Introduction: Accidents Happen

I lined up a summer job in 1957 as helper on a city water truck that would cruise Manhattan filling troughs for the dwindling number of working horses in the city. I had just graduated from Columbia and was headed to Claremont College in California, which was as far from the borough of Queens as I could imagine myself. I had sent a dorm deposit. Once out there, I would fulfill my destiny as a novelist, either starving on the beach because my fiction was too avant-garde or luxuriating by the side of my pool because I had sold out. Both scenarios involved dangerous women. I was an English major.

But I needed a summer job to raise cash for the trip. When the water truck job fell through—it was canceled, I think, for lack of funding—I bought my first copy of The New York Times. I’d heard the paper had good classified ads and quickly found one for “editorial assistant” at the Times itself.

The personnel people at the Times were pleasant enough when I showed up at West Forty-third Street that June morning, but patronizing. These jobs are extremely coveted, they said, because you assist New York Times reporters and editors. You get to share their air. It sounded as though I were applying to be a squire for King Arthur’s Knights of the Round Table. One of my interviewers waved toward the invisible line of Rhodes Scholars, Fulbright Scholars, and Ph.D. candidates waiting for a job and implied that my B.A. was a dime a dozen. But my last interviewer suggested I fill out an application anyway. Who knows? Something might come up in a few months. I almost didn’t bother since I would be going west in a few months. But I was a polite boy then, and I filled it out.

I went a block south to seedy old Forty-second Street and saw a cowboy double-feature. I loved Westerns. When I was a kid, my dad and I went to a shoot-’em-up every Tuesday night in the summertime, and the Lone Ranger has been a role model of mine since childhood. He protected weaker people by beating up bullies without becoming a bully himself. (I still love Westerns. In some ways, I think, sports have replaced Westerns and jocks have replaced gunslingers in our national imagination, not necessarily to our advantage.)

After the movies, I took the subway to Rego Park. I had moved back home after graduation. My mother looked up from the stove to say, “You got a crank call, Bobby. A man said if you show up tomorrow and pass a physical, you can start work immediately at The New York Times.”

The physical consisted of showing up.

That “editorial assistant” job was copyboy in the sports department. It seemed like an odd place for me, and I wondered if I could handle it. I didn’t know much about sports. A fat boy growing up, I didn’t even start playing sports seriously until I was in my teens. My dad was no fan; we never talked sports at home. I was, at best, a casual fan, enough to understand what my friends were talking about. (I actually didn’t become a fan until I left daily sportswriting for the first time in 1971 and could watch a game without having to think about covering it.) And not only had I never read the Times sports pages, I had barely read the Times at all. (My parents, being public school teachers, got the New York World-Telegram & Sun, which had an education page.) But I needed a job.

My shift was 7 P.M. to 3 A.M. My nights off were Tuesday and Wednesday. My first night on the job, I almost stopped the presses.

The copyboy who broke me in was in a hurry to get out for a long dinner break at Gough’s, the bar across the street, to talk sports with the printers and pressmen. What he was supposed to train me to do was simple enough: hover near the copydesk—actually a dozen dirty blond cigarette-charred wooden desks lined up so the cranky old bullies could face each other and chuckle as they butchered reporters’ stories—until one of them yelled “Boy!” This could be a call to get coffee, sharpen pencils, refill pots of library paste, or, most important, snatch a page of edited copy, roll it up, snap on a rubber band, and slip it into a plastic-and-leather canister that would be launched like a mortar round up a metal pipe in the pneumatic system to the fourth floor, where it would pop out of the pipe and thump into a rubber well. Someone would unsnap the leather strap of the canister, pluck out the copy, and hand it to a Linotype operator, who would turn it into lines of hot metal type to be fitted into the frames of printing press pages on huge stone tables.

Whether it was a failure of communication in the five-minute training session or, more likely, one of my enduring techno screw-ups, I skipped the stage in which I was supposed to slip the copy into the canister. I slipped the rolled-up paper directly into the sucking mouth of the pneumatic pipe. There was a whoosh, and the lid of the pipe snapped shut.

