WORKS CITED

Introduction

  1. Doctorow, E. L. (1989). Billy Bathgate. New York: Harper & Row.
  2. Liversedge, S. P., White, S. J., Findlay, J. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading. Vision Research, 46(15), 2363–2374.
  3. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J. & Clifton, C. (2012). The psychology of reading. New York: Psychology Press.
  4. Willingham, D. T. (2012). When can you trust the experts? San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.

Chapter 1

  1. Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 244–255.
  2. Dick, F., Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., Utman, J. A., Dronkers, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2001). Language deficits, localization, and grammar: Evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychological Review, 108(4), 759–788.
  3. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 430–445.
  4. Herodotus. The histories. Available at http://perseus.uchicago.edu/perseus‐cgi/citequery3.pl?dbname=GreekFeb2011&query=Hdt.%204.131.2&getid=1/.
  5. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
  6. National Institute of Child Health and Human. (2000). National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence‐based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the subgroups. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/Pages/nrp.aspx/.
  7. Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24. http://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_02.
  8. “Review of Kavanagh, a Tale by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.” (1849, July). The North American Review, 69(144), 207.
  9. Robinson, A. (2007). The story of writing (2nd ed.). London: Thames & Hudson.
  10. Schmandt‐Besserat, D., & Erard, M. (2008). Origins and forms of writing. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing (pp. 7–22). New York: Erlbaum.

Chapter 2

  1. Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963‐7214.2005.00376.x.
  2. Backman, J. (1983). The role of psycholinguistic skills in reading acquisition: A look at early readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(4), 466–479.
  3. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
  4. Bus, A. G., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta‐analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403–414.
  5. Calfee, R. C., Lindamood, P., & Lindamood, C. (1973). Acoustic‐phonetic skills and reading: Kindergarten through twelfth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 293–298. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4710951.
  6. Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q., Ye, H., & Shimojo, S. (2006). The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist, 167(5), E117–E139, Figure 6b. http://doi.org/10.1086/502806.
  7. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Attention & performance VI. London: Academic Press.
  8. Courrieu, P., & De Falco, S. (1989). Segmental vs. dynamic analysis of letter shape by preschool children. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 189–198.
  9. Cunningham, A. E., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Book smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta‐analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393.
  11. Ellefson, M. R., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2009). Learning to label letters by sounds or names: A comparison of England and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 323–341.
  12. Grainger, J., Rey, A., & Dufau, S. (2008). Letter perception: From pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 381–387. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.006.
  13. Hanson, V. L., Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1984). Linguistic coding by deaf children in relation to beginning reading success. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37(2), 1984.
  14. Hanson, V. L., Goodell, E. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Tongue‐twister effects in the silent reading of hearing and deaf college students. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 319–330.
  15. Holden, M. H., & MacGinitie, W. H. (1972). Children's conceptions of word boundaries in speech and print. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(6), 551–557. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.orgjournals/edu/63/6/551.
  16. Hu, C.‐F., & Catts, H. W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(1), 55–79.
  17. Hubel, D., & Wiesel, T. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 160(1), 106–154. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837/full/.
  18. Hulme, C., Goetz, K., Gooch, D., Adams, J., & Snowling, M. J. (2007). Paired‐associate learning, phoneme awareness, and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(2), 150–166. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.09.002.
  19. Justice, L. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2003). Promising interventions for promoting emergent literacy skills: Three evidence‐based approaches. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(3), 99–113.
  20. Liberman, I. Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition. Annals of Dyslexia, 23(1), 64–77.
  21. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Orlando, C., Harris, K. S., & Berti, F. B. (1971). Letter confusions and reversals of sequence in the beginning reader: Implications for Orton's Theory of Developmental Dyslexia. Cortex, 7(2), 127–142. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0010‐9452(71)80009‐6.
  22. Litt, R. A., de Jong, P. F., van Bergen, E., & Nation, K. (2013). Dissociating crossmodal and verbal demands in paired associate learning (PAL): What drives the PAL‐reading relationship? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 137–149. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.012.
  23. Litt, R. A., & Nation, K. (2014). The nature and specificity of paired associate learning deficits in children with dyslexia. Journal of Memory and Language, 71(1), 71–88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.005.
  24. Melby‐Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta‐analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322–52. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744.
  25. Morais, J., Luz, G., Alegria, J., & Bertels, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously ? Cognition, 7, 323–331.
  26. Morford, J. P., Wilkinson, E., Villwock, A., Piñar, P., & Kroll, J. F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition, 118(2), 286–292. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006.
  27. Nodine, C. F., & Lang, N. J. (1971). Development of visual scanning strategies for differentiating words. Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 221–232. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0031428.
  28. Rodriguez, E. T., & Tamis‐Lemonda, C. S. (2011). Trajectories of the home learning environment across the first 5 years: Associations with children's vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten. Child Development, 82(4), 1058–1075. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐8624.2011.01614.x.
  29. Seidenberg, Mark (2016). Language at the speed of sight. New York: Basic Books.
  30. Share, D. L. (2004). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(3), 213–233.
  31. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden‐variety poor reader: The phonological‐core variable‐difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(10), 590–604.
  32. Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code‐related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 934–947. http://doi.org/10.1037//0012‐1649.38.6.934.
  33. Suggate, S. P., Schaughency, E. A., & Reese, E. (2013). Children learning to read later catch up to children reading earlier. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 33–48.
  34. Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard‐of‐hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4), 337–348. http://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.4.337.
  35. Treiman, R., & Broderick, V. (1998). What's in a name: Children's knowledge about the letters in their own names. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70(2), 97–116. http://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2448.
  36. Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. In Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 31, pp. 105–138).
  37. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Pollo, T. C. (2006). Learning about the letter name subset of the vocabulary : Evidence from US and Brazilian preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 211–227.
  38. Treiman, R., Levin, I., & Kessler, B. (2012). Linking the shapes of alphabet letters to their sounds: The case of Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 569–585. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11145‐010‐9286‐3.
  39. Vaughn, J. S. (1902, August). Our strange language. The Spectator, 187.
  40. Vellutino, F. R., Smith, H., Steger, J. A., & Kaman, M. (1975). Reading disability: Age differences and the perceptual‐deficit hypothesis. Child Development, 46(2), 487–493. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1128146.
  41. Windfuhr, K. L., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The relationship between paired associate learning and phonological skills in normally developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(2), 160–173. http://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2625.
  42. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for ‐ough and the for computing spelling for /u /? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(4), 600–618.

