Chapter 48

Intermediate moves

When in the middle of a variation, we suddenly play a deflecting move instead of the natural retreat or capture, we call this move an ‘intermediate’ move or zwischenzug. This usually happens on a different part of the board and with tempo, and brings about an important change to the position. Such possibilities often escape the players’ notice, and the ability to spot them can be improved by training one’s calculation of variations and gaining more experience.

291 *

Training position

Konstantin Sakaev

images

If we move the bishop to e7 or d6, White castles and then brings the rook to d1 with tempo. Later, the dark-squared bishop comes out to e3 or f4, exerting pressure on the black queenside. Consequently, there follows

12…c7!

White is forced to defend the pawn on c3, and bring his bishop to a passive square. At the same time, c7 is the best square for the black queen anyway, as she gets out of the attack along the d-file, exerts pressure on c3, and defends the pawn on b7, thereby freeing the light-squared bishop. After

13.d2 e7 14.0-0 d7!

followed by neutralising the white pressure along the long diagonal with …d7-c6, Black has a good game.

292 *

Alexander Beliavsky

Vladimir Malaniuk

Moscow ch-URS 1983 (12)

images

40…g3+!

This blow sows confusion in White’s ranks.

If Black takes the rook immediately with 40…xc1, then after 41.d8 g3+ 42.g2, White has set up a construction that allows him to give perpetual check. But now White resigned, since after 41.xg3 xc1 42.d8 g1+ 43.f4 f2+, he continues to lose pieces with check.

293 *

Training position

Konstantin Sakaev

images

14.b4!

If we exchange on e5, then after 14.xe5 xe5 15.xd2 0-0, the white e- and f-pawns are not sufficiently advanced, and he has no space advantage as a consequence. The reduced number of minor pieces remaining on the board also helps Black. The only plus White has is the d-file, which does not give him a real advantage, and a drawn outcome to the game looks highly likely.

14…c7 15.b3 xb4

If 15…0-0 16.xd2 White’s advantage is great, whilst 15…xe3 16.fxe3 0-0 17.c5 leads to the loss of a piece.

16.axb4 e7

Here too he cannot castle: 16…0-0 17.c3 e8 18.a5 b5 19.xb5.

17.fd1 e6 18.xe6 xe6 19.c5 g6 20.d6

Black has been unable to castle, and White can develop an attack both with pieces and with the e- and f-pawns.

294 *

Jean-Pierre Le Roux

2551

Konstantin Landa

2646

France tt 2012 (10)

images

13…c3!

In this case, the zwischenzug helps Black equalise.

A) 13…cxd5?! 14.xg7 xg7 15.bxc4images;

B) 13…d6?! 14.xg7 xg7 15.bxc4images.

14.xc3 xc3 15.xc3 cxd5

Black even temporarily wins a pawn.

16.c7 d7 17.xd5 xd5 18.ad1 e6 19.xd7

Draw, because the variation 19…xe2 20.xe7 xa2 21.xb7 ab8 22.xa7 xa7 23.xa7 xb3, leads to a complete elimination of the fighting forces.

295 *

Konstantin Landa

2640

Alexander Poluliakhov

2511

Sochi 2012 (6)

images

20…d2?

The best continuation was 20…c8!, when White retains a small, but insignificant advantage.

21.xe6+ h8 22.d1

Equally possible was 22.c1, exploiting the weakness of the back rank. 22…xg2 23.xg2 xd4? 24.c8+–.

images

22…e8

After Black’s original intention 22…xd4?, there follows 23.e3!, the zwischenzug: 23…d3 24.xb7+–.

23.g4 c8

23…xg2 24.xd2 c6 25.f3! does not give Black many chances of surviving.

24.h5! g6 25.h4

1-0

296 **

Mateusz Bartel

2627

Pentala Harikrishna

2672

Germany Bundesliga 2011/12 (12)

images

White is to move, and Black has a knight under attack.

17.d1!

It turns out that we can first attack the queen, creating in the process the deadly threat 18.xc4+.

In the game, there followed 17.xf5 d5 18.f3 xf3 19.xf3 f6, with Black having sufficient compensation for the pawn.

After

17…d5 18.xf5

thanks to the pin on the bishop, the c4-pawn is lost as well. White is winning.

297 **

Evgeny Bareev

2709

Joel Lautier

2658

Aix-les-Bains 2001 (4)

images

If we now simply take the bishop, then White’s advantage in the opposite-coloured bishops position will be minimal. Instead, White sees a tactical motif, connected with the unstable position of the black rook and the insufficiently protected black king on h8.

23.f6! xf6 24.xc7 xh4 25.gxg7!

Even more precise than 25.xb7 g6.

25…e4+ 26.g1

Black resigned.

298 **

Boris Spassky

2610

Robert Hübner

2600

Solingen 1977 (2)

images

With his last move, Black exchanged the light-squared bishop on d3. Everything would be fine for him if White had to take back on d3, but there followed the zwischenzug

24.h6! cc7?

Allowing a forcing finish.

Bad was 24…f8? 25.xg7 xg7 26.xg7+ xg7 27.xe6++–.

The most tenacious was 24…e7! 25.xg7

images

analysis diagram

25…f4! 26.g4 f5 27.f6+ xg4 28.xe7 xe7, but here too, there follows 29.d5! (29.xf4 g7!) 29…f8 30.f3 f5 31.xf4+–.

