Bibliography

Achard, G. 1999. “Les Paradoxa Stoicorum de Cicéron: éloquence ou philosophie?” REL 77:72–86.

Ackrill, J. L. 1980. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” In ed. A. O. Rorty, Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, 15–33. Berkeley, CA.

Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.

Adkins, A.W.H. 1978. “Theoria versus Praxis in the Nicomachean Ethics and the Republic.” CP 73:297–313.

Ahl, F. 1984. “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome.” AJP 105: 174–208.

Alexander, M. C. 2007. “Oratory, Rhetoric, and Politics in the Republic.” In Dominik and Hall, 98–108.

André, J.-M. 1966. L’Otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine, des origines à l’époque augustéene. Paris.

———. 1974. “Cicéron et Lucrèce: loi du silence et allusions polémiques.” In Mélanges de philosophie, de littérature et d’histoire ancienne offerts à Pierre Boyancé, 21–38. Rome.

Annas, J. 1989. “Cicero on Stoics and Private Property.” In Griffin and Barnes, 151–73.

———, ed. 2001. Cicero: On Moral Ends. Cambridge.

Arweiler, A. 2003. Cicero rhetor. Die Partitiones Oratoriae und das Konzept des gelehrten Politikers. Berlin.

Astin, A. E. 1978. Cato the Censor. Oxford.

Badian, E. 1964. Studies in Greek and Roman History. New York.

———. 1966. “The Early Historians.” In Dorey, 1–38.

Baier, T. 1997. Werk und Wirkung Varros im Spiegel seiner Zeitgenossen. Stuttgart.

———. 2001. “Lucilius und die griechischen Wörter.” In ed. G. Manuwald, Der Satiriker Lucilius und seine Zeit, 37–50. Munich.

Balsdon, J.P.V.D. 1960. “Auctoritas, Dignitas, Otium.” CQ n.s.10:45–50.

———. 1969. Life and Leisure in Ancient Rome. London.

———. 1979. Romans and Aliens. Chapel Hill, NC.

Baraz, Y. 2008. “From Vice to Virtue: the Denigration and Rehabilitation of superbia in Ancient Rome.” In ed. I. Sluiter and R. M. Rosen, Kakos: Badness and Anti-Value in Classical Antiquity, 365–97. Leiden.

Bardon, H. 1952. La Littérature Latine Inconnue. Paris.

Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.

Batstone, W. W. 1990. “Intellectual Conflict and Mimesis in Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae.” In ed. J. W. Allison, Conflict, Antithesis and the Ancient Historian, 112–32. Columbus, OH.

Beard, M. 1986. “Cicero and Divination: the Formation of a Latin Discourse.” JRS 76:33–46.

———. 1993. “Looking (Harder) for Roman Myth: Dumézil, Declamation and the Problems of Definition.” In ed. F. Graf, Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: das Paradeigma Roms, 44–64. Stuttgart.

———. 2002. “Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book Out of Letters.” In ed. T. P. Wiseman, Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome, 103–44. Oxford.

———. 2007. The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA.

Beck, H. 2007. “The Early Roman Tradition.” In Marincola 2007, 259–74.

Bianco, G. 1979. “Il giudizio di Sallustio sull’agricoltura e la caccia.” In Studi su Varrone, sulla retorica, storiografica e poesia latina. Scritti in onore di Benedetto Riposati, vol. 1:3–36. Milan.

Blom, H. van der. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.

Bloomer, W. M. 1997. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia.

Boes, J. 1990. La philosophie et l’action dans la correspondance de Cicéron. Nancy.

Boissier, G. 1903. “Les prologues de Salluste.” JS n.s.1:59–66.

Bolaffi, E. 1938. “I proemi delle monographie di Sallustio.” Athenaeum n.s.16: 128–57.

Bonner, S. 1949. Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Liverpool.

———. 1977. Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley, CA.

Boyancé, P. 1936. “Les méthodes de l’histoire littéraire. Cicéron et son œuvre philosophique.” REA 14:288–309.

———. 1941. “Otium cum Dignitate.” REA 43:172–91.

Bringmann, K. 1971. Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero. Göttingen.

Brinton, A. 1988. “Cicero’s Use of Historical Examples in Moral Argument.” Ph&Rh 21:169–84.

Brittain, C. 2006. Cicero: On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis, IN.

Brunt, P. A. 1965. “ ‘Amicitia’ in the Late Republic.” PCPS n.s.11:1–20.

———. 1974. “Marcus Aurelius in his Meditations.” JRS 64:1–20.

———. 1986. “Cicero’s Officium in the Civil War.” JRS 76:12–32.

Bruwaene, M. van den. Cicéron. De Natura Deorum. CollLatomus, vv.107 (1970), 154 (1978), 175 (1981), 192 (1986).

Büchner, K. 1960. Sallust. Heidelberg.

———. 1964. Cicero. Bestand und Wandel seiner geistingen Welt. Heidelberg.

Burnyeat, M. F. 1980. “Can the Sceptic live his Scepticism?” In ed. J. Barnes, M. F. Burnyeat, and M. Schofield, Doubt and Dogmatism, 20–53. Oxford. Reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede 1997, 25–27.

Burnyeat, M. F. and M. Frede. 1997. The Original Sceptics: A Controversy. Indianapolis, IN.

Burton, P. 2007. “Genre and Fact in the Preface to Cicero’s De Amicitia.” Antochthon 41:13–32.

Bushnell, R. W. 1988. Prophesying Tragedy: Sign and Voice in Sophocles’ Theban Plays. Ithaca, NY.

Butler, S. 2002. The Hand of Cicero. London.

Cambiano, G. 2002. “Cicerone e la necessità della filosofia.” In Narducci 2002, 66–83.

Casson, L. 2001. Libraries in the Ancient World. New Haven, CT.

