My childhood home was a top-floor walk-up apartment in Lower Manhattan. By the time I was born, most of the bohemians belonging to my parents’ downtown scene had decamped to suburbs or college towns—or at least to elevator buildings on the Upper West Side. Even I left New York for a few years. But my parents remained in their East Village apartment, decade after decade.
In the fall of 2018, I popped by to look for a toy to give my baby goddaughter. In the warren of their building’s basement, my parents stored papers, books, and bubble-wrapped appliances—not antique so much as just old and unused. That afternoon, I went through the small, tiled lobby, past a padlocked door, and down narrow metal stairs into the dank space, ten degrees cooler than the hall. I hit my head and cursed myself for doing it. On the rare occasions I’ve gone into the basement since I reached five foot nine in high school, I’ve reminded myself not to stand up straight, and every single time I’ve forgotten and smacked my head on a ceiling pipe.
In a heavy filing cabinet almost as tall as I am, I found what I’d come for—my old miniature plastic foods for playing kitchen, in storage since I’d graduated to a Spirograph and Sit ’n Spin thirty-five years earlier.
Then I noticed something in another of the heavy drawers that, in my haste to spend no more time in the basement than necessary, I hadn’t seen before: dozens of loose, dust-covered cassette tapes labeled with the dates 1977 or 1976, the year I was born, along with names like Willem de Kooning and Edward Gorey. I’d never met any of these people, but I knew their names. They were painters and poets—people it would make sense for my father—Peter Schjeldahl, an art critic—to have known.
Before I was born, he’d been a hotshot poet, giving readings at crowded galleries, lofts, and churches in Manhattan. His inspiration both for writing and for moving to New York City was his idol: the poet Frank O’Hara.
O’Hara wasn’t as famous a cultural figure of the midcentury as the Beatles or Andy Warhol, but to people who cared about art and literature he and his cohort of cosmopolitan New York City poets and painters were the ones you would push past more famous people to get to. They ushered in a lusty new gay sensibility—urbane, witty, obsessed with all forms of culture from Russian ballet to the trashiest Hollywood movies. O’Hara was the group’s beating heart.
In his early twenties, my father met O’Hara, sixteen years his senior, a few times at parties. With his crooked nose and wide smile, high forehead and light blue eyes, O’Hara looked soft and hard at the same time: part boxer, part librarian. He was short, but thanks to his perfect posture and a tendency to walk on the balls of his feet, he seemed taller. The last time my father saw him, O’Hara inscribed a catalog to him at a Museum of Modern Art opening: “for Peter with palship from Frank.”
A month later, on July 25, 1966, O’Hara died at the age of forty in a freak vehicular accident on Fire Island, a gay-friendly vacation town off the South Shore of Long Island known for being car-free. A beach taxi he and his friends were taking from a dance bar to the house they were staying in broke down. While they were waiting for another taxi in the darkness, O’Hara was hit by a dune buggy driven by a young man on a date. In my father’s obituary for the Village Voice, he wrote: “Everything about O’Hara is easy to demonstrate and exceedingly difficult to ‘understand.’ And the aura of the legendary, never far from him while he lived, now seems about to engulf the memory of all he was and did.”
The less affectionate New York Times obituary, which appeared with no byline, is riddled with an impressive number of errors, given its brevity. Among other things, it said O’Hara was hit by a taxi, not a dune buggy, and it gave his address as that of Grace Church’s churchyard—not a likely residence for a lapsed Catholic. Worse, it minimized O’Hara’s literary importance, suggesting he was little more than a museum functionary and a muse who posed for a scandalous painting by the abstract expressionist painter and troublemaker Larry Rivers. The headline identified him as a museum curator; the subheadline: “EXHIBITIONS AIDE AT MODERN ART DIES—ALSO A POET.”
My father, long-haired and glassy-eyed, wearing spats and a dandyish vest with pockets for his pocket watch and pillbox of amphetamines, spent the rest of the sixties and early seventies staying out late, he said, so he had time to make the maximum number of mistakes.
