Randy spent two sleepless nights after his office meeting with his graduate student. She admitted she had doctored the research results she had reported at the Willow River meeting. Even more disturbing, she had threatened that if he told anyone about her manipulation of research data, she would make sure the chair of the Department of Agribusiness Studies would get an incriminating DVD.
Her reasons for tampering with the data didn’t make sense. Did she really believe she was helping the citizens of the Tamarack River Valley with her actions? What should he do? For three days, he rolled the alternatives around in his mind: not say anything to anyone about Emily’s admission of changing research numbers, say that she had made an honest mistake and reveal the true numbers, or go to the department chair and tell the truth in all its gory detail.
He considered the ramifications of each. If he said nothing, the phone calls about the research data would keep coming in. He would need to have an answer for these callers, and he didn’t have one.
He could make a case for the second alternative. He could say that in their haste to put together the numbers for the meeting, they had simply made some honest mistakes in analyzing the survey data. He would apologize, probably get a reprimand from the department chair, and the whole thing would blow over—he hoped. But Emily was still the unknown. What would she do? She had incriminating evidence against him and could, and probably would, hold it over his head throughout her PhD program. What if she ran into difficulty with a required course—say, advanced statistics? Would she come to him and say she would tell the world about their little roll in the hay if he didn’t make the problem she was having go away?
The third alternative would be to go to Professor Evans and tell him what had happened, that his graduate student had manipulated the numbers—on purpose. That it was not an error. He wouldn’t mention that he and Emily had slept together. That little error in judgment he would keep to himself, unless Emily filed a sexual harassment suit against him. Then everything would hit the fan. He knew the university’s rules about sexual harassment; breaking them was grounds for dismissal. He would be looking for another job, and with this blemish on his record, finding another university research position would be difficult, if not impossible. Randy knew what he must do. He contacted the department administrator and set up a meeting for the following morning with the department chair.
Professor Evans sat behind his big wooden desk, with piles of paper on each side of it and on the chairs nearby and books stacked on the floor. He looked his dapper self, his signature bowtie standing out against his white shirt and his blue blazer hung behind the office door. With a corner office on the third floor of Agriculture Hall, he had a view of Lake Mendota to the north and campus buildings to the east.
He stood to shake Randy’s hand.
“How are things going, Randy? The research project on track?” he asked.
Randy expected him to ask about the phone calls Evans had been receiving from the press and others asking about the numbers presented at the Willow River meeting.
“I know you’ve been getting phone calls about the Willow River meeting,” Randy began.
“Yes, I have. Do you have some answers for me?”
“I do. That’s why I’m here this morning.” Randy opened his manila folder and pulled out Emily’s computer spreadsheets and his own hand-tally sheets.
Evans pushed aside some of the clutter on his desk to make room for the papers.
“These are our tally sheets for the one question on our survey that asked if the communities supported large, confined hog operations.”
Evans peered at the numbers and said “hmm” a couple of times.
“How do you account for the differences? Did Emily make some big mistakes along the way?”
“No, she didn’t. I asked her about the numbers, and she said she first came up with the exact numbers that I did.”
“What happened?”
“She manipulated them. Changed them.”
“Why would she do that?” Evans had a perplexed look on his face.
“She said that the good people of Ames County, especially the Tamarack River Valley, needed an economic boost and this new hog facility would provide it. She correctly figured that our research findings would influence the decision-making, and it seems that they did.”
“Randy, these are serious accusations. You realize that, of course. Do you have any proof beyond these tally sheets and what she told you?”
“I don’t. But these sheets seem to speak for themselves.”
“They do. But we don’t have any evidence of intent. Do you believe the reasons she gave for changing the numbers?”
“She seemed sincere, seemed to believe she was doing the right thing. But I must say, I have my doubts about her reasons for changing the data.”
“Hmm,” Evans said. He rubbed his chin with his hand. “Hmm,” he said again.
“Well, thank you, Randy, for sharing all this. You realize this casts a long shadow on your research supervision. It was your responsibility to make sure your numbers were accurate before they were presented to the public.”
Randy could see Evans was clearly agitated, his normally smiling face frowning. He tapped a pencil on the desk.
“I know that. I know it’s not an excuse, but we were in a hurry to have something ready for the meeting, and I didn’t take time to check Emily’s work.”
“You should have found some time, or you should have cancelled your appearance there.” Evans’s voice was stern and a bit too loud for the setting.
“I know that now.”
“Is Emily Jordan in this morning? I need to talk with her.”
“She is. Do you want me to ask her to come in?”
“Please. And leave these tally sheets with me.”
“Of course.”
Emily was her usual upbeat self. To see and hear her around the department, you would not realize that she and her major professor faced serious problems.
“Emily,” Randy said when he approached her desk. “Professor Evans would like a word with you.”
“About what?” She had noticed that Randy had just come out of Evans’s office.
“He’s waiting to see you,” Randy said.
Emily slowly got up from her chair, glared at Randy, and walked toward Professor Evans’s open office door.
“Emily, good to see you,” Evans said as he rose from his desk and shut the door behind her. “Appreciate that you could stop by.”
“Glad to do it, Professor Evans. How can I help?”
