© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
Liselotte Schebek, Christoph Herrmann and Felipe Cerdas (eds.)Progress in Life Cycle AssessmentSustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Managementhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92237-9_15

Life Cycle Assessment of Industrial Cooling Towers

Christine Schulze1  , Sebastian Thiede1 and Christoph Herrmann1
(1)
Chair of Sustainable Manufacturing and Life Cycle Engineering, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
 
 
Christine Schulze

Abstract

Sustainability and life cycle thinking is becoming part of companies’ “green identity”. For this reason, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a common tool to assess the environmental impacts of manufactured products in order to improve it—starting with raw material selection to efficiency improvements of manufacturing processes and optimization of operation. Focusing the manufacturing stage, usually only the machines and processes directly related to the manufacturing are taken into account for assessment. Peripheral processes e.g. pump and pipe systems and technical building services (TBS) e.g. air conditioning, process water supply, are often neglected due to poor data availability. Supplying cooling water for production machines, cooling towers (CTs) are a central part of the industrial TBS—and therefore part of almost every manufacturing system. Neglecting the environmental impact of CT would result in a major white spot when accomplish a LCA. In order to close this gap, this paper presents the first LCA of industrial CTs showing the hot spots of environmental impacts along the entire CT life cycle.

Keywords

Cooling towerEnergy demandFresh water demand

1 Introduction

Water is one of the most important elements in our daily life and basis of existence for almost every creature on our planet. The “blue planet” is named by the colour of the surface water, which covers 71% of the earth surface. The majority of existing water (97%) occurs as salted water in oceans. The remaining 3% are fresh water e.g. in lakes and rivers or locked up as arctic ice (Perlman 2016). Therefore, fresh water, useable for living purposes, is a very rare resource. Due to climate change, growing population and industrialization, water stress in the year of 2040 is predicted by the World Resource Institute (Luo et al. 2015) for majorly industrialized countries, e.g. USA, China, Australia and European countries such as Spain and Italy. Therefore, the use of water is more and more in focus when companies develop their factory related sustainability strategies (Dehning et al. 2016; Kurle et al. 2015).

In industrial context, water is widely used as operational resource, e.g. for washing processes and heat transfer. The usage of water is one main drivers for total energy consumption in industrial process chains (Thiede et al. 2016). The so-called water-energy-nexus describes the relation of water and energy: energy for water, such as water treatment, pumping, heating etc., water for energy, which is used for e.g. extraction, purification, processing of natural gas, coal and electricity generation (Thiede et al. 2017; Walsh et al. 2015). For LCA in production environment, water is usually only considered as resource for the product with rather neutral impact in case of energy flows. Although, the main share of water is not directly used in products, but for energy and mass transfer in the discrete manufacturing (Kurle et al. 2017). Thus, it is necessary to consider water and water-energy-nexus related devices in factories for LCA studies as well as several studies demonstrated (Lévová and Hauschild 2011; Mousavi et al. 2015). Industrial cooling towers (CT) are an example for the water-energy nexus in manufacturing. Several studies have researched Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for operation and control during the usage stage of CT (Thiede et al. 2017; Cortinovis et al. 2009; Schlei-Peters et al. 2017; Guo et al. 2017; Kurle 2018). The studies prove high environmental impacts in green house gas emissions as well as fresh water demand depending on the operation mode as well as the climatic condition of the location (Schulze et al. 2018). Nevertheless, for a holistic assessment of the environmental impacts of CTs all life cycle stages should be taken into account. For that reason, this study presents an LCA for industrial CTs.