At an art opening at the Whitney Museum in 1973, he met my mother, Donnie Brooke Alderson. She’d recently retired from musical touring shows like You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown. (No one who knew her would be surprised to hear she’d played Lucy.) She’d spent a good part of the sixties working as a hostess on a cruise ship. On one voyage, she had a mystical experience while staring out at the ocean, a cigarette in one hand and a beer in the other.
Now in New York, working with her accompanist, Gary Simmons, she’d begun doing stand-up comedy in lesbian bars. A Texas girl, she never went to a party without full makeup and high heels, and she still carried herself like the ballet dancer she once was. As a child, she’d appeared as Clara in The Nutcracker alongside America’s first major prima ballerina, Maria Tallchief.
My father didn’t know much about dance, but he would have known that name. In a marriage poem for his friends Jane Freilicher and Joe Hazan, “Poem Read at Joan Mitchell’s,” Frank O’Hara wrote that Maria Tallchief’s rhinestones heralded spring.
When I was born, my father gave up sleeping until noon but otherwise carried on as before, writing all day and drinking all evening. He didn’t write poetry anymore, but he did poetically write art criticism for the New York Times, Art in America, and the Village Voice.
Over time, even though he was a college dropout and in many respects sort of a mess, he became one of the most respected art critics in the country. His meticulously crafted sentences require many of his fans to keep a dictionary by their side when they read him. And yet, he wasn’t pedantic or academic. He wrote as a fan, full of love of and enthusiasm for beauty. His reviews were so persuasive they could make readers see even Picasso and Rembrandt in a new way.
After climbing the four flights to my parents’ apartment, I asked my father about the tapes I’d found in the basement.
“They’re interviews I did in the seventies,” he said, and grimaced. “I was going to write a biography of Frank O’Hara.”
I’d always loved Frank O’Hara’s poetry. I copied his style when I wrote poetry myself as a bookish little girl, and I’ve given many friends copies of his book Lunch Poems over the years. There was something about his poems that made me feel like I was sharing a wonderful secret. A verse about how a drink tasted or a city block looked felt like an invitation to another world. An O’Hara poem could make even public-school hallways shimmer with possibility.
My father said that looking at those tapes made him depressed. By not finishing the biography, my father felt he’d let down his hero. He wrote of O’Hara in the New York Times in 1974: “He seems to have had that most dubious and enchanting of gifts, the ability to romanticize reality, for oneself and others, as it is happening. His legend, an inextricable tangle of fact and inflated memory, is going to be with us for a long time.”
O’Hara’s legacy haunted my father and inflected his sentences. People noticed. In the New Criterion, art critic Roger Kimball wrote: “In many respects, Mr. Schjeldahl’s style is a demotic and more dour version of Frank O’Hara’s, the poet-critic upon whom he has most conspicuously modeled himself.”
I took the tapes home and put one into my cassette player. Suddenly I was standing in a Soho loft, drink in hand, watching my handsome, strung-out young father up at the front of the room.
Peter Schjeldahl Reading—SoHo, New York City (98 Greene Street)—3/1/71
Unknown voice: A poetry recital at the 98 Greene Street loft held on March 1, 1971. The poet is Peter Schendell [sic].
Peter Schjeldahl: “La Vie en Rose.” For Larry Fagin.
To deal with death, ignore it.
Then when it shows up, feign madness.
Make faces.
It will be frightened and disappear.
[Crowd laughs.]
In the past decade I’ve spent writing books—a few under my own name and many more as a ghostwriter—I’ve seen projects fall apart for all sorts of reasons. Still, I couldn’t imagine how anyone, especially a great writer embedded in the scene, could do that many interviews and have nothing come of it.
In the days after I found the tapes, I ransacked libraries, bookstores, and the Internet for everything I could find about O’Hara. I discovered that there was a hole in the canon where my father’s contribution would have been. One book from 1979 about O’Hara’s work even referenced his biography as a work in progress.
I invited my father out for lunch at our favorite diner, Odessa, so I could ask him about his doomed biography. Odessa sat a block and a half from my parents’ apartment, on Avenue A, which runs along the western side of Tompkins Square Park. I once took an extremely famous person there for lunch and, to my satisfaction, the Odessa waitress was as gruff with his pierogi order as she was with everyone else’s. Over eggs, I turned on my tape recorder and asked my father for the story of the O’Hara book.
