Index

  • Accountability, 20, 68
  • Administrators
    • credibility of, 14–18, 19 (table)
    • self-care for, 8–11
    • taking care of colleagues, 12–14, 14 (table)
    • See also Leadership
  • Adult learning theory, 34
  • Agency, 104
  • American Academy of Family Physicians, 14
  • Andragogy, 34
  • Asked-for feedback, 110
  • Assessments, 97–101
  • Autonomy, 20
  • Barron, K. E., 102–103
  • Baseline for measurement in expectations, 68
  • Beaudoin, M. F., 3
  • Benevolence, 15
  • Breaks, regular, 9, 44
  • Brown, V., 76
  • Capacity, 20, 48
  • Challenge, striving for, 107–109
  • Chambers, M., 66
  • Change agents, administrators as, 103–106
  • Charisma, 16
  • Chavez, A., 11
  • Check-ins with staff members, 12–13, 26, 43
  • Clarity in expectations, 68
    • of teachers, 72–76
  • Climate. See School climate
  • Clinton, J., 94
  • Coaching and facilitating in distance learning, 85–87
  • Collaborating in distance learning, 83–85
  • Collaborative inquiry cycles, 38–42, 39–40 (figure)
  • Collective teacher efficacy, 101–103
  • Communication
    • in dialogue more than monologue, 113–116
    • of expectations, 68
  • Compassion fatigue, 13–14, 14 (table)
  • Competence, 15, 17
  • Competency, 15
  • Consortium for Chicago Schools Research (CCSR), 23
  • Covey, S. M. R., 15
  • COVID-19 pandemic, 1, 6, 124–125
  • Credibility, leader, 14–18
  • Critical thinking, 72, 73
  • Culturally sustaining pedagogies (CSP), 76–77
  • Culture, 7, 27
  • Daily welcome messages, 26
  • Data collection, 97–101
  • Decisional capital, 104, 106
  • Dedicated workspaces, 9
  • Deliberate practice, 88
  • Demonstrating in distance learning, 81–83
  • Dialogue, engaging in, 113–116
  • Direct instruction, 81–82
  • Discussion skills, 85
  • Distance learning, 1–3
    • coaching and facilitating in, 85–87
    • collaborating in, 83–85
    • culturally sustaining pedagogies (CSP) in, 76–77
    • demonstrating in, 81–83
    • distributed leadership and, 21, 21 (figure)
    • expectations for, 69–70
    • input training, 42–45
    • instructional framework for, 78–80, 78 (figure)
    • learning beliefs at a distance and, 36–37, 37 (figure)
    • microteaching in, 51–52, 52–54 (figure)
    • need for professional learning and, 34–35
    • personalized learning, 55–56, 56 (figure)
    • practicing in, 87–89
    • revisiting school goals in light of, 65–67
    • safe practice in, 46–47
    • school climate and (See School climate)
    • social presence in, 57–58, 58 (figure)
    • stakeholder advisory groups for, 23–24
    • virtual learning walks in, 47–50, 49 (figure)
    • virtual visibility in, 25–26
  • Distance Learning Playbook for Parents, 59
  • Distributed leadership, 20–21, 21 (figure)
  • Donohoo, J., 101
  • Dynamism, 16, 17
  • Education Trust, 24
  • Elliott, J. K., 13
  • Elliott, K. W., 13
  • Empathetic feedback, 110–111
  • Empathy, 72, 73, 110–111
  • Empowerment, 68, 104
  • Escobedo, F., 8
  • Expectations
    • aligning goals to, 68–71
    • clarifying teacher, 72–76
    • distance learning, 69–70
  • Explanations and examples, 83
  • Families
    • explicit communication of goals with, 117–119, 117 (figure)
    • parent education and support for, 59–61
    • surveys of, 28–30 (figure)
    • ties with communities and, 23, 26
  • Feedback, understanding and acting on, 110–112, 112 (figure)
  • Feel of school, 26–31, 28–30 (figure)
  • Figley, C. R., 13
  • First-person statements, 82
  • Garmson, R., 113
  • Genuineness, 72, 73
  • Getty, S., 102–103
  • Goal orientation, 107
  • Goals
    • aligned to expectations, 68–71
    • explicit information on, 117–119, 117 (figure)
    • lesson, 87
    • revisited in light of distance learning, 65–67
    • striving for, 107–109
  • Goldberg, S., 108
  • GREAT model, 110
  • Grouping, 87