After a while, the sports makeup man on the fourth floor began phoning down: “Where’s the fucking copy?” The head of the sports copydesk screamed back, “Look up your ass!” This was common, but the long absence of copy was not. As deadline approached, someone thought to check the system, actually put an arm up the pipe. It was lined with paper. Most of that night’s sports report was stuck in transit.

Had it happened a few minutes later, they might have had to stop the presses or release part of the first edition with no sports section. Small loss, I say in retrospect, but unthinkable then (not unthinkable now, of course, when the Times apparently has toyed with the idea of further downsizing the sports report, even dropping the section entirely, as did the Washington Times, to save money). With the exception of Gay Talese’s pieces, the Times sports section in 1957 was at best mediocre, perhaps by design. The editorial side of the Times seemed faintly embarrassed by sports, although Business appreciated the car and boat ads it anchored, and everybody enjoyed the free tickets that flowed in. A survey later revealed that Times readers interested in sports took a second paper, usually the New York Post or the Daily News, to satisfy their jock jones.

But on my first night, the pipes were jammed with the faux Homeric mythmaking of rosy-fingered Arthur Daley, the “Sports of the Times” columnist; the plodding game detail of the ambassadors to baseball, John Drebinger, Roscoe McGowen, and Louis Effrat; John Rendel’s yacht-racing stories with their long tails of agate-type results; and the symphonic tennis summaries of the courtly Allison Danzig. All were respected students of their games, all were determinedly dulled down in the style of the Times. Years later, writing feature sidebars to Danzig’s coverage, I was impressed (and, yes, proud) at how tennis stars lined up at the press table after their matches to respectfully ask what Mister Danzig had observed and how well or poorly they had played.

But that first night at the Times, I was made to feel as though I had almost let the only illuminated pages of Genesis slip out of my hands into a fire.

The pneumatic system was shut down until the pages, some still rolled, tumbled and fluttered back into the sports department. I stood there dumbly as the deskmen glanced at me, rolled their eyes, and shook their heads. Smirking, one of them, with exaggerated movements, filled the canisters and fired them upstairs. They chuckled, then asked me if I understood what I had done, how close we had come.

I felt like crying, but didn’t know how anymore. I was nineteen. Should I walk out into the night right now or wait to quit until the other copyboy returned?

I’m not sure why I decided to wait. It was not as if this were going to be the start of a career. Was it because I thought it was the right thing to do or I wanted to hang tough or I was frozen in place? After the other copyboy returned, I decided to finish my shift because I didn’t want to slink off. The next day I decided to go back because I didn’t want to let the bullies win. All night I had brooded over that deskman’s smirk and his elaborate gestures. I went back that next night with a stony look and my fists in my pockets. No one mentioned the incident that night or ever again. Old news.

Fifty-three years later, time contracts. The humiliation of that first night is more vivid than today’s breakfast. And the lesson as well. Don’t quit. Gut it out. Try to hold on till the buzzer. It will work out, somehow.

Doggedness was the first of many lessons I learned as I began, accidentally, my career. I’m sure I would have learned many of them as a doctor (in my mother’s dreams) or as a college professor (my dad’s). Mine came from a lifetime ducking into and out of locker rooms chasing Muhammad Ali, Mickey Mantle, Billie Jean King, myself, and, ultimately, my dad.

In the protective environment of the Times, in those days more powerful than most of the sports organizations the Times covered, I got the chance to develop a distinctive voice that has drawn supportive fans and furious critics. Some thought I was a clear voice of reason, some thought I was a clueless contrarian. The label cynic often cropped up; I saw myself as a skeptic. I came to despise the common practice, in the great sports editor Stanley Woodward’s term, of “godding up” the ballplayers.

Some in friendly fashion (Bob Costas, Dick Schaap), some not, wondered why I couldn’t kick back and enjoy the games. Why couldn’t I appreciate the joy? Why couldn’t I accept these accomplished men and women in sports as my heroes? Why did my work have to be so relentlessly political? (At first, perhaps defensively, I would try to trace that question back to the discussions about social justice at my parents’ dinner table. Then I thought—now I always think—why isn’t everyone else’s work more political?)

The question begs, Bobby: What held you in sports for so long, and what kept bringing you back?

