References

Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments: How to connect standards-based instruction and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. W. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214.

Bahekar, A. A., Singh, S., Saha, S., Molnar, J., & Arora, R. (2007). The prevalence and incidence of coronary heart disease is significantly increased in periodontitis: A meta-analysis. American Heart Journal, 154(5), 830–837.

Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (1991). Lifetime maintenance of high school mathematics content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 120, 20–33.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bay-Williams, J. M., & Kling, G. (2014). Enriching addition and subtraction fact mastery through games. Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(4), 238–247.

Bay-Williams, J. M., & Livers, S. (2009). Supporting math vocabulary acquisition. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(4), 238–245.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Bennett, N., & Cass, A. (1989). The effects of group composition on group interactive processes and pupil understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 19–32.

Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Biddle, M. (2007). When opportunity knocks: Integrating language arts and the daily calendar. Reading Teacher, 60(5), 488–491.

Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139.

Boaler, J. (1997). Setting, social class and survival of the quickest. British Educational Research Journal, 23(5), 575–595.

Boaler, J. (2015). What’s math got to do with it? How teachers and parents can transform mathematics learning and inspire success (Rev. ed.). New York: Penguin.

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets. New York: Jossey-Bass.

Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14.

Butler, R. (2008). Ego-involving and frame of reference effects of tracking on elementary school students’ motivational orientations and help seeking in math class. Social Psychology of Education, 11(1), 5–34.

Carmody, G., & Wood, L. (2009). Peer tutoring in mathematics for university students. Mathematics & Computer Education, 43(1), 18–28.

Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (2014). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Center on Disability & Community Inclusion. (2014). Core concepts. Retrieved from http://www.uvm.edu/~wfox/CoreConcepts.html

Chapin, S., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn (2nd ed.). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.

Clarke, S., Timperley, H., & Hattie, J. A. C. (2003). Unlocking formative assessment: Practical strategies for enhancing students’ learning in the primary and intermediate classroom (1st New Zealand ed.). Auckland: Hodder Moa Beckett.

Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.

Cronbach, L. J. (1942). Measuring knowledge of precise word meaning. Journal of Educational Research, 36(7), 528–534.

Cunningham, P. M. (2000). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write. New York: Addison-Wesley.

DeLashmutt, K. (2007). A study of the role of mnemonics in learning mathematics (Summative Projects for MA Degree). Retrieved July 12, 2012, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidsummative/19

Domino, J. (2010). The effects of physical manipulatives on achievement in mathematics in Grades K–6: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behaviour a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 162–173.

Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A meditational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 968–980.

Ellis, J. A., Semb, G. B., & Cole, B. (1998). Very long-term memory for information taught in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 419–433.

Fendick, F. (1990). The correlation between teacher clarity of communication and student achievement gain: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

Flores, M. M., & Kaylor, M. (2007). The effects of a direct instruction program on the fraction performance of middle school students at-risk for failure in mathematics. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(2), 84–94.

Foundation—Year 10 Australian Curriculum. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10?layout=1

Frayer, D., Frederick, W. C., & Klausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of cognitive mastery. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Frey, N. (2005). Retention, social promotion, and academic redshirting: What do we know and need to know? Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 332–346.

Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2013). Rigorous reading: 5 access points for comprehending complex texts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Fuson, K. C., Kalchman, M., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). Mathematical understanding: An introduction. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 217–256). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K., Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176.

Gentry, M., & Owen, S. (1999). An investigation of the effects of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 224–243.

Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/

Gersten, R., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (Eds.). (2011). Understanding RTI in mathematics: Proven methods and applications. Baltimore: Brookes.

Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749.

Graves, M. F. (1986). Vocabulary learning and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 13, 49–89.

Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning & instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gresham, G., & Little, M. (2012). RtI in math class. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(1), 20–29.

Hastie, S. (2011). Teaching students to set goals: Strategies, commitment, and monitoring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91.

Hattie, J. (n.d.). Visible Learning that makes the difference in education [Power-Point Presentation]. Visible Learning Laboratories, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Nature Partner Journals, 1. doi:10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13

Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York: Routledge.

Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Breyfogle, M. L. (2005). Questioning our patterns of questioning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 484–489.

Hester, K., & Cunningham, C. (2007, June). Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/1469

Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K., & Gamoran Sherin, M. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116.

Humphreys, C., & Parker, R. (2015). Making number talks matter: Developing mathematical practices and deepening understanding, Grades 4–10. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212.

Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e79.

Ingersoll, R. M. (2011). Do we produce enough mathematics and science teachers? Kappan Magazine, 92(6), 37–41.

Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

Jackson, R. (2015). 10 promises worth keeping to your students. Retrieved from https://mindstepsinc.com/2015/08/10-promises-worth-keeping-to-your-students/

Jacobs, H. R. (1994). Mathematics: A human endeavor (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.

Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Jeon, K. (2012). Reflecting on PEMDAS. Teaching Children Mathematics, 18(6), 370–377.

Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424.

Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40(4), 651–672.

Karp, K. S., Bush, S. B., & Dougherty, B. J. (2014). 13 rules that expire. Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(1), 18–25.

Knight, J., & van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2012). Instructional coaching: A focus on practice. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5(2), 100–112.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, J. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 3, 72–76.

Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute-by-minute and day-by-day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24.

Lembke, E. S., Hampton, D., & Beyers, S. J. (2012). Response to intervention in mathematics: Critical elements. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 257–272.

Leinwand, S. (2016). Thoughts on revising how we do math homework. Personal communication.

Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Levasseur, K., & Cuoco, A. (2003). Mathematical habits of mind. In H. L. Schoen (Ed.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6–12 (pp. 23–37). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Lin-Siegler, X., Ahn, J. N., Chen, J., Fang, F. A., & Luna-Lucero, M. (2016). Even Einstein struggled: Effects of learning about great scientists’ struggles on high school students’ motivation to learn science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 314–328.

Livers, S. D., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). Vocabulary support: Constructing (not obstructing) meaning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(3), 153–159.

Lobato, J., Clarke, D., & Ellis, A. B. (2005). Initiating and eliciting in teaching: A reformulation of telling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 101–136.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Loehr, A. M., Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2014). Wait for it . . . Delaying instruction improves mathematics problem solving: A classroom study. Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), Article 5. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jps/vol7/iss1/5

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345.

Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Education Lab.

McGinn, K., Lange, K., & Booth, J. (2015). A worked example for creating worked examples. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 21(1), 26–33.

Munter, C., Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2015a). Dialogic and direct instruction: Two distinct models of mathematics instruction and the debate(s) surrounding them. Teachers College Record, 117(11), 1–32.

Munter, C., Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2015b). Is there a common pedagogical core? Examining instructional practices of competing models of mathematics teaching. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 16(2), 3–13.

Nathan, M. J., & Petrosino, A. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 905–928.

National Association for Gifted Children. (n.d.). Curriculum compacting. Retrieved June 4, 2016, from https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/gifted-education-practices/curriculum-compacting

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles & standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Orlowski, M., Lorson, K., Lyon, A., & Minoughan, S. (2013). My classroom physical activity pyramid: A tool for integrating movement into the classroom. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(9), 47–51.

Palincsar, A. S. (2013). Reciprocal teaching. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 369–371). New York: Routledge.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.

Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 118–127.

Parks, M., Solmon, M., & Lee, A. (2007). Understanding classroom teachers’ perceptions of integrating physical activity: A collective efficacy perspective. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(3), 316–328.

Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. Contribution to the International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

Plato. (1996). The republic (R. W. Sterling & W. C. Scott, Trans.) (Paperback ed.). New York: Norton.

Purkey, W. W. (1992). An introduction to invitational theory. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 1(1), 5–15.

Reilly, Y., Parsons, J., & Bortolot, E. (2009). Reciprocal teaching in mathematics. Proceedings of the Mathematics of Prime Importance Conference, the 46th Conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria (pp. 182–189). Retrieved from http://www.mav.vic.edu.au/files/conferences/2009/13Reilly.pdf

Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well structured) talk builds the mind. In R. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 163–194). New York: Springer.

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192.

Rosenzweig, C., Krawec, J., & Montague, M. (2011). Metacognitive strategy use of eighth-grade students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: A think-aloud analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 508–520.

Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359–382.

Scott, P. (2007). Successfully bringing parents into the classroom. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 73(2), 47–49.

Senko, C., & Hulleman, C. S. (2013). The role of goal attainment expectancies in achievement goal pursuit. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 504–521.

Sheffield, L. J. (Ed.). (1999). Developing mathematically promising students. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Short, D., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Sidney, P. G., & Alibali, M. W. (2015). Making connections in math: Activating a prior knowledge analogue matters for learning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(1), 160–185.

Simpson, A., & Cole, M. W. (2015). More than words: A literature review of the language of mathematics research. Educational Review, 67(3), 369–384.

Sloyer, C. W. (2004). The extension-reduction strategy: Activating prior knowledge. Mathematics Teacher, 98(1), 48–50.

Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344–350.

Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussion. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Sousa, D. (2011). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.

Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5–15.

Stinson, D. W. (2004). Mathematics as “gate-keeper” (?): Three theoretical perspectives that aim at empowering all children with a key to the gate. Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 8–18.

Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165–169.

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Mathematics. (2012). 19 TAC Chapter 111. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter111/ch111a.html

Throndsen, I. (2011). Self-regulated learning of basic arithmetic skills: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 558–578.

Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school’s journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(2), 77–87.

VanDerHeyden, A., McLaughlin, T., Algina, J., & Snyder, P. (2012). Randomized evaluation of a supplemental grade-wide mathematics intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 1251–1284.

VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2005). Quantifying the context of assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review, 34, 161–183.

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Van Garderen, D. (2004). Reciprocal teaching as a comprehension strategy for understanding mathematical word problems. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20(2), 225–229.

Van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B. H., van Gog, T., & van Merriernboer, J. J. G. (2013). Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students’ metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 15–25.

Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Webb, D. C., Boswinkel, N., & Dekker, T. (2008). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Using representations to support student understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(2), 110–113.

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco: Wiley.

Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing? In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bartolini Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.

Zevenbergen, R. (2005). The construction of a mathematical habitus: Implications of ability grouping in the middle years. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 607–619.