Cipriani, G. 1977. “La Pro Marcello e il suo significato come orazione politica.” A&R 22:113–25.

Citroni Marchetti, S. 2000. Amicizia e potere nelle lettere di Cicerone e nelle elegie ovidiane dall’esilio. Florence.

———. 2009. “Words and Silence: Atticus as the Dedicatee of De Amicitia.” CW 103:93–99.

Clark, D. L. 1957. Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education. New York.

Clarke, M. L. 1996. Rhetoric at Rome: A Historical Survey. Third edition. London.

Connolly, J. 2007. The State of Speech: Rhetorical and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.

Connors, C. 2000. “Imperial Space and Time: The Literature of Leisure.” In ed. O. Taplin, Literature in the Roman World, 208–34. Oxford.

Copeland, R. 1991. Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Translation in the Middle Ages: Academic Traditions and Vernacular Texts. Cambridge.

Corbeill, A. 2001. “Education in the Roman Republic: Creating Traditions.” In ed. Y. L. Too, Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, 261–87. Leiden.

———. 2007. “Rhetorical Education and Social Reproduction in the Republic and Early Empire.” In Dominik and Hall, 69–82.

Corbier, M. 1991a. “Constructing Kinship in Rome: Marriage and Divorce, Filiation and Adoption.” In ed. D. I. Kertzer and R. P. Saller, The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present, 127–44. New Haven, CT.

———. 1991b. “Divorce and Adoption as Roman Familial Strategies.” In ed. B. Rawson, Marriage, Divorce and Children in Ancient Rome, 47–78. Oxford.

Cossarini A. 1979–80. “Il prestigio dell’agricoltura in Sallustio e Cicerone.” AIV 137:355–64.

Cotton, H. 1985. “ ‘Mirificum genus commendationis’: Cicero and the Latin Letter of Recommendation.” AJP 106:328–34.

———. 1986. “The Role of Cicero’s Letters of Recommendation: Iustitia versus Gratia?” Hermes 114:443–60.

Coudry, M. 1994. “Sénatus-consultes et acta senatus: redaction, conservation et archivage des documents émanant du sénat, de l’époque de César à celle des Sévères.” In ed. S. Demougin, La mémoire perdu: à la recherché des archive oubliées, publiques et privées, de la Rome antique, 65–102. Paris.

Craig, C. P. 1986. “Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena.” TAPA 116:229–39.

Cugusi, P. 1983. Evoluzione e forme dell’ epistolografia latina. Rome.

Culham, P. 1989. “Archives and Alternatives in Republican Rome.” CP 84: 100–15.

Damon, C. 2008. “Enabling Books.” NECJ 35:175–84.

D’Arms, J. 1970. Romans on the Bay of Naples: A Social and Cultural Study of the Villas and Their Owners from 150 B.C. to A.D. 400. Cambridge, MA.

———. 1981. Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome. Cambridge, MA.

Davies, J. C. 1971. “The originality of Cicero’s Philosophical Works.” Latomus 30:105–19.

Delz, J. 1985. “Verachtete Sallust die Beschäftigung mit der Landswirtschaft?” MH 42:168–73.

Demmel, M. 1962. Cicero und Paetus (ad Fam. IX 15–26). Diss. Köln.

Dench, E. 1995. From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the Central Apennines. Oxford.

Deniaux, É. 1993. Clientèles et pouvoir à l’époque de Cicéron. Rome.

Derrida, J. 1981. Dissemination, trans. B. Johnson. Chicago.

Di Maria, G. 1991. “Sitne scripsisses an cavisses in Ciceronis Topicis (1.4.) legendum?” In Studi in filologia classica in onore di Giusto Monaco, vol. 2:843–848. Palermo.

Dixon, S. 1992. The Roman Family. Baltimore, MD.

Dodds, E. R. 1959. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford.

Dominik, W. J., and J. Hall, eds. 2007. A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Malden, MA.

Dorey, T. A., ed. 1966. Latin Historians. London.

Douglas, A. E. 1960. “Clausulae in the Rhetorica ad Herennium as Evidence of Its Date.” CQ n.s.10:65–78.

———. 1962. “Platonis Aemulus?” G&R 9:41–51.

———. 1965. “Cicero the Philosopher.” In ed. T. A. Dorey, Cicero, 135–70. London.

———. 1966. M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford.

———. 1985. Tusculan Disputations I. Warminster.

———. 1990. Tusculan Disputations II and V: With a Summary of III and IV. Warminster.

———. 1995. “Form and Content in the Tusculan Disputations.” In Powell 1995a, 197–218.

Dubuisson, M. 1989. “Non quaerere externa, domesticis esse contentos: Cicéron et le problème de la “traduction” du grec en latin.” Ktema 14:201–204.

———. 1991. “Graecus, Graeculus, Graecari: l’emploi péjoratif du nom des Grec en latin.” In ed. S. Saïd, Hellemismos: quelques jalons pour une histoire de l’identité grecque, 315–35. Leiden.

———. 1992. “Le grec à Rome à l’époque de Cicéron, extension et qualité de bilinguisme.” AnnEconSocCiv 47:187–206.

Dugan, J. R. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.

———. 2007. “Modern Critical Approaches to Roman Rhetoric.” In Dominik and Hall, 9–22.

Dupont, F. 2000. L’Orateur sans visage. Paris.

Durand, R. 1903. “La Date de De Divinatione.” In Melanges Boissier. Paris.

Dyck, A. R. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor, MI.

———. 2003. Cicero: De Natura Deorum Book I. Cambridge.

———. 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor, MI.

Dyer, R. R. 1990. “Rhetoric and Intention in Cicero’s Pro Marcello.” JRS 80: 17–30.

Eagle, E. D. 1949. “Catiline and the Concordia Ordinum.” Phoenix 3:15–30.