For starters, I fell in love—with the paper. Though I never liked the copyboy job or the grumblies on the desk, I came to love the Times, especially at 9 P.M., when the giant presses in the subbasement roared to life with the first edition. More than fifty years later, the hot-type presses long scrapped, the paper now housed in a glass skyscraper a few blocks south of the Disneyfied Times Square, I can feel the old building shuddering in its nightly rebirth. When the tremors reached the sports department on the third floor, I could feel them in my loins. Maybe it helped to have read too much Romantic English poetry, but I felt connected to something grand and important. I had dabbled in journalism as an ironical columnist for the Forest Hills High School Beacon and as a lackluster reporter for Columbia’s Daily Spectator, which I quit, bored, after a year or so. Truth was in the sweep of fiction, I thought, not in a string of little facts. But at the Times, there was a sense of mission to find the Truth.

There were heroes at the Times who had that calling, role models you could actually talk to: the great war and civil rights reporter Homer Bigart; the artistic, compassionate cityside columnist Meyer Berger; the bold foreign correspondents Harrison Salisbury, David Halberstam, and Gloria Emerson. There was also Charlotte Curtis, whose incisive, witty dispatches on society and fashion transformed the style pages; she proved you could make your points and launch a big-league career from a Times department that was considered secondary to Foreign or National. Her example certainly helped me. I rejected offers to move to other departments at the paper or to the Washington or Tokyo bureau.

There could be no denying, even if not always understanding, sports’ hold on me. It was heady to interview my heroes’ heroes (“What’s Yogi Berra really like?” Halberstam asked me) and attend the front-page games and fights. But after a few years, that was no longer glamorous. Other people’s envy of my job wasn’t enough. I’m still figuring out how much of what kept me on the job was the pull of sporting events themselves and how much was the perspective that sports gave me on the larger world. I could enjoy the Kentucky Derby, for example, as a great horse race, a splendid party, and a vignette of Americana only the first couple of times I covered it before issues of class, race, and equine exploitation became impossible to ignore. The first two Super Bowls I covered (II and III) were bang-up football games. What fun I had, drinking with Coach Vince Lombardi, hanging out with Joe Namath, meeting sportswriters from all over the country! But after that, the glorification of real and symbolic violence in a time of war, the corporate involvement, and the defining of manhood through the game seemed at least as compelling as the play-by-play.

Eventually, in all the events I covered, I began to perceive the shape of a social infrastructure that at first I called SportsWorld, now Jock Culture, because it is based on a model of manhood in the arena and it extends into business, politics, and family life. I’m more and more convinced that Jock Culture is a defining strand in American life and has helped create many of its values—positive ones such as hard work, bravery, and fellowship, as well as negative ones such as intimidation, domination, and cheating to win. In Jock Culture, the opponent must be beaten but ultimately respected. Contempt is reserved for those who are not of the team, not one of the righteous, focused, disciplined insiders who play or cheerlead or comfort or boost. Contempt is reserved for the Outsiders, the nerds, wimps, burnouts, band fags. The English majors.

In this company of men, male sportswriters are honorary jocks, their manhood certified by their locker room access (which has been diminishing for years). At first I preened in my faux jockhood, but that got harder when I realized that what we did was hardly manly, sniffing around athletes for news crumbs, boosting them when they were winning, kicking them when they were down, dismissing them when they no longer mattered for our stories, meanwhile convincing ourselves and others that the outcomes of games were important. The games are important, as Jock Culture dramas, as signifiers of a time, as definers of values. The scores aren’t important.

As an ambitious sportswriter on a major-league paper, I acted like a jock in pursuit of victory, which in my case meant filing the best story. Yet I felt like an outsider among most of my subjects and even some of my colleagues. I rarely cared who won or lost, except for how it affected my travel plans or the drama of my story.

