degrees to intractable seizures. Less commonly, skeletal system involvement with jaw tumours or lytic bone lesions may be present; these may be progressive [5, 7–10].
Congenital heart malformation, in particular aortic coarctation, is seen in about 10% of ECCL patients [6].
This includes the Proteus syndrome, oculoectodermal syndrome, oculocerebrocutaneous syndrome and epidermal naevus syndrome [11–15].
Complications and co-morbidities depend on the extent of organ system involvement.
Investigations for suspected ECCL include a biopsy of suspected naevus psiloliparus lesions or ‘skin tags’ around the eye. Ophthalmological examination is required to detect associated ocular anomalies. Neuroimaging studies may characterize and assess the extent of CNS involvement [6]. Since fatty masses can involve the spinal cord, it is recommended that MRI of the spine be performed [6]. An electrocardiogram and an echocardiogram may help screen for cardiac problems.
Treatment is symptomatic and requires multidisciplinary care.
Lipoedema is the term used to describe swelling of tissues due to abnormal accumulation of subcutaneous fat rather than fluid as seen in lymphoedema, with which it may be confused or coexist (lipo-lymphoedema). In the majority of cases it affects the lower extremities but it may also affect the upper extremities and the scalp. Hereafter the term lipoedema, if unqualified, will be used to denote lipoedema of the lower limbs.
Lipoedema is characterized by progressive, symmetrical and bilateral enlargement of involved areas due to subcutaneous deposition of fat.
Lipoedema, first described in 1940 [1], is characterized by progressive, symmetrical and bilateral enlargement due to subcutaneous deposition of fat occurring anywhere from the buttocks to the ankles with sparing of the feet [1, 2]. Lipoedema occurs independently of lymphatic stasis or venous insufficiency. Imaging studies verify that oedema is minimal and the swelling is in fact due to homogenous enlargement of the subcutaneous compartment [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Its principal clinical features are summarized in Box 100.1 [2].
The exact incidence and prevalence of lipoedema are unknown. It is probably underreported and often misdiagnosed due to unfamiliarity with this disorder [9, 10, 11, 12]. In lymphoedema clinics, up to 15% of referred patients were diagnosed with lipoedema [13, 14].
Onset occurs during or soon after puberty [15].
Lipoedema occurs almost exclusively in women [1, 2, 9, 16]. The condition has been reported only rarely in men [9, 17].
There is no racial or ethnic predilection.
Most lipoedema patients do not have elevated lipids or other abnormal laboratory values [9, 18]. One group of investigators found elevated plasma lipids as well as an abnormal fatty acid composition of tissue triglycerides in lipoedema patients relative to controls. However, the clinical significance of this finding is unclear [19].
The aetiology of lipoedema is unknown. Hormones appear to play a role in the development of lipoedema, given that it occurs almost exclusively in women with a typical onset near puberty or during periods of significant hormonal changes [1, 2, 9, 16]. Moreover, male lipoedema cases occurred in those receiving hormonal therapy for prostate carcinoma or with hepatic cirrhosis [12, 20].
The anatomy of the lymphatic vessel system in lipoedema patients has been found to be normal or sufficient, as far as the large lymph vessels are concerned [15]. The degree of insufficiency in lipoedema patients, if present, never however reached the level of true chronic venous insufficiency or lymphoedema [10, 11, 21, 22]. The lymphatic transport in lipoedema decreases as the body ages and the fibrosis increases [15]. As a result, in longstanding cases, lipoedema and lymphoedema often coexist [12].
Although obese patients may be overrepresented, individuals with normal weight are also affected [1, 2, 9, 16].
No histological abnormalities have been identified by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains, fat stains or electron microscopy [9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19.
A significant portion (16–64%) of affected women have a self-reported positive family history of lipoedema [1, 11, 14]. Pit-1 mutation was identified in female members of one family with multiple anterior pituitary hormone deficiency and lipoedema [23]. However, no other genetic mutations have been identified.
The onset of symmetrical and bilateral gradual fat deposition starts around puberty in most cases. However, it may also develop during other periods of hormonal changes such as pregnancy or menopause [24].
