Abel, G. (2012). Knowing-how: Indispensable but inscrutable. In S. Tolksdorf (Ed.), Conceptions of knowledge (pp. 245–267). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Adler, J. (1981). Skepticism and universalizability. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 143–156.
Adler, J. (2002). Belief’s own ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adler, J. (2009). Why fallibility has not mattered and how it could. In H. Siegel (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the philosophy of education (pp. 83–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alberti, L. B. (2011). On painting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alston, William (1988). The deontological conception of epistemic justification. In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives (Vol. 2): Epistemology (pp. 257–299). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Ankeny, R. (2014). The overlooked role of cases in causal attribution in medicine. Philosophy of Science, 81, 999–1011.
Aristotle. (1973). Poetics. In Introduction to Aristotle. Ed. Richard McKeon. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Austen, J. (1814). Letter to her niece, Anna Austin Lefroy, September 9, 1814. In Letters of Jane Austen. Bradbourne Edition, http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/brablt16.html.
Ball, P. (2005). Elegant solutions. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Banes, S. (2003). Gulliver’s hamburger: Defamiliarization and the ordinary in the 1960s avant garde. In S. Banes (Ed.), Reinventing dance in the 1960s (pp. 3–5). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bannock, G., Baxter, R., & Davis, E. (1998). Dictionary of economics. New York: John Wiley.
Bealer, G. (1998). Propositions. Mind, 107, 1–32.
Bennett, J. (1974). The conscience of Huckleberry Finn. Philosophy, 69, 123–134.
Berkeley, G. (1957). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.
Berker, S. (2013). The rejection of epistemic consequentialism. Philosophical Issues, 23, 363–387.
Bokulich, A. (2001). Rethinking thought experiments. Perspectives on Science, 9, 285–307.
BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Boswell, T. (2011). Penn State Coach Joe Paterno reaches a sad conclusion. Washington Post, Nov. 9.
Bourgeois, F. T., Murthy, S., & Mandl, K. (2010). Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(3) (Aug. 3): 158–166.
Brewer, S. (1998). Scientific expert testimony and intellectual due process. Yale Law Journal, 107, 1535–1682.
Brogaard, B. (2005). I know, therefore I understand. Unpublished MS.
Burge, T. (1993). Content preservation. Philosophical Review, 102, 457–488.
Capdevila, R. (2009). Construing architecture, constructing philosophy. Dissertation presented to the Deparatment de Filosofia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Carr, D. (1979). The logic of knowing how and ability. Mind, 88, 394–409.
Carroll, N. (2002). The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60, 3–26.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, N. (1999). Aristotelian natures and modern experimental method. In The dappled world (pp. 77–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cavell, S. (1987). Disowning knowledge in six plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chisholm, R. (1973). The problem of the criterion. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
Cohen, L. J. (1992). An essay on belief and acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cohen, S. (2014). Contextualism defended. In M. Steup, J. Turri, & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 69–75). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Comfort, N. C. (2001). The tangled field: Barbara McClintock’s search for the patterns of genetic control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cunningham, Merce. (1986). Interview. Points in space (CD).
Davenport, E. (1983). Literature as thought experiment (on aiding and abetting the muse). Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 13, 279–306.
David, M. (2005). Truth as the primary epistemic goal: A working hypothesis. In M. Steup & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 296–312). Malden: Blackwell.
Davidson, D. (2001). Rational animals. In Subjective, intersubjective, objective (pp. 95–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, D. (2010). Learning through fictional narratives in art and science. In R. Frigg & M. C. Hunter (Eds.), Beyond mimesis and convention (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht: Springer.
DeRose, K. (2011). The case for contextualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
Dickie, G. (2007). What is art? An institutional analysis. In J. Adler & C. Elgin (Eds.), Philosophical inquiry (pp. 852–862). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Dougherty, T., & Rysiew, P. (2009). Fallibilism, epistemic possibility, and concessive knowledge attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78, 123–132.
Douglas, H. (2004). The irreducible complexity of objectivity. Synthese, 138, 453–473.