Chapter 3

  1. Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., Fielding, L. G., Anderson, R. C., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285–303.
  2. Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 286–304. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551‐6709.2011.01200.x.
  3. Badian, N. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51(1), 177–202. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11881‐001‐0010‐5.
  4. Carlson, K. (2009). How prosody influences sentence comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1188–1200. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749‐818X.2009.00150.x.
  5. Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 631–644. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022‐0663.89.4.631.
  6. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 35(5), 386–406.
  7. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–56. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11212628.
  8. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing, 14, 549–568.
  9. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‐5371(80)90312‐6.
  10. Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences on‐line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 12203–12208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602173103.
  11. Freebody, P., & Byrne, B. (1988). Word‐reading strategies in elementary school children: Relations to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 441–453.
  12. Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertand, D., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123(2), 280–92. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.003.
  13. Haber, L. R., & Haber, R. N. (1982). Does silent reading involve articulation? Evidence from tongue twisters. The American Journal of Psychology, 95(3), 409–419. http://doi.org/10.2307/1422133.
  14. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662–720. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐295X.111.3.662.
  15. Ise, E., Arnoldi, C. J., & Schulte‐Körne, G. (2012). Development of orthographic knowledge in German‐speaking children: A 2‐year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(3), 233–249. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9817.2012.01535.x.
  16. Jared, D., Ashby, J., Agauas, S. J., Levy, B. A. (2016). Phonological activation of word meanings in Grade 5 readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(4), 524‐–541.
  17. Juel, C. (2006). The impact of early school experiences on initial reading. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 410–426). New York: Guilford.
  18. Kessler, B. (2009). Statistical learning of conditional orthographic correspondences. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 19–34. http://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp004.
  19. Kosslyn, S. M., & Matt, A. M. (1977). If you speak slowly, do people read your prose slowly? Person‐particular speech recoding during reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9(4), 250–252.
  20. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21.
  21. Leinenger, M., & Leinenger, M. (2014). Phonological Coding During Reading. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1534–1555.
  22. Levy, B. A., Gong, Z., Hessels, S., Evans, M. A., & Jared, D. (2006). Understanding print: Early reading development and the contributions of home literacy experiences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(1), 63–93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.07.003.
  23. Marchand‐Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., Modderman, S. L., Petersen, H. M., & Pan, S. (2013). Key areas of effective adolescent literacy programs. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 161–184.
  24. McCusker, L. X., Gough, P. B., & Bias, R. G. (1981). Word recognition inside out and outside in. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(3), 538–551.
  25. Nation, K. (2009). Form‐meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3665–3674. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0119.
  26. Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
  27. Price, C. J., & Mechelli, A. (2005). Reading and reading disturbance. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 231–238. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.003.
  28. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. J. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
  29. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17(3), 192–193.
  30. Rehm, D. (2013). Aimless love: New and selected poems. Retrieved from http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2013‐10‐22/billy‐collins‐aimless‐love‐new‐and‐selected‐poems/transcrip/.
  31. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 275–280.
  32. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–68. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐295X.96.4.523.
  33. Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. G. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading–writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 116–123. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.orgjournals/edu/78/2/116.
  34. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self‐teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218.
  35. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.
  36. Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta‐analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261.
  37. Treiman, R., Freyd, J. J., & Baron, J. (1983). Phonological recording and use of spelling‐sound rules in reading of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(6), 682–700. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‐5371(83)90405‐X.
  38. Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don't students like school? San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Chapter 4

  1. “Spill.” Merriam‐Webster. Retrieved from www.merriam‐webster.com/dictionary/spill/.
