first century
ce. According to E.H. J
ohnston, ancient fragments of Ashva·ghosha’s
Sariputraprakarana belong to “the reign of Kanishka or Huvishka,”
18 which implies that he lived “not later than the time of Kanishka and may have preceded him” (J
ohnston 1984, Part II: xvi).
If we follow H
arry F
alk in dating the beginning of the Kanishka era to
127 ce,
19 we can probably agree with J
ohnston that Ashva·ghosha flourished “between
50 bce and
100 ce.”
20 And since ‘Liberation’ was compiled gradually, by adding new texts at its end, it would appear that roughly its first two-thirds had been compiled by the first century
ce. The final third was probably completed during the first or second century
ce.
Important Teachings in
the First Volume of ‘Liberation’
This first volume of ‘Liberation’ is dominated by two lengthy philosophical tracts: ‘The dialogue between Bhrigu and Bharad·vaja’ (cantos
182–192), and ‘The Dialogue between
Manu and
Brihas·pati’ (cantos
201–206). The former contains an important cosmogony (
182.11–21,
183.8–17) which postulates that world-creation begins with the self-cognition of an unmanifest, nondual deity (called ‘pure consciousness,’
182.11, or
brahman, 182.37). A similar understanding is implied in the dialogue between Manu and Brihas·pati (
202.1,
204.10–1), although this text is more interested in the attainment of liberation (
moksa) through meditation (
dhyana or
yoga:
204.5,
205.10–22). Both dialogues probably originated in different but related early Brahminic schools.