Doyle, Y., Egan, S., Graham, N., & Khalifa, K. (2015). Non-factive understanding: A statement and a defense. Unpublished MS.
Dretske, F. (2000). Conclusive reasons. In Perception, knowledge, and belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elgin, C. Z. (1988). With reference to reference. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Elgin, C. Z. (1996). Considered judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Elgin, C. Z. (2002). Art in the advancement of understanding. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 1–12.
Elgin, C. Z. (2007a). The laboratory of the mind. In J. Gibson, W. Huemer, & L. Pocci (Eds.), A sense of the world: Essays on fiction, narrative, and knowledge (pp. 43–54). London: Routledge.
Elgin, C. Z. (2007b). Emotion and understanding. In G. Brun, U. Dogouglu, & D. Kunzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 33–50). London: Ashgate.
Elgin, C. Z. (2011). Making manifest: Exemplification in the sciences and the arts. Principia, 15, 399–413.
Federal Register. 2009. Aug. 20 (Vol. 74, No. 160), http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-19930.htm.
Feldman, R. (2008). Modest deontologism in epistemology. Synthese, 177, 41–66.
Feynman, R. (2001). What do you care what other people think? New York: W. W. Norton.
Fine, A. (1998). The viewpoint of no-one in particular. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 72, 9–20.
Firth, R. (1981). Epistemic merit: Intrinsic and instrumental. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 55, 5–23.
Folkman, J. (1996). Fighting cancer by attacking its blood supply. Scientific American, 275(3), 50–54.
Fricker, E. (1994). Against gullibility. In B. K. Matilal & A. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Knowing from words (pp. 125–161). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frigg, R. (2010). Fiction and scientific representation. In R. Frigg and M. C. Hunter (Eds.), Beyond mimesis and convention (pp. 97–138). Dordrecht: Springer.
Fry, R. (1952). Cézanne. London: Hogarth.
Fumerton, R. (2010). Foundationalist theories of epistemic justification. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2010 Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/justep.foundational.
Gendler, T. (2010). Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment. In Intuition, imagination, and scientific methodology (pp. 21–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giere, R. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ginsborg, H. (2010). Primitive normativity and skepticism about rules. Journal of Philosophy, 108, 227–254.
Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldman, A. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Clarendon.
Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Goodman, N. (1977). The structure of appearance. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Goodman, N. (1984). Fact, fiction, and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goodstein, D. (2010). On fact and fraud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Greco, J. (2014). Episteme: Knowledge and understanding. In K. Timpe & C. Boyd (Eds.), Virtues and their vices (pp. 285–302). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, M., & Williams, J. N. (Eds.). (2007). Moore’s paradox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Greenberg, C. (1961). Art and culture. Boston: Beacon.
Greenberg, C. (1966). Modernist painting. In G. Battcock (Ed.), The new art (pp. 100–110). New York: Dutton.
Grice, P. (1989). Logic and conversation. In Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grimm, S. (2006). Is understanding a species of knowledge? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 515–535.
Grimm, S. (2008). Explanatory inquiry and the need for explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59, 481–497.
Grimm, S. (2014). Understanding as knowledge of causes. In Abrol Fairweather (Ed.), Virtue epistemology naturalized: Bridges between virtue epistemology and philosophy of science. New York: Springer.
Habermas, J. (2001). Truth and society: The discursive redemption of factual claims to validity. In On the pragmatics of social interaction (pp. 85–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hacking, I. (1982). Experimentation and scientific realism. Philosophical Topics, 13, 71–88.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 693–708.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Studies in the logic of explanation. In Aspects of scientific explanation (pp. 245–295). New York: Free Press.
Herodotus. (1985). The histories. New York: Penguin.
Hetherington, S. (2011). How to know. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hills, A. (2015). Understanding why. Noûs, 50, 661–688.
Hughes, R. I. G. (1996). Models and representation. In PSA 1996 (Vol. 2, pp. S325–336). Philosophy of Science Association.