Enlargement of the lower extremities is disproportionate in relation to the trunk, upper extremities, face and neck [15], even among obese patients [2, 13]. Feet are generally spared. Fat deposition of lipoedema begins abruptly above the malleoli, causing a sharp demarcation between the normal and abnormal tissue at the ankles, which is known as the ‘cuff sign’. The only sign during early stages of disease may be the disappearance of the retromalleolar sulcus. As the disease progress, this characteristic physical sign becomes more prominent. If the upper extremities are affected, a similar cuff sign that ends sharply above the wrists is seen with sparing of the hands [15]. Although the non to minimal pitting oedema component is mild initially, prominent oedema may eventually develop [15].
Patients often complain of heaviness and discomfort of the involved areas with sensitivity to pressure. The swelling and aching is aggravated by exercise and warm weather [15].
A classification based on the location of involved areas has been proposed [25]:
Differential diagnosis of lipoedema includes lymphoedema, obesity, chronic venous insufficiency and lipohypertrophy (Table 100.1) [12, 15, 26]. In contrast to lipoedema, patients with lymphoedema have a positive Stemmer's sign where there is an inability to pinch a fold of skin at the base of the second toe due to thickening and fibrosis of the subcutaneous tissue. In obesity, the increase in subcutaneous fat is generalized and pain is not usually a feature; furthermore, the typical sparing of the feet is not seen in obese patients. Chronic venous insufficiency is associated with hyperpigmentation and, initially, pitting oedema that can be relieved by leg elevation; with time, however, lymphoedema may supervene. The main difference between lipohypertrophy and lipoedema is the absence of oedema and pain in lipohypertrophy [15]. Other differential diagnoses include Dercum disease and benign symmetrical lipomatosis.
Table 100.1 Differential diagnosis of lipoedema.
Lipoedema | Lymphoedema | Obesity | Chronic venous insufficiency | |
Sex | Female | Both | Both | Both |
Family history | Frequent | Rare (except for Milroy disease) | Frequent | In some cases |
Effect of leg elevation | Little to none | Initially with moderate improvementa | No effect | Marked improvementb |
History of cellulitis | None | Frequent in secondary lymphoedema | None | Frequent |
History of ulcers | None | None | None | Very frequent |
Symmetry | Present | Absent | Present | Present or absent |
Involvement of feet | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Tenderness to palpation | Yes | No | No | Yes |
Pitting oedema | None or minimal initiallyc | Present with varying severity | Absent | Markedb |
Tissue consistency | May be soft, fat, or firm | Doughy, similar to gelatin | Soft, like fat | Soft, pitting |
aLongstanding lymphoedema may not show improvement with leg elevation.
bLongstanding venous insufficiency may be complicated by lymphoedema, in which case this may not apply.
cLongstanding lipoedema may have pitting oedema.
Mobility can be significantly impaired.
Lipoedema is a progressive lifelong disorder.
Lipoedema remains a clinical diagnosis. MRI may be used to verify that the swelling is due to homogenous enlargement of the subcutaneous compartment [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Dynamic lymphoscintigraphy can rule out true lymphoedema. Since venous disease can present concomitantly, duplex ultrasound is advocated by some if patients’ complaints cannot be fully explained by lipoedema [15]. No specific abnormalities have been found in phlebograms or arteriograms from lipoedema patients [16, 18, 19].
Management includes strategies to address the physical as well as psychological impact of the disease, and, as such, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary [15].
Management of diet is important because additional fat laid down in lipoedematous limbs may be abnormally resistant to control by dieting and exercise and will also compound the difficulties of taking adequate exercise, causing further frustration and low self-esteem [15, 20, 27]. Because BMI and total body weight may not accurately reflect obesity status in lipoedema patients, some authors advocate the use of waist circumference as an indicator for ‘healthy weight’ [15, 28].
Diuretics and leg elevation do not help patients with lipoedema [11, 13], although they may benefit patients with concomitant lymphoedema.
Complex physical decongestion therapy, which combines manual lymphatic drainage and compression therapy, is widely accepted as a conservative therapeutic approach [13, 20, 29, 30]. While manual lymphatic drainage reduces the actual volume, compression by stocking or bandage is used to minimize recurrence. Compression therapy may improve, in part, the symptoms of lipoedema and also mitigate the progression of the lymphatic component. Certainly, patients with concomitant chronic venous insufficiency and/or lymphoedema will benefit from compression therapy [15]. In lipoedema patients, however, despite lifelong decongestion therapy, the amount of subcutaneous tissue increases and the disease overall progresses over time.