Earl, D. C. 1961. The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.

———. 1966. “The Early Career of Sallust.” Historia 15:302–11.

———. 1967. The Moral and Political Tradition of Rome. Ithaca, NY.

Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.

Egermann, F. 1932. Die Proömien zu den Werken des Sallust. SAWW 214.3. Vienna.

Englert, W. 1990. “Bringing Philosophy to the Light: Cicero’s Paradoxa Stoicorum.” In Nussbaum 1990, 119–42.

Erskine, A. 1997. “Cicero and the Expression of Grief.” In ed. S. M. Braund and C. Gill, The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, 36–47. Cambridge.

Fagan, G. G. 2006. “Leisure.” In ed. D. S. Potter, A Companion to the Roman Empire, 369–84. Oxford.

Fantham, E. 1996. Roman Literary Culture From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore.

———. 1997. “The Contexts and Occasions of Roman Public Rhetoric.” In ed. W. J. Domink, Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, 111–28. London.

———. 2004. The Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford.

Farrell, J. 2001. Latin Language and Latin Culture from Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge.

Feeney, D. 1994. “Beginning Sallust’s Catiline.” Prudentia 26:139–46.

Fern, M. E. 1941. The Latin Consolation as a Literary Type. St. Meinard, IN.

Fiore, B.S.J. 1996. “Theory and Practice of Friendship in Cicero.” In ed. J. T. Fitzgerald, Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, 59–76. Atlanta, GA.

Flach, D. 2006. Varro: Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft. Darmstadt.

Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.

———. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill, NC.

———. 2009. “Alternative to Written History in Republican Rome.” In ed. A. Feldherr, Cambridge Companion to Roman Historians, 65–76. Cambridge.

———. 2010. Roman Republics. Princeton, NJ.

Fögen, T. 2000. Patrii Sermonis Egestas. Einstellungen lateinischer Autoren zu ihrer Muttersprache. Munich.

Fortenbaugh, W. W., and E. Schütrumpf, eds. 2000. Demetrius of Phalerum: Text, Translation and Discussion. RUSCH 9. New Brunswick, NJ.

———, eds. 2001. Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation and Discussion. RUSCH 10. New Brunswick, NJ.

Fox, M. 2007. Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford.

Franzoi, A. 1997. “Ancora sulla funzione dei prologhi nelle monografie di Sallustio.” Lexis 15:189–96.

Frede, M. 1984. “The Sceptic’s Two Kinds of Assent and the Question of the Possibility of Knowledge.” In ed. R. Rorty, J. B. Scheewind, and Q. Skinner, Philosophy in History, 255–78. Cambridge. Reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede 1997, 127–52.

Freyburger G. 1986. Fides. Étude sémantique et religieuse depuis les origines jusqu’à l’époque augustéenne. Paris.

Frings, I. 1993. “Struktur und Quellen des Prooemiums zum 1. Buch Ciceros De Officiis.” Prometheus 19:169–82.

Fuhrmann, M. 1992. Cicero and the Roman Republic. Oxford.

Gagliardi, P. 1997. Il dissenso e l’ironia: per una rilettura delle orazioni “cesariane” di Cicerone. Naples.

Gaines, R. N. 2002. “Cicero’s Partitiones oratoriae and Topica: Rhetorical Philosophy and Philosophical Rhetoric.” In May 2002a, 445–80.

Galinsky, G. 1996. Augustan Culture. An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ.

Gardner, J. F. 1998. Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford.

Gargola, D. J. 1995. Lands, Laws and Gods: Magistrates and Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Land in Republican Rome. Chapel Hill, NC.

Garver, E. 2004. “Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Civic Education in Aristotle and Isocrates.” In Isocrates and Civic Education, ed. T. Poulakis and D. Depew, 186–213. Austin, TX.

Gazda, E. K., ed. 2002. The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity. Ann Arbor, MI.

Gebhardt, U. 2009. Sermo Iuris: Rechtsprache und Recht in augusteischen Dichtung. Leiden.

Geffken, K. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. Leiden.

Gehrke, H.-J., and A. Möller, eds. 1996. Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommmunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewuβtsein. Tübingen.

Gelzer, M. 1969. Cicero. Ein biographischer Versuch. Wiesbaden.

Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY.

———. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge.

Gibson, R. K., and A. D. Morrison. 2007. “Introduction: What is a Letter?” In ed. R. Morello and A. D. Morrison, Ancient Letters. Classical and Late Antique Epistolography, 1–16. Oxford.

Gildenhard, I. 2006. “Reckoning with Tyranny: Greek Thoughts on Caesar in Cicero’s Letters to Atticus in early 49.” In ed. S. Lewis, Ancient Tyranny, 197–209. Edinburgh.

———. 2007. Paideia Romana. Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge.

———. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.

Gilson, E. 1953. “Éloquence et sagesse selon Cicéron.” Phoenix 7:1–20.

Glucker, J. 1978. Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen.

———. 1988. “Cicero’s Philosophical Affiliations.” In ed. J. M. Dillon and A. A. Long, The Question of “Eclecticism,” 34–69. Berkeley, CA.

———. 1995. “Probabile, Veri Simile, and Related Terms.” In Powell 1995a, 115–43.

———. 1997. “Socrates in the Academic Books and Other Ciceronian Works.” In Inwood and Mansfeld 1997, 58–88.

Goldberg, S. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and Its Reception. Cambridge.

Görler, W. 1974. Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Philosophie. Heidelberg.

———. 1990. “Cicero zwischen Politik und Philosophie.” Ciceroniana n.s.7: 61–73.

———. 1992. “Ein sprachlicher Zufall und seine Folge. ‘Warscheinliches’ bei Karneades und bei Cicero.” In ed. C. W. Müller, K. Sier, and J. Werner, Zum Umgang mit Fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Antike, 159–171. Stuttgart.

