This chapter describes the natural behaviors of the experience-centric organization. You might already exhibit some of these behaviors, in which case the chapter can give you confidence you are on the right track. You might, however, see the need to develop new ones or turn up the volume on some of your weaker ones. If that is the case, read on, as the rest of the book describes more about these behaviors and how you can develop them in your organization.
The experience-centric organization has core behaviors that characterize it and nurture its development. At some point, the organization’s efforts toward experience centricity become energized like a flywheel and start to turn on their own. You can use this chapter to help develop your organization, or as a means of monitoring your progress and seeing how many of these behaviors your organization exhibits. There is no specific order to these points, although arguably the first one—knowing the experience you want to offer—is the most important.
The experience-centric organization knows exactly what experience it wants its customers to have. Further, it knows how to make that experience happen through the service personality, tone of voice, and individual touchpoints along the experiential journey. The organization is continually updating and adjusting the experience, and all members of the organization know their role in delivering it. Discussions regarding strategy and tactics regularly center on their relevance to, or consequences for, the desired customer experience.
As an experience-centric organization, you listen to what customers want to tell you, rather than seeking answers to what you want to hear. You are also aware that to surprise and delight customers you have to be proactive about customer needs, and intuit needs that customers cannot express. The experience-centric organization knows the desires of its customers and has the agility to react to, and to stimulate, these desires (see Figure 4-1).
Figure 4-1. Make this the mantra of your organization: See the customer, hear the customer, and be the customer! Understand what this means in the bigger picture, and apply it to your company, your project, and your people.
In this organization, you have built a picture of your customers that comes from an integrated understanding of them—and when you have this, you can have the confidence to sometimes go against what they say. This is because you know that there are other factors in play when it comes to customer desire, and that by going ahead of your customers, you can lead them: they will desire what you are offering. The more you know your customers, the more you can be ahead of them, confident that they will follow you. To paraphrase Atticus Finch, “to really know a man, you have to walk in his shoes.”1
Even though you are skilled at listening to customers, you have also developed the ability to go beyond what they say and intuit what they mean. You are able to reflect on your customers in context and extract meaning from what they say and do.
Because you know your customers so well and deliver on your experiential promise, they consider you benevolent. They believe that you act with their best interests at heart, within the frame of the offering that they have entered into. This builds mutual trust and creates a long-term relationship. It also promotes customer acceptance and tolerance when things don’t go as planned or break down.
The zeitgeist is the spirit of the times. You know what characterizes the zeitgeist, and you follow it as it evolves and changes. You understand how society embraces your offering as part of a cultural movement that utilizes the nature of groups to share, build, and experience together.
The organization continuously engages in trendslation—that is, translating cultural trends into experiences—and has taken a larger role within the culture. This role allows you to be influenced by culture and, to a certain extent, you can influence it in return.
You have spent time building a story based on your DNA, supporting that story through the touchpoints of your service, continually rewriting it together with your customers during interactions, and listening to it be told and retold by your customers and employees. The story is not fiction; it is a transformation of your DNA, recounted and experienced in narrative form. And a good story can never be told too many times.
The experience-centric organization balances the analytical with the creative, the practical with the social, and all the while is focused on developing the emotional. You encourage a “multiple intelligences” approach to the organization and the experience it supports. The organization values empathy as a core intelligence—not only customer empathy, but empathy within the organization for the roles and challenges each and every employee takes on to make the experience a success.
The experience-centric organization always works from the experience backward through the wheel of experience centricity. Starting with the frontline employee, it asks, “What does this employee need to be able to give the experience the customer craves?” Then, taking another step back, it asks, “What does this work group need to be able to support the individual frontline employee in delivering the experience?” Finally, it asks, “What does this manager need to be able to support the team and the individual in providing the desired experience?” The same is asked of platforms and infrastructure within the organization: “What enterprise platform will enable the touchpoints to provide the desired experience?” With this view, the term management breaks down into a combination of tasking, trusting, and tending to the frontline touchpoints.
The organization is aligned around the experience that you wish to give customers. Everyone in the organization understands the wheel of experience centricity and their role in energizing it. There is internal rotation of staff, such that all employees have periods of customer contact and therefore understand the importance of the customer experience, even if they are far from the front line. Everyone in the organization works to support the delivery of a superior customer experience.
Everyone in the experience-centric organization feels a responsibility and a motivation to develop and deliver desirable experiences. Employees are empowered to do it, and they take this responsibility seriously. The CEO is responsible for the customer experience and has a supporting part of the organization, headed up by the chief experience officer (CXO). The CXO in turn is responsible for the orchestration of the experience and is the caretaker and custodian of the experiential DNA.
