§38 The Practice of Prophecy (1 Cor. 14:1–5)

The discussion returns to the direct consideration of spiritual gifts that was the explicit focus of Paul’s remarks up to 12:31a. One should notice at the outset that Paul’s general concern is with orderly worship, but there are bends and turns to the argumentation that are hard to follow and highly debated. Moreover, as later readers turn to this passage they sometimes forget the concrete historical circumstances that lie behind Paul’s remarks, but to do so is a disaster. Paul faced a complex, problem-laden congregation that had disruptive behavior of nearly unimaginable proportions at work in it. The severity of the situation brings Paul to argue with a vigor that can seem overbearing from afar, although one should recognize that Paul apparently thought such elaborate and forceful discussion was needed at the time. Indeed, students of the Corinthian church’s history can develop a deep sympathy for Paul’s difficult situation when they read 1 Clement, a letter from a later church leader in Rome, written in the last decade of the first century A.D., some forty years after Paul’s own letter. This later letter shows that many of the problems Paul faced in Corinth in the 50s still existed in the 90s. Knowing the severity of the problems Paul faced makes it easier to understand his energy, tone, and even aggravation with the Corinthians.

At the outset (vv. 1–5) Paul compares and contrasts only two of the gifts: tongues and prophecy. His discussion makes clear that so-called tongues are unintelligible assertions (glossolalia), not foreign languages. Paul’s concern is not so much with the content of tongue speech and prophecy as with the mode and orientation of these utterances. Paul declares the superior merit of an utterance that is oriented away from one’s self over speech—even if it is spectacular spiritual speech—that merely serves one’s self.

14:1 / In 14:1a Paul opens this segment of the letter as he ended a previous section at 12:31a—with an admonition, Follow the way of love! Then, as Paul launches into his discussion of the disorderly circumstances that apparently characterized the Corinthian church at worship, he urges the readers to eagerly desire spiritual gifts, but he makes his own preference clear by adding especially (lit. “rather”; Gk. mallon) the gift of prophecy. “Prefer prophecy” becomes Paul’s thesis for all that will follow in chapter 14; he even repeats this admonition in 14:39, “Be eager to prophesy.” These twin declarations in 14:1 and 14:39 form a literary inclusio, which emphasizes the material it surrounds. From this insight one gains a solid footing for attempting to follow Paul’s thought as he winds his way through the rest of this discussion.

14:2 / Verses 2–5 develop the thesis that was stated in verse 1. Having declared his own strong preference for prophecy over tongues, Paul offers a reflection on these two gifts that informs the readers that anyone who speaks in a tongue does not address people but God, and no human understands because the speaker utters mysteries with his spirit (lit. “but in spirit speaks mysteries”). According to Paul’s teaching, there is a clear point and a clear audience for tongues, but other humans are not the intended recipients of the message and so they do not comprehend the substance of the speech in tongues or benefit from it.

14:3 / Paul pursues the same objective from another point of view. By contrast to the tongue speakers, those who prophesy speak to humans for the edification, encouragement, and consolation of their hearers. As one can see from nearly everything that Paul writes in this letter, the building up of the church and the well-being of the whole body of Christ are his principal concerns. In fact, Paul borders on saying that the value of any gift or action is the same as its value for edification of the church.

14:4 / Paul analyzes the meaning of the contrast he has painted between prophecy and tongues. He tells the Corinthians that tongues edify the one speaking and prophecy edifies the whole church. In verses 5, 12, 17, 26, Paul will return explicitly to the importance of practicing spiritual gifts for the good of the church.

14:5 / Paul’s prejudice is clear, but it could be misunderstood. Therefore, he states that he wants all to speak in tongues, but even more he desires that all prophesy. Both gifts have true value, but as Paul will explain, there are fewer potential complications with prophecy than with tongues; so prophecy is preferable.

One might think at this juncture that Paul has made himself clear, but he is not finished. He will now undertake a series of arguments that illustrate and support his contention. Moreover, he will do so in two segments of discussion: verses 6–12 and verses 13–19.