  2. “Heavy.” Merriam‐Webster. Retrieved from www.merriam‐webster.com/dictionary/heavy/.
  3. Astuti, R., Solomon, G. E. A., & Carey, S. (2004). Constraints on conceptual development: I. Introduction. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(3), 1–24. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0037‐976X.2004.00297.x.
  4. Barsalou, L. W. (2016). On staying grounded and avoiding Quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1122–1142. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423‐016‐1028‐3.
  5. Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long‐term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506–521. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0663.74.4.506.
  6. Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353.
  7. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Elbro, C. (2003). The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school‐age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30(30), 681–694. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005713.
  8. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0663.96.4.671.
  9. Carver, R. (1994). Percentage of unknown vocabulary words in text as a function of the relative difficulty of the text: Implications for instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 26(4), 413–437. http://doi.org/10.1080/10862969409547861.
  10. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading‐activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978‐1‐4832‐1446‐7.50015‐7.
  11. Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage‐level comprehension of school‐age children: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44. http://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539200.
  12. Foertsch, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1994). In search of complete comprehension: Getting “minimalists” to work. Discourse Processes, 18(3), 271–296. http://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544896.
  13. Fukkink, R. G., & de Glopper, K. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meaning from context: A meta‐analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 450–469. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068004450.
  14. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. (1995). Skilled suppression. In F. N. Dempster & C. N. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 295–327). San Diego: Academic Press.
  15. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. http://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2011.2140890.
  16. Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta‐analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(2), 183–208. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11881‐010‐0041‐x.
  17. Goulden, R., Nation, P., & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 341–363. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.4.341.
  18. Hare, M., Jones, M., Thomson, C., Kelly, S., & McRae, K. (2009). Activating event knowledge. Cognition, 111(2), 151–167. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.009.
  19. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. http://doi.org/10.1016/0167‐2789(90)90087‐6.
  20. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.
  21. Hayes, D. P., & Ahrens, M. G. (1988). Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case of “motherese”? Journal of Child Language, 15(02), 395. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012411.
  22. Hsueh‐Chao, M. H., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.
  23. Kintsch, W. (2012). Psychological models of reading comprehension and their implications for assessment. In J. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O'Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: advances in how we assess reading ability (pp. 21–37). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
  24. McKeown, M., Beck, I., Omanson, R., & Perfetti, C. (1983). The effects of long‐term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Literacy Research, 15(1), 3–18. http://doi.org/10.1080/10862968309547474.
  25. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234.
  26. Miller, G. A., & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257(3), 94–99.
  27. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
  28. Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1985). Incidental vs. instructional approaches to increasing reading vocabulary. Educational Perspectives, 23(1), 16–21.
  29. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 63(1), 59–81. http://doi.org/10.1353/cml.2006.0049.
  30. Nation, K. (2008). EPS Prize Lecture. Learning to read words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 61(8), 1121–1133. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802034603.
  31. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word‐recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 85–101. http://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2564.
  32. Oakhill, J., Cain, K., McCarthy, D., & Nightingale, Z. (2013). Making the link between vocabulary knowledge and comprehension skill. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman, & J.‐F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to multiple texts (pp. 101–114). New York: Routledge.
  33. Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0663.98.3.554.
  34. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‐4781.2011.01146.x.
  35. Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Effects of a conversation intervention on the expressive vocabulary development of prekindergarten children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(3), 303–313. http://doi.org/10.1044/0161‐1461(2009/08‐0100).
  36. Yu, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross‐situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18(5), 414–420. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9280.2007.01915.x.
  37. Yurovsky, D., Fricker, D. C., Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2014). The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423‐013‐0443‐y.

