The letters to and from the city of Cologne brought me right back to the subject of history, pre-Uni. While I was being navigated through the likely questions for my Highers, the British Army pushed for a result in a no-go part of Londonderry. The headlines on the banned civil rights march failed to prompt discussion in our class. Of course it wasn’t history then. But it was, by the evening of the 30th January 1972. Or was it? Question: do you have to wait to the end of the day, the end of the month or the end of the year till events are indeed history? No, we never got asked that one either.
For the UK government this was a constitutional question, an internal matter. It could be a different story, abroad, if states wanted to break away or reunite. Also on 30th January 1972, Britain, Australia and New Zealand recognised Bangladesh. Pakistan then withdrew from the Great Commonwealth. For the new Secretary-General of the UN, the aforementioned former Nazi soldier, Northern Ireland was just another civil war. The United Kingdom was a bit curt (sorry) when the Austrian offered to act as a go-between.
So it was not even a thirty per cent possible question:
‘Why were thirteen civilians left dead on the streets and many more wounded by British Army fire during a civil rights March in Londonderry on the 30th January 1972?’ Let’s attempt to apply my history teacher’s methodology to the question that wasn’t asked. I’m a bit rusty on how this is done. History was a bit of a different subject, at Uni. How far back can we go in the attempt to determine a cause for an effect?
The deaths and woundings which occurred in Derry on 30th January 1972 were the result of a complex combination of circumstances, which had developed over a period of centuries. William of Orange’s victory at the Battle of the Boyne has remained a potent symbol, used by both sides. ‘Remember 1690.’ The vibrancy of the colour orange, as manifested on sashes worn on marches and mural paintings displayed on gables in Loyalist areas of Belfast and Londonderry, is set against the intensity of the colour green, which features prominently on murals in Republican areas.
Musical rhythms provide a further manifestation of two opposing cultures. The Lambeg drum has long been used by the Protestant side to project a steady, military and very loud beat, offset by high-pitched fifes. These expressions of the localised domination of one group over another are bound to lead to a series of reactions and counter-actions.
In contrast, Republican songs often work within a Celtic ballad tradition, where narrative and lyrical phrasing is to the fore. Often the lyrics are sentimental. There are many historical precedents for the use of an anthem by a group regarded as ‘Rebel’. Despite the horrors of a more mechanised warfare, there are still romantic songs relating to the ‘Rebel’ forces in the American Civil War.
An additional tier has been brought into the tension by the military traditions associated with particular regiments, deployed with the aim of enforcing the UK government’s policies in Northern Ireland. The distinctive maroon berets of ‘the paras’ or the green and black of Black Watch tartan bring their own associations into the complex mix.
The process of colonisation has left inevitable resentment. There are clear parallels between the encouragement of the Planters across the north of Ireland by King James I/VI and other historical situations.
Right, that’s enough of that. I just don’t get it that the Jewish settlers took over Palestinian farms and properties. Just like the Nazis gave confiscated lands to ‘ethnic Germans’ in Czechoslovakia after murdering or deporting the ‘inferior’ folk who were in them.
It was maybe inevitable that the Army would come to be seen as a force of occupation. Violence escalated, in the form of killings and explosions. The degree of ruthlessness, in bombing ‘campaigns’ which were bound to lead to high numbers of civilian casualties, is World War Two again. The failure of successive UK governments to instigate enquiries into the conduct of their troops was another factor. On the thirtieth anniversary of ‘Bloody Sunday’ it’s still not easy to decipher it all. Let’s fucking try.
Civil rights, in matters of arrest and justice, had been withdrawn as a security measure. One side said that not enough terrorist convictions were being made under the normal judge and jury system, so suspension of these rights and adoption of ‘internment’, was a necessary measure. The policy of imprisonment without trial and its apparent application to one sector more than another, led to the decision to organise that civil rights march through Derry.
Now how the hell do we change tack on this argument? The slick teacher did indeed give us a choice of four phrases but I can’t be arsed planting one in.
What about Heath’s memories? It was the Wilson government which first ordered the troops across the North Channel. But Heath was at the helm when it became a war. Sorry. My chronology is arse about face. We’re going backwards and forwards. But we’re going to Derry now.
So, let’s think of the paras in their signature maroon headgear, cooped up and hearing the usual rain of bricks. You’re behind a hot metal wall, in a powered steel pram. You’ve been issued the rounds and told again. You are the agent of delivery. In your warpaint, psyched for the game, this is it. It’s come from the highest authority that you ‘scoop up the yobos’. Once you’ve got separation from the rest of the crowd, you go in. If you see anything, let this be clear, you shoot first.