Looking disheveled in messy hair, crooked glasses, and an unbuttoned plaid shirt over a gray T-shirt, my father hunched a little, as if still at his desk. He said the problem was the relationship he had with the estate’s executor, O’Hara’s younger sister, Maureen O’Hara Granville-Smith. He said initially she was in favor of his project, but then she kept putting him off when it came to making O’Hara’s letters available. She would say she was mailing him copies and they wouldn’t show up. She would say “soon,” and then soon and even much later than soon would arrive and still no letters.
This went on for months and then more than a year, until finally he began to suspect that the material would never come. His agent, Maxine Groffsky, and his publisher, Harper and Row, tried to help him negotiate with Maureen, to do anything to keep the project alive, but evidently there was nothing he could do to change her mind. He was out as authorized biographer. At a tense lunch with his editor about returning the advance, he said he’d been through hell and should be allowed to keep the money—which, by the way, he had already spent. In the end, he was allowed to keep the first $7,500 of his $15,000 advance. The rest of the contract was canceled. The tapes went into the basement, and my father tried not to think about them again.
Sixteen years passed before the publication of the only significant O’Hara biography, City Poet: The Life and Times of Frank O’Hara by Brad Gooch, which came out in 1993. My father had theories about why Maureen decided he was wrong for the project and that, two decades later, Gooch was right. He came to believe that she was opposed to anything that might reflect poorly on the O’Haras. She seemed to fear, too, that O’Hara’s homosexuality would be all anyone remembered of his story—and perhaps she had more cause to worry about that in the 1970s than in the 1990s.
The well-off O’Haras, who were what used to be called lace-curtain Irish, cared about appearances. Frank gave them trouble even before he was born by being conceived out of wedlock. O’Hara’s parents moved to Baltimore soon after marrying. When they returned, they told everyone that their son had been born on June 27, 1926—three months later than his true birthday.
I’m not a believer in horoscopes, but there’s still something unsettling about Frank O’Hara living his whole life believing he was a Cancer when really he was an Aries. My father thinks that when he started to ask questions about the birthday discrepancy was when Maureen began to freeze him out.
Peter Schjeldahl—Odessa Diner, East Village, New York City (119 Avenue A)—11/9/18
Peter Schjeldahl: She started out super friendly, super cooperative, and then it got weird.
Ada Calhoun: And when did it get weird?
PS: Pretty soon. I mean, well, no, it’s like— It was weird for a long time before I realized it was weird, you know? It was like nothing was happening and then there’s this note of hostility. And then when I talked to the brother in Chicago and raised the question about the birth date, it became militant.
Sitting across from my father at Odessa, I listened with compassion. Still, I was pretty sure that whatever had happened, he must have been partly to blame. He’d always had a gift for accidentally saying terrible things. My mother said he should give out business cards that read: PETER SCHJELDAHL—BRIDGE BURNER. I imagined him throwing a handful of them into the air as he fled from a cocktail party where he’d just offended the host.
From a very young age, I knew that my father wasn’t like the fathers on TV shows or in movies. He wasn’t a protector or an advice giver. He took pride in always choosing freedom over security. Studying Martin Luther King Jr. circa 1985 at PS 41, I asked my father if he’d attended the 1963 March on Washington. He told me that he was assigned by his New Jersey paper to cover it, but he overslept and missed his bus. Later that day, he walked into the newsroom and saw his colleagues huddled around a black-and-white TV, trying to spot him in the crowd.
My takeaway from this story—and from most of the stories he told—was that I shouldn’t count on him.
In rebellion against his flakiness, I became compulsively reliable. I don’t think the Girl Scouts bivouacked in the 1980s East Village, but had they, I would have earned all the badges. Growing up, I was a hall monitor and teacher’s pet. As an adult, I became friends’ go-to executor on wills; godmother to children; reference writer for co-op board, adoption, and school applications. With my CPR/first aid/ AED certification current, I would give you directions, watch your bag while you made a call, and feed your cats while you were away. A Village Voice profile described me as “cheerful and mannerly.” My credit score: 837. Excellent.