2 Background

2.1 Industrial Cooling Tower Systems

In industrial plants, cooling is demanded by many places. These include in particular machines that require cooling for their components or processes. Since these machines are distributed throughout the entire plant location, often decentralized cooling-supply is required. As a rule, CT systems are used if the waste heat is not available for further use (Kurle et al. 2016). A detailed overview of the components, energy and mass flows can be found in Fig. 1. The heated water from the production machines is supplied via pump and pipe system and sprayed into the upper part of the CT. In counter flow, ambient air is forced-draft in by a fan. Through energy and mass transfer between water and air, the water is cooled down while the air is saturated with evaporating water. In order to maximize the time for energy and mass transfer, fillers are installed in the CT where the water slowly flows down. Finally, the cooled water is pumped back to the production machines. As thermodynamically open systems, the operation of CT is highly impacted by the environmental conditions of the location. Warm and humid climate impairs the energy and mass transfer leading to higher air demand and fan operation (Schulze et al. 2018).
../images/462404_1_En_15_Chapter/462404_1_En_15_Fig1_HTML.gif
Fig. 1

Elements of industrial CTs (Schulze et al. 2018)

For industrial purposes, different types of re-cooling systems are broadly differentiated by the type of coolant: dry or wet as well as the type of air supply natural-draft ventilation or forced-draft ventilation. Hence, different construction types are developed for the special field of application. Dry coolers, using only the ambient air as coolant, are used for low cooling requirements or flexible locations without large-scale infrastructure use. Thereby ventilators are used to ventilate the objects to be cooled, e.g. for slow cooling of products. Due to the low heat capacity of air, the cooling capacity of dry CT is limited (Schodorf and Geiger 2012). If larger waste heat streams need to be cooled, coolants with higher heat capacity are used. As a technical medium with one of the highest heat capacities, fresh water is often used as a coolant. In the so-called wet CT types, the warm water is cooled in the ambient air while partly evaporate the water. The evaporation increases the cooling capacity and therefore wet CT can be used also for higher ambient heat temperatures (24–26 °C) during the summer time (Schodorf and Geiger 2012). Furthermore, a particular distinction is made between the types of air supply: natural-draft by using the so-called chimney effect and force-draft ventilation by fan. CTs with forced-draft ventilation are usually used at industrial sites as described above. In contrast to other types, the design can be significantly more compact and requires less space at factories’ sites. In addition, the formation of visible vapour can be avoided. Vapours can be carriers of legionellae, which may be a danger for humans in the workplace.

2.2 Life Cycle Stages of Industrial Cooling Tower

For industrial purposes, usually forced-draft CT are used to meet the cooling demand of lower temperature waste heat from production machines. In this compact-designed type of CT water is used as coolant. The generic life cycle of an industrial used CT has four stages: raw material, manufacturing, usage and end of life. For every life cycle stage several inputs and outputs such as energy, water and emissions determine the environmental impacts related with the CT system. In the next sections, these inputs and outputs are described (Fig. 2).
../images/462404_1_En_15_Chapter/462404_1_En_15_Fig2_HTML.gif
Fig. 2

Generic life cycle stages of industrial CTs, inputs and outputs

  • Raw material and manufacturing stage

The compact building type of industrial CTs consist mainly of steel and plastics. The body is usually made of galvanized or stainless steel by performing processes like cold forming, welding and riveting. Further installations such as nozzles for water spraying, fillers packages, mist eliminators and covers are typically made of plastics, mainly polyvinylchloride. Injection moulding and film extrusion processes are main processes used for their production. The water supply is realized by a pump and pipe system towards and back from the production machines. For pump and fan engines, electrical motors are used (Schodorf and Geiger 2012; Berliner 1975). A scheme of a typical industrial CT with its main parts is presented in Fig. 1.
  • Usage stage

The usage stage of a CT can last some decades. Usually TBSs are operated permanently during production time of the manufacturing processes, which can be for instance six days with three shifts a week. During the operation time, the coolant water is pumped to the top of the CT and air flow is ventilated in counter flow direction by the fan. For the operation of pumps and fan, electrical energy is consumed. In addition, due to evaporation and blow-down the fresh water demand of CT is a remarkably factor for environmental impacts. Typical industrial CT operate with water as coolant, which is taken either from groundwater or from public water supply. Contaminated cooling water is removed as waste water by blow-down and replaced with fresh water. The fillers are replaced regularly by maintenance.
  • End of life stage

At the end of the usage stage, the CT can completely disassembled. The steel body can be treated as scrap steel. The electric motors of the pumps and fan can be treated as electric scrap. The fillers are treated as scrap plastic.