Hume, D. (1928). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hume, D. (1977). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Hume, D. (2007). On the standard of taste. In J. Adler & C. Elgin (Eds.), Philosophical inquiry (pp. 815–824). Indianapolis: Hackett.
James, W. (1951). The will to believe. In A. Castelli (Ed.), Essays on pragmatism (pp. 88–109). New York: Harner.
James, W. (1983). Principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jullien, C. (2006). Esthetique et modes Operatoires en Mathématiques. PhD dissertation, Nancy-Université.
Kant, I. (1981). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism. New York: Henry Holt.
Khalifa, K. (2012). Inaugurating understanding or repackaging explanation? Philosophy of Science, 79, 15–37.
Kipling, R. (1978). The elephant’s child. In Just so stories (pp. 49–63). New York: Weathervane Books.
Kitcher, P. (1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 5–22.
Klein, P. (1999). Human knowledge and the infinite regress of reasons. Philosophical Perspectives, 13, 297–325.
Korsgaard, C. (1996a). The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, C. (1996b). The reasons we can share. In Creating the kingdom of ends (pp. 249–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kripke, S. (2011a). On two paradoxes of knowledge. In Philosophical troubles (pp. 27–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. (2011b). A puzzle about belief. In Philosophical troubles (pp. 125–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kvanvig, J. (2003). The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kyburg, H. (1997). The rule of adjunction and reasonable inference. Journal of Philosophy, 94, 109–125.
Lehrer, K. (1974). Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehrer, K. (1986). The coherence theory of knowledge. Philosophical Topics, 14, 5–25.
Leite, A. (2004). Is fallibility an epistemological shortcoming? Philosophical Quarterly, 54, 232–251.
Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Lewis, D. (1983). Truth in fiction: Postscript. In Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 276–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1999a). New work for a theory of universals. In Papers in metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 8–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1999b). Elusive knowledge. In Papers in metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 418–445). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, M. (2000). Making the memorial. New York Review of Books, Nov. 2.
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
Lipton, P. (2009). Understanding without explanation. In H. de Regt, S. Leonelli, & K. Eiger (Eds.), Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 43–63). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Lo, Bernard, & Fields, Marilyn J. (Eds.). (2009). Principles for identifying and assessing conflicts of interest. In Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice (pp. 44–61). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Locke, J. (1894). An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lopes, D. (1996). Understanding pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mazur, J. (2014). Enlightening symbols: A short history of mathematical notation and its hidden powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McClintock, B. (1973). Letter to J. R. S. Finchman, May16, 1973. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/LL/Views/Exhibit/documents/biographical.html.
McGowan, M. K. (2003). Realism, reference, and grue. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 47–57.
McGowan, M. K. (2009). On silencing and sexual refusal. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 487–494.
Metropolis, N. (1987). The beginning of the Monte Carlo Method. Los Alamos Science, 15 (Special Issue dedicated to Stanislaw Ulam), 125–130.
Mill, J. S. (1978). On liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Moore, G. E. (1991). Russell’s theory of descriptions. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Bertrand Russell (pp. 177–225). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Moore, G. E. (1993). A defence of common sense. In G. E. Moore: Selected Writings. London: Routledge.
Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 10–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, M. (1999). Models as autonomous agents. M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 38–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nersessian, Nancy (1993). In the theoretician’s laboratory: Thought experimenting as mental modeling. In PSA 1992 (Vol. 2, pp. 291–301). Philosophy of Science Association.
Nersessian, N. (2007). Thought experimenting as mental modeling: Empiricism without logic. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 7(20), 125–161.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Oxford dictionary of science. (1999). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pascal, B. (2007). The wager. In J. E. Adler & C. Z. Elgin (Eds.), Philosophical inquiry (pp. 784–786). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Plato. (1997). Plato: The complete works. J. Cooper (Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pritchard, D. (2005). Epistemic luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. (2010). Knowledge and understanding. In D. Pritchard, A. Millar, & A. Haddock, The nature and value of knowledge: Three investigations (pp. 1–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1961). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46). New York: Harper & Row.
