M25 Tadeusz Kantor

The Emballage Manifesto (1964)

The experimental artist and theatre director Tadeusz Kantor (1915–90) was a leading figure in the radical art world of mid-twentieth-century Poland. He had originally been an advocate of Art Informel – an umbrella term for European gestural abstraction – but after Socialist Realism became the official, state-sanctioned art of Poland in the late 1940s, he concentrated his energies on theatre and performance, helping to establish a thriving underground avant-garde art scene.

Emballage (French for ‘the act of wrapping up’) was a new artistic process invented by Kantor, in which objects, people and works of art were hidden and made inaccessible. Kantor believed this action to be significant, partly as a means of protection and concealment – important in a country with strict censorship rules – but also as a way of critiquing artifice in art: the act of unwrapping exposes, or unmasks, the truth.

Kantor wrote ‘The Emballage Manifesto’ in Switzerland in February 1964, while staying at the house of the art collector Theodor Ahrenberg; but it was not published until September 1968, when it appeared in the sixth issue of the French contemporary art journal Opus. It became the unofficial manifesto of the Polish ‘happenings’ culture of theatrical, improvisational events, and went on to inspire many other conceptual artists.

* * *

Emballage –

one ought to

categorize first

some of the attributes

that define it.

It would not, however,

be wise to generalize

or to create ready-made formulas.

Anyway, it would be almost impossible to do so.

Emballage, Emballage.

Because a discussed phenomenon

has many meanings –

worse than that,

it is ambiguous –

I should state at the very beginning that

Emballage actually exists

beyond the boundaries of reality.

It could thus be discussed –

Emballage, Emballage, Emballage –

in terms of metaphysics.

On the other hand,

it performs a function that is

so prosaic,

so utilitarian,

and so basic;

it is enslaved to its

precious content

to such a degree that

when the content is removed,

it is functionless,

no longer needed,

a pitiful sign of

its past glory

and importance.

Emballage, Emballage.

Branded

and accused of

a lack of any content,

it is bereft of its

glamour and

expression.

Emballage, Emballage.

I must objectively note here

that it is a victim of

the fates’ injustice.

First, an extremely high honour

is bestowed on it

because one’s success depends on its

looks,

opacity,

ability to convey,

expressiveness,

precision.

Then

it is ruthlessly cast aside,

exposed to ridicule,

doomed to oblivion,

and banished.

Such an ambiguous behaviour towards it

leads to further

misunderstandings

and contradictions;

prevents any serious, legitimate

attempt to classify it.

Emballage.

As a described phenomenon, it

balances at the threshold –

Emballage, Emballage –

between eternity

and

garbage.

We are witnesses of

a clownlike tomfoolery

juggling

pathos and pitiful

destruction.

Emballage, Emballage, Emballage.

Its potential is limitless.

E m b a l l a g e.

Any extra activity connected with it

must be

a completely disinterested service

because one should remember

it is performed with a full awareness of

the fatal end.

Let us discuss some of

the stages of this ritual:

f o l d i n g,

whose complicated strategies

requiring some mysterious initiation

and a surprising end effect

bring to mind magic

and a child’s play;

t y i n g u p,

the knowledge of various type of knots

touches almost on

a domain of sacred knowledge;

s e a l i n g, always full of dignity

and complete concentration;

this gradation of actions,

this adding of

surprising effects,

as well as human need

and desire to

store,

isolate,

hide,

transfer,

becomes an almost

autonomous process.

This is our chance.

We must not overlook

its emotional possibilities.

There are many such possibilities inside it:

promise,

hope,

premonition,

temptation,

desire for the unknown

and for the mystery.

Emballage –

marked

with the symbols of fragility,

of urgency,

of hierarchy,

of degrees of importance;

with the digits of its own time,

of its own language.

Emballage –

with the address of receiver,

with the symbols of power,

with promises of

effectiveness,

durability,

and perfection.

It shows up in

special,

mundane,

funny,

grand,

and final

circumstances of

our everyday life.

Emballage –

when we want to send

something important,

something significant,

and something private.

Emballage –

when we want to shelter

and protect,

to preserve,

to escape the passage of time.

Emballage –

when we want to

hide something

deeply.

EMBALLAGE –

must be isolated,

protected from trespassing,

ignorance,

and vulgarity.

Emballage.

Emballage.

Emballage.

(1964.)