Belgium

Context (national)

Belgium scored higher than the OECD average in science in PISA 2015, with a mean score of 501 points, compared to the OECD average of 493 points. Performance in science remained stable across PISA cycles, with an average score change of -2.7 score points, while reading performance has stayed the same and mathematics performance has decreased. Socio-economic status had one of the largest impacts among OECD countries on science performance in PISA 2015, explaining 19.3% of the variance in performance (OECD average: 12.9%). The impact of ESCS on performance in science has not changed since 2006. Gender differences in science performance were among the highest in the OECD, with a difference between boys and girls of 12 points, compared to the OECD average difference of 4 points. Immigrant students made up 17.7% of the student population of 15-year-olds in 2015, higher than the OECD average of 12.5%. Performance differences between immigrant and non-immigrant students are higher than the OECD average. Immigrants scored on average 43 score points lower than non-immigrants in science in PISA 2015, compared to the OECD average of 31 score points.

Education-only pre-primary programmes with no tuition fees exist in each community of Belgium. A formal curriculum for these programmes is delivered by qualified teachers. Compulsory education in Belgium begins at age 6 and ends at age 18, longer than the typical duration across the OECD. Students are typically first tracked into different educational pathways at age 14, but in some cases as early as age 12, which is earlier than the OECD average of age 14. Upper secondary education has a wide diversity of streams in all education systems in Belgium. All three Communities offer four-year general, technical and vocational streams of education, and the Flemish and French Communities also offer an art education stream. In general, students can access higher education after attending a general, technical or art education upper secondary programme. Vocational streams require the completion of a seventh year of secondary education to receive a secondary school leaving certificate. In the Flemish and French Communities, secondary vocational education can be followed in two strands: purely school-based or dual school- and work-based. All five upper secondary education programmes, including dual vocational education, lead to a diploma for secondary education. Only completion of general, arts, and technical secondary programmes provides access to higher education, after four years of upper secondary education. Students in the Flemish and French Communities who complete vocational secondary education receive a secondary school leaving certificate and have access to associate degree programmes only if they complete an extra year, which then can grant access to all strands of higher education, universities and university colleges. In the German-speaking Community, students who complete secondary school receive a leaving certificate and have access to higher education, regardless of the education stream they have completed.

Overall, Belgium has a higher-than-average enrolment rate in school-based VET among OECD countries, with 57% of students aged 15-19 following a VET programme (compared to the OECD average of 40%). The proportion of the population aged 25-64 with lower secondary education as the highest level of attainment in Belgium is higher than the OECD average, with an attainment rate of 16% in 2016, compared to the OECD average of 14.3%. NEET rates (the proportion of those aged 18-24 that are neither employed nor in education or training), are lower than the OECD average, at 12.4%, compared to the OECD average of 15.3%. The share of population aged 25-34 with a tertiary-level qualification is higher than the OECD average, at 44.3% in 2016, compared to the OECD average of 43.1%. Employment rates for 25-34 year-olds with tertiary education are higher than the OECD average. In 2016, 86.8% were employed, while the OECD average rate was 82.9%.

Figure 7.3. Selected indicators compared with the average: Belgium
graphic

Note: For each indicator, the absolute performance is standardised (normalised) using a normative score ranging from 0 to 220, where 100 was set at the average, taking into account all OECD countries with available data in each case.

Sources: OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en; OECD (2016), Skills Matter: Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264258051-en; OECD (2017), Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en.

Evolution of key education policy priorities

Table 7.3. Evolution of key education policy priorities, Belgium (2008-17)

Identified by

Equity and quality

Preparing students for the future

Selected OECD country-based work, 2008-171

The socio-economic background and immigrant status of students have a higher impact on student performance than in other OECD countries. In the case of immigrants, explaining variables are the level of education on arrival in the country and lower enrolment rates in ECEC, which have an impact on early assimilation of the language. [2007; 2011; 2015]

Persisting difficulties were identified in filling some job vacancies, especially in technical areas. Young people in secondary vocational studies are often unable to find employment, as they lack technical skills. This can partially be explained by the marginal training received in the workplace. As a result, a severe skills mismatch has developed on the labour market. Also, a high share of immigrants pursue VET, with fewer opportunities to pursue further studies afterwards. [2011; 2015]

Evolution of responses to EPO Surveys, 2013 and 2016-17

The Flemish Community has reported difficulty in integrating students with disadvantaged backgrounds and limited knowledge of Dutch into mainstream education, which has increased dramatically due to the acceleration of immigration within the last few years. In the French Community, grade repetition remains the highest among countries participating in PISA 2015. The integration of students with special needs into mainstream education must also be improved. According to the Community’s reports, major school reforms have been launched recently, aiming to improve equity, key competences, and the quality and relevance of VET. [2013; 2016-17]

The Flemish Community had previously reported a need to adjust adult education to facilitate effective transitions to the labour market, as well as to reduce numbers of students leaving secondary education without a qualification. In the French Community, similar policy priorities remain with regard to early school leaving. It has also been reported that VET lacks attractiveness and student preference should be further taken into account when improving the VET system. [2013; 2016-17]

