Table 32.4 Concordance lines for ‘delimiting the caseunderconsideration’ (adapted from Weber2001: 17)

received Brian’s letter.	Assuming	the offer does remain open, Brian’s Thursda
proceeding on the latter	assumption	In order to discuss the law related to
to discuss. I now have to	consider	whether B’s message, left on the answerphone
third party. Bata v. Bata.	Considering	first the story about The BCDs, can the ba
With	regard to	contracts ex facie illegal it is necessary to
second part of the story.	Regarding	the potential claim of Evangeline, it is subm
consented to it. The key	issue	here is what caused the injury; was it Geoffrey’s
At	issue	here is whether Neil will have a cause of action