‘What can cinema offer political theory? And what can political theory contribute to the experience of film? Through a series of transformative readings of recent Hollywood films, American political thought, and contemporary cultural theory, Watkins discerns the threads of a new political film genre that organizes itself around the representations of precarious lives. In doing so, Watkins challenges us to rethink not only the terms of what a cultural politics may be, but also its reach, sensibilities, and limits. What one discovers in the pages of Freedom and Vengeance on Film is the centrality of spectatorship for a radical democratic politics that isn’t easily persuaded by the fragile myth of American individualism and autonomous choice. More than this, Watkins’s book is an exemplary instance of an ethics of paying attention to the world of appearances that imbues and surrounds our contemporary condition.’
Davide Panagia, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles
‘Arguing that we are not sovereign, isolated individuals, but dependent, precarious subjects, Robert E. Watkins aims his critical sights on the hollow idea of individualism that hovers near the heart of American liberalism. But this is not yet another abstract critique of liberal political philosophy; instead, in doing cultural politics by reading recent American film, Watkins offers a deft analysis of the powerful and abiding notions of freedom and vengeance. He thereby reveals to his readers the tangible reality of liberal practices of freedom, showing not just that sovereign individualism is a myth, but how that myth sustains itself and with what effects.’
Samuel A. Chambers, Associate Professor of Political Science, Johns Hopkins University
‘The myth of the self-reliant individual saturates US cinema, and Robert E. Watkins offers an incisive analysis of its effects. He shows how filmic visions of individualism ignore social dependence while legitimating domination and vengeance. Yet Watkins also reveals an alternative cinema that rejects the violence of individualism by emphasizing “unchosen” experiences of political vulnerability. This astute and timely book should be read by political theorists, film scholars, and anyone interested in investigating the US political imaginary.’
Elisabeth Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science, The George Washington University