Chapter 5

  1. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston and Sons.
  2. Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 367–381.
  3. Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell, N. S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(4), 471–481. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‐5371(74)80024‐1.
  4. Begg, I. (1971). Recognition memory for sentence meaning and wording. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(2), 176–181. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‐5371(71)80010‐5.
  5. Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D.S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children's comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164.
  6. Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (2000). Temporal adverbials as segmentation markers in discourse comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 74–87.
  7. Butcher, K. R., & Kintsch, W. (2003). Text comprehension and discourse processing. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 578–604). New York: Wiley.
  8. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In K. Cain, & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 41–75). New York: Guilford.
  9. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference‐making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859.
  10. Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). The classic study on poor children's fourth‐grade slump. American Educator, 27(1), 14–15.
  11. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945.
  12. Daneman, M., Lennertz, T., & Hannon, B. (2007). Shallow semantic processing of text: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(1), 83–105.
  13. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐295X.101.3.371.
  14. Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(2), 133–159. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749‐596X(90)90069‐C.
  15. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1997). Individual differences in readers' sentence‐and text‐level representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 129–145.
  16. McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Coh‐Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47(4), 292–330. http://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959943.
  17. McNamara, D. S., & O'Reilly, T. (2009). Theories of comprehension skill: Knowledge and strategies versus capacity and suppression. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Progress in experimental psychology research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  18. O'Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(4), 777–784.
  19. Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3(4), 229–235.
  20. Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309–315. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0663.69.4.309.
  21. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Basic Books.
  22. Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. (2006). The syntax‐semantic interface: On‐line composition of sentence meaning. In M. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., 537–577). New York: Elsevier.
  23. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. J. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed., pp. 245–275). New York: Psychology Press.
  24. Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(1), 110–131.
  25. Schneider, W., Korkel, J., & Weinert, F. E. (1989). Domain‐specific knowledge and memory performance : A comparison of high‐ and low‐aptitude children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 306–312.
  26. Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Katz, L., Stuebing, K., Fletcher, J., Brady, S., Fowler, A., Dreyer, L., Marchione, K., Shaywitz, S., & Shaywitz, B. (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Patterns of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 69–94.
  27. Singer, M. (2007). Inference processing in discourse comprehension. In M. G. Gaskel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 343–359). New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 211–229. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022‐0663.85.2.211.
  29. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Literacy experiences and the shaping of cognition. In S. G. Paris & H. M. Wellman (Eds.), Global prospects for education: Development, culture, and schooling (pp. 253–288). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  30. Sulin, R. A., & Dooling, D. J. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(2), 255–262. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0036846.
  31. Sweet, A. P., & Snow, C. E. (Eds.). (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford.
  32. Willingham, D. T., & Lovette, G. (2014). Can reading comprehension be taught? Teachers College Record. Retrieved from www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 17701.
  33. Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1196–1207.
  34. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.