1. See Annex A, Table A A.3 for the list of OECD publications consulted for this snapshot.

Flemish Community

After the Flemish Parliament ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2009, the Flemish Community of Belgium legally reinforced the right of students with special educational needs to be enrolled in mainstream education, through the passing of the M-Decree in 2014. Its measures include: 1) updating the definition categories for students with special educational needs, including a category for children with autism; 2) requiring mainstream schools to make reasonable adjustments (such as providing specialist equipment and support staff to accommodate students with special education needs in the mainstream system) and requiring mainstream schools to only refer a student to special education once all such “reasonable adaptations” have been tried; and 3) providing the right to appeal to a Student Rights Commission (Commissie inzake leerlingenrechten) to parents of a child with special educational needs who disagree with a school’s refusal to enrol their child. This commission, created by the Parliamentary Act of 2002 on Equal Educational Opportunities, is comprised of experts in equality and education law. In May 2017, the government reached an agreement regarding the allocation of EUR 103 million for updating classrooms and training teachers for special needs students (EC, 2017a).

As part of the Parliamentary Act for primary and secondary education (2008) in the Flemish Community of Belgium, additional financial resources are provided to schools to compensate for socio-economic disadvantage. In fact, the Flemish school-financing system is designed to support equal access to educational opportunities for all students and compensate for differences in student backgrounds. To help schools meet the needs of students from diverse backgrounds, school operating grants are weighted for socio-economic status. This is intended to account for the influence of key differentiating variables: the mother’s educational level, foreign language spoken at home, the family’s financial capacity and the student’s neighbourhood characteristics. Student socio-economic characteristics are also used in the calculation, and elementary schools and secondary schools receive a top-up of teaching hours based on school concentrations of such characteristics. Differential weighting recognises the adverse impact on student learning of specific student background characteristics. For elementary education, characteristic-based funding amounted to 14% of the overall budget in 2012, and it is being increased gradually to reach 15.5% by 2020. For secondary education, the share of the budget amounted to 10% in 2008-09, and it is gradually being increased to 11% by 2020. For secondary education, the share of the budget amounted to 10% in 2008-09 and is gradually being increased to 11% by 2020 (Flemish Department of Education and Training, 2015). This additional funding may make it possible to run remedial classes, split classes, and release teachers for a range of pedagogical and support activities. In these ways, the Flemish authorities seek to balance choice and autonomy with equity.

In 2015, the parliament of the Flemish Community of Belgium launched the action plan “Together against Early School Leaving” (previously the Action Plan on Early School Leaving [2013] and Spijbelplan [2012]). It targets different types of populations at risk: early school leavers (emigrants with low education level); truants; NEETs; and general youth at risk (SERV, 2015). The policy guidelines in the Action Plan outline actions that have been completed, are in operation and are about to begin. Local actions are aligned to the European reference framework of prevention, intervention and compensation (Vlaanderen Department Onderwijs en Vorming, 2017). Furthermore, the action plan includes monitoring, identification and co-ordination. In 2016, the government set up the Early School Leaving Monitor to monitor and track the outcomes, socio-economic characteristics and study progression of young people who leave education without an upper secondary qualification.

In the Flemish Community of Belgium, a new model of dual vocational learning (Schoolbank op de werkplek) is underway, with pilot projects running since 2015/16 and general implementation starting during 2018/19. Students are trained in the workplace and in a centre for part-time education (CEDEFOP, 2017a). One component is an online tool (werkplek duaal) where companies can upload requests for getting their apprenticeship place accredited (Syntra Vlaanderen, 2017a). The tool started operating in 2016, and 8 938 accreditations were verified by 2017 (Syntra Vlaanderen, 2017a).

Between 2009 and 2013, Belgium’s Flemish Community implemented a national qualifications structure that includes measures such as short-cycle tertiary education (Hoger beroepsonderwijs [Higher Vocational Education], HBO5 or SCHE EQF level 5). This new level was added to expand access to higher education and meet labour market needs. The qualifications’ structure will be further expanded with the systematic definition of the competences of professional qualifications to be obtained through schooling. This process is carried out by the Flemish Ministry of Education and Training in co-operation with employers and representatives of the different business and industry sectors.

French Community

In 2016, the French Community of Belgium introduced a further series of measures aimed specifically at reducing the prevalence of children repeating the third pre-primary year. These measures are part of the Take-off Project, initiated in 2012 to prevent grade repetition among children age 2.5 to 8. These recent measures require that children be held back only in exceptional circumstances, following an assessment by the school leader and a psycho-social-medical centre (CPMS). They also introduce a skills assessment for children for early identification of learning difficulties and disabilities. Depending on the child’s outcomes on this assessment, a remediation plan can be put in place by the school, in partnership with the CPMS involved in the assessment to increase the chances for a successful transfer to primary education. In additional, new curriculum standards were introduced for pre-primary schools to define core initial competence bases and promote smoother transitions from pre-primary to primary education.

Additional education policies of potential interest to other countries

Flemish Community:

French Community:

German-speaking Community:

More information available at: www.oecd.org/education/policyoutlook.htm.