The walker is not always welcome. A stranger arriving on foot in a small community has the power to alarm. In some corners of literature, particularly the Gothic, the solitary tramper is frequently presented as a figure of menace. Preacher Harry Powell in Davis Grubb’s novel Night of the Hunter is released from prison, intent upon hunting down a fortune hidden by an executed man. This money has been left with the man’s children John and Pearl, and the first these children know of Preacher Powell’s sinister arrival in their little town is the sound of his footsteps in the foggy night, walking up and down the street outside their house, casting a vast shadow on their bedroom wall as he sings a gospel hymn. The solitary walker sometimes has mythic qualities. Joseph Maturin’s popular 1830 Gothic novel Melmoth the Wanderer features a figure who has sold his soul to the Devil in return for an extra 150 years of life and is now wandering the earth in search of someone to swap the bargain with. This, in turn, was an echo of the medieval Christian legend of the Wandering Jew. After insulting Jesus as he carried the Cross along the Via Dolorosa, he was doomed to walk all the continents until the time of the Second Coming. Again, we see the idea of walking as something uncanny, connected with rootlessness and a certain moral ambiguity.
As much as the Romantic poets and subsequent Victorian enthusiasts proselytised about the virtues of walking in real life, there was always another side to it; the sense that walking could also be transgressive. The sense, also, that a certain class of walkers somehow symbolically offended a certain social order, and could be viewed by some as threatening. That class of walker, inevitably, was either labouring, or entirely dispossessed. So, running in parallel with the soaring poetic fancies are also accounts – both real and fictional – of the poor and the wretched walking, almost literally, on the fringes of society.
After the Enclosure Acts, there was very much an element of necessity, and of transgression around the entire subject of walking. In centuries past, only the wealthy middle and upper classes could undertake the sorts of tours that everyone now takes for granted. Poor people stayed close to their own communities and were often legally obliged to do so. In the seventeenth century one needed a licence to walk to another village in search of work or lodgings. Even then, there were those who looked upon even the more genteel class of walkers with a combination of distrust and horror. In 1793, German writer Karl Philipp Moritz was staying with a friend in Richmond, Surrey. He announced his intention to walk to Oxford. His friend was ‘greatly astonished’. Nonetheless, Moritz set off. Just a couple of miles in, while enquiring if he was going in the right direction for Oxford, he was told ‘you’ll want a carriage to get you there.’ Undaunted, he struck off on a ‘fine broad road’ into the countryside, bordered with ‘lovely green hedges’. But as the miles wore on, he found that every passing coachman was asking if he wanted a lift on the outside of their vehicle, and every farm-worker he passed looked at him in puzzlement. On top of this, he added: ‘When I passed through a village, the old women in their bewilderment would let out a “God almighty!”’
There is a similar distrust and impatience on show in Dickens’ 1841 novel The Old Curiosity Shop when saintly Little Nell and her grandfather are compelled to flee London to escape the nightmarish demands of Daniel Quilp upon the pair of them. Initially, it seems to both Nell and the narrator that away from the London stews and the vice lies a bucolic world of innocence and ease, which they will find even though they are travelling on foot. This illusion of yearning immediately dissipates. The little girl and her kleptomaniac grandfather walk across much of England, fleeing from parish to parish, through nightmare industrial landscapes, meeting various colourful characters, and an increasing amount of peril. As the novel – and their walk – progresses, its lethal nature becomes ever more apparent:
The child walked with more difficulty than she had led her companion to expect, for the pains that racked her joints were of no common severity, and every exertion increased them. But they wrung from her no complaint, or look of suffering; and though the two travellers proceeded very slowly, they did proceed.