———. 2001. “Sokrates bei Cicero.” In ed. H. Kessler, Sokrates. Nachfolge und Eigenwege, 233–59. Zug.

Gorman, R. 2005. The Socratic Method in the Dialogues of Cicero. Stuttgart.

Gotoff, H. C. 1993. Cicero’s Caesarian Speeches: A Stylistic Commentary. Chapel Hill, NC.

Gotter, U. 1996a. Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des zweiten Triumvirats. Stuttgart.

———. 1996b. “Cicero und die Freundschaft. Die Konstruktion sozialer Normen zwischen römischer Politik und griechischer Philosophie.” In Gehrke and Möller, 339–60.

———. 2000. “Marcus Iunius Brutus—oder: Die Nemesis des Namens.” In ed. K.-J. Hölkeskamp and E. Stein-Hölkeskamp, Romulus zu Augustus: Groβe Gestalten der römischen Republik, 328–39. Munich.

Gottschalk, H. 2000. “Demetrius of Phalerum: A Politician among Philosophers and a Philosopher among Politicians.” In Fortenbaugh and Schütrumpf 2000, 367–80.

Gowing, A. 2000. “Memory and Silence in Cicero’s Brutus.” Eranos 98:39–46.

———. 2005. Empire and Memory. The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.

Graver, M. 2002. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago.

Griffin, M. T. 1976. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford.

———. 1989. “Philosophy, Politics, and Politicians.” In Griffin and Barnes, 1–37.

———. 1995. “Philosophical Badinage in Cicero’s Letters to his Friends.” In Powell 1995a, 325–46.

———. 1997. “The Composition of the Academica: Motives and Versions.” In Inwood and Mansfeld, 1–35.

Griffin, M. T., and E. M. Atkins, eds. 1991. Cicero: On Duties. Cambridge.

Griffin, M. T., and J. Barnes, eds. 1989. Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford.

Grilli, A. 1962. M.Tulli Ciceronis Hortensius. Milan.

———. 1987. Marco Tullio Cicerone. Tuscolane Libro II. Brescia.

———. 2002. “Cicerone tra retorica e filosofia.” In Narducci 2002, 53–65.

Gruen, E. S. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley, CA.

———. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Berkeley, CA.

———. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.

Guite, H. 1962. “Cicero’s Attitude to the Greeks.” G&R 9:142–59.

Gunderson, E. 2000a. Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor, MI.

———. 2000b. “The History of Mind and the Philosophy of History.” Ramus 29:85–126.

———. 2003. Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity: Authority and the Rhetorical Self. Cambridge.

———. 2007. “S.V.B.; E.V.” ClAnt 26:1–48.

Gurd, S. 2007. “Cicero and Editorial Revision.” ClAnt 26:50–80.

Habicht, C. 1990. Cicero the Politician. Baltimore, MD.

Habinek, T. N. 1990. “Towards a History of Friendly Advice: The Politics of Candor in Cicero’s De Amicitia.” In Nussbaum 1990, 165–85.

———. 1994. “Ideology for an Empire in the Prefaces to Cicero’s Dialogues.” Ramus 23:55–67.

———. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ.

———. 2005. Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Oxford.

Hadot, P. 1998. The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Cambridge, MA.

Haffter, H. 1956. “Superbia innenpolitisch.” SIFC 27:135–141.

Hall, J. 1996a. “Cicero’s Fam. 5.8 and Fam. 15.5 in the Light of Modern Politeness Theory.” Antichthon 30:19–33.

———. 1996b. “Social Evasion and Aristocratic Manners in Cicero’s De Oratore.” AJP 117:95–120.

———. 2009a. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford.

———. 2009b. “Serving the Times: Cicero and Caesar the Dictator.” In ed. W. J. Dominik, J. Garthwaite, and P. A. Roche, Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, 89–110. Leiden.

Harder, R. 1952. “Das Prooemium von Ciceros Tusculanen (Die Antithese Rom—Griechenland).” In Ermeneia: Festschrift Otto Regenbogen, 104–18. Heidelberg.

Hegel, G.W.F. 1977 [1807]. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford.

Heldmann, K. 1976. “Ciceros Laelius und die Grenzen der Freundschaft: Zur Interdependenz von Literatur und Politik 44/43 v. Chr.” Hermes 104:72–103.

Hellegouarc’h, J. 1963. Le Vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la Republique. Paris.

Henderson, J. 2004. Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters. Cambridge.

———. 2006. “From FILOSOFIA into philosophia: Classicism and Ciceronianism.” In ed. J. I. Porter, Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, 173–203. Princeton, NJ.

Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext. Cambridge 1998.

———. 2005. “Defamiliarizing Latin Literature, from Petrarch to Pulp Fiction.” TAPA 135:49–81.

Hoffer, S. E. 2003. “Cicero’s ‘Friendly Disagreement with Metellus Celer (Fam. 5.1–2).” SCI 22:93–101.

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1996. “Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität.” In Gehrke and Möller 1996, 301–38.

Hubbell, H. M. 1914. The Influence of Isocrates on Cicero, Dionysius and Aristides. New Haven, CT.

———, ed. 1949. Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De inventione. De optimo genere oratorum. Topica. Cambridge, MA.

Huby, P. M. 2001. “The Controversia between Dicaearchus and Theophrastus about the Best Life.” In Fortenbaugh and Schütrumpf 2001, 311–28.

Hunt, J. M. 1981. “On Editing the Letters of Cicero.” CP 76:215–24.

Hutchinson, G. O. 1988. Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study. Oxford.

Inwood, B. 1990. “Rhetorica Disputatio: The Strategy of De Finibus II.” In Nussbaum, 143–64.

Inwood, B., and J. Mansfeld, eds. 1997. Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden.

Iser, W. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD.

Janson, T. 1964. Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Stockholm.

