And Yet the Burning Bush Has Voice

Einstein? Or Christ? My prognosis?

Dichotomy? Symbiosis?

What’s clearly seen, or just half-seen,

And man trapped somewhere in-between.

He is the skin that takes the sun

Through which the various mysteries run;

Where metaphysic turns to blood

What evil seemed, now pulses good.

The scientific method finds

The Holy Ghost that substance binds

And gives it name and draws up charts

And with its laboratory arts,

With shove where pull becomes mere push,

Says one in hand worth two in bush.

And yet the burning bush has voice

And from the blood of men rejoice

The singing tides of beasts that died

Of rank genetic suicide,

Or murders multitudinous,

As death with minus made a plus

Through wild survivals of the fit,

To sieve forth fang and claw and wit

And then amongst the many choose

Which live to win, or die to lose;

And on the path from bloody shore

To squander flesh, yet make it more;

And from the tidal meteoroids

Call mystery from winter voids

To bombard hippos whose vast brides

Are Nile or all the cosmic tides

That through the universe do thrive

And all time’s catacombs survive.

See! hippo’s skin which husks and keeps

Saints’ bones or scientists’ bone-heaps,

Both worshipped for their hymnal stuffs,

Theologies plus data snuffs

Which sneezed turn dust to fire and flesh

To all dichotomies mend/mesh.

So Holy Ghost now thrives in jaws

Where dental scientists seek cause

In microscopic bones they gnaw

To vanish deep beyond the law

Where God’s small molecules they find

But lose in countries of the blind

Where small, then smaller/smallest goes

In sub-electric Arctic floes.

And so with microscopes and men

We search—find what? The dark again

As out beyond, the universe

Goes by, one great celestial hearse,

Where stars, moons, planets, nebulae,

And silent-wailing comets die.

So we are circumscribed by nights

And all our first or second sights

Are bounded by too big, too small,

Where nothing reigns to us appall,

And purgatory our domain

Where monk and chemist meet again

And nothing know and nil profess

And ignorance and dumb confess,

But with pure theory, raw faith

Now interlock or inter-plaith.

Which man to choose? which right? which wrong?

How high is high? How long is long?

Now with God’s priests do we mock fact?

Or with great physics dare attack,

Shake stars, knock moon, then smite the sun

And only with pure reason run?

To with the biochemists boast:

“We’ve trussed and laid the Holy Ghost!”?

Church pew? Pure lab? My last prognosis?

Dichotomy or symbiosis?

To pick just one? I find me loath.

Try this for size:

A bit of both?