Covering orchestrated commercial spectaculars such as the Final Four college basketball tournament, I felt I was wasting my life. Covering the political and racial aspects of Muhammad Ali or the paradoxes of Sandinista baseball in Nicaragua, I felt like a real reporter. Once I became a columnist in 1967, ten years after the happy accident, the job became a lot more fun. Not only could I express my own growing opinions, I could follow stories off the beaten track—lacrosse on an Indian reservation, a youth league in Brooklyn, gay athletes coming out. Even while covering the mainstream events I could filter the story through my own developing sensibility. Sometimes I tried too hard and became tiresome and didactic. But I couldn’t help myself. At the Olympics, at the World Series, at the heavyweight championships, I kept looking for a story beneath the story, always sure that if I found it I would be able to enlarge my own and my readers’ understanding of our world.

I never understood until I began to write this book that sports would also reveal my own story to me. And maybe that was what I was looking for all along.

Sports helped confirm my sense of myself as an outsider, a lurker in the shadows, a spy gathering intelligence in an alien world for people who want to know the truth. “That’s pretty gaudy,” as Jim Roach, the sports editor who nurtured my early Times career, would describe the most overheated of my most painfully know-it-all prose. But outsider was the way I had come to feel as a fat kid, and as a sportswriter. I also thought of myself as smarter and a better writer than my colleagues, free to leave for higher pastures when I felt my mission of wringing truth from the locker room was completed.

Because of this sanctimonious attitude, I knew, I would never be a universally beloved scribe. In the 1960s, after I wrote about boxing’s cynical use of racial and ethnic rivalries to boost the box office, Madison Square Garden demanded that the Times take me off the beat. I was thrilled and thought of President John F. Kennedy demanding that the Times bring Halberstam home from Vietnam—his boots-on-the-ground reporting was giving the lie to the generals’ falsely optimistic press conferences. I didn’t equate my judgmental stories with David’s brave dispatches, but the Garden’s reaction confirmed my belief that there was a calling in sports journalism.

(Forty-odd years later, in 2008, I had a welcome flashback when the Professional Golfers’ Association of America mounted a campaign to have me removed from USA Today’s Board of Op-Ed Contributors. I had written what I thought was a somewhat tongue-in-cheek piece about the Masters tournament being “all that’s retrograde in American life.” Fortunately, USA Today, as had the Times, seemed gratified by the attention.)

I wonder now if that outsider armor was something I wore as psychic protection in the planet of the jocks. Or did I stay a sportswriter because I felt more comfortable as an outsider?

In 1971, I left the Times to write fiction. After twenty years that also included television journalism, screenplays, and young adult novels, all unforeseen opportunities, I was called back to the paper. Joseph Lelyveld was about to become the executive editor and Neil Amdur, another friend, the sports editor. They wanted an edgy voice among the columns. That was 1991, and I thought I’d write the column for a year or two, tops. Another summer job. But I fell in love with the Times all over again and was entranced anew by the looking glass of sports. That time, the summer job lasted twelve years and ended with another lesson in Jock Culture.

In the summer of 2001, soon after he was named executive editor, Howell Raines invited the sports department upstairs to an executive dining room for lunch. He contemptuously dismissed the Lelyveld administration (“wussies” was the implicit criticism) and promised a new era of hard-driving, zone-flooding, competitive tension in which he would run the paper the way Coach Bear Bryant had run the University of Alabama football team. College sports, he said, was the mortar that held America together.

Being sportswriters, we assumed that this Coach Bullfrog was merely trying to out-jock us. Sportswriters are used to that, and, like jocks, we tend to offer sly servility to alpha males. We were wrong. Raines was serious. He was ruthless, capricious, and inaccessible, and for all his micromanaging, he was careless. Maybe he was scared, in over his head. He ignored warnings about a young reporter, Jayson Blair, who was ultimately fired for plagiarisms and fabrications. Using that as a weapon, the newsroom rose up and drove Raines out of the arena. But not before he got me. At the end of 2002, Raines, who may have felt personally defied by my columns on the corruption of college football, refused to renew my thirteenth consecutive annual contract. Hurt and angry, but not surprised, I slinked off.

Less than six months after I left, right after Raines was fired, Lelyveld returned as interim coach and the Times sent me a new contract. I never signed it. I had moved on again, back to young adult fiction and TV, ahead to online sportswriting. But I never stopped thinking about Jock Culture and manhood, about the psychosocial-political aspect of games, and about the people, most of them subjects, whose stories had informed my career and my life. Their stories begat my story.