10.1 Introduction
Medicinal plants produce a variety of biologically active compounds, i.e., secondary metabolites which play a vital role in plant self-defense mechanisms. Especially, roots play major roles in plants, including anchoring plants to the soil, uptake of minerals and water from the soil, storage of nutrients in perennial plants, and defending themselves from other plants or microbes present in the soil by producing a wide variety of chemical compounds, popularly known as secondary metabolites. These secreted metabolites not only provide protection to plants from biotic and abiotic stresses like pathogens, insects, and other environmental stresses but also useful in improving human’s and other animal’s health (Tian 2015). These compounds are produced in trace amounts during the secondary metabolism, but not essentially necessary for plant growth and development. Plant-based compounds, including alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, terpenes, anthraquinones, and anthocyanins, are the essential source for the preparation of drugs, food additives, dyes, oils, resins, and agricultural chemicals (Kim et al. 2002; Zhou et al. 2011; Bharati and Bansal 2014). Obtaining the chemical compounds directly from the wild- or field-grown plants is not promising as the yield obtainable is being very low and has limited availability in their habitat. Moreover, it may lead to the destruction of the natural habitat due to over exploitation of these plants. The artificial synthesis of chemical compounds also has several disadvantages including high cost of production, the difficulties in the synthesis, unavailability of the optimized methods for the compound synthesis, and characterization. These problems can be overcome by the using the biotechnological approaches such as plant tissue culture, transgenic medicinal plants, etc. to enhance the synthesis of valuable phytochemicals from medicinal plants (Zhou et al. 2011). In this regard, the hairy root technology is widely preferred by biotechnologists for the large-scale production of diverse secondary metabolites from various medicinal plant resources (Veena and Taylor 2007).

The schematic representation of hairy root induction and its application
10.2 Production of Secondary Metabolites Through Hairy Root Cultures
Establishment of hairy root cultures for plant secondary metabolite production
Plant species | Secondary metabolite | Biological properties | References |
---|---|---|---|
Artemisia annua | Artemisinin | Antimalarial | Weathers et al. (2005) |
Beta vulgaris | Betalains | Antioxidant, colorant | Pavlov and Bley (2006) |
Bixa orellana | Stigmasterol | Antimalarial | Zhai et al. (2014) |
Chlorophytum borivilianum | Stigmasterol and hecogenin | Antioxidant | Bathoju et al. (2017) |
Clitoria ternatea | Taraxerol | Anticancer | Swain et al. (2012) |
Datura innoxia | Scopolamine and hyoscyamine | Anticholinergic | Dechaux and Boitel-Conti (2005) |
Echinacea sps. | Alkamides | Anti-inflammatory, immune-stimulatory | Romero et al. (2009) |
Eschscholzia californica | Benzylisoquinoline | Antimicrobial, anticancer | Vázquez-Flota et al. (2017) |
Fragaria x ananassa cv. Reikou | Polyphenols (proanthocyanidins, flavonoids, hydrolyzable tannin) | Antioxidant, anticancer | Motomori et al. (1995) |
Gingko biloba | Ginkgolide | Against cardiovascular and aging diseases | Ayadi and Tremouillaux-Guiller (2003) |
Hyoscyamus niger | Tropane alkaloids | Anticholinergic | Jaziri et al. (1988) |
Isatis tinctoria | Flavonoids | Antioxidant | Gai et al. (2015) |
Linum flavum | Aryltetralin lignans Lignans coniferin | Anticancer | |
Linum usitatissimum | Lignan | Anticancer | Gabr et al. (2016) |
Nasturtium officinale | Glucosinolates (gluconasturtiin, glucotropaeolin) | Anticancer, antifungal, antibacterial, antinematode, anti-insect | Wielanek et al. (2009) |
Ophiorrhiza pumila | Camptothecin | Antitumor | Saito et al. (2001) |
Papaver somniferum | Morphine Sanguinarine Codeine | Sedative, analgesic | Le Flem-Bonhomme et al. (2004) |
Polygonum multiflorum Thunb | Anthraquinones | Antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial | Thiruvengadam et al. (2014) |
