Table 1.1 Correlations between personality variables and leadership (data from Mann, 1959)
Personality dimension | No. of tests | Direction of associationa |
Median absolute correlationb (r) |
Variance explainedc (r2) |
Strength of associationd |
Intelligence | 196 | positive | .25 | 5% | weak |
Adjustment | 164 | positive | .15 | 2.3% | weak |
Extroversion | 119 | positive | .15 | 2.3% | weak |
Sensitivity | 101 | positive | (<.10) | (<1%) | weak |
Masculinity | 70 | positive | (<.10) | (<1%) | weak |
Conservatisme | 62 | negative | ? | ? | ? |
Dominance | 39 | positive | .20 | 4% | weak |
Notes
a A positive association indicates that a higher score on the dimension in question is associated
with greater leadership. b Absolute correlations can vary between a minimum of 0.00 and a maximum of 1.00. c Mann does not provide median correlations for sensitivity or masculinity but describes these
associations as “low” and “weak” respectively. d According to Cohen’s (1977) criteria, correlations above .50 are strong, those between .50 and
.30 are moderate, and those below .30 are weak. e Mann does not present data for conservatism, but notes that only one measure, the F -scale,
reveals any consistent relationship with leadership.