Even though they find sanctuary in the end with a kindly schoolmaster in a small village, it is all too late for Little Nell. The walk has broken her. Her journey must soon come to its end. This is an extreme example, but for an author who was himself so enthusiastic about walking, he has the activity often spelling great hardship for his characters. There is Oliver Twist, on the run from the funeral parlour and the Beadle, on his way to London, almost starving in the process. There is Nicholas Nickleby and crippled Smike, struggling their way across the wintry wastes of the Yorkshire moors. David Copperfield features a harrowing journey when the young boy David takes it upon himself to walk from London to Dover, a journey of about seventy miles. Along the way, he is swindled, threatened, and gradually has to sell off his clothes to rascally second-hand traders in order to pay for food. His feet are sore with the unaccustomed exercise, his face is white with chalk, his hair dusty and tangled; he is forced to sleep beneath the stars. Worse yet, though, are his fellow pedestrians. We are left in no doubt that among the lower classes, walking is not merely a token of great poverty, but also the last redoubt of the low-down drunken bully.
Things are different for Victorian literature’s country folk, but even then, long epic walks tend to mirror quite vivid physical and emotional states. In Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the d’Urbervilles, walking is the natural mode of transport in places such as the Vale of Blackmoor. Indeed, in the summer months, it is seen as a source of pleasure: witness Angel Clare and his priggish brothers, on their ‘walking tour’ of Wessex. But it is also a token of privation; and later, when Angel Clare has left his wife Tess, and she proves too proud to apply to his family for funding, she is obliged to walk the countryside in search of scarce winter work:
There was something of the habitude of the wild animal in the unreflecting instinct with which she rambled on – disconnecting herself by little from her eventful past at every step, obliterating her identity … Thus Tess walks on; a figure which is part of the landscape; a fieldwoman pure and simple, in winter guise; a grey serge cape, a red woollen cravat, a stuff skirt covered by a whitey brown rough wrapper, and buff-leather gloves. Every thread of that old attire has become faded and thin under the stroke of raindrops, the burn of sunbeams, and the stress of winds.
Rather like Little Nell, Tess in the end is forced to escape on foot. Having murdered Alec, the man who raped her, and having caught up with her estranged husband Angel, the two of them (ignoring the modern railway) simply walk away from the town of Sandbourne (Bournemouth) and into the New Forest. There is a sense of disengagement about this walk; that both of them are plunged too deep into shock to properly register where they might be going. They are walkers in a trance. Many miles into this woodland, they find an empty, secluded house. But this fairy-tale sanctuary – where they achieve their long-delayed consummation – cannot last and, once again, they are forced to move on, this time in the middle of the night:
Though the sky was dense with cloud, a diffused light from some fragment of a moon had hitherto helped them a little. But the moon had now sunk, the clouds seemed to settle almost on their heads, and the night grew as a dark as a cave. However, they found their way along, keeping as much on the turf as possible that their tread might not resound, which it was easy to do, there being no hedge or fence of any kind. All around was open loneliness and black solitude, over which a stiff breeze blew.
They are on Salisbury Plain. And it is here that Angel and Tess find themselves at a moonless Stonehenge, the wind causing the ancient heathen monument to ‘hum’. Tess lies upon the sacrificial stone to rest, and falls asleep there. This has been her final walk. This sort of compulsive walking, the automaton trudge as the mind slips its moorings, is found in the writings of the poet John Clare and his The Journey from Essex (1841). This searingly sad journal charts his escape from a lunatic asylum (or ‘mad house’, as he terms it) in Epping Forest, and his subsequent walk all the way up the North Road to Northamptonshire to be reunited with a wife that he refuses to believe is dead.
This journey augurs badly when he takes a wrong turning, seemingly towards London; but then he is on the right road, ‘where it was all plain sailing and steering ahead, meeting no enemy and fearing none.’ He spends the night in a shed near Stevenage in which he is tormented by an ‘uneasy’ dream. The next day’s walk finds Clare growing weaker through lack of food and drink: ‘a Man passed me on horseback in a Slop frock and said “here’s another of the broken down haymakers” and threw me a penny to get a half pint of beer which I picked up and thanked him for.’ Clare observes ‘I seemed to pass the Milestones very quick in the morning – but toward night they seemed to be stretched further asunder.’ By the time he is progressing through Bedfordshire, his hunger is growing worse, as indeed is his physical condition. ‘So I went on hopping with a crippled foot for the gravel had got into my old shoes one of which had now nearly lost the sole.’ Shelter seems elusive, despite various parsons and passers-by attempting to help with directions to barns and sheds. ‘It now began to grow dark apace and the odd houses on the road began to light up and show the inside tennants lots very comfortable, and my outside lot very uncomfortable and wretched.’
