Recognizing a disease process on a histopathologic slide becomes instantaneous, with increasing familiarity. Breaking this process down into the “how” is difficult, especially given that the steps may not be the same for each individual. Nonetheless, on a basic level, it is important to separate a solitary growth (“tumor” or “lesion”) from a rash (“inflammatory” process; Figures 1–3), focus on the most obvious pathologic finding, and run through a differential diagnosis. With experience, that “obvious” pathologic finding (i.e. where to start) becomes second nature. The diseases in this atlas are grouped, arbitrarily, by such findings (see the Index by Pattern). Notably, basic algorithms are ultimately overly simplistic, and there is overlap of the two major divisions in Figure 1 (tumor versus rash). For example, clear cell acanthoma can architecturally mimic psoriasis, mycosis fungoides can appear to be a dermatitis, and epithelioid sarcoma can be confused with a palisading granulomatous process.
Key concepts in cognitive psychology come into play during visual recognition, and having some understanding of how the brain processes visual information can be helpful in training the eye to see (Table 1). In figure-ground separation, the brain focuses on a perceived figure and tends to ignore the background. Thus, an important initial step in diagnosing disease when viewing microscopic slides is to train the brain to accurately identify the most important features (“figure”). In order to make sense of visual stimuli, the brain also automatically groups information. With all else being equal, similar objects will be grouped together, closer objects will be grouped together, and objects perceived as having a similar color/texture or common enclosure (“common region”) will be grouped together. Clues such as body site (Figure 4) and absence of obvious pathology (Figure 5 and Table 2) can also be useful.
Table 1 Visual recognition in dermatopathology as related to cognitive psychology.
Dermatopathology | Cognitive psychology concept | |
Overview (2×/4× ocular) |
|
|
Higher magnification (10×/20×/40× ocular) |
|
|
Figure 1 Gestalt impression of a slide
Note In some cases, it is not readily apparent if the process is a tumor or an inflammatory process (examples include mycosis fungoides, a form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, as well as deep fungal infections, which can induce florid epidermal hyperplasia mimicking a squamous cell carcinoma).
Figure 2(A) Location of the tumor
Figure 2(B) Architecture of an epidermal tumor/process
Note Benign tumors are often symmetric with a pushing border, and malignant tumors may be asymmetric and infiltrative.
Figure 2(C) Different tumors are predominantly composed of a particular cell type
Figure 2(D) Cytologic features are important in pointing toward a benign versus malignant tumor
Benign nevomelanocytes (left) | versus | Melanoma cells (right) |
Small nucleus, abundant cytoplasm | Large nucleus, relatively little cytoplasm | |
Smooth nuclear border | Irregular nuclear border | |
Chromatin pattern nondescript | Irregular, chunky nuclear contents (chromatin) | |
Inconspicuous nucleolus | 1 or more large, purple nucleoli |
“Rash”: key concepts
Figure 3(A) Key epidermal changes
Figure 3(B) Distribution of inflammation – major patterns.
See Figure 3(A) for lichenoid
Figure 3(C) The morphology of key inflammatory cells
Characteristic body sites
Figure 4(A) Acral skin
Note Meissner's corpuscles (black arrow), Pacinian corpuscles (red arrow), and thick stratum corneum with a stratum lucidum (green arrow).
Figure 4(B) Cutaneous lip (top row) has keratin and a granular layer (green arrow) as well as adnexal structures
Figure 4(C) Eyelid skin has a thin epidermis with dermal vellus hairs (red arrow) and skeletal muscle (black arrow)
Figure 4(D) Axilla
Table 2 (see page 22) shows a differential of “normal” appearing skin. Some entities, like vitiligo, require special stains (i.e. a melanocytic marker).
Figure 5(A) Argyria
Source: Case courtesy of James E. Fitzpatrick, MD.
Figure 5(B) Ichthyosis vulgaris
Source: Case courtesy of Jeff D. Harvell, MD.
Figure 5(C) Tinea versicolor
Figure 5(D) Urticaria
Table 2 Some entities to consider for a gestalt impression of “normal” skin
“Normal” skin | Look for |
Argyria | Flecks of black material around eccrine glands; elastic fibers may be discolored (Figure 5A) |
Ichthyosis vulgaris | Hyperkeratosis above hypogranulosis or absent granular layer (Figure 5B) |
Macular amyloidosis | Amorphous, smooth pink globules in the papillary dermis Pigment incontinence |
Scleredema | “Square”/rectangular biopsy shape
Increased space +/− mucin between collagen bundles |
Tinea versicolor | Spores and pseudohyphae in the stratum corneum (Figure 5C) |
Urticaria | Mixed inflammation (interstitial and perivascular) (Figure 5D) |