You know the enhanced significance of certain objects, behaviors, or interactions for customers, and you use them as part of your design. Coupled with this, your awareness of cultural relevance adds to the significance of these symbolic objects, behaviors, and interactions. Customers enjoy a richer experience with you, compared to your competitors, and this gives added meaning in their lives.
Experiential journeys have added an emotional layer to your journey structure, and you have found your organization’s own way of creating them. You recognize that smileys as a description of the customer experience are a thing of the past. Instead you are specific, describing how the customer should feel at each stage of a journey, and how you can make that happen. You continually craft the emotional curve of your experiential journeys, always looking to improve and tweak it—the odd nudge here, honing the tone of voice there. This extreme attention to detail pays off by fostering employee ownership and a shared desire for perfection.
You have an authentic purpose in terms of a transparency between your DNA and the customer experience. This clarity is visible to employees and customers alike, and makes life easier for all. It also encourages forgiveness from customers during service breakdowns, when things don’t go as expected. There is a generosity from employees and customers alike that comes from the simplicity that lies in authenticity of purpose.
The term brand has morphed into brand experience as you have focused on translating your experiential DNA into better and better experiences. Branding is now focused on experience fulfillment and interactions with customers, and takes a greater role in innovation projects.
The development of future concept services is one way that you get involved in the wider societal culture, but the majority of the concept services you develop are used internally to assist with alignment, infusion, and ultimately creating a relevant organizational culture that is infused with the customer experience. You have developed the skills to prototype new experiences based on the innovative offerings that you are always considering. You are confident that your innovation pipeline is an experiential roadmap with a strong fit to your organizational purpose.
The automotive industry has a tradition of developing concept cars (see Figure 4-2), and over time has found that they communicate not only outward to a potential customer base, but also inward, preparing the organization for change. The experience-centric organization knows that developing the equivalent of the concept car within the organization is a means of propelling the organization toward the future—a future that is highly experiential.
Figure 4-2. The Buick Model Y, built in 1938, was the world’s first concept car. Since then, concept cars have become a means of propelling an organization forward, and today, they are developed as much to prepare an organization for change as to draw external customers. The experience-centric organization understands this, and creates concept services as a form of organizational and market development. (Harley Earl and “The Y Job”; Source: Flickr.)
Studies of designers show that they use design as a way of understanding the problem by trying to solve it. In a kind of trial-and-error process, designers attempt solutions to determine whether they offer promise, and to better understand what might and might not work. This approach, often called “failing fast and forward,” is a way of rapidly understanding and learning about a new problem area and a potential solution space. You design with a view to having multiple failures along the way, and you are not precious with your solutions. You expect them to fail during the early stages of a project, because that is how you find out what works.
Source: author.
When the design and delivery of memorable experiences is your core mission, you naturally work to provide better experiences, always with an intent to improve the existing situation. This engenders a culture of directed improvement in the organization that is reflected in the market. This optimism and faith is something that your customers share and take part in. They feel it through the interactions they have with your organization, and are therefore willing to accept that sometimes things won’t go as expected. Optimism and faith translate into fault tolerance and loyalty and a positive circle of improvement in the customer experience.
As an organization you are aware of the difference between the lived experience, gained directly from interactions with touchpoints, the remembered experience afterward, and the shared experience as told to others. You know these well, and monitor each continuously. At the same time, you do not have a tyranny of metrics within the organization, since you balance measurement with your own insights at all levels of the organization.
You are successful at matching the overall offering with the detail in the customer interactions, so that together they are an experiential fit for your experiential DNA. This creates an experience that is more than its individual parts or the sum of those parts.
The organization knows that customers understand the offering as a holistic promise providing experiential benefits, delivered through interactions with many touchpoints. You understand this, and also know that it can be hard work to be obsessed with the details. At the same time, you know the pleasure customers gain when you get it right.
You actively and wisely use all five senses in the touchpoints of your service to support the experience you want to give customers. You know that the visual sense is very strong in most interactions, but you diligently use the four other senses too.
Choosing the right investments in infrastructure, the right organizational changes, and the right innovation projects to move forward is more about saying “no” to options than saying “yes.” There are countless possibilities to invest in projects, but the experience-centric organization invests only in projects that improve alignment around the customer experience. This means saying “no” more than “yes” and continually questioning how an investment will improve the customer experience.