Tumescent liposuction has become an integral part in the management of lipoedema. Ideally, it should be performed early, and multiple sessions are often required [15]. Patients experience significant improvement in swelling, pain, mobility, appearance and quality of life [24, 25, 31–33]. Decongestion therapy should remain an integral part of post-liposuction management [24].
Lipo-lymphoedema is the coexistence of lipoedema and secondary lymphoedema.
Secondary lymphoedema may coexist in patients with longstanding lipoedema and the distinction between the two entities can be a challenge. The increased pressure from expansion of fat tissues in lipoedema contributes to the development of lipo-lymphoedema by causing mechanical obstruction of small lymphatic vessels.
The lymphatic system in lipoedema is thought to be normal or sufficient, at least as far as the large lymph vessels are concerned. However, the increased pressure from the expansion of fat tissues may cause mechanical obstruction of the small lymphatic vessels in the septa, resulting in mild lymphostasis and oedema of the subcutaneous tissue. Furthermore, lymphatic transport in lipoedema also decreases as fibrosis increases with age, and this can exacerbate the secondary lymphoedema [1].
No distinct histological abnormalities have been identified in lipo-lymphoedema by H&E, fat stains or electron microscopy [2, 3, 4].
In addition to the physical examination findings in lipoedema, patients with lipo-lymphoedema may have a positive Stemmer's sign – the inability to pinch a skin fold at the base of the second toe due to oedema or fibrosis of the skin. Stemmer's sign is often present in lymphoedema patients but is usally absent in lipoedema patients [5].
Lipo-lymphoedema has a chronic and progressive course.
Lipo-lymphoedema is a clinical diagnosis. Table 100.2 describes imaging modalities that may assist in identifying lipo-lymphoedema [5].
Table 100.2 Imaging characteristics of lipoedema and lymphoedema.
Imaging modality | Lipoedema | Lymphoedema |
Lymphangiogram | Normal | Abnormal |
Lymphoscintigram | Normal, with mild lymphatic delay in some | Abnormal with delayed lymphatic flow, subdermal collateralization and dermal backflow |
Computed tomography | Diffuse and homogenous lipomatous hypertrophy of subcutaneous tissue | Thickening of the calf subcutaneous tissues and perimuscular aponeurosis. Increased fat density. Honeycomb appearance due to fibrous and oedematous stranding of fat |
Magnetic resonance imaging | Normal skin thickness, increased fatty tissue | Thickening of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Honeycomb appearance |
The lymphatic oedema component of lipo-lymphoedema may improve initially with leg elevation and compression. See also the management section for lipoedema of the lower limbs.
Lipoedema of the scalp (LS) and lipoedematous alopecia (LA) are characterized by the presence of a thick, boggy scalp due to a prominent increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue, which may be associated with varying degrees of hair loss.
Lipoedema of the scalp is a rare condition of unknown aetiology where a thick, boggy scalp develops due to a prominent increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue. It can be associated with scarring or non-scarring hair loss, when it is known as lipoedematous alopecia [1]. LS was first described by Cornbleet in 1935 [2] and LA was first described by Coskey et al. in 1961 [3]. There is some debate as to whether LS and LA represent clinical variants of the same entity or two different disorders [1]. Since they are both very rare, they will be grouped together for the purposes of this discussion.
These are rare conditions with only approximately 45 cases of LS and 30 cases of LA reported in the literature [1, 4].
Lipoedema of the scalp and LA are reported most commonly in adults [2, 3, 5–11, 12, 13–26, 27, 28–31].
Among reported cases, there is an approximate female to male ratio of 5 : 1 [2, 3, 4, 5–11, 12, 13–26, 27, 28, 29].
Both LS and LA have been described in all ethnicities [2, 3, 4, 5–11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].
Several conditions have been reported in association with LS or LA but there is no consistent link with any of them [3, 5, 8, 12, 13, 15, 16–19, 21, 23].
The exact aetiology is unknown. A failure to maintain the integrity of the dermal–subcutaneous interface with an expansion and invasion of subcutaneous fat into the dermis is likely to be of relevance [27]. Some have speculated that female sex hormones may play a role, since these conditions have a predilection for women [29].
Hair cycle disturbance could occur as a result of lymphangiectasia [1, 16, 21, 24] or oedema [1, 9], both of which have been observed histologically in LS and LA. Alternatively, the fat itself might invade and destroy the hair follicle [27].