The boys’ bellbottom jeans are no longer flapping. The old guy who’s gone to help the wounded chap on the ground is killed with him. The priest is waving the hankie that’s more red than white. He’s as near immortal as you can get. He’s an image of the day. He stays at the age he was, on that day.
If the march hadn’t been declared illegal; if the organisers had responded to the risk; if the Army had responded to the Constabulary; if the boys hadn’t started throwing bricks; if the difference between the British Army’s shots and the IRA’s was clear; if the major had stood up to the brigadier; if the sergeant-major had more control; if the mother’s sons under maroon berets hadn’t been psyched up for a result.
The film-makers have taught me better than the historians. Two works appeared in close succession to mark the thirtieth anniversary. McGovern and Greengrass. They are both documentaries but events are dramatised. Is that fiction or non-fiction?
I don’t know. There’s a few things we can’t know. What would have happened if…?
If the single inquiring judge hadn’t been only one; if he hadn’t been personally briefed by the Prime Minister; if the conclusion had not been composed before the evidence was heard… Maybe people in the streets might have thought they could still influence the course of history, without guns and bombs. Hell happened on the streets of more than one city and town and village and prison and home.
What about all the mother’s sons dragged out from in front of the telly and shot on their own front doorstep by the guys who thought they were heroes? What about the bairns blown to bits? It wasn’t till the 21st August 1976 that Betty Williams and Mairead Corrigan led the Northern Ireland Women’s Peace Movement through the Belfast streets. It was out of desperation. The casualties that year reached the worst since 1972 with 175 killed and 1,470 injured. There’s no statistics can get us into the minds of those who issued the orders. On best available information, at the time. That, of course, is information selected by higher authority.
The man at the helm, Edward Heath, must have had his own private hauntings in the years to follow. The latest version of the offshore yacht-racing gospel, according to Sparkmann and Stephens of New York, was commissioned by the then Prime Minister. Morning Cloud II went down, with loss of life, during a delivery trip in 1974. Crew had signed up for wages and no doubt for the kudos of sailing the PM’s yacht. I can’t even start to imagine how the ‘highest authority’ looked back on that decade. Remember that my own father was trapped in both a tank and a ship. I’m guessing that Heath was also troubled by the deeds of the paras but, politically, he could only pay his condolences to the crew he’d personally hired. There was no apology for Bloody Sunday, not in his lifetime.
At what point do you know that a plunging yacht is not going to recover? Maybe he could see the sheets being let go. Everything flying free but the sea still pouring into the cockpit and the heeling continuing to that point of no return. Or maybe the lads just heard a sudden bang. Then they were upside down with broken gear everywhere. Hissing electrics. The conscious ones braced, holding breath and waiting to see if she would come back up. Maybe she did but the mast was down, fractured, so the sharp bits were knocking holes in the hull. Where were the wire-cutters? But the noise factor would be knackering your normal ability to think it out. The skipper’s voice would probably be calm. ‘We’ll deal with this.’ But everyone would know that Morning Cloud II wasn’t coming back from this one and some of the lads wouldn’t get out.
No Foul Play was suspected. It was an accident, not an act of revenge. I don’t believe it was a supernatural event, divinely inspired to remind the powerful that it is human beings who drive racing machines, and human beings who comprise a march.
And the conclusions? Not sure I believe in conclusions, now. Not sure I did when I was sitting Higher History. But trailing ends are slack bastard things that foul your prop. So let’s look at a few strands again.
An obituary in the New York Times quotes the historian Robert Edwin Herzstein’s conclusion on the war record of the former Secretary-General of the UN:
Waldheim was clearly not a psychopath like Dr Josef Mengele nor a hate-filled racist like Adolf Hitler. His very ordinariness, in fact, may be the most important thing about him.
And let’s look again at the careers of two teachers, one in the new (West) Germany and one who found his home on a Hebridean island. So what happened to the masculine man in the brown tracksuit? No-one complained, to Gabriele’s knowledge. He continued to teach, as far as we know. And the man who taught us to arrange summaries of historical data in mechanical order? He got results, as assessed in exams. So if that is the aim of education, he was indeed successful. He was promoted to the highest level. He was promoted out of teaching. A strong case could be made out for that being a good thing.