Rauvolfia micrantha | Ajmalicine Ajmaline | Antihypertensive | Sudha et al. (2003) |
Rauwolfia serpentina | Terpenoid indole alkaloids (reserpine, ajmalicine, ajmaline, serpentine, yohimbine) | Hypertension, high blood pressure, mental illness | Mehrotra et al. (2015) |
Solanum chrysotrichum | Saponin | Antifungal | Caspeta et al. (2005) |
Stevia rebaudiana | Stevioside glycosides | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive | Kumari and Chandra (2017) |
Taxus brevifolia | Taxol | Anticancer | Huang et al. (1997) |
Valeriana wallichii | Iridoids (valepotriates) | Sedative, spasmolytic | Banerjee et al. (1998) |
Withania somnifera | Steroidal lactones (withanolide A) | Anticancer | Murthy et al. (2008) |
10.3 Role of Bioreactors in Large-Scale Production of Secondary Metabolites
Examples of some important plant secondary metabolites produced through bioreactors
Plant species | Secondary metabolite | Bioreactor type | References |
---|---|---|---|
Artemisia annua | Artemisinin | Mist and bubble column reactor; gas- and liquid-phase bioreactors | |
Astragalus membranaceus | Astragaloside IV and polysaccharide | Air lift bioreactor | Du et al. (2003) |
Artemisia annua | Terpenoids | Mist and bubble column reactor | Souret et al. (2003) |
Atropa belladonna | Tropane alkaloids | Stirred bioreactors | Lee et al. (1999) |
Atropa belladonna | Tropane alkaloids, atropine | Bubble column bioreactor | Kwok and Doran (1995) |
Beta vulgaris | Betalains, peroxidase | Bubble column reactor | |
Catharanthus roseus | Ajmalicine | Bubble column and rotating drum bioreactor | Thakore et al. (2017) |
Datura stramonium | Hyoscyamine | Isolated impeller stirred tank reactor | Hilton and Rhodes (1990) |
Eleutherococcus koreanum | Saponins | Air lift bioreactor | |
Genista tinctoria | Phytoestrogens | Prototype basket-bubble bioreactor | Luczkiewicz and Kokotkiewicz (2005) |
Hypericin | Balloon-type bubble bioreactor | Cui et al. (2010) | |
Hyoscyamus muticus | Tropane alkaloids | Trickle bed bioreactor | Flores and Curtis (1992) |
Nicotiana rustica | Nicotine | Air-sparged vessel stirred tank | Rhodes et al. (1987) |
Panax ginseng | Ginsenosides | Air bubble bioreactor | Murthy et al. (2017) |
Panax ginseng | Saponins | Air lift bioreactor | Yoshikawa and Furuya (1987) |
Panax ginseng | Ginsenosides | Wave bioreactor | Palazon et al. (2003) |
Polygonum multiflorum Thunb | Anthraquinones, stilbenes, flavonoids, tannins, | Air lift bioreactor | |
Stizolobium hassjoo | Levodopa | Mesh hindrance mist trickling bioreactor | Sung and Huang (2006) |
Trigonella foenumgraceum | Diosgenin | Air lift bioreactor | Rodriguez-Mendiola et al. (1991) |
10.4 Advances in Metabolic Engineering of Hairy Roots
A new promising technology known as metabolic engineering or genetic engineering was evolved in the early 1990s (Bourgaud et al. 2001). Metabolic engineering in plants involves the alteration of metabolic pathways to increase the flux toward desired secondary metabolites or to attain better understanding of metabolic pathways and use of cellular pathways for chemical transformation, energy transduction, and supramolecular assembly (Chandra and Chandra 2011; Hussain et al. 2012). In other words, metabolic engineering is the alteration or improvement of the cellular activities involving transport and enzymatic and regulatory functions of the cell by using rDNA technology (Bourgaud et al. 2001; Hussain et al. 2012). It is one of the fastest-growing applications for the production of industrially important bio-active compounds from various plant sources. The main aims of this technique are (1) overproduction of a desired compound which is normally produced in less quantity or increased metabolite production by transferring the pathways to another plant or microorganisms, (2) reducing the production of unwanted compounds, and (3) production of a new compound that is usually produced in nature but not present in the host plant (Verpoorte and Memelink 2002; Capell and Christou 2004; Chandra and Chandra 2011). This can be achieved by conquering the rate-limiting steps or by jamming competitive pathways and blocking of catabolism successfully.
