INDEX

Abortion, 7, 199, 211, 302–303, 310–311n. 16

L’affaire du foulard, 3, 178, 232

Aquinas, Thomas, 285

Arendt, Hannah, 194n. 29

Aristotle, 183–184, 186, 227

Augustine, 78, 88, 97, 185

and care for the soul, 85, 92, 290, 396

on compelling belief through fear, 62, 68, 96, 285

and dialectics of Christian toleration, 8, 81–85

and doctrine of benevolent force, 83–84

and freedom of conscience, 82, 88, 284

on just and unjust persecution, 56, 59

Authenticity, 205, 252–253

of faith, 86, 90–91

Autonomy: individual, 9, 12, 14, 57, 82, 177, 179, 185, 307, 320, 321, 365, 428–429

moral, 8, 73

Barry, Brian, 377, 378

on right to association and exit, 343–345

on rule and exemption approach, 338

Bayle, Pierre, 16, 18, 59, 78, 85, 175

on acceptance and rejection, 79

Bayle’s paradox, 94

and erroneous conscience, 99–100

on limits of toleration, 102

and mutual respect among equals, 17

on natural light of reason, 97–99, 286

as proto-Kantian, 95–96, 105

on reasonable disagreement, 102, 287

on reciprocity, 285–287, 290

on tolerance of atheism, 93–95, 103

on toleration of religious diversity, 56

Bennett, Jonathan, 63

Berlin, Isaiah, on Mill, 145–146, 148, 150, 159

Bodin, Jean, 222, 328, 330

Bou-Habib, Paul, 132

Boxel, Hugo, 65

Castellio, Sebastian, 95

Civilization: and barbarism, 410–417, 420, 433

and “clash of civilizations” thesis, 2, 244, 265–266, 279n. 74, 291, 410–412, 431

and western orthodoxy, 244, 245, 246, 266, 283, 291

Descartes, Renée, 62, 93

Dworkin, Ronald, 155, 378

Edict of Nantes (1598), 54, 80, 81, 85

Equality, 1, 18, 177, 196, 199–201, 203, 206, 258, 268, 317, 331, 345, 350, 361, 371, 383–384, 414, 423–425

ascendant value of, 211–212

before the law, 175, 198, 266

of cultures, 209

freedom and, 320–324, 341, 343

gender, 421, 427

German jurisprudence of, 267

historical demands for, 363

liberty and, 182

Locke on, 130

Mill on, 161

mutuality and, 363

neutrality and, 261, 263, 264, 267, 297–298

of political power, 222

and recognition, 204

of respect, 382

ultraliberal ideal of, 258, 259

for women, 344. See also Liberalism

Female genital mutilation, 187, 210, 345, 368, 420

Feuerbach, Ludwig, 101

First Amendment, 1, 245, 264, 267, 394

Fourteenth Amendment, 264

Freedom: of conscience, 81, 82, 84, 100, 104, 178, 284, 290, 396–397

of expression, 178, 381

of religion, 257, 325, 381

of speech, 230, 231, 257, 264

Fukuyama, Francis, 429

Fundamentalism, 407, 413, 417, 419, 433

market attenuation of, 430

religious, 4

terrorism and, 433

Gardner, Peter, 207

Gender: equality, 421

heterosexual toleration, 368, 383, 415–417

and homosexuality, 205, 301, 302, 303, 304, 349

and homosexual marriage, 288

Gray, John, 177

Habermas, Jürgen, 254, 271n. 6, 338, 370

Hegel, 222

Hobbes, Thomas, 104, 222, 330, 347, 430

and civil religion, 34

and criteria of well-being, 347

and dangers of religious disagreement, 31–32

and freedom of belief, 328

and “public worship” of God, 19, 32–48

Identity, 9, 13, 71, 203, 204–205, 288, 290, 315, 324, 328, 329, 331, 352, 370, 414, 434