But it gets progressively more wretched, so much so that ‘I was very often half asleep as I went. On the third day I satisfied my hunger by eating the grass by the road side which seemed to taste something like bread. I was hungry and eat heartily till I was satisfied.’ There are those who observe him with something like pity: a gypsy woman who warns him that he ‘will be noticed’; a young woman and an old relative who argue over whether he is ‘shamming’ or not and former neighbours from Helpston passing by on a cart who help him out with fivepence, enough to stop off at an inn for bread, cheese and beer. By now, ‘my feet was more crippled than ever and I could scarcely make a walk of it over the stones and being half ashamed to sit down in the street, I forced to keep on the move.’
Thus, agonisingly, he finally reaches his destination of Northborough. Journeys end, but lovers do not meet. ‘Mary was not there neither could I get any information about her further then the old story of her being dead six years ago.’ The walk has ended with the deranged poet both denying yet simultaneously accepting the truth about his wife. Clare died in an asylum in Northampton. His walk encapsulates a certain sort of extremity, the overwhelming need in the face of intolerable grief, to move and keep moving, to walk and walk with some sort of a purpose, no matter how phantasmal it may be.
Rural walkers could also attract suspicion because of fear. In plague-ridden times, a walking stranger might be a harbinger of the disease coming to the community. This unease and animosity was, in the sixteenth century, firmly embedded in the law. The crime was ‘vagrancy’ – it was strictly forbidden for anyone to take to the roads and move from village to village for the purposes of begging. In 1572, there was an ‘Acte for the punishment of Vacabondes’. This stated:
All and everye persone and persones beynge whole and mightye in Body and able to labour, having not Land or Maister, nor using any lawfull Marchaundize Crafte or Mysterye whereby hee or shee might get his or her Lyvinge … whiche … shall wander abroade and have not lycense of two Justices of the Peace at the leaste … shalbee taken adjudged and deemed Roges Vacabondes and Sturdy Beggars.1
Another term used was ‘mendicant’, which in the middle ages had been chiefly applied to friars asking for alms.
The eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Enclosure Acts changed not merely the shape and the lie of the land, but also inevitably the lives of so many country dwellers who depended on it. When forced out of work by the new harsh economic systems, some had little choice but to walk looking for alms or work. This form of roaming placed the walker perilously close to the very periphery of society; they would also be sharing those paths with others who had crossed that boundary.
In the era of highwaymen and footpads, strange walkers could turn out to be vicious criminals, looking for new victims. Karl Philip Moritz, who caused such a stir by walking to Oxford, was very interested in what he considered ‘the lowest and vilest class of criminal – the footpads.’ He observed that:
Tragic examples may be read almost daily in English newspapers of poor people met on the road who have been brutally murdered for a few shillings. These thieves probably murder because they are unable to take flight like the highwayman on his horse and so, should anyone live to give information concerning them, they can be pretty easily overtaken by a hue and cry.
As well as haunting the alleys and courts of the big cities, footpads were to be found out on the roads. Hounslow Heath was notorious for its instances of thieving, as was Windsor Forest. The Windsor footpads employed the striking tactic of painting their faces black. They became known as the Wokingham Blacks, and were responsible for a spree not only involving robbery but also murder. Unlike highwaymen, who persist to this day in enjoying a rather romantic reputation, these pedestrian robbers were always on pretty much the same level as modern muggers. Although as Anne Wallace has pointed out:
The shape of a footpad’s life, indeed, is simply another version of that circle of a day’s walk confining the more respectable poor. Because the footpads walk, they cannot easily detain or overtake a rider or a coach; their likeliest victims are walkers, probably poor themselves, and so the footpads remain poor, desperate, and pedestrian.