Now, multistep metabolic engineering is possible, which overtakes single-step engineering, and it is the best way to produce secondary metabolites in transgenic plants (Capell and Christou 2004). The main advantage of this method is that it is convenient and cost-effectively produces industrially important secondary metabolites continuously (Hussain et al. 2012). Also, this technique is used as a tool for improving crop plants that are resistant to various diseases, plants producing allelopathic compounds to control the weeds, pest-resistant plants to improve the importance of ornamentals and fruits, and enhanced pollination by modifying scent profiles (Chandra and Chandra 2011). Another advantage is the production of valuable secondary metabolites under controlled environment which is free from climate and soil conditions (Hussain et al. 2012). Engineering or structural design of secondary metabolite pathways is quite difficult in plants, because it requires a detailed knowledge of the whole biosynthetic pathways and a detailed perception of its regulatory mechanisms. But, such information is not explored in many medicinal plants known to have vast variety of bio-active metabolites (Oksman-Caldentey and Inze 2004). Recent advances in metabolic engineering have open a new way for the production of secondary metabolites in higher quantities. However, the success of this approach depends on the metabolic pathway elucidation and metabolite pathway mapping and identifying specific restraining enzyme activities. This process can be further improved by using an appropriate genetic transformation procedure. So far, most of the biosynthetic pathway strategies developed for producing secondary metabolites were through various ways which include isolating and expressing of the respective genes in more efficient organisms, construction of promoters to enhance the expression of a target gene, or antisense and co-suppression techniques for knockdown of particular plants for the desired traits (Bourgaud et al. 2001). For example, engineering of the flavonoid pathway in Saussurea involucrata by a transgenic approach increased the production of apigenin. The gene responsible for apigenin production in S. medusa was found to be chalcone isomerase (chi) gene. A complete cDNA sequence of chi gene construct was prepared under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The chi gene was introduced into the S. involucrata genome by A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation which resulted in the establishment of transgenic hairy root lines. The enzyme chalcone isomerase converts naringenin chalcone into naringenin, which is the precursor of apigenin. After 5 weeks of incubation, C46 hairy root line accumulated 32.1 mg/l of apigenin with total flavonoids at 647.8 mg/l. The accumulation of apigenin and flavonoid content was found to be 12 and 4 times, respectively, which is superior when compared to the wild-type hairy roots. The enhanced enzyme productivity was obtained due to the superior activity of chalcone isomerase (Li et al. 2006). In addition to that, hairy root metabolic engineering has been widely used to enhance the production of pharmaceutically important secondary metabolites and also the production of certain recombinant proteins. For example, solasodine glycoside harmfully controls its own biosynthesis. A recombinant gene construct, i.e., anti-solamargine (As)-scFv gene, contains single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibody region derived from hybridoma cell lines. Transformed hariy root cultures with anti-solamargine (As)-scFv gene controls and enhances the solasodine glycoside concentration up to 2.3-fold more in the transgenic S. khasianum than wild-type hairy roots (Putalun et al. 2003). Metabolic engineering of the hairy roots is also used to make the de novo synthesis of secondary metabolites by introducing the specific genes that encode related enzymatic process in other organisms. The transfer of three genes from Ralstonia eutropha bacterium into the genome of sugar beet hairy roots directed the accumulation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (Menzel et al. 2003). Recently, Hidalgo et al. (2017) reported the metabolism of tobacco hairy root for the production of stilbenes. In this study, in order to achieve the holistic response in the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway and also direct the upregulation of multiple metabolic process, transformed tobacco hairy root (HR) cultures carrying the gene stilbene synthase (STS) derived from Vitis vinifera and Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factor (TF) AtMYB12 were established. In addition to that, the normal flux was arrested through the incorporation of an artificial microRNA responsible for chalcone synthase (amiRNA CHS); otherwise there will be a heavy competition with STS enzyme for precursors. The transgenic tobacco hairy roots were capable to synthesize the target compound, stilbenes.