The main pathological feature in both LS and LA is an approximate doubling in scalp thickness resulting from expansion of the subcutaneous fat layer [1]. Dilated lymphatic vessels have been observed in both LA and LS [1, 16, 21, 24]. In LA there is also a loss of hair follicles without any inflammation. Perifollicular fat cells in direct continuity with underlying subcutaneous fat lobules are noted in the dermis, together with fibrous tracks [27] and fragmentation of dermal elastic fibres [1, 11].
No genetic mutation has been identified in patients with LS and LA. However, an LS mother–LA daughter pair has been reported [23].
One group of Egyptian investigators observed that all of their patients wore a special tight head scarf called a mandil [19]. The associations between LS, LA and other headwear have not been reported by others.
Although LS and LA are usually asymptomatic, some patients may experience pain, pruritus, paraesthesiae or headache [27]. While LA patients may present earlier due to alopecia, most LS patients were not aware of their condition and presented for other reasons [1].
Patients with LS and LA present with boggy thickening of the scalp, predominantly over the vertex, parietal and occipital scalp [12]. The bogginess may gradually extend to the entire scalp. The condition is more easily palpable than visible [1]. The consistency of the scalp has been likened to cotton wadding as used in quilting and upholstering [27]. The involved scalp is easily pressed down to the underlying bone, but returns to its original form immediately pressure is removed [19].
Hair loss in LA is variable and both scarring and non-scarring alopecia have been reported. Hairs do not exceed 2 cm in length and tend to break off easily [3]. Sometimes the hair in the affected area can have a lighter colour than hair from the surrounding unaffected scalp [4].
Of note is the fact that none of the LS and LA patients reported to date have had concurrent lipoedema of the legs.
Differential diagnosis of LS and LA includes naevus lipomatosus superficialis of the scalp, cutis verticis gyrata and encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis. Naevus lipomatosus superficialis is usually present at birth and may have solitary or multiple lesions [20]. The scalp in cutis verticis gyrata is furrowed and on biopsy demonstrates closely packed hair follicles and considerable thickening of the collagen bundles of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue [25]. Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis is associated with ophthalmological and neurological abnormalities.
Both LS and LA are chronic and persistent conditions.
Ultrasound or MRI of the involved scalp area can confirm subcutaneous tissue thickening [27]. The average scalp thickness in healthy individuals was 5.8 ± 0.12 mm [32]. In contrast, the scalp thickness in LA and LS patients ranged from 8.5 to 16 mm with an average of 11.4 mm [25]. Biopsy of the affected area may also support the diagnosis.
There is no specific and effective management guideline for LS and LA. Pain, pruritus and paraesthesia are managed symptomatically. Surgical excision of LS has been reported in one patient. At 12-month follow-up, there was no recurrence of LS although residual alopecia remained [27]. Topical minoxidil solutions have not been helpful in regrowing hair [27].
Cellulite is an architectural disorder of human adipose tissue. It is characterized by the dimpled and nodular appearance of the skin in cellulite-prone areas in postpubertal females [1].
The term cellulite was first introduced in the French literature 150 years ago [2]. Cellulite is nowadays among the more common concerns of patients presenting to dermatologists. It is a localized metabolic disorder of subcutaneous tissue that results in a readily visible alteration in the appearance of the female body. Cellulite presents as a change of skin topography evident by skin with dimpling and nodularity that principally involves the pelvic region, lower limbs and abdomen of women. The topographical alteration is caused by herniations of subcutaneous fat through its fibrous connective tissue support matrix.
It is estimated that between 85% and 98% of postpubertal females display some degree of cellulite [1].
It first appears after puberty.
It is almost exclusive to women [1].
White women are affected more frequently than women of other races [3].
The exact pathophysiology of cellulite is not fully understood; many theories seek to explain the structural, architectural, metabolic and biochemical differences between cellulite and non-cellulite fat. In a study performed by Rosenbaum et al. [4], biopsies from women with and without cellulite showed an irregular and discontinuous dermal–subcutaneous interface that was characterized by fat protrusion into the dermis. In contrast, the dermal–subcutaneous and connective tissue interface was smooth and continuous in male subjects. These findings suggest that there is a sexual dimorphism in the structural characteristics of subdermal connective tissue that predisposes women to the development of cellulite. Women with cellulite have a higher percentage of thinner, perpendicularly orientated, dermal septa: this appears to facilitate herniation of adipose tissue into the reticular dermis [5, 6].
