Appendix A

Additional Tables

Table A1 Post-Kelo Reform in States Ranked by Number of “Threatened” Private-to-Private Condemnations

State

Number of Threatened

Takings1

Effectiveness of

Reform

Florida

2,055

Effective (L & LR)

Maryland

1,110

Ineffective (L)

California

635

Ineffective (L & CR)

New Jersey

589

Ineffective (L)

Missouri

437

Ineffective (L)

Ohio

331

Ineffective (L)

Michigan

173

Effective (L & LR)

Utah

167

Enacted Prior to Kelo

Kentucky

161

Ineffective (L)

Texas

118

Ineffective (L & LR)

Colorado

114

Ineffective (L)

Pennsylvania

108

Effective (L)

New York

89

No Reform

Minnesota

83

Effective (L)

Rhode Island

65

Ineffective (L)

Connecticut

61

Ineffective (L)

Indiana

51

Effective (L)

Arkansas

40

No Reform

Tennessee

37

Ineffective (L)

Virginia

27

Effective (L & LR)

Nevada

15

Effective (L & CR)

Vermont

15

Ineffective (L)

West Virginia

12

Ineffective (L)

Wisconsin

12

Effective (L)

Nebraska

11

Ineffective (L)

Arizona

10

Effective (CR)

Illinois

9

Ineffective (L)

Kansas

7

Effective (L)

South Carolina

7

Ineffective (LR)

(continued)

Table A1 (continued)

State

Number of Threatened

Takings1

Effectiveness of

Reform

Hawaii

5

No Reform

Massachusetts

4

No Reform

Oregon

2

Effective (CR)

Delaware

0

Effective (L)

Georgia

0

Effective (L & LR)

Idaho

0

Ineffective (L)

South Dakota

0

Effective (L)

Wyoming

0

Effective (L)

Alabama

0

Effective (L)

Alaska

0

Ineffective (L)

Iowa

0

Ineffective (L)

Louisiana

0

Effective (LR)

Maine

0

Ineffective (L)

Mississippi

0

Effective (CR)

Montana

0

Ineffective (L)

New Hampshire

0

Effective (L & LR)

New Mexico

0

Effective (L)

North Carolina

0

Ineffective (L)

North Dakota

0

Effective (CR)

Oklahoma

0

No Reform

Washington

0

No Reform

L = Reform enacted by state legislature; CR = Reform enacted by citizen- initiated referendum; LR = Reform enacted by legislature- initiated referendum.

1. Dana Berliner, Public Power, Private Gain: A Five- Year, State- by- State Report Examining the Abuse of Eminent Domain (2003), http://www.castlecoalition.org/pdf/report/ED_report.pdf. This data on known eminent domain condemnations by stateincludes developments from 1998 to 2002. Ibid., 8-9.

Table A2 Post- Kelo Reform in States Ranked by Number of Private-to-Private Condemnations per 1 Million People

State

2005 Population1

Takings2/1M people

Effectiveness of Reform

Pennsylvania

12,429,616

202.5

Effective (L)

Kansas

2,744,687

56.5

Effective (L)

Maryland

5,600,388

22.7

Ineffective (L)

Michigan

10,120,860

13.6

Effective (L & LR)

Rhode Island

1,076,189

11.2

Ineffective (L)

Connecticut

3,510,297

8.8

Ineffective (L)

Ohio

11,464,042

7.9

Ineffective (L)

Virginia

7,567,465

7.7

Effective (L &LR)

Oklahoma

3,547,884

6.5

No Reform

California

36,132,147

6.2

Ineffective (L & CR)

New Jersey

8,717,925

5.9

Ineffective (L)

Tennessee

5,962,959

4.9

Ineffective (L)

Colorado

4,665,177

4.9

Ineffective (L)

West Virginia

1,816,856

4.4

Ineffective (L)

Florida

17,789,864

3.8

Effective (L & LR)

Table A2 (continued)

State

2005 Population1

Takings2/1M people

Effectiveness of Reform

Missouri

5,800,310

3.1

Ineffective (L)

New York

19,254,630

3

No Reform

Arizona

5,939,292

1.9

Effective (CR)

Minnesota

5,132,799

1.8

Effective (L)

Alabama

4,557,808

1.8

Effective (L)

Washington

6,287,759

1.7

No Reform

Kentucky

4,173,405

1.7

Ineffective (L)

North Dakota

636,677

1.6

Effective (CR)

Maine

1,321,505

1.5

Ineffective (L)

Iowa

2,966,334

1.3

Ineffective (L)

Nevada

2,414,807

1.2

Effective (L & CR)

Louisiana

4,523,628

1.1

Effective (LR)

Mississippi

2,921,088

1

Effective (CR)

Massachusetts

6,398,743

0.8

No Reform

Illinois

12,763,371

0.6

Ineffective (L)