Chapter 6

  1. Anderson, M. (2016). Parents, teens and digital monitoring. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
  2. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2012). Social psychology (8th ed.). New York: Pearson.
  3. Baker, L., Scher, D., & Mackler, K. (1997). Home and family influences on motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 69–82. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_2.
  4. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477.
  5. Blaydes, J. (2003). The educator's book of quotes (p. 9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  6. Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 143–153. http://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211582.
  7. Clark, C., & DeZoysa, S. (2011). Mapping the interrelationships of reading enjoyment, attitudes, behaviour and attainment: An exploratory investigation. London: National Literacy Trust.
  8. Cloer, T. J., & Ross, S. Y. (1997). The relationship of standardized reading scores to children's self‐perception as readers. In K. Camperel, B. L. Hayes, & R. Telfer (Eds.), Yearbook of the American Reading Forum (pp. 93–104). Whitewater, WI: American Reading Forum
  9. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 264–274. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022‐0663.83.2.264.
  10. da Matta, A., Gonçalves, F. L., & Bizarro, L. (2012). Delay discounting: Concepts and measures. Psychology & Neuroscience, 5(2), 135–146.
  11. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta‐analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.orgjournals/bul/125/6/627.
  12. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social‐cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐295X.95.2.256.
  13. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.
  14. Grotevant, H. D. (1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(3), 203–222. http://doi.org/10.1177/074355488723003.
  15. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐295X.108.4.814.
  16. Hall, L. A. (2012). The role of reading identities and reading abilities in students' discussions about texts and comprehension strategies. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(3), 239–272. http://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12445370.
  17. Harter, S. (1999). The cognitive and social construction of the developing self. New York: Guilford.
  18. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
  19. Kim, J. S., & White, T. G. (2008). Scaffolding voluntary summary reading for children in Grades 3 to 5: An experimental study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(1), 1–23.
  20. Lee, J. (2014). Universal factors of student achievement in high‐performing Eastern and Western countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 364–374. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0035609.
  21. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.orgjournals/psp/28/1/129.
  22. Mckenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934–956.
  23. Meyer, D. E., & Schvanaveldt, R. (1971) Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234.
  24. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta‐analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890.
  25. Morgan, P. L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73(2), 165–183.
  26. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self‐concept: Testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21–30. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004.
  27. Rideout, V. J. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. San Francisco: Common Sense Media.
  28. Rideout, V. J. (2011). Zero to eight: Children's media use in America. San Francisco: Common Sense Media.
  29. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberst, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8‐ to 18‐year‐olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Foundation.
  30. Rozin, P., Scott, S., & Dingley, M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity I : Minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgement and Decision Making, 6(4), 323–332. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753‐4887.2009.00206.x.
  31. Ruble, D. N., & Frey, K. S. (1991). Changing patterns of comparative behavior as skills are acquired: A functional model of self‐evaluation. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 79–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  32. Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., & Murdoch, A. (2014). Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of “10 years later.” Reading and Writing, 27(1), 189–211. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11145‐013‐9439‐2.
  33. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
  34. Stuart, E. W., Shimp, T. A., & Engle, R. W. (1984). Classical conditioning of consumer attitudes : Four experiments in an advertising context. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 334–349.
  35. Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attribution perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1–14. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978‐1‐4615‐1273‐8_2.
  36. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy‐value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
  37. Woolfolk, M. E., Castellan, W., & Brooks, C. I. (1983). Pepsi versus Coke: Labels, not tastes, prevail. Psychological Reports, 52, 185–186.