10.5 Enhancement of Secondary Metabolites Through Elicitation
Elicitation is an efficient and promising method for increasing the production of secondary metabolites using an elicitor which is a substance that when introduced into a living cell system in ideal/little concentrations improves the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. The mechanism involved in this process is that the addition of elicitors (both biotic and abiotic) into the plant system attacks the plant cell wall and triggers the production of plant-defensive secondary metabolites (Namdeo 2007; Bensaddek et al. 2008).

The mechanism of elicitors in secondary metabolite production
Production of plant secondary metabolites by using different elicitors
Plant species | Secondary metabolite | Elicitors | References |
---|---|---|---|
Ammi majus | Coumarine, furocoumarine | BION® Enterobacter sakazakii | Staniszewska et al. (2003) |
Arachis hypogaea | Trans-resveratrol | Sodium acetate | Medina-Bolivar et al. (2007) |
Arachis hypogaea | Resveratrol, piceatannol, arachidin-1, and arachidin-3 | MeJA and cyclodextrn | Yang et al. (2015) |
Astragalus membranaceus | Calycosin and formononetin | Aspergillus niger | Jiao et al. (2017) |
Artemisia annua | Artemisinin | Chitosan | Putalun et al. (2007) |
Azadirachta indica | Azadirachtin | Salicylic acid, jasmonic acid | Satdive et al. (2007) |
Catharanthus roseus | Alkaloids (indole) | Penicillium sp. | Rijhwani and Shanks (1998) |
Centella asiatica | Asiaticoside | Methyl jasmonate | Kim et al. (2007) |
Datura metel | Atropine | AgNO3, nanosilver, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus | Shakeran et al. (2015) |
Hyoscyamus muticus | Sesquiterpenes | Rhizoctonia solani | Singh (1995) |
Hyoscyamus niger | Polyamines and tropane alkaloids | Methyl jasmonate | Zhang et al. (2007) |
Linum album | Lignan | Coniferaldehyde and methylenedioxycinnamic acid | Ahmadian Chashmi et al. (2016) |
Oxalis tuberose | Harmaline, harmine | Phytophthora cinnamomi | Bais et al. (2003) |
Lotus corniculatus | Isoflavonoids | Glutathione | Robbins et al. (1991) |
Papaver orientale | Morphinan alkaloids | MeJA and salicylic acid | Hashemi and Naghavi (2016) |
Panax ginseng | Ginseng saponin | Selenium, NiSO4, NaCl | Jeong and Park (2006) |
Pharbitis nil | Umbelliferone, scopoletin, skimmin | CuSO4, MeJA | Yaoya et al. (2004) |
Salvia miltiorrhiza | Tanshinone | Sorbitol | Shi et al. (2006) |
Scopolia parviflora | Scopolamine | Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus | |
Solanum tuberosum | Sesquiterpene, lypooxygenase | Rhizoctonia bataticola, B cyclodextrin, MeJA | Komaraiah et al. (2003) |
Tagetes patula | Thiophene | Furasium conglutanis, Aspergillus niger |
10.6 Biotransformation
Biotransformation of hairy roots for plant secondary metabolite production
Plant species | Types of reaction | Product | References |
---|---|---|---|
Anethum graveolens | Acetylation, reduction | Menthyl acetate linalool, α -terpineol, citronellol | Faria et al. (2009) |
Anisodus tanguticus | Oxidation | Androst-4-ene-3,17-dione 6 α-hydroxy androst-4-ene-3 | Liu et al. (2004) |
Astragalus membranaceus | Deglycosylation | Calycosin Formononetin | Jiao et al. (2017) |
Atropa belladonna | Reduction | Scopolamine | Subroto et al. (1996) |
Brassica napus | Reduction, glycosylation | 6-(1(S)-hydroxyethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-4H-chromen-4-one | Orden et al. (2006) |
Brugmansia candida | Glucosylation | 4-Hydroxyphenyl β-D-glucopyranoside (arbutin) | Casas et al. (1998) |
Coleus furskohlii | Glycosylation | Methyl β-D-glucopyranosides, methyl β-D-ribo-hex-3-ulopyranosides | Li et al. (2003) |
