Sometimes the most complicated story can be told in the simplest manner. Sometimes it must be. I originally tried to write a more general book on abortion, one in which I would deal with nothing less than its ethical, moral, religious, and philosophical aspects. After several months of work I reluctantly concluded that such a book could not be written—at least not by me—and I note that no one else has attempted so broad a handling of the subject.
Abortion is too large, too amorphous a subject, to be dealt with in so broad a manner. It quickly becomes reduced to a polemic. It was only when Macmillan editor Ned Chase suggested that I try a book on a somewhat smaller scale—by dealing with the real events that surrounded the legalization of abortion—that the subject became manageable.
On the simplest level, this is a story about how two young, inexperienced women, barely out of law school, without any thought of larger glory, decided to test the constitutionality of the abortion law in Texas. Although experienced lawyers in several states were racing to get an abortion suit before the Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade became the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion.
Of course, within the framework of the “simple” story, this is also a book about the larger issues—the discriminatory nature of restrictive abortion laws, the inequality women suffer when they cannot control their own bodies, the right of the state versus the federal government to regulate its citizens, and most important, one of our most precious rights, that of privacy, which a recent poll shows most people now feel ranks alongside life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The story of Roe v. Wade has never been told before, and despite the Supreme Court decision, the abortion issue has never been resolved. Every year antiabortion forces fight a more aggressive battle to undo the abortion decision. They have begun to make inroads in some states and have repeatedly brought before the Supreme Court cases designed to chip away at the abortion right. Only in the past few years have the pro-choice reformers awakened to the need to continue their struggle.
Because abortion is an issue that never seems to fade in our collective public consciousness, and because all of us must constantly rethink and reevaluate our position on abortion, I thought it might be helpful to review the relevant issues in their original context, as well as to examine them from the distance that time can provide. That is why I wrote this book.
Abortion is, I think, one of the most trying issues of our time. A great deal of pain and rage exists on both sides of the debate. After all, abortion concerns nothing less than the value we place on human life. Those who oppose abortion believe that the value must be held collectively, that one standard must apply to everyone and to all circumstances, while those who support the abortion right believe that the choice can only be made individually.
Adding to the conflict is the fact that what people believe, at least where abortion is concerned, they tend to believe fervently. This, if nothing else, makes abortion an unresolvable issue, one about which people cannot be rational.
As I interviewed people for this book, I was repeatedly asked what “side” I was on. It is a difficult question to answer. Professionally, I was committed to writing an objective book about the legalization of abortion. Personally, like most other women, I could only answer that whether or not I would have an abortion would depend upon the circumstances.
After looking at abortion from every conceivable angle, I find that I am firmer than ever in my conviction that criminalization of abortion is wrong. It solves nothing. I agree with George Devereux, author of A Study of Abortion in Primitive Societies, who wrote: “Were the contracting of typhoid fever defined as a crime, this would dispense society from doing something about pollution and public health. The branding of abortion as a crime also seeks to sidestep our obligation to create a world . . . into which it would be good to be born.”
Am I, as I am so often asked, for abortion? That, to paraphrase Betty Friedan, is like being for mastectomy. I do support the abortion right, which means I believe each individual woman must have the right to decide for herself whether to undergo an abortion. Most Americans agree with me. In the fifteen years since the decision was issued, and despite a vociferous outcry from those who oppose abortion and almost nothing from those who worked to legalize it, slightly more than 50 percent of Americans believe the abortion decision is up to the individual woman. It is the only view, I believe, that offers any real relief to an otherwise irresoluble dilemma. Each person can make a decision based on his or her personal beliefs and conscience. No one is forced to have an abortion; no one is forced not to have one.
Marian Faux
New York City