Book 5, Part 1
CHAPTER 7
Annihilated States, Part A
Section 7.1
The king is one toward whom the people move;
the ruler is one who does not lose his following.1
Thus one who can cause the myriad people to flock to him and one who can gain a following throughout the world will be unmatched in the world. In the Spring and Autumn, [instances of] the assassination of rulers [number] thirty-six and the annihilation of states [number] fifty-two.2 [Of these,] the small states of meager virtue had not paid courtesy visits or sent friendly emissaries to other states, and the large states did not attend meetings with or assemblies of other Lords of the Land.
Battling alone, they did not defend one another.
Living isolated, they did not unite a following.
Thus when they encountered difficulties, no one rescued them, and consequently they were annihilated. Not only are dukes, lords, and great officers like this. There is nothing that lives between Heaven and Earth with shallow roots that can withstand fierce winds or violent rains. Whether their demise is sudden or gradual, they will surely suffer annihilation.
When Marquis Shuo of Wey served Duke Xiang of Qi, the world grew anxious.3
When [the states of] Yu and Guo combined their strength, [Duke] Xian of Jin was distressed by it.4
Zhao Dun of Jin was a lone knight, with not a foot or an inch of land or a single person in his entourage; yet Duke Ling, who possessed the honor and power bequeathed to him by his hegemonic ancestors, [feared him and] wanted to kill him. Although [Duke Ling] used every kind of artifice and utmost deceit, with deceit overflowing and his strength fully employed, [nevertheless] the calamity that [eventually] fell on his own person was great. Zhao Dun’s heart [was such that] had he been the ruler of [even] a small state, who would have been capable of destroying him?5
Thus, Wu Zixu [also] was a lone knight. He left Chu, sought out Helü, [king of Wu], and was able to fulfill his ambition in Wu.6 If the person whom a ruler entrusts is truly the right person, then who will be able to resist him?
When King Kun of Chu entrusted his state to Zi Yu and De Chen, the world feared them.7
When the duke of Yu entrusted his state to Kong Zhiji, Duke Xian of Jin grew apprehensive of him.8
[But]
When King Kun of Chu killed De Chen, the world disregarded him.
When the duke of Yu did not make use of Kong Zhiji, Duke Xian of Jin destroyed him.
[Whether or not a ruler employs the right person is] the source of survival and destruction. [The ruler] must not fail to understand this.
The Lords of the Land found themselves increasingly taking up arms and, [when defeated], ran away and fled, so that it reached the point that their states were on the verge of destruction and no one rescued them. Such outcomes may be deduced from their conduct in ordinary times. Duke Yin’s replacing Duke Huan is what people refer to as a matter of “prudent survival.”9 But when Wuhai was ordered to lead troops to annihilate Ji,10 inside the state of Ji there were no ministers who would remonstrate, and outside the state there were no Lords of the Land who would rescue Ji. The state of Zai was destroyed for the same reasons. When the states of Song, Cai, and Wey united and attacked [Zai], [the earl of] Zheng relied on their strength and annexed [Zai].11 There is no difference between this and leaving precious jewels unguarded in the street. Whoever discovers them will surely take them. Deng and Gu lost their land and paid court respects to Duke Huan of Lu. Was it not fitting that they lost their territory?12 [7/19/5–17]
 
  1.  Both lines contain puns: between “king” (wang ) and “move toward” (wang ), and between “ruler”(jun ) and “following” (in the sense of “constituency,” qun ). These paranomastic definitions of “the king” and “the ruler” are not unique to the Chunqiu fanlu. They appear to have been popular during the Han, and similar definitions are found in such texts as the Hanshi waizhuan, Bohutong, and Chunqiu yuanming bao. For these examples, see Su Yu, CQFLYZ 133. The idea that people will flock to live in the kingdom of a worthy ruler is especially associated with Mencius.
  2.  Emending to and supplying at the head of the sentence, as suggested by Su Yu. For the references to the assassination of thirty-six rulers and the annihilation of fifty-two states, see Zhong, CQFLJS 214–15, notes 4 and 5.
  3.  Duke Huan 2.16.5. Spring and Autumn: “In the eleventh month, Shuo, marquis of Wey, left his state and fled to Qi.” Gongyang:
Why does [the Spring and Autumn] refer to Shuo, marquis of Wey, by his personal name? It was in order to cut him off [from his lineage]. Why cut him off? He committed a crime against the Son of Heaven. How did he commit a crime against the Son of Heaven? Charged to defend Wey, Shuo was not even capable of employing a small band of men to do so. He traveled [beyond the borders of his state] to the northern side of Mount Dai in Qi. [There] he established a dwelling place and did not submit to punishment.
  4.  Duke Xi 5.2.3. A long narrative in the Gongyang Commentary relates that Duke Xian of Jin suffered a nightmare in which the states of Yu and Guo appeared. When the minister Xun Xi guessed at the cause of Duke Xian’s distress, the duke took him into his confidence and revealed both his desire to attack the states of Yu and Guo and his concern that it would be impossible to invade one of these states without the other coming to the rescue, making it a challenge for him to succeed in his plans. Xun Xi assuaged his anxieties by suggesting a stratagem that the duke supported. Xun Xi carried out his scheme, and Duke Xian annihilated Yu and Guo.
  5.  For the story of the rapacious Duke Ling of Jin and worthy minister Zhao Dun, see Duke Xuan 7.6.1. The Gongyang narrative states that Zhao Dun of Jin failed to punish his lord’s assassin and so must be held culpable for assassinating his lord. The Gongyang narrative, however, reads against the grain of the Spring and Autumn, underscoring Lord Ling’s treacherous conduct toward his ministers, his endeavors to kill Zhao Dun, Zhao Dun’s dramatic escape, and his return to install the future ruler (Lord Cheng).
  6.  For the anecdote describing Wu Zixu’s meteoric rise to power under King Helü of Wu and his successful attempt to “fulfill his ambition” to avenge his father’s wrongful death, see Duke Ding 11.4.14.
  7.  Duke Xi 5.28.4. He Xiu’s commentary explains that Zi Yu and De Chen were two arrogant and haughty ministers of Chu who repeatedly urged their ruler to invade the Central States (Su Yu, CQFLYZ 134).
  8.  See the narrative at Duke Xi 5.2.3 mentioned in note 4.
  9.  In other words, Yin assumed the throne as regent for Huan to ensure the survival of Lu.
10.  Duke Yin 1.2.3.
11.  Duke Yin 1.10.6.
12.  Duke Huan 2.7.2. The point seems to be that the rulers of Gu and Deng should not have paid court respects to a duke who had assassinated his brother in order to assume the throne.