“I’ve got a bit of a problem here, and I believe you can help me work my way through it.” Evans had a rather clever way of getting at difficult issues without immediately putting people on the defensive.
“What’s the problem?” Emily knew full well what it was, but she was interested in how Evans would handle it.
“I’ve been getting lots of phone calls about the accuracy of the numbers you and Randy presented at the Willow River meeting.”
“I’ve heard that. Randy says he got several calls as well.”
“Have you seen these?” Evans asked as he pushed the tally sheets to the front of his desk.
“Yes, I have,” she said. “I did one of them, and Randy did the other.”
“How do you account for the differences? Your results are very different from Randy’s.” Evans’s voice turned from friendly to stern, even a bit confrontational.
“I know that. And I feel bad about it.”
“How do you account for the differences?”
“Well, I hate to say it, but it was Randy’s idea that I present false data at the Willow River meeting.”
“Did he tell you to do it?” Evans asked, a surprised tone to his voice.
“Yes, he did. He told me that there would be serious consequences if I didn’t change the numbers, and there would be even worse consequences if I told anyone.”
“He said that?”
“Yes, he did.”
“What reason did he give you for changing the numbers?”
“Well, . . .” Emily hesitated for a moment and lowered her voice. “He said the good people of Ames County and especially those living in the Tamarack River Valley deserved a boost in their economy. He said that if we presented favorable research results, that is, showed that the majority of the people agreed with having a large, confined hog operation in their community, the zoning committee would give approval to Nathan West to build. And they did.”
“Hmm,” Professor Evans said. “Kind of an unbelievable reason, I would say.” He began tapping his pencil again.
“Well, thank you for stopping by and sharing all this. These are serious charges, you know. Manipulation of research findings is a serious offense. I’ve got to look into this further. This is a difficult matter.” Evans continued tapping his pencil.
“I know that,” Emily said. “I was very disappointed in Randy. I couldn’t imagine him asking me to do this, but he did.”
Once Emily had left his office, Evans walked to the locked file cabinet where he kept personnel files of all faculty members and graduate students. He pulled Emily Jordan’s file and began reading her letters of recommendation.
After a few minutes, he turned to the Rolodex on his desk, found a telephone number, and punched the numbers into his phone. He heard the phone ring twice.
“This is George Adams.”
“Bill Evans up in Madison. How’s everything going in that great city of Columbus?”
“Oh, fine. Running the department is about as good as can be expected. But you should know. Being a department chair at Ohio State can’t be a lot different than at UW,” said Adams.
Evans laughed, as he knew being a department chair at a large state university had its challenges, no matter where.
“How’re Susan and the kids? Let’s see, you’ve got one in high school now?”
“I do. Our little Wyatt is no longer little. He’s over six feet tall and playing varsity football. Susan’s fine. She just got a part-time job at a little bookstore here in Columbus. Something she’s always wanted to do. How can I help you, Bill?”
“Do you remember a grad student named Emily Jordan?”
“I surely do. Friendly personality. Full of enthusiasm. Most optimistic person I’d ever seen, especially among the crop of grad students we had when she was here. Sometimes they can be an unhappy bunch.”
“What can you tell me about her, beyond what you just said and what you wrote in your letter of recommendation?”
“Well, she’s a better than average student and a good researcher. She’s good with details, and once she’s working on something she sticks with it until it’s done.”
“I got all that from your letter. But anything you didn’t put in the letter? Something I should know?”
Adams hesitated for a moment. “I’m guessing you have a good reason for asking.”
“We’ve run into a little problem here. Emily’s being accused of tampering with some research data—making it look quite different from what the results really show,” said Evans.
There was more hesitation on the other end of the line.
“Well, as a matter of fact she had the same problem here. It was pretty clear that on one research project that involved some big agribusiness firms she may have doctored the data a little. But there was no evidence. No way of proving it.”
“Well, well, well,” said Evans. “Seems like she may be up to her old tricks.”
“Appears that way, doesn’t it. Shame, too. She’s a good student and a good researcher, no need to mess around with the results. What usually happens is you get caught, one way or another,” said Adams.
“George, thank you. I’ll let you know how all this turns out. It’s shaping up to be a real mess.”
“Let me know if I can be of further help. Nobody wins in these situations, nobody. How well I know.”
Bill Evans hung up the phone and sat back in his chair. Once the word got out that the preliminary data from a research project had been tampered with, everything would go south. He, as department chair, would be called on the carpet by the dean—why hadn’t he more closely supervised his assistant professor’s research projects? And the dean would be admonished by the chancellor, and so on up the pecking order of the university’s bureaucracy. Tampering with research data was right up there with sexual harassment cases—they were always messy and ended up with splashy headlines in the newspapers. Evans was well aware of the many problems state universities faced these days, especially with legislators who decided university budgets. The least little bit of negative news became fodder for the budget cutters.
Evans knew what he must do. He thought for a fleeting moment that he would sit on the information, with the hope that it would all go away. But he knew better. He knew of a case or two in which a rule was broken and the person in charge tried to keep it quiet. It didn’t happen. The information got out.
He turned to his phone and punched in some numbers.
A voice on the other end of the line said, “Dean’s office.”