The host table is a simple text file
that associates IP addresses with hostnames. On most Unix systems, the
table is in the file /etc/hosts. Each table entry in /etc/hosts
contains an IP address separated by whitespace from a list of hostnames
associated with that address. Comments begin with #.
The host table on rodent might contain the following entries:
# # Table of IP addresses and hostnames # 172.16.12.2 rodent.wrotethebook.com rodent 127.0.0.1 localhost 172.16.12.1 crab.wrotethebook.com crab loghost 172.16.12.4 jerboas.wrotethebook.com jerboas 172.16.12.3 horseshoe.wrotethebook.com horseshoe 172.16.1.2 ora.wrotethebook.com ora 172.16.6.4 linuxuser.articles.wrotethebook.com linuxuser
The first entry in the sample table is for rodent itself. The IP address 172.16.12.2 is associated with the hostname rodent.wrotethebook.com and the alternate hostname (or alias) rodent. The hostname and all of its aliases resolve to the same IP address, in this case 172.16.12.2.
Aliases provide for name changes, alternate spellings, and shorter
hostnames. They also allow for “generic hostnames.” Look at the entry
for 172.16.12.1. One of the aliases associated with that address is
loghost. loghost is a special hostname used
by Solaris in the syslog.conf configuration file. Some systems preconfigure programs
like syslogd to direct their output
to the host that has a certain generic name. You can direct the output
to any host you choose by assigning it the appropriate generic name as
an alias. Other commonly used generic hostnames are
lprhost, mailhost, and
dumphost.
The second entry in the sample file assigns the address 127.0.0.1 to the hostname localhost. As we have discussed, the network address 127.0.0.0/8 is reserved for the loopback network. The host address 127.0.0.1 is a special address used to designate the loopback address of the local host—hence the hostname localhost. This special addressing convention allows the host to address itself the same way it addresses a remote host. The loopback address simplifies software by allowing common code to be used for communicating with local or remote processes. This addressing convention also reduces network traffic because the localhost address is associated with a loopback device that loops data back to the host before it is written out to the network.
Although the host table system has been superseded by DNS, it is still widely used for the following reasons:
Most systems have a small host table containing name and address information about the important hosts on the local network. This small table is used when DNS is not running, such as during the initial system startup. Even if you use DNS, you should create a small /etc/hosts file containing entries for your host, for localhost, and for the gateways and servers on your local net.
Sites that use NIS use the host table as input to the NIS host database. You can use NIS in conjunction with DNS, but even when they are used together, most NIS sites create host tables that have an entry for every host on the local network. Chapter 9 explains how to use NIS with DNS.
Very small sites that are not connected to the Internet sometimes use the host table. If there are few local hosts and the information about those hosts rarely changes, and there is also no need to communicate via TCP/IP with remote sites, then there is little advantage to using DNS.
The old host table system is inadequate for the global Internet for two reasons: inability to scale and lack of an automated update process. Prior to the development of DNS, an organization called the Network Information Center (NIC) maintained a large table of Internet hosts called the NIC host table. Hosts included in the table were called registered hosts, and the NIC placed hostnames and addresses into this file for all sites on the Internet.
Even when the host table was the primary means of translating hostnames to IP addresses, most sites registered only a limited number of key systems. But even with limited registration, the table grew so large that it became an inefficient way to convert hostnames to IP addresses. There is no way that a simple table could provide adequate service for the enormous number of hosts on today’s Internet.
Another problem with the host table system is that it lacks a technique for automatically distributing information about newly registered hosts. Newly registered hosts can be referenced by name as soon as a site receives the new version of the host table. However, there is no way to guarantee that the host table is distributed to a site, and no way to know who had a current version of the table and who did not. This lack of guaranteed uniform distribution is a major weakness of the host table system.