Chapter 7

  1. Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023.
  2. Anderson, D. R., Huston, A. C., Schmitt, K. L., Linebarger, D. L., Wright, J. C., & Larson, R. (2001). Childhood television viewing and adolescent behavior: The recontact study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66(1), 1–154.
  3. Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39–85. http://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.636495.
  4. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐8535.2007.00793.x.
  5. Bohn, R. E., & Short, J. E. (2009). How much information? 2009 report on American consumers. San Diego: Global Information Center, University of California.
  6. Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students' evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 180–195. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.003.
  7. Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 107(2), 89–94. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744‐7984.2008.00172.x.
  8. Carr, N. (2011). The Shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York: Norton.
  9. Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2011, May). The effectiveness of education technology for enhancing reading achievement: A meta‐analysis, 1–48. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527572.pdf.
  10. Coffin, T. E. (1955). Television's impact on society. American Psychologist, 10(10), 630–641. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0039880.
  11. Connell, C., Bayliss, L., & Farmer, W. (2012). Effects of ebook readers and tablet computers on reading comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(2), 131–139.
  12. Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E‐textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers and Education, 62, 18–23. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016.
  13. de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book‐reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 145–155. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022‐0663.94.1.145.
  14. de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2004). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children's emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 378–393. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.2.
  15. DeLoache, J. S., Chiong, C., Sherman, K., Islam, N., Vanderborght, M., Troseth, G. L., Strouse, G. A. & O'Doherty, K. (2010). Do babies learn from baby media? Psychological Science, 21(11), 1570–4. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384145.
  16. Deocampo, J. A., & Hudson, J. A. (2005). When seeing is not believing: Two‐year‐olds' use of video representations to find a hidden toy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(2), 229–258. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0602_4.
  17. DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.‐A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012.
  18. Drouin, M., & Driver, B. (2012). Texting, textese and literacy abilities: A naturalistic study. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(3), 250–267. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9817.2012.01532.x.
  19. Guernsey, L. (2007). What's educational about “educational” TV. In Into the minds of babes: How Screen time affects children from birth to age five (pp. 113–134). New York: Basic Books.
  20. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.
  21. Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390–408. http://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230910978511.
  22. Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D. M, & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children's development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–49. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐8624.2008.01154.x.
  23. Matthew, K. (1997). A comparison of the influence of interactive CD‐ROM storybooks and traditional print storybooks on reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 1–13.
  24. Killi, C., Laurinen, L., & Marttunen, M. (2008). Students evaluating Internet sources: From versatile evaluators to uncritical readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 75–95.
  25. Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T. H. A. (1996). Longitudinal effects of television on children's leisure‐time reading: A test of three explanatory models. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 4–35.
  26. Korat, O., & Or, T. (2010). How new technology influences parent–child interaction: The case of e‐book reading. First Language, 30(2), 139–154. http://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709359242.
  27. Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2007). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children's emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 248–259. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2729.2006.00213.x.
  28. Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I., et al. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG‐eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS ONE 8(2): e56178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
  29. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2008). Integrating critical Web skills and content knowledge: Development and evaluation of a 5th grade educational program. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 666–692. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.022.
  30. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
  31. Leu, D. J., & Castek, J. (2006). What skills and strategies are characteristic of accomplished adolescent users of the Internet? In Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
  32. Macedo‐Rouet, M., Braasch, J. L. G., Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.‐F. (2013). Teaching fourth and fifth Graders to evaluate information sources during text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 204–226. http://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769995.
  33. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computers and Education, 56(2), 429–440. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