  • Growth-oriented feedback, 110
  • Hattie, J., 1, 3
  • Health, Safety, Security, and Environment (HSSE) plans, 65
  • Healthy eating, 9
  • Honesty, 15
  • Hopkinson, D., 6
  • Hoy, A., 15, 38
  • Hulleman, C. S., 102–103
  • Human capital, 104, 106
  • I am a change agent and I believe all teachers and students can improve mindframe, 103–106
  • I am an evaluator of my impact on teacher and student learning mindframe, 93–96, 95 (figure)
  • I build relationships and trust so that learning can occur in a place where it is safe to make mistakes and learn from others mindframe, 120–122
  • I collaborate with my peers and my teachers about my conceptions of progress and my impact mindframe, 101–103
  • I engage as much in dialogue as in monologue mindframe, 113–116
  • I explicitly inform teachers and students what successful impact looks like from the outset mindframe, 117–119, 117 (figure)
  • I give and help students and teachers understand feedback and I interpret and act on feedback given to me mindframe, 110–112, 112 (figure)
  • Immediacy, 16, 17
  • Influencer Marketing Hub, 25
  • Input training, 42–45
  • Institute for Organization Management, 68
  • Instructional framework, distance learning, 78–80, 78 (figure)
  • Instructional leadership, 64–65
    • aligning goals to expectations, 68–71
    • clarifying teacher expectations, 72–76
    • coaching and facilitating in distance learning and, 85–87
    • collaborating in distance learning and, 83–85
    • demonstrating in distance learning and, 81–83
    • distance learning instructional framework and, 78–80, 78 (figure)
    • ensuring culturally sustaining pedagogies, 76–77
    • practicing in distance learning and, 87–89
    • revisiting school goals in light of distance learning and, 65–67
  • Instructional leadership teams (ILT), 6, 20–22, 21 (figure), 36
    • collaborative inquiry cycles and, 38
  • Internal dialogue, 82
  • I see assessment as informing my impact and next steps mindframe, 97–101
  • “I” statements, 82
  • I strive for challenge rather than merely doing my best mindframe, 107–109
  • Kapur, M., 120
  • Knowles, M., 34
  • Kosovich, J. L., 102–103
  • KSS method, 108–109
  • LarkApps, 110
  • Leader credibility, 14–18, 19 (table)
  • Leadership
    • distributed, 20–21, 21 (figure)
    • instructional (See Instructional leadership)
    • major functions of, 22
    • mindframes in (See Mindframes)
    • transformational, 64
    • See also Administrators
  • Leana, C., 104
  • Learning beliefs survey, 36–37, 37 (figure)
  • Learning management systems (LMS), 48, 50
  • Learning walks, virtual, 47–50, 49 (figure)
  • Links to learning in collaboration, 85
  • Lloyd, C. A., 64
  • Manna, P., 2
  • Marcus, L., 65–66
  • Martin, 107
  • Mastery orientation, 107
  • McNulty, E. J., 65–66
  • Mehrabian, A., 16
  • Microteaching, 51–52, 52–54 (figure)
  • Midles, R., 20
  • Mindframes, 92–93
    • I am a change agent and I believe all teachers and students can improve, 103–106
    • I am an evaluator of my impact on teacher and student learning, 93–96, 95 (figure)
    • I build relationships and trust so that learning can occur in a place where it is safe to make mistakes and learn from others, 120–122
    • I collaborate with my peers and my teachers about my conceptions of progress and my impact, 101–103
    • I engage as much in dialogue as in monologue, 113–116
    • I explicitly inform teachers and students what successful impact looks like from the outset, 117–119, 117 (figure)
    • I focus on learning and the language of learning, 122–125
    • I give and help students and teachers understand feedback and I interpret and act on feedback given to me, 110–112, 112 (figure)
    • I see assessment as informing my impact and next steps, 97–101
    • I strive for challenge rather than merely doing my best, 107–109