This form of poverty and desperation finds its historical and most emblematic image in the form of the tramp. When you see the phrase ‘gentleman of the road’, you instantly see the drink-reddened nose, the disintegrating jacket and trousers, the flapping soles of the shoes, the tied up handkerchief at the end of the stick. This figure is imagined recumbent on a grass verge, listening to the bees hum around the wildflowers on a summer’s day. The many vagrants who moved through Wordsworth’s poetry gave way to Charles Dickens’ tramps. In 1860, he wrote about all the different sorts that he had come into contact with. There was ‘Soldier Sailor’, obviously discharged from military duty; ‘the Lads’, who are young and travel in gangs and treat authority figures like beadles with contempt. There is the ‘Poor Fellow’, an old illiterate man on a desperate quest to visit an ill child some miles away, and who asks for help with directions. He receives money by means of help too; and is later discovered insensible outside a public house.
In more recent times, the rural tramp (as opposed to the urban variety) has been the subject of more interest and sympathy. The author Laurie Lee made the acquaintance of a few as he travelled across England in the 1930s on his way to Spain; men with billy-cans blackened with tannin, who were adept at building small fires, and boiling up tea or potatoes. Subsistence for these men would consist of roaming from village to village, asking for money and food along the way. They would find shelter in barns or outbuildings and do odd jobs on farms, such as hay-making, in return for food and money. Even up until the late 1960s, the tramp seemed an organic part of the rural landscape; a figure who wanted little more than his freedom to roam, and also his freedom to be alone, on the fringes. However, the figure of the tramp always disturbs the city dweller in particular, for the tramp stands for what could conceivably happen to any of us; an unforeseen breakdown that could be triggered by job loss, bereavement, intoxicants. It is a combination of catastrophe, and a curious wish-fufilment. So many people, at some point in their lives, feel an overwhelming urge to escape, to walk in a new direction and leave the past firmly behind them. We hear much less about tramps these days. Disturbed former soldiers – such as those encountered by Wordsworth – are these days more likely to be found in prison, having committed small offences purely to be sent there. There is little succour for the gentleman alcoholic among the lanes of southern England now, and one cannot go begging in a gated community.
As to helping out with hay-making, or sleeping in barns: that form of farming is now industrialised. And the barns have been converted. There is no room in the countryside any more for the gentleman of the road. And there is no room on the road itself. Neither tramps nor regular walkers are welcome any longer on the tarmacked thoroughfares that accommodate obscenely large 4x4s.
So we come full circle to the present day. Whereas in remote areas, walkers are not merely welcomed but actively sought out, they seem to have no place on the actual Queen’s highway itself. Nothing apparently must be allowed to interfere with the motorist’s right to race along every country road at vast speeds. Notice how, when one is leaving a small village on foot, the pavement grows narrower and narrower, until the point at which it disappears altogether. At this point, the walker is on his own. And once again, as with those eighteenth-century vagrants and mendicants, the walker on the roadside verge is also the transgressor; an unwelcome figure.
In the eyes of many of those behind wheels, there is something at best eccentric about the hiker noodling along the side of the verge. Whereas motorists versus cyclists is a war of more direct confrontation, the motorist’s ill-will towards the walker seems less to do with his use of the road as the furrow-browed bewilderment he is causing. Try walking along the verge of a moderately busy B-road within the bounds of the M25, for instance, and you will hear a lot of scorn, and quite a few beeped horns. This is especially bad on the roads of Epping; if one has tired of the pathless leafy woodland floor, and of losing one’s sense of direction, and of starting to go round in circles, the way out is to get to one of the roads, and walk in a straight line. But the minute you are on that road, the motorists have little time or patience for you. This is to say nothing of the jokers in cars who like to throw eggs at walkers (another Essex speciality). For the moment, the drivers are in the ascendant, and it is the walkers who look like nerdy eccentrics. But things will change though. Perhaps in the manner of militant cyclists, it is time for the outcast oddball walkers to start reclaiming the roads.
In the nineteenth and early-twentieth century – as walking for its own sake acquired more of a beneficial reputation, and walkers gradually became more assertive about where they could walk – one particular area down in the deep west of the country became the focus for the nascent walking movement. In fact, some prophetic Edwardian ramblers could see a future in which this vast tract of land would be open to all. Since then, this area has lost none of its symbolic weight or value, and remains attractive to walkers drawn from all over the world.