Cyanotis arachnoidea | Reduction | Deoxyartemisinin | |
Daucus carota | Reduction | (S)-1-phenyl ethanol) | Caron et al. (2005) |
Lobelia sessilifolia | Glucosylation | Protocatechuic acid 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | Ishimaru et al. (1996) |
Lobelia sessilifolia | Glucosylation | (+)-catechin 7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | Yamanaka et al. (1995) |
Protocatechuic acid, protocatechuic acid 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | |||
(–)-epicatechin 7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | |||
(–)-epiafzelechin 7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | |||
Levisticum officinale | Isomerization | Linalool, nerol | Nunes et al. (2009) |
Panax ginseng | Esterification | Digitoxigenin stearate | Kawaguchi et al. (1990) |
Digitoxigenin palmitate | |||
Digitoxigenin myristate | |||
Digitoxigenin laurate | |||
Panax ginseng | Glycosylation | (RS)-2-phenylpropionyl β-D-glucopyranoside | Yoshikawa et al. (1993) |
(2RS)-2-0-(2-phenylpropionyl) D-glucose | |||
(2RS)-2-phenylpropionyl) 6-0-β-D-xylopyranosyl β-D-glycopyranoside | |||
Myoinositol ester of (R)-2-phenylpropionic acid | |||
Panax ginseng | Glycosylation | 30-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→2) β-D-glucopyranosyl] | Asada et al. (1993) |
18 β-Glycyrrhetinic acid | |||
30-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl] 18 β-glycyrrhetinic acid | |||
3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl -(1→2) β-D- glucopyranosyl] 18 β-glycyrrhetinic acid | |||
3-0-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl] -30-0-(β-D-glucopyranosyl) 18 β-glycyrrhetinic acid | |||
Panax ginseng | Glycosylation | p-carboxyphenyl β-D-glucopyranoside | Chen et al. (2008) |
p-hydroxybenzoic acid | |||
β-D-glucopyranosyl ester | |||
m-carboxyphenyl β-D-glucopyranoside | |||
Pharbatis nil | Glucosylation | Skimmin | |
4-Methylskimmin | |||
Scopoline | |||
3,4,8-Tri methylskimmin | |||
Scopolin, aesculin, eichoriin, vanillin-4-O-β-glucopyranoside | |||
Vanillyl alcohol-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | |||
Physalis ixocarpa | Glucosylation | Arbutin | Bergier et al. (2008) |
Plantago lanceolata | Glucosylation | (E)-p-coumaroyl-1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | Fons et al. (1999) |
Polygonum multiflorum | Glycosylation | 3-oxo-eremophila 1,7(11)-dien-12,8-olide | Yan et al. (2008) |
3-oxo-8-hydroxy-eremophila 1,7(11)-dien-12,8-olide | |||
Polygonum multiflorum | Glucosylation | 4-Hydroxybenzene derivatives: 1-4-benzendiol | Yan et al. (2007) |
4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde | |||
4-Hydroxybenzyl alcohol | |||
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | |||
Polygonum multiflorum | Glucosylation | 5-Methyl-2-(1-methylethyl) phenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside | Dong et al. (2009) |
10.7 Hairy Root Applications in Environmental Protection (Phytoremediation)
Phytoremediation of environmental pollutants by hairy root cultures
Plant species | Pollutant | Reference |
---|---|---|
Solanum nigrum | PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and zinc | |
Thlaspi caerulescens | Cadmium | Nedelkoska and Doran (2000) and Boominathan and Doran (2003) |
Alyssum sp. | Nickel | |
A. bertolinii, A. tenium, and A. troodi | ||
Catharanthus roseus | RDX (hexahydro-1,3-5-trinitro-1,3-5-triazine) and HMX (oxtahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine) | Bhadra et al. (2001) |
Daucus carota | Phenol and chloroderivatives | De Araujo et al. (2002) |
A. bertolonii and Thlaspi caerulescens | Nickel, and cadmium | Boominathan and Doran (2002) |
