The purpose of this section is to provide you with a way to forecast bankruptcy using five simple ratios to determine a Z-score for any firm. The ratios used to determine the Z-score are working capital to total assets, retained earnings to total assets, E.B.I.T. to total assets, the market value of the firm’s equity to the book value of its debt, and sales to total assets. The Z-score is a measure of overall financial health.
Z = .012X1 + .014X2 + .033X3 + .006X4 + .999X5
X1 = working capital/total assets
X2 = retained earnings/total assets
X3 = earnings before interest and taxes/total assets
X4 = total equity/total debt
X5 = sales/total assets
Z = overall index
If Z is | This indicates |
Less than 1.81 | A problem |
Between 1.81 and 2.99 | Concern |
Greater than 2.99 | No problem |
The Z-score was developed using a statistical procedure called discriminant analysis. This procedure allows the statistician to find variables that distinguish between groups. In this case the procedure found five ratios that distinguish between bankrupt and non-bankrupt companies. The coefficients in front of the X variables come from the statistical procedure.
Variables X1 to X4 are to be computed as a percent, not as a decimal. For example, if X1 is 21.8 percent, put it in the model as 21.8, not as 0.218.
The Z-score is a good measure of overall health. Do not become too hung-up on Altman’s 1.81 cutoff. Observe how the Z-score varies across time. I would be less worried about a company whose Z-score remains between 1.70 and 1.85 for the last 10 years than about a firm that dropped from 2.8 to 1.95 in 1 year. Use your judgment regarding this ratio.
Crystal Brands, Inc. selected financial data (in 000) | |||||
20X5 | 20X6 | 20X7 | 20X8 | 20X9 | |
Net sales | $857,241 | $868,465 | $826,876 | $486,893 | $444,302 |
EBIT | 84,758 | 84,393 | (19,345) | 1,103 | (87,379) |
Current assets | 351,726 | 363,880 | 350,048 | 245,744 | 155,245 |
Current liabilities | 167,558 | 172,179 | 199,761 | 77,165 | 313,392 |
Total assets | 682,528 | 688,138 | 659,437 | 486,309 | 248,437 |
Total debt | 444,779 | 421,963 | 465,946 | 362,128 | 340,556 |
Retained earnings | 47,161 | 74,235 | 1,019 | (66,801) | (282,917) |
Number of shares | 9,078 | 9,098 | 9,116 | 9,117 | 9,117 |
Market price/share | 33.03 | 21.06 | 14.00 | 4.03 | 1.07 |
X1 | 26.98% | 27.86% | 22.79% | 34.66% | (63.66%) |
X2 | 6.91% | 10.79% | 0.15% | (13.74%) | (113.88%) |
X3 | 12.4% | 12.2% | (2.9%) | (0.2%) | (35.17%) |
X4 | 67.41% | 45.41% | 27.39% | 10.15% | 2.86% |
X5 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.79 |
Z | 2.49 | 2.42 | 1.59 | 1.29 | (1.71) |
In 1983 Altman developed a second model that is, perhaps, more useful for small companies (service companies and manufacturers). Each variable is computed as a percent, not as a decimal.
Where
Y1 = working capital to total assets
Y2 = retained earnings to total assets
Y3 = earnings before interest and taxes to total assets
Y4 = net worth to total liabilities
Critical values
Z′ ≤ 1.1 | Concern |
1.1 < Z′ < 2.6 | Grey Area |
2.6 ≤ Z′ | Strong Company |
Several other bankruptcy prediction models have been proposed. Altman’s models may work as well as most others. However, if you would like an additional model to choose from, we recommend the following: