62

This game, like the last two, illustrates Fischer’s ability to blend the tactical and technical in the endgame. Botvinnik later compared him to his most famous student. “From a combinational point of view, I suggest Kasparov outstripped Fischer,” he wrote. “But in the endgame, Fischer was stronger.”

Bent Larsen – Fischer

Monte Carlo 1967
King’s Indian Defense, Classical Variation (E97)

1

d4

f6

2

c4

g6

3

c3

g7

4

e4

d6

5

e2

0-0

6

f3

e5

7

0-0

c6

8

e3

 

Larsen had injected several ideas into the Classical King’s Indian. For example, in Benko’s line, 8 d5 e7 9 e1 d7 10 f3 f5 11 g4, he showed that what was considered the book refutation – 11...h5 12 g5 h4 13 d3 f4 followed by winning the g-pawn – was actually a strong gambit after 14 h1 f7 15 c5 h8 16 b3!.

8

...

e8

9

dxe5

 

Black is at least equal after 9 d5 d4! (10 xd4 exd4 11.xd4 xe4).

9

...

dxe5

10

xd8

xd8

11

b5

e6

12

g5

e7

White’s pressure is strong after 12...xg5 13 xg5 e7 14 ad1 e6 15 f4!.

13

fd1

 

Najdorf, who popularized 8...e8, had pronounced 13 xa7 f4! good for Black.

illustration

13

...

b6!

Fischer is the first to vary from book (his ninth match game with Reshevsky, which went 13...c6 14 xe6 xe6 15 c3 d7). Larsen had been waiting to test a new idea – 13...c6 14 xa7! d7 15 xe6 xe6 16 f3.

14

c5!

xc5!

One point of the pawn sacrifice is 14...bxc5 15 xe6 xe6 16 xc5 d7 17 f3 and Black’s pawns are just too weak (17...c6 18 xd7 xd7 19 c7).

15

d8+

f8

White also has a big edge after 15...e8? 16 xe8+ xe8 17 xc5 bxc5 18 c4 (18...d6 19 xd6 cxd6 20 xf7 f8 21 xd6).

16

xa7

xa7

17

xc8

g7

With this Black anticipates h6 (17...cxe4?? 18 xe4 xe4 19 h6 and wins) and declines an invitation into 17...b3 18 d1 xa2 19 dd8 d7 20 h4! threatening c4 or b5.

Fischer later said 17...h6 18 f3 g7 19 xc5 bxc5 was a straighter road to equality but even then White is a bit better, e.g. 20 d3 c4 21 xc4 xe4 22 d8. Better is 17...e8 18 xe8 xe8 with equality.

18

f3

e8

19

a3

 

Fischer thought 19 xc5 bxc5 20 b8 was best but there’s little if anything after 20...f6 followed by ...d6/...e8.

19

...

d6

Now 20 b8 d7! 21 d8 b7 leads to a repetition of moves.

20

d8

h6

21

h3

e6

22

b8

e8

23

xe8

xe8

illustration

24

b5

 

The position is dead even and only Larsen’s eternal optimism changes that. He wants to prevent ...c5 and considers planting the bishop on c6.

24

...

d6

Now 25 c6? c4 26 c1 c5+ favors Black.

25

f1

b7!

26

f2

c5

27

xc5

bxc5

28

d1

h5

This avoids the complications of 28...d4 29 g4 f6 30 f4! – although Black stands perfectly well after 30...xe4 31 fxe5 fxe5 32 xe5 c5.

After the text White should acknowledge the way of the world, play 29 d3 and f2 and offer a handshake.

29

d5

f6

30

h4

e7!

Now 31 xe5?? c6 seals the rook’s doom (32...f6). White’s position slowly deteriorates now.

31

c4

c6

32

d2

d4

33

f1

f5!

34

b4?

 

In his calculations Larsen missed either Black’s 34th or 35th move. Again 34 d3 was better although Black can play for a win after 34...xd3 and ...f4.

34

...

b5!

35

g8

fxe4!

Now the e-pawn is a major weakness. Black is also winning after 36 bxc5 e3 37 d3 exf2 38 xf2 (38 f4 f6 39 xf2 f5 is slightly better) a8 39 a2 b4 or 37 xd4 exd4 38 d3 xa3.

36

fxe4

d7

37

d3

a6

38

c3

 

illustration

38

...

c5

This is one of Fischer’s most famous moves – an echo of Larsen’s own pawn sacrifice on the same square, at move 14. But it’s an error.

With the more precise 38...a8! Black wins quickly, e.g. 39 a2 c5! 40 bxc5 b4. Then 41 g3 xc5 and ...b3 wins. The key point is that 41 c1 xa3 now attacks the bishop – and after 42 d5 c3 43 b1 xc5 44 d1 c2 or 43 xc3 bxc3 44 d3 c2 the game would likely have ended some 10 moves earlier than it did.

39

g4?

 

A typical time-pressure stab. White could have exploited Black’s miscue with 39 bxc5 b4! 40 c1!. Fischer said the outcome is uncertain then (40...a8 41 d5; 40...xa3 41 c6 or 40...bxa3 41 a2). Closer to a win is 40...f6 41 a2 xa3 42 c6 d8.

39

...

c4

40

gxh5

gxh5

The crippled a-pawn and the lack of a good square for White’s bishop prove decisive.

41

d5

f6

White has counterplay after 41...b3 42 g3!.

42

g3

xd5

43

exd5

f6

Now 44 g1? e2+ or 44 e1 f4.

44

g2

f5

45

h3

g6+

46

f3

d4+

47

e3

 

Fischer pointed out that 47 e4 d6 was zugzwang. For example, 48 h2 g3 or 48 a4? bxa4 49 a3 g1 50 xa4?? e1 mate.

47

...

g2

The rest was kinderspiel:

48 h1 d6 49 e4+ xd5 50 c3+ e6 51 c1 h2 52 a4 h3+! 53 f2 b3 54 g2 xc1 55 xh3 bxa4 56 xa4 e2 57 b5 c3 58 b6 c2 59 c5+ d5 60 b3 c6 61 g2 xb6 White resigns