Atropa belladonna | TCE (trichloroethylene) | Banerjee et al. (2002) |
Brassica napus | 2,4-Dichlorophenol, Phenol | |
B. juncea and Chenopodium amaranticolor | Uranium | Eapen et al. (2003) |
B. juncea and Cichorium intybus | DDT (Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) | Suresh et al. (2005) |
Helianthus annuus | Tetracycline and oxytetracycline | Gujarathi et al. (2005) |
Lycopersicon esculentum | Phenols | Wevar-Oller et al. (2005) |
Daucus carota, Ipomoea batata, and Solanum aviculare | Guaiacol, catechol, phenol, 2-chlorophenol, and 2,6-dichlorophenol | |
Brassica juncea | Phenol | Singh et al. (2006) |
Lycopersicon esculentum | Phenol | |
Alyssum murale | Nickel | Vinterhalter et al. (2008) |
Solanum lycopersicon | Phenol | |
Nicotiana tabacum | Phenol, 2,4-DCP | |
Armoracia rusticana | Uranium | Soudek et al. (2011) |
10.8 Germplasm Conservation
Germplasm conservation is one of the prominent techniques to preserve/restore the plant biodiversity, because most of the plants do not produce viable seeds and propagate vegetatively, while some plants produce recalcitrant seeds, and the storage of seeds is affected by pests or other pathogens. So, the conservation of wild, rare, and endangered medicinal plant species for future use has become a big problem, and more efforts are initiated in this direction. Biotechnological tools such as plant tissue culture micropropagation and cryopreservation have certainly benefited in protecting plant germplasms including vegetatively propagated plant species, genetic resources of recalcitrant seeds, rare and endangered plant species, cell lines with special attributes, genetically transformed plant material, and clones obtained from elite genotypes (Engelmann 2011). Based on the storage duration, in vitro conservation methods are classified into three types, namely, short-, medium-, and long-term storage. Among them, cryopreservation is the most efficient technique for long-term conservation of the germplasm of a valuable plant, because of its cost-effectiveness and safety. Three types of cryopreservation methods are highly employed for the biodiversity conservation. They include freeze-induced dehydration, encapsulation-dehydration, and encapsulation-vitrification (Shibli et al. 2006). Hairy root cultures can be used for the germplasm conservation, because hairy root cultures are significantly a good resource for the production of several secondary metabolites and, in recent times, they are obtained in many medicinal plants for commercial applications. Hence, conserving such hairy roots will be more useful for future applications. However, there are only very few reports available on the conservation of hairy roots of medicinal plants. Hairy roots in the form of artificial seeds are a reliable delivery system for the clonal propagation of elite plants with genetic uniformity, high yield, and low production cost. Cryopreservation method for root tips was first developed by Benson and Hamill (1991) from hairy root cultures of Beta vulgaris, and the same technique was implemented in Nicotiana rustica. Yoshimatsu et al. (1996) reported the cryopreservation of Panax ginseng hairy roots. In addition to that, cryopreservation of hairy roots was reported in some more medicinal plants like Artemisia annua (Teoh et al. 1996), Armoracia rusticana (horseradish) (Phunchindawan et al. 1997; Hirata et al. 1998), Atropa belladonna (Touno et al. 2006), Eruca sativa, Astragalus membranaceus and Gentiana macrophylla (Xue et al. 2008), Maesa lanceolata and Medicago truncatula (Lambert et al. 2009), and Rubia akane (nakai) (Kim et al. 2010, 2012; Salma et al. 2014).