You constantly strive to improve existing situations, always looking for a creative leap. You understand that design thinking adds something to your existing skill set,2 and make it a core competency in your organization. Design thinking is found in the leadership of all experience-centric organizations, as an approach to continual innovation in changing situations.
The experience-centric organization knows the importance of getting the right fit between the service offering and its experiential DNA. At the same time, it has an attention to detail that ensures that the experiential vision also imbues the touchpoints and interactions. This is a combination of doing the right thing, and doing the thing right. The two are inseparable, and this ambidextrous way of working is key in the experience-centric organization. Doing the right thing focuses on zooming out and asking the big questions about what it is you offer as an organization. What does banking mean in a mobile and socially connected world? How should healthcare be provided when the patient has spent two days Googling their illness and knows more (in some cases) than the doctor? The continual questioning of what can be at this level is proactive, looking for radical innovations and continually exploring experiential futures. It’s always striving to improve the service offering. At the same time, the experience-centric organization also has its eye on doing the thing right. It zooms in, right down to last detail, recognizing that it has a promise to deliver on. This ability to move between a macro view and a micro view is a core competency in the experience-centric organization (see Figure 4-3).
Figure 4-3. Zooming out and zooming in, focusing on functional and emotional, is a typical approach to experience-centric innovation. During this process the organization zooms out in terms of developing new offerings and zooms in on the detail, the individual touchpoint experience. At the same time, it focuses on combining functional value and emotional value.
Co-design is your normal way of working, because you know that any innovation will impact the whole wheel of experience centricity in some way or another. By having representatives for each part of the wheel working together, you speed up development and implementation and reduce problems along the way.
The organization works visually, sketching during discussions to illustrate and clarify ideas and reduce the risk of misunderstandings. In other words, through this visualization, the organization shows it has listened, understood, and imagined how a solution might work if implemented, and communicated that idea so that all can understand it. You encourage visualization in all cross-functional discussions (including leadership meetings).
You encourage people to bring home and share new and exciting experiences with others, be they innovative offerings, touchpoints, platforms, or structures. This promotes a culture of looking for and discussing new and valuable solutions. This is coolhunting in its best form, an organizational interest in exciting new innovations with a goal to share them and learn from them. Coolhunting is part of the formal and informal structure of your organization—formal in terms of providing a means to facilitate and reward sharing, and informal in terms of being infused in and a natural part of the organizational function.
Source: ZOZO.com.
You understand the flow experience of film and want to emulate it, but in your own way. Flow is a term that was first used in 1975 by the psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi to describe a situation of complete absorption in a task, resulting in loss of one’s sense of space and time. You know that films are characterized by exactly the same things that characterize services: a strong experiential message, a large team of disparate specialists that need to collaborate to deliver that experience, a high degree of complexity, technical constraints, budgetary constraints, and (not least) aspects such as the peculiarities of individual stars.
In addition, you recognize that films have cultural relevance and have the ability to fit with the culture of the moment. Your services continually evolve to do the same.
You understand that the customer experience cannot adequately be described through measures and quantities alone. You have a pragmatic approach to the use of quantitative data and use it critically. You do not go in for “number comforting” as a means of distancing yourself from customers, but instead use customer data in a way that brings them inside the organization.
You have the confidence and experience to look beyond what your customers are saying. You know that they most often can talk well about what they know, about something that exists, and you respect that they have limited abilities to look into the future like you can. You know that sometimes you need to talk to customers in a different way, and get to know more about what their lives are like and less about what they want.
You reflect on broader cultural issues and are not afraid to ask yourself what these customer and cultural inputs really mean at a deeper level. You understand that people are looking for meaning in their lives, and strive to develop meaningful experiences for your customers. You do this because you know that meaning is the new currency; it translates into devoted and loyal customers and long-term relationships.
Source: Flickr user atomtesuwan and Creative Commons.
Insights from Lynn Hunsaker
Lynn Hunsaker is a Hall of Fame author at CustomerThink and serves on the Customer Experience Professionals Association’s Board of Directors; since the early 1990s she has led customer experience transformation at Fortune 250 companies. She finds that organizations are so caught up in what competitors are doing that they forget to consider what they can and should offer their customers.
If you analyze Disney and others in the forefront of customer experience, you will see that the customer experience permeates the whole organization. They have it in their DNA. The whole idea of customer experience is living up to your brand promise. People are looking for a silver bullet to solve the customer experience. There is no silver bullet.
The CEO is the most critical person in customer experience. If there is no alignment between the CEO and CXO then there will always be a suboptimal transformation.