Additional Notes §38

14:1 / Follow the way of love (Gk. Diōkete tēn agapēn; lit. “you [pl.] pursue love”). Having said that the Corinthians should be zealous for the greater gifts of grace (12:31), now Paul is more specific in this new declaration. He tells them to “pursue love.” The NIV’s paraphrase is sensible. Love sets the path or charts the course, and the Corinthians are challenged and privileged to follow that path in pursuit of God’s own end. In brief, after 14:1a admonishes the Corinthians to “pursue love” (reiterating the theme of ch. 13), at 14:1b Paul employs the post-positive conjunction “but” (not and as in the NIV; Gk. de). This word indicates Paul’s moving in a related but different direction in this particular phrase of the verse. The words of 14:1a prepare the way for 14:1b, where Paul dives into the discussion of ch. 14 with the words, “But, be zealous for the gifts [of the Spirit], but especially in order that you may prophesy.”

14:2 / The Gk. word glōssa means tongue or “language,” but its use here refers to spiritual utterance. From Paul’s discussion of this phenomenon one finds that to speak in a tongue was a supernatural gift. It was not speech in an unstudied human language or dialect. This gift was bestowed on an individual (14:4, 16) and had a spontaneous quality (14:15) that was at least in part under the will of the speaker (14:27–28). Even the speaker did not necessarily understand the utterance (14:2, 13). In order to impart an intelligible communication, the gift of tongues required the practice of a complementary spiritual gift of interpretation (14:2, 5, 13). Tongue speaking benefited the speaker as a direct spiritual communication to God (14:2, 16–17), but without interpretation it had no capacity for benefiting the congregation, even when spoken in the assembly (14:17, 27–28).

In setting the word spirit with a lower case “s” and in rendering the phrase “with his spirit” rather than “in the spirit,” the NIV interprets Paul’s use of the word (Gk. pneuma) to refer to the spirit of the human speaker. This reading is possible, perhaps correct; yet, Paul’s ambiguous phrase in Gk. contains the possibility that Paul meant to indicate that a tongue speaker spoke “in the Spirit of God,” so that the unintelligibility of the speaking was because of the divine origin of the language. A final decision for this question of translation is impossible and not crucial for grasping the basic sense of Paul’s statement.

14:3 / Paul’s description of the effects of prophecy is instructive; the words he chooses to explain prophecy are image-laden: strengthening (Gk. oikodomē; lit. “building up,” from the language of construction or household management), encouragement (Gk. paraklēsis; lit. “invitation, exhortation,” from the language of the courtroom or debate wherein one “appealed” to another for a decision), and comfort (Gk. paramythia; lit. “encouragement, consolation” from the realms of education and friendship). Together these words impart the picture of a rousing address meant to motivate, to enable, and to bring results.

14:4 / In a incisive essay, E. Schweizer (“The Service of Worship: An Exposition of 1 Corinthians 14,” Int 13 [1959], pp. 400–408) makes clear that the character of Christian worship is found only in congregational togetherness where each and every member participates in the worship to the mutual upbuilding of the entire church. Such a situation was assumed and encouraged (because of problems in the realization) by Paul. The way Paul phrases the juxtaposition of speaking in a tongue over against prophesying names two kinds of speaking—one taking an obscure form (tongues) and the other imparting content (prophecy). Both kinds of speech have value, but of very different quality with very different results.

14:5 / Paul’s grammar forms an elaborate, unnecessary purpose clause. He writes, thelō hina prophēteuēte (lit. “I wish in order that you [pl.] may prophesy”); whereas, as Zerwick and Grosvenor observe, he could have more easily and more normally written, thelō hymas lalein (lit. “I wish you [pl.] to speak”). The awkwardness of the phrasing anticipates the even more forceful concluding, contrasting declaration, mallon de hina prophēteuēte (lit. “but rather in order that you [pl.] may prophesy”). The rhetorical deliberateness of the lines is part of Paul’s ploy to emphasize the importance of prophesying over speaking in tongues.