  34. Mason, L., Junyent, A. A., & Tornatora, M. C. (2014). Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web‐source information on controversial science‐related topics: Effects of a short‐term instructional intervention. Computers and Education, 76, 143–157. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.016.
  35. Neuman, S. B. (1988). The displacement effect: Assessing the relation between television viewing and reading performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 414–440.
  36. Nusername. (2013). AskReddit. Retrieved from User “nusernamed” on the entertainment site Reddit: www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/15yaap/if_someone_from_the_1950s_suddenly_appeared_today/c7qyp13?context=5#c7qyp13/.
  37. Ouellette, G., & Michaud, M. (2016). Generation text: Relations among undergraduates' use of text messaging, textese, and language and literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 48(3), 217–221. http://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000046.
  38. Parish‐Morris, J., Mahajan, N., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2011). Once upon a time: Parent–child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 200–211.
  39. Pinker, S. (2010, January). Not at all. Retrieved from http://edge.org/q2010/q10_10.html#pinker/.
  40. Richert, R. A., Robb, M. B., Fender, J. G., & Wartella, E. (2010). Word learning from baby videos. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(5), 432–7. http://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.24.
  41. Richtel, M. (2012, November 1). For better and for worse, technology use alters learning styles, teachers say. New York Times, A18.
  42. Rideout, V. J. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. San Francisco: Common Sense Media.
  43. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberst, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8‐ to 18‐year‐olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Foundation.
  44. Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., Rideout, V. J., Brodie, M. (1999). Kids and media at the new millenium. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. Available at http://kff.org/hivaids/report/kids‐media‐the‐new‐millennium/.
  45. Rosenwald, M. S. (2014, April 6). Serious reading takes a hit from online scanning and skimming, researchers say. Washington Post. Re‐trieved from www.washingtonpost.com/local/serious‐reading‐takes‐a‐hit‐from‐online‐scanning‐and‐skimming‐researchers‐say/2014/04/06/088028d2‐b5d2‐11e3‐b899‐20667de76985_story.html/.
  46. Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2009). To scroll or not to scroll: Scrolling, working memory capacity, and comprehending complex texts. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51(5), 730–738. http://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809352788.
  47. Schank, R. (2010, January). The thinking process hasn't changed in 50,000 years. Retrieved from www.edge.org/response‐detail/11519/.
  48. Segal‐Drori, O., Korat, O., Shamir, A., & Klein, P. S. (2009). Reading electronic and printed books with and without adult instruction: effects on emergent reading. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 913–930. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11145‐009‐9182‐x.
  49. Szalai, A. (1972). The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. Den Haag: Moton.
  50. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second‐order meta‐analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361.
  51. Troseth, G. L., Saylor, M. M., & Archer, A. H. (2006). Young children's use of video as a source of socially relevant information. Child Development, 77(3), 786–99. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐8624.2006.00903.x.
  52. Trushell, J., Burrell, C., & Maitland, A. (2001). Year 5 pupils reading an “interactive storybook” on CD‐ROM: Losing the plot? British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 389–401.
  53. van Dijk, C. N., van Witteloostuijn, M., Vasić, N., Avrutin, S., & Blom, E. (2016). The influence of texting language on grammar and executive functions in primary school children. Plos ONE, 11(3), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152409.
  54. Walraven, A., Brand‐Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2010). Fostering transfer of websearchers' evaluation skills: A field test of two transfer theories. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 716–728. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.008.
  55. Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2016, November 1). Why students can't Google their way to the truth. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/11/02/why‐students‐cant‐google‐their‐way‐to.html
  56. Zhang, S., & Duke, N. K. (2011). The impact of instruction in the WWWDOT framework on students' disposition and ability to evaluate Web sites as sources of information. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 132–154. http://doi.org/10.1086/660687.

Conclusion

  1. Beilock, S. (2010). Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to. New York: Free Press.
  2. Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L. III, & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Chabot, A., Bergen, H., Kawamura, M., & Steubing, F. (2016). Harnessing adolescent values to motivate healthier eating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10830–10835.
  4. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  5. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Basic Books.
  6. National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence‐based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
  7. National Science Board. (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Chapter 7, “Science and Technology: Public attitudes and understanding.” Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 10‐01). Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter‐7/c7h.htm/.
  8. Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
  9. Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  10. Willingham, D. T. (2012). When can you trust the experts? San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.