“Transforming silos is the next frontier of customer experience management.”
Transforming silos is the next frontier of customer experience management. As soon as you start working with experience journeys, you will find that silos are causing problems and there is a need to tame them. I say tame rather than bust, because they need to be there. However, they need to be connected, and a collaborative attitude is necessary. That is a real challenge for an organization that has never really had an experiential focus.
I advocate a three-part methodology called “customer experience DNA.” It has three key interlocking elements:
“People are looking for a silver bullet to solve the customer experience. There is no silver bullet.”
When companies first start the transformation journey, there is usually too much of a focus on value maximization, and too little on all hands on deck and being aligned from the top. If an organization addresses points one and two, then point three is easier to address.
It is vital that an organization knows what kind of experience they need to give their customers. The best place to start is to formulate what you want customers to feel. If you can formulate that “we want our customers to feel A and B and C” then you have something to aim toward. If you don’t know what outcome the customer is looking for, then you will not be able to develop services that make it happen.
Brand experience, customer experience, and employee experience need to be brought together. Unfortunately, in many cases, [organizations] have divorced themselves from this, and have felt the need to just promise something. This leads to a dramatic fall in trust, and in general trust is going down, down, down because of this. It’s ironic that the things on a customer experience manager’s mind are often very different to the things that are on a customer’s mind.
Insights from Christian Beil
Christian Beil has been successful in introducing the design thinking approach into an extremely large organization. He is a Senior Innovation Design Expert at BASF, Germany, working in the BASF management consulting group Growth & Innovation.
From [BASF’s] point of view, there are two major converging aspects pointing to radical change. Firstly, more people are concerned about the environment, and secondly, digitalization and platforms can open [up] radically new solutions. These two are good triggers that can open [up] radically new experiential offerings.
Compared to B2C companies’ classical B2B companies are far behind when it comes to customer orientation. With our new corporate strategy, the aspiration is to be the world’s leading chemical company for our customers. We want to strengthen our passion for customers throughout the entire organization. We therefore need to go further toward experience centricity. A lot of people at BASF believe this is fine-tuning to the left or right, but in reality it means offering things that are radically different. The awareness is there, and with the new strategy under way, it will play a greater role in BASF.
The core competencies of BASF are good chemists, and research expertise. As an organization we need to find a balance between customer orientation and a technology/products focus. What I see is that the majority of chemists do not know how to generate customer insights. By training they have a different focus, so they need help understanding customers to generate insights, and the group I work for offers this to them.”
At the strategic level there is a need for training across the whole company. At the organizational level, more training of middle management is needed toward understanding customers. Focusing on customers gives a focus on your customer base. However, environments have changed and there are opportunities for new ecosystems in which the customer plays a different role. From a customer experience perspective, empathy is vital. The ability to ask the right questions and reflect and then translate [the findings] back into compelling offerings is something we work very hard to develop.
We have done a lot of empathic design, and how to go out and explore needs and pains, including living in relevant contexts and shadowing people getting water, etc. In Mumbai, our team worked with NGOs and lived with families in slums to learn what could be done to understand better. There, we developed a water “ATM” using micropayments, to provide clean drinking water as part of a customer-focused solution. This was well received and is a good example of creating a service offering from what was earlier a product focus.
“From a customer experience perspective, empathy is vital. The ability to ask the right questions and reflect and then translate [the findings] back into compelling offerings is something we work very hard to develop.”
New business models based on a service-based customer orientation offer huge potential. As an example in sustainability: the agricultural chemical market uses a large amount of pesticides and fungicides, and use can be error-prone. We worked with potato farmers in Brazil, where we showed that, following BASF expert advice, they could increase yield and quality by applying fewer chemicals. This was developed into a new business model that was service-based with a novel offering. The farmers did not pay for the chemicals, but instead paid a subscription to a service that included advice about when and what to spray, field data, access to the BASF traceability platform, and access to potato buyers, who were interested in purchasing “sustainable” potatoes. Although this would cannibalize BASF sales, the value proposition was seen as so compelling that it would offer long-term advantage for BASF. In other words, instead of selling a product, BASF was offering more yield, better quality, and market access.
1 Atticus Finch served as a moral hero for many readers in the book, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, published in 1960
2 Design thinking is a term used to describe how designers approach and carry out their work. It has its roots back in the 1950s with the emergence of industrial design as a separate discipline, but was introduced as a term by Tim Brown from IDEO in 2008 in the Harvard Business Review article, “Design Thinking,” 86 no. 6 (2008), 84.