25.xe6 c4 26.xg7+ f8 27.xc7 xc7 28.xf7+ xf7 29.d6+ g8 30.d8+

1-0

299 **

Richard Teichmann

Jacques Mieses

Vienna 1903

images

We have a sharp position on the board. It seems as though Black is winning, but it is important to find the correct order of moves. Calculating straightforward variations does not yield the correct answer:

A) 28…e2? 29.xf3! xf3 30.xe2 xf4 31.xe6+=;

B) 28…d5+? 29.c1! (29.e1 c2!) 29…xa2 30.a4∞;

C) After 28…e2+!?,

images

analysis diagram

Black still has to show his endgame technique: 29.c1 e4 30.xe2 fxe2 31.e1 xf4 32.xe2 f7 33.d2 e7 34.g2 f6 35.d2images.

Instead, he decides the game with

28…b5!

0-1

Because of 29.xb5 e2+ 30.xe2 fxe2+ 31.e1 exf1+ 32.xf1 f5–+.

300 **

Vladimir Akopian

2655

Miguel Illescas Cordoba

2635

Ubeda 1997 (5)

images

The immediate knight sacrifice on g7 does not bring success, because the black queen can defend along the fifth rank. Therefore, White first drove the queen away:

20.c3!

And only after…

20…d8

landed the blow…

21.xg7! xg7 22.g4+ h8 23.f5 g8

images

24.h6! f8

24…b5 25.g5+ f8 26.xh7+–.

25.g5! d5 26.xh7 c5+ 27.xc5 xh7 28.h6+ e7 29.h4+ f8 30.h6+ e7 31.h4+ f8 32.xh7 e6 33.xe6+ fxe6 34.g7+ e8 35.f6 d6 36.g8+ d7 37.xa8 b6+ 38.f1 dxe4 39.f8

1-0

301 **

Nelson Gamboa

2410

Juan-Manuel Bellon Lopez

2445

Santa Clara 1999 (7)

images

Having achieved a large advantage against a weaker player, the grandmaster relaxed.

25…5b6?!

He could easily have found the variation 25…xg4 26.xg4 f8 27.g3 (27.f3 e3–+) 27…e8 28.f3 7b6, with a mating attack.

26.xb6! xg4!

Black notices in time the line 26…axb6 27.a1 b5+ 28.c2+–, and luckily for him the game ends not with a banal oversight, but flares up anew.

27.xg4

images

27…f8!!

A brilliant zwischenzug.

27…axb6 28.a1 b5+ 29.c2 f8 30.a8+ c7 31.xf8 xf8 32.f4+ d7 33.f7+!+–.

28.e2?

Other continuations lose:

A) 28.f4 axb6 29.a1 b5+ 30.c2 c7–+;

B) 28.f3 e8! 29.f4 axb6 30.a1 b5+–+;

C) 28.e1 is the most tenacious, but after 28…xf2+ 29.e2 xe2+ 30.xe2 axb6 31.h5 c5 32.h6 cxd4 33.d2 b5+ 34.c1 h5 35.cxd4 f6, Black should win.

28…xb6 29.e6+ d8 30.d6+ d7–+

Suddenly, Black has everything defended.

31.f3 f5

Also good was 31…e8!.

32.a3 b5+ 33.a2 c2+ 34.a1 b6 35.c1 d2

White resigned.

302 **

Jan Gustafsson

2633

Zahar Efimenko

2702

Halkidiki Ech tt 2011 (4)

images

The position has an unclear character. If Black manages to stabilise and strengthen his position, he will hardly be worse. White needs to play energetically.

24.xh6! xe4 25.h5

images

25…f6??

The decisive mistake.

Black could maintain equality in the complications after 25…gxh6! 26.xe4 d2!. There are many variations here, but there seems to be no advantage for White in any of them.

26.xf6! xf6

images

27.h7+!

An extremely important zwischenzug, which wins for White.

It was not too late to step on a hidden mine with 27.g5? g6!. Here, it is Black who plays the zwischenzug, after which he is simply better.

27…f8 28.g5 e5

28…e5 29.d3+–.

29.f5! g6 30.h4

Black must part with material.

30…xg5 31.xg5 xf5 32.h4

Black resigned.

303 ***

Viktor Kortchnoi

2544

Francisco Vallejo Pons

2698

Gibraltar 2011 (10)

images

28…xb6?

The only move to maintain equality was the zwischenzug 28…e2!. A draw is achieved after 29.e1 (29.d7+?! xd7! (not 29…f8? 30.bxc7 e1+ 31.f1 e8 32.f4! xf4 33.xf4 e6 34.d8 g7 35.c8 xc8 36.xc8 xc8 37.d3+–; 29…xd7 30.f7+ d6 31.d5+ e7 32.f7+=) 30.xe5+ f8 31.xb8+ e8 32.xe2 xa4 33.b7 b4 34.h5 e6 35.h2 e7 36.f3images) 29…xb6 30.xe2 d7 31.d2 (31.f7+ d8 (31…d6 32.b4!!+–) 32.a8+ b8 33.d2 d4 34.e2 e5=) 31…d4 32.e2+ e5 33.f7+ d8 34.a8+ b8 35.d2 d4 36.e2=. The two sides cannot avoid a repetition of moves.

images

29.da1?

A gift of fate.

White misses the simple win 29.a7! xa7 30.xe5+ f8 31.d8+ g7 32.g8+ h6 33.f4+ h5 34.e2++–.

29…f8 30.d5 e2 31.f2 d4 32.xe2 xd5 33.a8+ g7 34.f3 h6 35.1a7 f4

White resigned.

Additional material

Geller-Spassky, Riga 1958

Dolmatov-Kuzmin, Kislovodsk 1982 – White’s 27th move

Hübner-Tal, Biel 1976 – Black’s 26th move

Kasparov-Karpov, Tilburg 1991 – White’s 15th move