  • Mindset check-ins, 12
  • Modeling, 83
  • Monitoring, 85
  • Monologue, 113–116
  • Morning routines, 9
  • National Preparedness Leadership Initiative, 65–66
  • National School Reform Faculty, 99
  • New leadership, 105
  • New York Times, 122
  • Nichols, K., 20
  • Nondirectivity, 72, 73
  • Office hours for families, 26
  • Omnibus T-scale, 18, 19 (table)
  • Openness, 15
  • Optimus Performance, 108
  • Pacing, 83
  • Paraphrasing, 113
  • Parent education and support, 59–61
  • Pausing, 113
  • Paying attention to self and others, 114
  • Peer collaboration, 83–85
  • Pérez, L., 6
  • Personalized learning, 55–56, 56 (figure)
  • Personal learning network (PLN), 55
  • Posing questions, 113
  • Practicing in distance learning, 87–89
  • Presentation Zen, 16
  • Presuming positive intentions, 114
  • Principal trust survey, 112 (figure)
  • Productive failure, 120–121
  • Productive success, 120–121
  • Professional capacity of staff, 23, 48
  • Professional capital, 104
  • Professional learning
    • collaborative inquiry cycles in, 38–42, 39–40 (figure)
    • input training, 42–45
    • learning beliefs at a distance and, 36–37, 37 (figure)
    • microteaching in, 51–52, 52–54 (figure)
    • need for, 34–35
    • parent education and support and, 59–61
    • personalized learning in, 55–56, 56 (figure)
    • principles of adult learning theory and, 34
    • safe practice in, 46–47
    • social presence and, 57–58, 58 (figure)
    • virtual learning walks in, 47–50, 49 (figure)
  • Prompting turn taking, 114
  • Providing data, 114
  • Putting ideas on the table, 114
  • Real feedback, 110
  • Reference point for expectations, 68
  • Reflection, 44
  • Reliability, 15
  • Richardson, S., 64
  • Rigor, 83, 87
  • Robinson, V. M. J., 64
  • Routines
    • collaboration, 85
    • morning, 9
  • Rowe, K. J., 64
  • Russo, R., 6
  • Safe practice in professional learning, 46–47
  • Salcedo, J., 92
  • Scaffolding, 87
  • School climate
    • administrator self-care and, 8–11
    • defined, 7
    • distance learning and, 6–7
    • feel of school and, 26–31, 28–30 (figure)
    • instructional leadership teams (ILT) in, 6, 20–22, 21 (figure)
    • leader credibility and, 14–18, 19 (table)
    • major functions of leadership and, 22
    • stakeholder advisory groups and, 23–24
    • taking care of colleagues and, 12–14, 14 (table)
    • virtual visibility and, 25–26
  • Second-person statements, 82
  • Self-care, administrator, 8–11
  • Sleep, 9
  • Smith, R., 3
  • Social capital, 104, 106
  • Social presence, 57–58, 58 (figure)
  • Solly, B., 20
  • Spaced practice, 88
  • Spears, S. G., 13
  • Speed of Trust, The, 15
  • Staff meetings, 12–13, 26, 92
    • input training, 42–45
  • Stakeholder advisory groups, 23–24
  • Statement of goals for lessons, 83
  • Student Achievement Partners, 34
  • Student-centered learning climate, 23
  • Student-teacher interactions, 74–76
  • Success stories, 16
  • Surveys
    • family, 28–30 (figure)
    • learning beliefs, 36–37, 37 (figure)
    • principal trust, 112 (figure)
  • Task design, 85
  • Think-alongs, 82
  • Timely feedback, 110
  • Transformational leadership, 64
  • Trejo, D., 51–52
  • Trust, 14–15, 17
    • mindframe for building, 120–122
    • Omnibus T-Scale on, 18, 19 (table)
    • principal trust survey, 112 (figure)
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., 15, 38
  • Unconditional positive regard, 72, 73
  • Unproductive failure, 120–121
  • Unproductive success, 120–121
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 68
  • Virtual learning walks, 47–50, 49 (figure)
  • Virtual visibility, 25–26
  • Visibility, virtual, 25–26
  • Visible Learning, 1–2, 2 (figure), 88, 124
  • Vygotsky, L. S., 86
  • Wellman, B., 113
  • William, D., 2