of barbarism, 409

as bargaining chip, 362

Christian, 326

and citizenship, 326

claims, 13, 339–340, 414

collective, 178, 415, 429

communal, 179

group, 324, 340, 407

of Islam, 407

public, 5

religious/ethnic, 416

unmarked-because-hegemonic, 416

of Western women, 419

Identity politics, 203

Ignatieff, Michael, and individualism, 414–415, 429–431

Imperialism: and liberalism, 425, 431–435

Mill’s, 161

liberal, 425, 431–435

Infibulation. See Female genital mutilation

Islam, 2, 3, 4, 15, 149, 163, 266, 270, 296, 327, 334–337, 373, 413, 414

Christian toleration of, 173

doctrine of toleration, 14

identity of, 407

and veiling, 178, 232, 345, 418

Jurieu, Pierre, 96

Kant, Immanuel, 222, 282

and categorical imperative, 121, 129

and the concept of toleration, use of, 180–181

on moral autonomy, 18–19, 225

and public reason, 181

Koerbagh, Adrian, 57

Kukathas, Chandran, 341–343, 345

Kymlicka, Will, 341

critique of Rawls, 178, 431

L’Hôpital, Michel de, 326

Liberalism: and domination of women, 425–428

Fukuyama on, 429

and imperialism, 425, 431–435

and impoverishment of political discourse, 262–269, 289

and impoverishment of the soul, 261–262, 269, 288

and market attenuation of difference, 430

as masculine, 323–326

and neutrality, 175–179, 197, 220–224, 229–233, 243–244, 259, 263, 267–270, 304

in opposition to fundamentalism, 417, 419–423

and progress, 423, 425

and reiteration problem, 366–367, 368, 370, 381–383

and right of association and exit, 343

separation of church and state, 1, 6, 176, 197

stability of, 296–297

supremacy of, 414–415, 417. See also Ultraliberalism

Lipsius, Justus, 282

on tolerance and political stability, 56

Locke, John, 1, 57, 78, 174, 175, 252, 268, 282, 284, 328, 330, 370, 401

and atheism, 92

on authentic faith, 85–93

and Bayle, 97, 102, 103, 104

and care of the soul, 85–87, 95

and consent, 134

on dangers of religious disagreement, 31, 32, 43

on freedom of conscience, 81, 88, 93, 396–397

and general duty of toleration, 91

“Locke’s Fear,” 92, 93

on mutual respect, 90

on secular law, 328

on toleration of Catholics, 91

on toleration of religious diversity, 56, 73

and true belief argument, 114, 115, 116–119, 120, 132, 135

and unilateral toleration, 20, 22

and universalization argument, 114–116, 119–131

Luther, Martin, 86

Madison, James, 222, 252

Malebranche, Nicolas, 93

Martinich, A. P., 44

Mendus, Susan, on Locke, 132

Mill, John Stuart, 1, 175, 176, 249, 282, 303, 306

advocacy of imperialism, 161–162

alleged intolerance, 158–164

critique of Bentham, 141, 142, 144

Berlin’s critique of, 145–146, 150, 153, 159, 160–161

on civilization, 161–162

on civilizing education, 157, 412–414

conception of liberty, 145–154

harm principle, 18, 139, 147–149

historical-developmental continuum, 143–145, 151, 159–161

on improvement of moral character, 18

on justified coercion, 147

on liberal progress, 140–141, 423

on limits of toleration, 147, 154

on mode of toleration, 155–158

on “national character,” 141–145

political liberal critique of, 160–161

radical pluralist critique of, 161–164

and reasonable disagreement, 140

sociological theory of, 141–145, 152–155, 161, 423

and security, 140, 150–154, 157, 160, 161

and utilitarianism, 226

Mohanty, Chandra, 419

Montaigne, Michel de, 282, 328

Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat Baron de, 92, 222, 430

Multiculturalism, 12–13, 410, 430, 431

Okin’s critique of, 420, 421–429, 439n. 35

Nagel, Thomas, 265, 268, 318–319, 354n. 7, 366–367, 381

on devout religious belief, 318–320

Native Americans, 10

and peyote ceremony, 223

Nestle, Joan, 208

Northern Ireland, 295, 365, 383–385

and violence, 385

Nozick, Robert, 364

Obiora, Leslye, on female circumcision, 210–211

Okin, Susan, 431

on multiculturalism, 420–429, 439n. 35

Oldenburg, Henry, 65

O’Neill, Onara, 180–182

Phillips, Anne, 205–206

Pornography, 231, 334–336, 368

Proast, Jonas, 78–79

and care for the soul, 89

critique of John Locke, 15, 16, 81, 90–91, 104, 115, 116–118, 120–128, 131, 132, 284, 396

on use of force, 88, 116, 120, 135, 285

Rawls, John, 96, 99, 105, 113n. 112, 175, 177, 178, 183, 192n. 10, 268, 303, 306, 377, 378