2.3 Approaches for Life Cycle Assessments of Industrial Cooling Towers

Different approaches and studies looking at environmental impacts from CT have been identified. Several authors assess the usage of CTs as part of a building or energy generation system. Many approaches particularly focus on water losses through evaporation as well as resulting fresh water demand (Burkhardt et al. 2011; Koroneos and Tsarouhis 2012; Guerra et al. 2014; Ali and Kumar 2016). In industrial context, several studies have been published focusing on the energy and water efficiency of industrial CTs during the use stage (Thiede et al. 2017; Kurle et al. 2017; Schlei-Peters et al. 2017). In Schodorf and Geiger (2012) the usage stage of different types of CT are compared regarding energy demand, CO2 footprint and costs to give a broad overview of the pro’s and con’s of each type. For the assessment of the economic efficiency and CO2 footprint of evaporation and hybrid CT, the Mechanical Engineering Industry Association (VDMA) published a guideline (Markus et al. 2015). It also focuses on the use stage of CT, arguing that CO2 emissions from manufacturing stage would account less than 1% of the total CO2 emissions over the whole life cycle. Schulze et al. present an analysis of the environmental impacts from industrial CTs operation considering individual climate data and energy mixes for different locations (Schulze et al. 2018). Nevertheless, for the holistic assessment of environmental impacts over the whole lifetime a life cycle assessment is necessary.

3 Life Cycle Assessment of Industrial Cooling Towers

In order to perform an LCA study, the regarded CT system with its system boundaries is described and goal and scope are defined. Subsequently, the underlying data for the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) is presented followed by the results of the Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). The model for LCIA was built in the software environment UMBERTO.

3.1 Goal and Scope Definition

The object of this case study is an industrial force-draft CT as part of the TBS of an automotive production plant located in Germany. The CT system includes pump and pipe system, transporting the warm water to and back from the production. Furthermore, the air-draft is soken by the fan located on the top of the cooling tower in counter flow direction to the water. In order to increase the time for energy and mass transfer, the water rinses down over filler built into the cooling tower. As the outcome of CT operation is cooled water, the cooling of 1 kg water from 35 to 28 °C in Germany for the overall usage time is chosen as the functional unit for the LCA. The impact assessment has been conducted using CML 2001 methodology.

As it is assumed that all processes of the life cycle take place in Germany, data for this area have been used. For raw materials and manufacturing of industrial CT, mainly stainless steel coils for the body and polyvinylchloride films (PVC) for the filler packages are considered. The fillers are replaced completely every 5 years as maintenance and prevention for clogging. For the peripheral aggregates, electric motors for pumps and a fan are taken into account. Due to the individual CT design, the pipe system is neglected in this use case. The usage time of this CT accounts for 20 years. During this time, the electricity demand of pumps and fan are considered as energy input flows. Furthermore, regular exchange of cooling water causes fresh water demand as well as waste water generation. As in this case study the CT is located in Germany, data for the energy and fresh water demand for the location of Berlin are taken from Schulze et al. (2018). In end-of-life, a treatment of the scrap is considered for the fractions steel, plastics and electrical components. The details and data for LCI are listed in Table 1.

3.2 Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Industrial Cooling Towers

In order to analyse the LCI, the flows of energy and material in each life cycle stage have to be determined. Adequate datasets have been selected from Ecoinvent 3 database for modelling the resource demand in UMBERTO (Ecoinvent 2016).

