Introduction

When Richmond’s history is mentioned, most people think of Hampton Court and Henry VIII. Crime does not obviously spring to mind, whereas it would if Whitechapel or Notting Hill were mentioned. Some books about Richmond and Kingston do not even allude to it. Yet criminal activity does not recognise geographical or social boundaries and this book aims to demonstrate this. Foul Deeds in Richmond and Kingston covers a number of serious crimes which took place in what are now the London Boroughs of Kingston on Thames (Norbiton, Surbiton and Kingston itself) and Richmond (Barnes, Mortlake, Teddington, Hampton, Twickenham and Richmond), from the early nineteenth century until the 1950s. Some are shocking indeed, such as the murder and dissection of Mrs Thomas, by her servant, Kate Webster, in Richmond, in 1879 and the savage killing of two teenagers on the Teddington towpath in the 1950s. The alleged poisoning of Louisa Bankes in 1859 was once a cause celebre, but all these have now been mostly forgotten, except by crime buffs. In their day all were reported as national news. There are also unsolved murders, killings in Richmond Park and other foul crimes.

This book does not aim to be comprehensive, due to limitations of space; therefore other murders in these districts can be found listed in the appendix. Rather I have chosen ones for which there is an appreciable amount of information. Those which occurred elsewhere, but have local connections, are also omitted – Buster Edwards of Great Train Robbery infamy resided at St Margaret’s Road, Twickenham, and hid some of the loot at a friend’s in Kingston, for instance.

Many people believe that the internet is the fount of all knowledge, but only three of the cases in this book feature there (those referred to in the first paragraph), and not in any great detail. It is the paper-based sources which are of most use. Chiefly, the evidence used here has been taken from the police files found at The National Archives, Kew. These include reports made by the chief inspector who was in charge of the investigation, reports by doctors, witnesses, other police officers and those accused of the crime. Some of these sources have only recently been made available to the public. They vary enormously in scope – those for the nineteenth century murders are quite thin, compared to the later ones, for example.

Other key sources include the press. These are the local newspapers, such as the Surrey Comet. These have detailed reports of the discovery of the crime, inquests and trials. The national newspapers are also useful, especially The Times online digital database, which although not as detailed for the twentieth century, does enable a researcher to find cases which otherwise would be difficult to locate. Of course, there is much overlap between the press and the police files, but there is also different information found in both, too.

I have also used sources well known to the experienced geneaologist in order to flesh out the principal characters in the text: census returns, wills, parish registers, military records and so forth.

The book begins with an introductory chapter about the districts in which the crimes were committed, and a survey of policing and law and order in these places. Then the cases will be discussed in chronological order, from 1812–1953.

My qualifications for writing this book are that I have been a published historian for a decade. A qualified and experienced London archivist, my knowledge of the relevant sources is not inconsiderable. And I have had seven books about crime history published already. Finally, I resided in Richmond in 1992, working at the Surrey Record Office when it was located at Kingston.