equal right to belief, 397–398

and modus vivendi, 324–325, 397–400, 401, 402

and public arguments, 11

on reasonable disagreement, 101–102, 180, 286, 287

on reasonable moral doctrines, 180

and religious freedom, 18

Raz, Joseph, 430, 431

and respect for autonomy, 12, 179

Reason, natural light of, 60, 96, 100

Bayle on, 285–286

and “overlapping consensus,” 177, 266, 377–378

and reasonable arguments, 320

and reasonable dis/agreement, 102, 105, 375, 382

Relativism, 162, 302, 380, 410

Religious belief, 230, 301, 244–245

as basis for toleration, 282, 290

distinction between knowledge and, 308–309, 285

diversity of, 56

and faith, 89, 328

as human right, 6

and liberalism, 319–320

and natural law, 62, 72–74, 51n. 28, 119, 122–129, 137n. 21

opposed to liberal commitments, 290

and violence, 93, 97, 98–99

Respect, 57

egalitarian, 5, 23

equal, 257, 258, 267, 320, 321

and human dignity, 267, 289

mutual, 90, 100, 105, 256, 270, 290, 352n. 1, 374

and politics of recognition, 176, 201, 209–210, 365, 386

Rights, 176

Christian origins of, 267

human, 183, 266, 267, 406, 407, 410

natural, 58–61

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 92

Rushdie, Salman, Satanic Verses, 334–337

Scanlon, T. M., 202, 207, 377, 378

Scepticism, 117, 176, 178, 250–251

Seneca, 95

Spinoza, Baruch, 17, 18, 78

on compulsion and persuasion, 16, 67–72, 74

critique of Descartes, 62–63

on democracy, 58

on emotions, 72

on fear, 69

on freedom and necessity, 64–67, 71

on natural right and sovereign power, 58–61, 67, 71, 74

rejection of Kantian autonomy, 73, 77n. 29

on the will and mind-body relations, 61–64

Stephens, James Fitzjames, 146

Taylor, Charles: politics of recognition, 204–205, 209–210

on protecting cultures from assimilation, 337

Toleration: and l’affaire du foulard, 3, 178

approaches to, 225–228

asymmetrical, 206, 408

Bodin on, 328

as bourgeois capitalist virtue, 429

Buddhist, 14

Christian, 415, 416

Christian foundations of, 81–85, 173–176, 325

and citizenship, 295, 324

in civil society, 5, 19

coexistence conception, 80

as colonial gesture, 427–428

common grounds for, 225–227, 228

and Confucianism, 14

conventional view of, 316

curiosity and, 208–209, 210

and Danish cartoons, 3

degrees of, 246

dualistic approach to, 281

elements of, 244–247

engaged version, 9, 196, 198, 206–212

esteem conception, 80–81

expedience of, 397

as forbearance, 9, 196, 198, 201–204, 207, 212, 256, 301–306, 316, 361, 408

as grace, 5, 197

grudging, 207

and hegemony, 337–340

historical and philosophical approaches to, 171–172

humility and, 209–210

of illiberal minorities, 340–345

and impossibility of neutral justification, 8–9

as indifference, 17, 18, 156, 176, 249–250

instrumental justifications of, 24

as insult, 80, 106n. 6

Islamic, 14

limits of, 13, 139, 140, 147, 154, 376

as meta-toleration, 228–232

mode of, 155–158

as modus vivendi, 177, 303, 306, 324–325, 394, 398–399, 402, 434

monistic position on, 281–282

as a moral concept, 172

moral-philosophical view, 224–225, 228, 23

as moral principle, 394, 396–400

moral psychology of, 5, 12, 14

as murality, 21–22, 371–387

and mutuality, 22–23, 315–352, 361–371, 374–378, 381, 384

as mutual respect, 90, 100, 105

neutrality and, 282, 300, 306–307, 317, 339

of non-liberal religious views, 305

as objection, acceptance, and rejection, 79, 283

in opposition to illiberalism, 247–256, 284

of oppressive cultures, 13

origins in religion and royal grace, 173–174

paradox of, 6, 300

and peace, 80, 176

permission conception of, 79–80

pluralism and, 224–229

reflexive theory of, 105

respect conception of, 80

security and, 379, 381

skeptical position, 281, 282, 285–286

social costs of, 182

as a supererogatory attitude, 172, 183, 185–189, 197

as unilateral act, 20–21, 316

and “will to relationship,” 316, 321–332, 362–367

Toleration Act (1689), 284, 329, 370, 383, 393–396, 438n. 28

Tocqueville, Alexis de, 152, 153, 222

Ultraliberalism, 246–247, 257, 261, 263, 264, 267–270, 284, 288, 290, 293–298, 306, 307

van Gogh, Theo, 3

Vernon, Richard, on Locke, 134

Violence, 327, 345, 392, 435

civil unrest and, 83

and compulsion, 70, 97, 305

intolerance and, 352

and IRA, 385

Islamicist, 413

legitimizing of, 434

as means of dealing with uncivilized, 409

and non-violence 225, 226

physical, 151, 157, 229, 347

politicians and, 393, 400

post-colonial, 435

public, 151

religion and, 93, 97, 98–99

rise in, 411

threat of, 72

Voltaire, 19–20, 92

Walzer, Michael, 177

Williams, Bernard, 175, 177, 430–431

Wolff, Jonathan, 207

Wootton, David, 133

Zagorin, Perez, 325