Jaeger, M. 2008. Archimedes and the Roman Imagination. Ann Arbor, MI.

Jäger, W. 1986. Briefanalysen: Zum Zusammenhang von Realitatserfahrung und Sprache in Briefen Ciceros. Frankfurt.

Jocelyn, H. D. 1967. The Tragedies of Ennius. Cambridge.

Johnson, W. A. 2000. “Towards a Sociology of Reading in Classical Antiquity.” AJP 121:593–627.

Kaimio, J. 1976. Cicero’s Topica: The Preface and Sources. Turku.

———. 1979. The Romans and the Greek Language. Helsinki.

Kajanto, I. 1981. “Fortuna.” ANRW 17.1:502–58.

Kassel, R. 1958. Untersuchungen zur Griechischen und Römischen Konsolationsliteratur. Munich.

Kaster, R. A. 2001. “Declamation in Rhetorical Education at Rome.” In ed. Y. L. Too, Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, 317–37. Leiden.

———. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford.

Keaveney, A. 1992. Lucullus: A Life. London.

———. 2005. Sulla, the Last Republican. Second edition. New York.

Kennedy, G. 1994. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ.

Koch, B. 2006. Philosophie als Medizin für die Seele: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes. Stuttgart.

Koestermann, E. 1971. C. Sallustius Crispus: Bellum Iugurthinum. Heidelberg.

Konstan, D. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge.

———. 2005. “Clemency as a Virtue.” CP 100:337–46.

Kraut, R. 1989. Aristotle on the Human Good. Princeton, NJ.

Kretschmar, M. 1938. Otium, Studia Litterarum, Philosophie und im Leben und Denken Ciceros. Diss. Leipzig.

Kronenberg, L. 2009. Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil. Cambridge.

Krostenko, B. 2000. “Beyond (Dis)belief: Rhetorical Form and Religious Symbol in Cicero’s De Divinatione.” TAPA 130:353–91.

———. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago.

Kurfess, A. 1954. Gai Sallusti Crispi Catilina, Jugurtha, Fragmenta Ampliora. Leipzig.

Kytzler, B. 1989. “Fidus interpres: The Theory and Practice of Translation in Classical Antiquity.” Antichthon 23:42–50.

Lacey, W. K. 1970. “Boni atque Improbi.” G&R 17:3–16.

Laidlaw, W. A. 1968. “Otium.” G&R 15:42–52.

Lambardi, N. 1982. Il “Timaeus” Ciceroniano: arte e tecnica del ‘vertere.’ Florence.

La Penna, A. 1959. “Il significato dei proemi Sallustiani.” Maia 11:23–43.

———. 1968. Sallustio e la rivoluzione romana. Milan.

Lawrence, G. 1993. “Aristotle and the Ideal Life.” Philosophical Review 102: 1–34.

Leach, E. W. 1974. Vergil’s Eclogues: Landscapes of Experience. Ithaca, NY.

———. 1993. “Absence and Desire in Cicero’s De Amicitia.” CW 87:3–20.

———. 1999. “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Papirius Paetus in 46 B.C.E.” TAPA 129:139–79.

———. 2003. “Otium as Luxuria: Economy of Status in the Younger Pliny’s Letters.” Arethusa 36:147–65.

Lear, J. 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge.

Leeman, A. D. 1954. “Sallust Prologe und seine Auffassung von der Historiographie. I. Das Catilina-Proömium.” Mnemosyne 7:323–39.

———. 1955. “Sallust Prologe und seine Auffassung von der Historiographie. II. Das Jugurtha-Proömium.” Mnemosyne 8:38–48.

Leeman, A. D., H. Pinkster, and E. Rabbie, eds. 1989. M. Tullius Cicero De Oratore Libri III: Kommentar, 3 Band: Buch II. 99–290. Heidelberg.

Lefevere, A. 1992. Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London.

Lefèvre, E. 2001. Panaitios’ und Ciceros Pflichtenlehre. Stuttgart.

———. 2007. “Der Tithonos Aristons von Chios und Ciceros Cato.” Hermes 135:43–65.

———. 2008. Philosophie unter der Tyrannis. Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes. Heidelberg.

Leo, F. 1913. Geschichte der römischen Literatur. Berlin.

Leonhardt, J. 1995. “Theorie und Praxis der deliberatio bei Cicero: der Briefwechsel mit Atticus aus dem Jahre 49.” ACD 31:153–71.

———. 1999. Ciceros Kritik der Philosophenschulen. Munich.

Levene, D. S. 2000. “Sallust’s “Catiline” and Cato the Censor.” CQ 50:170–91.

———. 2007. “Roman Historiography in the Late Republic.” In Marincola 2007, 275–89.

Linderski, J. 1988. “Garden Parlors: Nobles and Birds.” In ed. R. I Curtis, Studia pompeiana et classica in honor of Willhelmina F. Jashemski, vol. 2:113–20. New Rochelle, NY.

Lindsay, H. 2009. Adoption in the Roman World. Cambridge.

Lintott, A. W. 1990. “Electoral Bribery in the Roman Republic.” JRS 80:1–16.

———. 2008. Cicero as Evidence. Oxford.

Long, A. A. 1986. Hellenistic Philosophy. Second edition. Berkeley, CA.

———. 1995. “Cicero’s Politics in De Officiis.” In ed. A. Laks and M. Schofield, Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, 213–40. Cambridge.

MacKendrick, P. 1989. The Philosophical Books of Cicero. London.

Malitz, J. 1975. Ambitio Mala: Studien zur politischen Biographie des Sallust. Bonn.

Marincola, J. 1997. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography Cambridge.

———, ed. 2007. A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Malden, MA.

Mariotti, I. 2007. Gaio Sallustio Crispo. Coniuratio Catilinae. Bologna.

May, J. M. 1988. Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill, NC.