10.9 Omics Approaches in Secondary Metabolite Production
The omics approaches, namely, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have been majorly utilized in hairy root-based secondary metabolite production. As transcriptomic tools the microarrays and expressed sequence tags (EST) were useful in measuring the gene expression studies in large scale. Expression of target genes in a plant cell can be modified through various methods such as precursor feeding, elicitor treatment, overexpression or silencing of transgenes, etc. Generation of cDNA microarrays and EST database provides the information about the changes at mRNA level and also briefs the functions of genes and its regulation in secondary metabolism of hairy root cultures. Transcriptome analysis of hairy root cultures has been done in several plants including P. ginseng (ginsenoside), C. roseus (indole alkaloids), Medicago truncatula (anthocyanin), S. miltiorrhiza (tanshinones), etc. (Jung et al. 2003a, b; Murataa et al. 2006; Pang et al. 2008; Gao et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2010). In studying the tanshinone biosynthesis, S. miltiorrhiza hairy root cultures were used as a model system. The combined analysis of metabolite profiling and cDNA-AFLP identified the candidate genes which are potentially involved in the biosynthetic pathway (Yang et al. 2012). Proteomics is an important, powerful, and under-explored omics technology for the secondary metabolite elucidation in hairy root cultures. Proteomic approach for hairy root cultures has been initiated in P. ginseng and opium poppy (Kim et al. 2003; Zulak et al. 2009). Metabolomics is an emerging approach which is highly useful in secondary metabolite production (Yang et al. 2012). The systems biology approaches with a combination of omics approaches will offer a great opportunity for high-throughput secondary metabolite elucidation in various plant species.
10.10 Conclusions and Future Prospects
In the modern era, humankind is facing the problem of high demand for several potent plant secondary metabolites possessing many bio-pharmacological activities. Previously, in vitro dedifferentiated plant tissue cultures were used for obtaining plant metabolites. As the years passed, cell suspension and adventitious root cultures were widely adopted for the same. However, to elucidate such metabolites, there is a need to develop an efficient and reliable, fast-growing in vitro tissue culture model to overcome the problem of wild plant availability. In this regard, hairy root cultures offer a great value to the continuous production of several precious secondary metabolites, because of their unique characteristics discussed above. Since the emergence of hairy root technology, a lot of improvements have been made day by day especially the use of bioreactors, application of elicitation strategy, and biotransformations. Overall, hairy root technology has shown its wide utility in many medicinal plants. Moreover, the production of plant secondary metabolites in the hairy root culture system has delivered very encouraging findings, for example, illuminating the sites of biosynthesis or rate-regulating stages, precursor’s requirements, role of regulatory genes, transcription factors, and putative metabolite intermediates relating to secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Also, it offers the possibility of recognizing a suitable gene candidate required for metabolic engineering of specific plant traits and to improve their secondary metabolite secretion. However, more efforts are to be encouraged to better understand the biosynthetic pathways and regulatory cascades involved in secondary metabolite synthesis. Therefore, it is crucial to make use of genetic engineering approaches in order to fully realize the biosynthetic prospective of hairy roots. Plant biotechnologists are required to work closely with bioengineers to overcome the challenges faced during the scaling-up of hairy root cultures in bioreactors. In the future, research efforts should be encouraged toward making use of hairy root culture technology for producing high-value secondary metabolites commercially from many unexplored medicinal plant species.
Acknowledgments
The author A. Sagina Rency gratefully acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology for financial support in the form of DST INSPIRE Fellowship (DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/03/2014/004363). Also the authors sincerely thank the Bioinformatics Infrastructure Facility of Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University (funded by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India: Grant No. BT/BI/25/015/2012), for providing the computational facility.