3.3 Results of the Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)

The impact assessment has been conducted using CML 2001 methodology. The LCIA results are presented exemplarily in Fig. 3, as well as detailed in Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 for the categories climate change GWP 100a, human toxicity HTP 100a, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, FAETP 100a, terrestrial ecotoxicity TAETP 100a.
../images/462404_1_En_15_Chapter/462404_1_En_15_Fig3_HTML.gif
Fig. 3

Total impact share of life cycle stages on the impact categories GWP, HTP, FAETP, TAETP exemplarily, results in percent [%]

The results coincide that the environmental impacts primarily occur during the usage stage of the industrial CT. The life cycle stages of raw material and manufacturing as well as end of life only play minor roles here. These findings correlate with findings of previous studies (Markus et al. 2015). The high environmental impact during the usage stage results from the long operation time (20 years and continuously demand of electrical energy and fresh water).

Focussing the impact category climate change, GWP 100a, a contribution analysis is presented in Fig. 4. Comparing the resource in- and outputs listed in Table 1, the electrical energy demand is by far related to the highest GWP, followed by the fresh water demand and waste water treatment. Thus, the three main driver processes for GWP are part of the usage stage, explaining its dominant share regarding total GWP (96%). The processes of raw material and manufacturing stage accounts for only 3.75% of total GWP. The end of life process GWP impacts are negligible. This can be explained by the effective recycling treatment of stainless steel and low-emission end of life treatment of PVC and electrical devices. The detailed results can be found in Table 2 (Appendix).
../images/462404_1_En_15_Chapter/462404_1_En_15_Fig4_HTML.gif
Fig. 4

Results for climate change, GWP 100a

Table 1

LCI of the industrial CT (Schulze et al. 2018)

Life cycle stage

Objective

Amount

Unit

Raw materials and manufacturing

Stainless steel (body)

850.0

kg

PVC (fillers)

192.3

kg

2 electrical motors 18 kW (pumps)

600.0

kg

Electrical motor 15 kW (fan)

135.0

kg

Usage

Operating hours

8500

h/a

Electrical energy demand

864.0

MWh

Fresh water demand

63740000.0

kg

Waste water generation

21246000.7

kg

End of life

Electric scrap

735.0

kg

Scrap steel

850.0

kg

Waste PVC

192.3

kg

Table 2

LCIA results for climate change, GWP 100a [kg CO2-eq]

Life cycle stage

Processes of CT life cycle

[kg CO2-eq]

Total share (%)

Raw material and manufacturing

2 electric motors (pump)

2350.92

3.75

Electric motor (fan)

528.96

Stainless steel (body)

3036.88

PVC (fillers)

11,821.11

Usage

Wastewater treatment

8157.32

96.04

Electrical energy demand

427,639.13

Fresh water demand

18,766.55

End of life

Waste PVC

682.85

0.14

Electronics scrap

314.01

Scrap steel

5.73

Results

 

473,303.46

100.00

4 Conclusion and Outlook

This paper presents the first LCA of industrial CTs, identifying the hot spots regarding environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. Confirming previous studies reviewed before, the results show that the usage stage has been revealed as the main driver for environmental impacts. This conclusion can be drawn for the selected impact categories GWP, HTP, FAETP and TAETP respectively. This can be explained by the long usage time of 20 years, which is not unusual for TBS devices. With a zoom in for GWP, the electrical energy demand for pump and fan operation is the main driver of environmental impact by far. Furthermore, water-based objectives as fresh water demand and water treatment are at the next positions for environmental impact. As mentioned before, cooling tower is an example of the water-energy nexus in production, it is necessary to consider water in LCA studies. As CT operation is highly impacted by the environmental conditions, different locations should be considered for future LCA work as well. As the environmental footprint of countries’ specific electricity generation mix is typically in continuous change, in particular due to a significant increase in installations of renewable energies, further work should consider future electricity mixes as well. A first study considering different locations and energy mixes is given by Schulze et al. (2018), focussing the usage stage only. Furthermore, there are various types of CT which entail different environmental impacts (Schodorf and Geiger 2012). This study has been applied for an open circuit draft-forced CT only, which is one of the main applied types for industrial purposes. For further studies, the authors propose the extension of the objective to a broaden range of CT types.