There are also regional differences in both the hormonal responsiveness and metabolic activity of human adipose tissue. For example, adipocytes in the gluteal–femoral region are larger and are influenced by female sex hormones. The gluteal–femoral adipocytes are also metabolically more stable and resistant to lipolysis [1]. Although it has been conjectured that deterioration of the dermal vasculature with oedema and deposition of glycosoaminoglycans in the dermal capillary walls could result in cellulite [3], this observation has not been supported by others [5, 6, 7]. Similarly, the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of cellulite remains controversial [2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10].
Excessively high carbohydrate diets provoke hyperinsulinaemia and lipogenesis, leading to an increase in total body fat content, and thereby predispose to cellulite [1, 11]. Prolonged periods of sitting or standing may impede normal blood flow and lead to stasis, which alters microcirculation and may increase the risk of cellulite. Finally, fluid retention and the hormonal environment in pregnancy may also be contributory [1].
Cellulite is a clinical diagnosis. Tissue sampling is not required for the diagnosis. Histopathological specimens demonstrate indentations of subcutaneous fat into the dermis [5].
There seems to be a genetic predisposition to the development of cellulite as most women with cellulite report its occurrence in other family members [12]. However, no specific genetic mutation has been identified.
Cellulite presents almost exclusively in postpubertal females and involves the skin of the pelvic region, lower limbs and abdomen. The skin appears dimpled, like the surface of a mattress or of orange peel [1, 5]. This surface irregularity is especially apparent when the skin is pinched. Cellulite can affect individuals with both high and low BMI [1].
Obesity is differentiated from cellulite in that obesity is characterized by hypertrophy and hyperplasia of adipose tissue that is not necessarily limited to the pelvis, thighs and abdomen [1]. The skin is not dimpled in obesity.
Cellulite has been divided into three grades of severity [1]:
There is no associated morbidity or mortality [1].
Cellulite can be progressive.
Although cellulite is a very common complaint, treatments proposed for it have lacked substantial proof of efficacy. There is no single treatment or treatment combination that has been shown to be reliably effective. The best currently available treatments have resulted in mild to moderate improvement at best. Most of any improvement obtained is not sustained over time and maintenance treatment is often needed.
Weight gain may accentuate the visibility of cellulite. Weight reduction may reduce but, ironically, may also sometimes increase its prominence. One group of investigators has shown, however, that, on average, cellulite severity decreases following weight loss. This is especially true for those with higher BMI and greater cellulite severity grading [13].
Various over-the-counter and prescription topical therapies have been advocated for cellulite. Topical application of 0.3% retinol for 6 months or more has been claimed to improve cellulite [14]. So-called mesotherapy, whereby a variety of substances including phosphatidylcholine, caffeine, theophylline and herbal extracts are injected into subcutaneous tissue in an attempt to dissolve fat, has been widely promoted but, not surprisingly, has not been shown to have any useful place in managing cellulite [14, 15, 16].
Many non-invasive devices have been promoted for the treatment of cellulite. These include a skin-kneading device, unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency devices, ultrasound devices and selective cryolysis [14].
More invasive procedures such as subcision and liposuction have also been attempted. While subcision may temporarily improve cellulite appearance, long-term efficacy remains to be demonstrated. Liposuction for the treatment of cellulite carries risk. While liposuction reduces fat deposits deeper in the subcutaneous fat, cellulite adipose tissue is deposited more superficially. When liposuction is performed at more superficial levels, there is an increased risk of necrosis and poor cosmetic outcome. Laser-assisted liposuction and/or laser-assisted lipoplasty, which are less invasive than traditional liposuction and offer simultaneous skin tightening, may be the preferred treatment [1].
In the search for a novel approach to managing cellulite, various investigators have looked at peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), which are found on adipocytes and are thought to have an effect on the extracellular matrix, as possible targets for the treatment of cellulite but there is no evidence to date that they are likely to be effective [14, 17–21].
The ideal management for this condition, which so many women find distressing and for the treatment of which considerable sums have been expended, has yet to be found.