Rainer, Y. (1995). Some retrospective notes on a dance for 10 people and 12 mattresses called parts of some sextets. In M. R. Sandford (Ed.), Happenings and other acts. London: Routledge.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Riggs, W. (2003). Balancing our epistemic goals. Noûs, 37, 343–352.
Rowling, J. K. (1999). Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban. New York: Scholastic.
Russell, B. (1968). On denoting. In Logic and knowledge. New York: Capricorn.
Russell, W. (1783). The tragic muse: A poem addressed to Mrs. Siddons. London: Printed for G. Kearsley.
Ryle, G. (1949/2009). The concept of mind. New York: Routledge.
Sarkar, S. (2014). Ecology. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/ecology/.
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schwartz, R. (1985). The power of pictures. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 189–198.
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception, and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sellars, W. (1968). Science and metaphysics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Shah, N. (2002). Clearing space for doxastic voluntarism. Monist, 85, 436–445.
Sigman, J. (1998). Ordinary people: Trio A and how dances signify. In Bodies, souls, and ordinary people: Three essays on art and interpretation. Dissertation presented to the Department of Philosophy, Princeton University.
Sklar, L. (1999) Philosophy of science. In R. Audi (Ed.), Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (pp. 700–704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, M. (2012). Teaching Jo Pa. Academe, 98, 55.
Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stadler, I. (1982). The idea of art and of its criticism. In T. Cohen and P. Guyer (Eds.), Essays in Kant’s aesthetics (pp. 195–220). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Strevens, M. (2008). Depth: An account of scientific explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Strevens, M. (2010). Varieties of understanding. Unpublished manuscript.
Strevens, M. (2012). Ceteris paribus hedges: Causal voodoo that works. Journal of Philosophy, 109, 652–675.
Strevens, M. (2016). How idealizations provide understanding. In S. Grimm, C. Baumberger, & S. Ammon (Eds.), Explaining understanding: New essays in epistemology and the philosophy of science (pp. 37–49). New York: Routledge.
Stroud, B. (1984). The significance of philosophical scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Suárez, M. (2003). Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 225–243.
Suzuki, H., et al. (2007). Novel strategy to treat multi-drug-resistant gram-negative pathogens using bacterial conjugation. Plasmid, 57, 237–238.
Szabó, Z. G. (2001). Fictionalism and Moore’s paradox. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31, 299–300.
Teller, P. (2001). The twilight of the perfect model model. Erkenntnis, 55, 393–415.
Treanor, N. (2013). The measure of knowledge. Noûs, 47, 577–601.
Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual and statistical thinking: Displays of evidence for decision making. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
USA Diving. (2013). Official technical rules 2015–2017. http://usadiving.org.
Van Cleve, J. (2005). Why coherence is not enough: A defense of moderate foundationalism. In M. Steup & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 168–180). Malden: Blackwell.
Van Fraassen, B. (2008). Scientific representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Venter, J. C., et al. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291(5007), 1304–1351.
Vogel, J. (1990). Are there counterexamples to the closure principle? In M. D. Roth & G. Ross (Eds.), Doubting (pp. 13–27). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Walden, K. (2007). A practico priori. Unpublished MS.
Weatherson, B. (2008). Deontology and Descartes’ demon. Journal of Philosophy, 105, 540–569.
Wedgwood, R. (2002). The aim of belief. Noûs, 16 (supplement), 267–297.
Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
West, R. (1928). The strange necessity. Garden City: Doubleday.
White, M. (1965). Foundations of historical knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
Williams, B. A. O. (1973). Deciding to believe. In Problems of the self (pp. 136–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. A. O. (1978). Descartes: The project of inquiry. New York: Penguin.
Williams, B. A. O. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Williams, B. A. O. (2002). Truth and truthfulness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wills, G. (1992). Lincoln at Gettysburg: Words that remade America. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Wilson, M. (2006). Wandering significance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Zimba, J. (2009). On the possibility of trigonometric proofs of the Pythagorean theorem. Forum Geometricorum, 9, 275–278.
Zinn, H. (1980). A people’s history of the United States. New York: Harper & Row.