———, ed. 2002a. Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden.

———. 2002b. “Ciceronian Oratory in Context.” In May 2002a, 49–70.

Mayer, R. G. 1991. “Roman Historical Exempla in Seneca.” In ed. P. Grimal, Sénèque et la prose latine, EntrHardt 36:141–69.

Merrill, W. A. 1909. “Cicero’s Knowledge of Lucretius’s Poem.” CPCP 2:35–42.

Meyer, E. 1999. Epistolary Ethos: A Rhetorical Analysis of Cicero’s Letters. Diss. Boston University.

Michel, A. 1960. Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l’art de persuader. Paris.

——— 1972. “Rhétorique et philosophie dans les traites de Cicéron.” ANRW I.3:139–208.

———. 1977. “Cicéron, Pompée et la guerre civile: rhétorique et philosophie dans la ‘Correspondance.’ ” AAntHung 25:393–403.

———. 1981. “La Théorie de la rhétorique chez Cicéron: éloquence et philosophie.” EntrHardt 28:109–47.

———. 1996. “Rhétorique, philosophie, oralité: Cicéron et les genres littéraires.” In ed. J. Dangel and C. Moussy, Les structures de l’oralité en latin, 201–207. Paris.

Milanese, G. 1989. “Romani antichi e antichi filosofi. Note sul valore filosofico della tradizione romana in Cicerone.” Aevum Antiquum 2:129–44.

Minyard, J. D..1985. Lucretius and the Late Republic. Leiden.

Mitchell, T. N. 1979. Cicero, the Ascending Years. New Haven, CT.

———. 1991. Cicero: the Senior Statesman. New Haven, CT.

Moatti, C. 1997. La Raison de Rome: naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la république. Paris.

Monoson, S. S. 2000. Plato’s Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy. Princeton, NJ.

Moore, F. G. 1906. “Cicero’s Amaltheum.” CP 1:121–26.

Morford, M. 2002. Roman Philosophers: From the Time of Cato the Censor to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. New York.

Morstein-Marx, R. 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.

Murphy, T. 1998. “Cicero’s First Readers: Epistolary Evidence for the Dissemination of His Works.” CQ 48:492–505.

Mynors, R.A.B., ed. 1969. P.Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.

Narducci, E. 1997. Cicerone e l’eloquenza romana: retorica e progetto culturale. Laterza.

———, ed. 2002. Interpretare Cicerone. Percorsi della critica contemporanea. Florence.

Nicholson, J. 1994. “The Delivery and Confidentiality of Cicero’s Letters.” CJ 90: 33–63.

Nightingale, A. W. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.

———. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context. Cambridge.

Nussbaum, M. C., ed. 1990. The Poetics of Therapy: Hellenistic Ethics in its Rhetorical and Literary Context. Apeiron 23.4.

Obdrzalek, S. 2006. “Living in Doubt: Carneades’ Pithanon Reconsidered.” OSAP 31:243–79.

Ochs, D. 1993. Consolatory Rhetoric. Columbia, SC.

Oiserman, T. I. 1988. “Sur la Sous-estimation de la philosophie cicéronienne.” Ciceroniana n.s.6:151–57.

Oppermann, I. 2000. Zur Funktion historischer Beispiele in Ciceros Briefen. Munich.

Osgood, J. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.

O’Sullivan, T. M. 2006. “The Mind in Motion: Walking and Metaphorical Travel in the Roman Villa.” CP 101:133–52.

Paananen, U. 1972. Sallust’s Politico-Social Terminology: Its Use and Biographical Significance. Helsinki.

Pantzerhielm-Thomas, S. 1936. “The Prologues of Sallust.” SO 15–16:140–62.

Parkin, T. G. 2003. Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History. Baltimore, MD.

Paul, G. M. 1966. “Sallust.” In Dorey 1966, 85–113.

———. 1984. A Historical Commentary on Sallust’s Bellum Jugurthinum. Liverpool.

Peachin, M., ed. 2001. Aspects of Friendship in the Graeco-Roman World. JRA Supplement 43. Portsmouth, RI.

Pease, A. S. 1920. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Divinatione Libri Duo. Urbana, IL.

———. 1955. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum. Cambridge, MA.

Perelli, L. 1990. Il pensiero politico di Cicerone: Tra filosofia greca e ideologia aristocratica romana. Florence.

Petrochilos, N. 1974. Roman Attitudes towards the Greeks. Athens.

Philippson, R. 1939. “M. Tullius Cicero (Philosophische Shriften).” RE 7A1: 1104–92.

Poncelet, R. 1957. Cicéron traducteur de Platon. L’expression de la pensée complexe en latin classique. Paris.

Powell, J.G.F. 1988. Marcus Tullius Cicero, Cato Maior De Senectute. Cambridge.

———. 1990a Cicero. Laelius: On Friendship and the Dream of Scipio. Warminster.

———. 1990b. “The Tribune Sulpicius.” Historia 39:446–60.

———, ed. 1995a. Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford.

———. 1995b. “Introduction: Cicero’s Philosophical Works and Their Background.” In Powell 1995a, 1–36.

———. 1995c. “Cicero’s Translations from the Greek.” In Powell 1995a, 273–300.

Prinzen, H. 1998. Ennius im Urteil der Antike. Stuttgart.

Pucci, G. C. 1966. “Echi lucreziani in Cicerone.” SFIC 38:70–132.

Rambaud, M. 1946. “Les Prologues de Salluste et la démonstration morale dans son œuvre.” REL 24:115–30.

———. 1953. Cicéron et l’histoire romaine. Paris.

Ramsey, J. T. 1984. Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. Atlanta, GA.

———. 2003. Cicero: Philippics I–II. Cambridge.

Rawson, E. 1983. Cicero: A portrait. Revised edition. Ithaca, NY.

———. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore, MA.

———. 1994. “The Aftermath of the Ides.” CAH 9²:468–90.

Redfield, J. M. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: the Tragedy of Hector. Chicago.

Ree, J. 2001. “The Translation of Philosophy.” New Literary History 32:223–57.

Reeve, C.D.C. 1988. Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic. Princeton, NJ.

Reid, J. S. 1885. M.Tulli Ciceronis Academica. London.

———. 1925. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri I, II. Cambridge.

Reinhardt, T. 2000. “Rhetoric in the Fourth Academy.” CQ 50:531–37.

———. 2003. Cicero’s Topica. Oxford.

Ribbeck, O. 1897. Scaenicae Romanorum poesis fragmenta³. Vol. 1: Tragicorum Fragmenta. Leipzig.

Riccio Coletti, M. L. 1994. M. Tulli Ciceronis Topica. Chieti.

Richardson Lear, G. 2004. Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay On Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Princeton, NJ.

Robinson, D. 1992. “Classical Theories of Translation from Cicero to Aulus Gellius.” TEXTconTEXT 7:15–55.

Rochette, B. 1995. “Du grec au latin et du latin au grec: les problèmes de la traduction dans l’antiquité gréco-latine.” Latomus 54:245–61.

Roller, M. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton, NJ.

———. 2004. “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia.” CP 99:1–56.

———. 2009. “The Exemplary Past in Roman Historiography and Culture.” In ed. A. Feldherr, The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, 214–30. Cambridge.

Ronnick, M. V. 1991. Cicero’s “Paradoxa Stoicorum”: A Commentary, an Interpretation, and a Study of Its Influence. Frankfurt am Main.

Rösch-Binde, C. 1997. Vom zum “diligentissimus investigator Antiquitatis.” Zur komplexen Beziehung zwischen M. Tullius Cicero und M. Terentius Varro. Cologne.

Ruch, M. 1958a. Le Préambule dans les œuvres de Cicéron: essai sur le genèse de l’art de dialogue. Paris.

———. 1958b. L’Hortensius de Cicéron: histoire et reconstitution. Paris.

———, ed. 1970. Cicero Academica Posteriora Liber Primus. Paris.

Rutherford, R. B. 1989. The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A Study. Oxford.

Saller, R. P. 1982. Personal Patronage under the Early Empire. Cambridge.

Schmidt, P. L. 1978–79. “Cicero’s Place in Roman Philosophy: A Study of His Prefaces.” CJ 74:115–27.

Schneider, W. C. 1998. Vom Handeln der Romer: Kommunikation und Interaktion der politischen Fuhrungsschicht vor Ausbruch des Burgerkriegs im Briefwechsel mit Cicero. Hildesheim.

Schofield, M. 1986. “Cicero For and Against Divination.” JRS 76:47–65.

———. 2002. “Academic Therapy: Philo of Larissa and Cicero’s Project in the Tusculans.” In ed. G. Clark and T. Rajak, Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin, 91–109. Oxford.

Scullard, H. H. 1970. Scipio Africanus: Soldier and Politician. Ithaca, NY.

Seager, R. 1994. “Sulla.” CAH 9:165–207.

Sedley, D. 1997. “The Ethics of Brutus and Cassius.” JRS 87:41–53.

———. 1988. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.

Severy, B. 2003. Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire. New York.

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1965–1970. Cicero, Marcus Tullius: Letters to Atticus. Cambridge.

———. 1971. Cicero. London.

———. 1977. Cicero, Marcus Tullius: Epistulae ad familiares. Cambridge.

———. 1980. Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum Fratrem et M. Brutum. Cambridge.

Sharples, R.W. 1991. Cicero: On Fate and Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy IV.5–7, V. Warminster.

Simon, S. 1990. “Translating the Will to Knowledge: Prefaces and Canadian Literary Politics.” In ed. S. Bassnett and A. Lefevere, Translation, History and Culture, 110–17. London.

Sinclair, P. 1993. “Sententia in Rhetorica ad Herennium: A Study in the Sociology of Rhetoric.” AJP 114:561–80.

Sjöblad, A. 2009. Metaphors Cicero Lived By: The Role of Metaphor and Simile in De Senectute. Lund.

Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford.

Smethurst, S. E. 1953. “Cicero and Isocrates.” Supplementary Paper. TAPA 84: 262–320.

Smith, P. R. 1995. “ ‘A Self-indulgent Misuse of Leisure and Writing’? How Not to Write Philosophy: Did Cicero Get it Right?” In Powell 1995a, 301–23.

Solodow, J. B. 1978. The Latin Particle Quidem. Boulder, CO.

Sommer, R. 1926. “T. Pomponius Atticus und die Verbreitung von Ciceros Werken.” Hermes 61:389–422.

Spielvogel, J. 1993. Amicitia und Res Publica. Stuttgart.

von Staden, H. 1999. “Celsus as Historian?” In ed. P. J. van der Eijk, Ancient Histories of Medicine, 251–94. Leiden.

Stanton, G. R. 1969. “Marcus Aurelius, Emperor and Philosopher.” Historia 18: 570–87.

Starr, R. J. 1987. “The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World.” CQ 37:213–23.

Steel, C.E.W. 2001. Cicero, Rhetoric, and Empire. Oxford.

———. 2005. Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.

———. 2006. Roman Oratory. Cambridge.

———. 2009. “Friends, Associates, and Wives.” In ed. M. T. Griffin, A Companion to Julius Caesar, 112–25. Oxford.

Steinmetz, P. 1990. “Planung und Planänderung der philosophischen Schriften Ciceros.” In ed. P. Steinmetz, Beiträge zur hellenistischen Literatur und ihrer Rezeption in Rom, 141–53. Stuttgart.

Stem, R. 1999. Cicero and the Legacy of Cato Uticensis. Diss. University of Michigan.