Rates of people being overweight and obese (BMI >25 kg/m2) have been rising at an alarming rate in many countries of the world in recent years: in England, for instance, 62.1% of adults were overweight or obese in 2013 [1]. The prevalence of obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2 in adult men and women rose over the 20 years from 1993 to 2013 from 13.2% and 16.4% to 26.0% and 23.8%, respectively [1]. Nearly 10% of all children entering English schools (at age 4–5 years) were classified as obese (weight ≥95th centile for age) [1].
Obesity exposes people not only to well-known metabolic and cardiovascular consequences including type 2 diabetes but also has significant effects on other body systems including the skin [2].
Physiological consequences of obesity on the skin. Subcutaneous fat insulates the body core from the external environment. Whilst this may be of benefit in protecting the body from the effects of exposure to cold it also means that it is harder for the obese to dissipate heat from the core out to the skin surface. This increases the reliance on sweating for thermoregulation in obese people, who tend to sweat more profusely than those who are not overweight [3]. Paradoxically, however, transepidermal water loss is increased in obese people, who are prone to xerosis [4].
Mechanical problems contributing to skin disease in the obese. Friction, sweating and maceration within body folds frequently lead to a painful erosive intertriginous dermatitis with secondary candidosis. Obese women with restricted mobility are more likely to have problems with urinary continence, which can contribute further to inflammation, with an irritant contact dermatitis affecting the genito-crural folds [5]. Stretch marks (striae distensae) are common, particularly if weight gain has been rapid [2, 5, 6]. They tend to be located in the axillary folds, upper thighs, buttocks and abdomen.
The mechanical effects of obesity may impede lymphatic drainage not only in the lower extremities but also elsewhere, for example in abdominal apron folds, resulting in lymphoedema [3]. The chronic high pressure exerted on the skin of the soles of the feet may result in plantar hyperkeratosis and postmenopausal plantar keratoderma (keratoderma climactericum) [2, 6].
Peripheral vascular and lymphovascular disorders in the obese. Obesity puts strain on the vascular system. Lower limb venous hypertension from whatever cause may be exacerbated in the obese by high intra-abdominal pressures and by immobility. The risks of venous eczema and venous ulceration are increased and they may be more difficult to manage. Chronic lymphoedema frequently supervenes (Figure 100.8) [2].
Cutaneous infections and obesity. The prevalence of superficial skin infections such as candidosis, dermatophytosis and erythrasma is raised in the obese [2]. Pyogenic infections such as folliculitis and furunculosis are also more frequently seen and may be recurrent. In a large study of patients requiring operative treatment of skin and soft tissue infections by community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), obese patients were more than three times likely to need further surgical intervention within a year than non-obese patients [7]. Lymphoedema in the obese is commonly complicated by streptococcal cellulitis. Obesity also increases the risk of surgical wound infection and of necrotizing fasciitis [8].
Cutaneous consequences of immunological and endocrine dysregulation in the obese. It is increasingly recognized that adipose tissue has multiple, complex regulatory and hormonal functions in addition to its role as an energy store (see Chapter 99); these functions may be disturbed in the obese. Altered adipocytokine secretion may have an effect on inflammation in the obese [9, 10]: for instance, delayed-type hypersensitivity responses are increased in obesity and decline with weight reduction [11]. Adipocytokines may also play a role in the well-recognized link between severe psoriasis and obesity, with evidence that weight reduction, including that achieved by bariatric surgery, can produce significant improvement in psoriasis [2, 12, 13]. There is also some evidence of a link between obesity and atopy including atopic eczema [2, 13].
The hyperinsulinaemia associated with obesity increases androgen production from adipose tissue and reduces the production of sex-hormone-binding globulin, thus increasing circulating free androgen levels. This manifests as increased risks of acne, hirsutism, androgenetic alopecia and polycystic ovary syndrome in the obese [2, 15]. Type 2 diabetes is a common complication of obesity and is associated with a variety of specific skin disorders (see Chapter 64).
Genetic disorders associated with obesity. Obesity is a component of a number of genetic disorders of which Prader–Willi syndrome is one of the best known. These are discussed in Chapter 74.
Other skin disorders in the obese. Dercum disease (see earlier in this chapter) is strongly associated with obesity. The presence of obesity may aggravate a variety of other skin disorders including hidradenitis suppurativa and pilonidal sinus. Surgical wound healing is impaired in the obese with an increased risk of incisional hernia [16].