Indiana

6,271,973

0.6

Effective (L)

Nebraska

1,758,787

0.6

Ineffective (L)

Texas

22,859,968

0.5

Ineffective (L & LR)

Arkansas

2,779,154

0.4

No Reform

North Carolina

8,683,242

0.1

Ineffective (L)

Alaska

663,661

0

Ineffective (L)

Delaware

843,524

0

Effective (L)

Georgia

9,072,576

0

Effective (L & LR)

Idaho

1,429,096

0

Ineffective (L)

South Dakota

775,933

0

Effective (L)

Wyoming

509,294

0

Effective (L)

Hawaii

1,275,194

0

No Reform

Montana

935,670

0

Ineffective (L)

New Hampshire

1,309,940

0

Effective (L & LR)

New Mexico

1,928,384

0

Effective (L)

Oregon

3,641,056

0

Effective (CR)

South Carolina

4,255,083

0

Ineffective (LR)

Utah

2,469,585

0

Enacted Prior to Kelo

Vermont

623,050

0

Ineffective (L)

Wisconsin

5,536,201

0

Effective (L)

L = Reform enacted by state legislature; CR = Reform enacted by citizen-initiated referendum; LR = Reform enacted by legislature-initiated referendum.

1. United States Census Bureau, Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States and States, and for Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (2005), available at http://www.census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann -est2005.html.

2. Some takings affected more than one property.

Table A3 Post- Kelo Reform in States Ranked by Number of Threatened Private-to-Private Condemnations per 1 Million People

State

2005 Population1

Threatened Takings2 /1M people

Effectiveness of Reform

Maryland

5,600,388

198.2

Ineffective (L)

Florida

17,789,864

115.5

Effective (L & LR)

Missouri

5,800,310

75.3

Ineffective (L)

Utah

2,469,585

67.6

Enacted Prior to Kelo

New Jersey

8,717,925

67.6

Ineffective (L)

Rhode Island

1,076,189

60.4

Ineffective (L)

Kentucky

4,173,405

38.6

Ineffective (L)

Ohio

11,464,042

28.9

Ineffective (L)

Colorado

4,665,177

24.4

Ineffective (L)

Vermont

623,050

24.1

Ineffective (L)

California

36,132,147

17.6

Ineffective (L & CR)

Connecticut

3,510,297

17.4

Ineffective (L)

Michigan

10,120,860

17.1

Effective (L & LR)

Minnesota

5,132,799

16.2

Effective (L)

Arkansas

2,779,154

14.4

No Reform

Pennsylvania

12,429,616

8.7

Effective (L)

Indiana

6,271,973

8.1

Effective (L)

West Virginia

1,816,856

6.6

Ineffective (L)

Nebraska

1,758,787

6.3

Ineffective (L)

Nevada

2,414,807

6.2

Effective (L &CR)

Tennessee

5,962,959

6.2

Ineffective (L)

Texas

22,859,968

5.2

Ineffective (L & LR)

New York

19,254,630

4.6

No Reform

Hawaii

1,275,194

3.9

No Reform

Virginia

7,567,465

3.6

Effective (L & LR)

Kansas

2,744,687

2.6

Effective (L)

Wisconsin

5,536,201

2.2

Effective (L)

Arizona

5,939,292

1.7

Effective (CR)

South Carolina

4,255,083

1.6

Ineffective (LR)

Illinois

12,763,371

0.7

Ineffective (L)

Massachusetts

6,398,743

0.6

No Reform

Oregon

3,641,056

0.5

Effective (CR)

Delaware

843,524

0

Effective (L)

Georgia

9,072,576

0

Effective (L & LR)

Idaho

1,429,096

0

Ineffective (L)

South Dakota

775,933

0

Effective (L)

Wyoming

509,294

0

Effective (L)

Alabama

4,557,808

0

Effective (L)

Alaska

663,661

0

Ineffective (L)

Iowa

2,966,334

0

Ineffective (L)

Louisiana

4,523,628

0

Effective (LR)

Maine

1,321,505

0

Ineffective (L)

Mississippi

2,921,088

0

Effective (CR)

Montana

935,670

0

Ineffective (L)

New Hampshire

1,309,940

0

Effective (L & LR)

New Mexico

1,928,384

0

Effective (L)

North Carolina

8,683,242

0

Ineffective (L)

North Dakota

636,677

0

Effective (CR)

Oklahoma

3,547,884

0

No Reform

Washington

6,287,759

0

No Reform

L = Reform enacted by state legislature; CR = Reform enacted by citizen-initiated referendum; LR = Reform enacted by legislature-initiated referendum.

1. United States Census Bureau, Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States and States, and for Puerto Rico.

2. Some takings affected more than one property. Berliner, Public Power, Private Gain.