———. 2005. “The First Eloquent Stoic: Cicero on Cato the Younger.” CJ 101:37–49.

———. 2006. “Cicero as Orator and Philosopher: The Value of the “Pro Murena” for Ciceronian Political Thought.” Review of Politics 68:206–31.

Stone, A. M. 2008. “Greek Ethics and Roman Statesmen: De Officiis and the Philippics.” In ed. T. Stevenson and M. Wilson, Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, Prudentia 37–38:214–39. Auckland.

Strasburger, H. 1956. Concordia Ordinum. Eine Untersuchung zur Politik Ciceros. Amsterdam.

———. 1990. Ciceros philosophisches Spätwerk als Aufruf gegen die Herrschaft Caesars. Hildesheim.

Strati, R. 2000. “Il proemio del Cato Maior di Cicerone.” Lexis 18:193–212.

Straume-Zimmermann, L. 1976. Ciceros Hortensius. Bern.

Striker, G. 1995. “Cicero and Greek Philosophy.” HSCP 97:53–61.

Stroh, W. 2003. “Declamatio.” In ed. B.-J. and J.-P. Schröder, Studium declamatorium: Untersuchungen zu Schulubüngen und Prunkreden von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit, 5–34. Munich.

Stroup, S. C. 2007. “Greek Rhetoric Meets Rome: Expansion, Resistance, and Acculturation.” In Dominik and Hall, 23–37.

———. 2010. Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. Cambridge.

Swain, S. 2002. “Bilingualism in Cicero? The Evidence of Code-Switching.” In ed. J. N. Adams, M. Janse and S. Swain, Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text, 128–167. Oxford.

Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.

———. 1964. Sallust. Berkeley, CA.

Tatum, W. J. 1999. The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill, NC.

Taylor, L. R. 1961. Party Politics at the Age of Caesar. Berkeley.

Teichert, D. 1990. “Der Philosoph als Briefschreiber. Zur Bedeutung der literarishen Form von Senecas Briefen an Lucilius.” In ed. G. Gabriel and C. Schildknecht, Literarische Formen der Philosophie, 62–72. Stuttgart.

Thomas, R. 1986. “Virgil’s Georgics and the Art of Reference.” HSCP 90:171–98.

Tiffou, E. 1973. Essai sur la pensée morale de Salluste à la lumière de ses prologues. Montreal.

Toner, J. P. 1995. Leisure and Ancient Rome. Oxford.

Treggiari, S. 2007. Terentia, Tullia, and Publilia: the Women of Cicero’s Family. London.

Trouard, M.A. 1942. Cicero’s Attitude towards the Greeks. Diss. University of Chicago.

Vahlen, J. 1903. Ennianae Poesis Reliquiae. Second edition. Leipzig.

Vasaly, A. 1985. “The Masks of Rhetoric: Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino.” Rhetorica 3:1–20.

Venuti, L. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London.

———. 1998. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London.

———, ed. 2004. The Translation Studies Reader. Second edition. London.

Vretska, K. 1976. De Catilinae Coniuratione. Heidelberg.

Walbank, F. W. 1957. A Historical Commentary on Polybius. Vol. I. Oxford.

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1997. “Mutatio Morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution.” In ed. T. N. Habinek and A. Schiesaro, The Roman Cultural Revolution, 3–22. Cambridge.

———. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.

Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica: zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt am Main.

Wardle, D. 2006. Cicero on Divination: De Divinatione Book 1. Oxford.

Wassmann, H. 1996. Ciceros Widerstand gegen Caesars Tyrannis: Untersuchungen zur politischen Bedeutung der philosophischen Spätschriften. Bonn.

White, P. 1993. Promised Verse. Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MA.

———. 2010. Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic. Oxford.

White, S. 1995. “Cicero and the Therapists.” In Powell 1995a, 219–46.

Wilcox, A. R. 2002. The Epistolary Habit: Representation, Participation, and Exchange among the Roman Elite. Diss. University of Pennsylvania.

———. 2005a. “Sympathetic Rivals: Consolation in Cicero’s Letters.” AJP 126:237–55.

———. 2005b. “Paternal Grief and the Public Eye: Cicero Ad Familiares 4.6.” Phoenix 59:267–87.

Winterbottom, M. 2002. “Believing the Pro Marcello.” In ed. J. F. Miller, C. Damon, and K. S. Myers, Vertis in usum. Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney, 24–38. Munich.

Wirszubski, C. 1954. “Cicero’s Cum Dignitate Otium: A Reconsideration.” JRS 44:1–13.

Wiseman, T. P. 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 B.C.–A.D.14. Oxford.

———. 2009. Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford.

Wistrand, M. 1979. Cicero imperator: Studies in Cicero’s Correspondence 51–47 B.C. Göteborg.

Wood, N. 1988. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley, CA.

Wright, F. W. 1931. Cicero and the Theater. Northampton, MA.

Wright, M. R. 1994. Cicero: On Stoic Good and Evil: De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum III and Paradoxa Stoicorum. Warminster.

Yon, A. 2002. Cicéron. Traité de destin, Paris.

Zetzel, J.E.G. 1972. “Cicero and the Scipionic Circle.” HSCP 76:173–79.

———. 1995. De Re Publica: Selections. Cambridge.

———. 1998. “De re publica and De rerum natura.” In ed. P. Knox and C. Foss, Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, 230–47. Stuttgart.

———. 2003. “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture.” In ed. D. Braund and C. Gill, Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, 119–38. Exeter.

———. 2007. “The Influence of Cicero on Ennius.” In ed. W. Fitzgerald and E. Gowers, Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond, 1–16. Cambridge.

Zimmermann, B. 1999. “Cicero und die Griechen.” In ed. G.Vogt-Spira und B. Rommel, Rezeption und Identität: Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europaisches Paradigma, 240–48. Stuttgart.