My father and I had just one thing in common: writing. I didn’t particularly want to follow in his footsteps, but it felt fated. I learned to read early and went to the library every week for a new stack of books to haul up the stairs. In middle school, I memorized Shakespeare and Coleridge and edited the school paper. In my twenties, I became a newspaper reporter. In my thirties, I started writing books. At various points over the years, I tried to follow different paths—translator, photographer—but writing and editing seemed like what I was built for, like a greyhound is born to run.
Before I even started elementary school, I would wake up in the middle of the night with lines of poetry in my head. Preserved in a large manila envelope decorated with a penguin sticker, marker drawings of a tree, wreath, Santa, candy cane, and presents, plus a big “Do not open until Christmas,” is a book of poetry by me called City Poems.
Here’s one:
A Summer Night in the City
Outside in the dark blue sky
Lights are glowing.
All of the lights are out
Except this very one
Where I am writing away at plans for a new day.
(Good night.)
I was six. At that age, I loved staying up late, looking out into the dark, seeing people go places. In the darkness, with no one watching me, I could be anything. And what I chose alone in my room, with all the choices in the world at my feet, was to imitate my father, who was imitating Frank O’Hara—all three of us writing poems about New York and nighttime and dreams. I mimicked my father’s O’Hara reverence the way a boy learns how to shave from watching his father’s face in the bathroom mirror.
And yet, my father has been considered the real writer, the tortured artist creating behind a locked door. I’ve been the hard worker, meeting deadlines over a laptop in coffee shops or on the couch with a child watching Wonder Pets! at my side. I’ve always been a mystery to my father and he to me. The main difference is that I’ve been fascinated by him, and he’s often seemed to forget I was there.
This O’Hara book, though—this seemed like a time when he’d failed at something that I was pretty sure I could have nailed. Maybe my Frank O’Hara biography wouldn’t have been as poetic or elegant as his Frank O’Hara biography, but by god it would have gotten done. In my twenty years as a journalist, I’ve successfully interviewed hundreds of people, including difficult celebrities in their four-star Los Angeles hotel suites, lawyers in sleepy Southern towns, and gang members at the sites of Brooklyn shootings.
I thought of how many books I’d conjured into being with less than a quarter of the material in that basement drawer. A few years ago, I got a call from my agent telling me that a celebrity needed someone to redo the twenty thousand words the first ghostwriter had done and then to finish the hundred-thousand-word manuscript in five weeks. I took the job. The book came out on time and hit the New York Times bestseller list.
A couple of years after that, I sensed that a memoir on which I was the ghost might be in jeopardy. The celebrity was making sounds about the pages not sounding quite right, a red flag. I asked for a sample of writing that worked. Then I spent hours mapping the grammar of that sample, line by line, onto each story I’d been told. That book came out on time, and it, too, hit the New York Times bestseller list.
Ghostwriting is a good name for this job. If you do it well, you remain invisible. You learn to think and write as the person you’re helping, and to fall at least half in love with them. To be good at this work you must have boundless curiosity about the subject’s internal world, the way you would if they were your crush.
I was certain that if I’d been named Frank O’Hara’s authorized biographer, I never would have let the project fall apart. I also thought that the executor might have had understandable reasons for being cautious about careless people digging too deeply into her brother’s childhood, which after all was her childhood, too. I wondered if my father even tried to find out why she was so protective.
“Did you ever ask to interview Maureen herself?” I asked.
“No,” he said.
There’s your first mistake, I thought.
By the time I found the O’Hara tapes forty years after they went into the basement, nearly every one of the people my father had interviewed was dead. But his shame endured: “I felt that the interviews were horrible, and I was horrible,” he told me at Odessa. “They were a total failure.”
I felt sorry for my shame-steeped father, but I also felt something like glee. I knew that there must be a way that I could resurrect this project. These dual impulses—to do something noble and to win—characterized my time a decade ago as a national news reporter. I’d be interviewing someone in Alabama or Idaho about a tragedy. Half of me would feel moved, would think, Here, before me, is a fellow human being who is suffering. The other part, the reporter, sensing that this scene would produce potent copy, would have just one word in her head: Yessssss.
I asked my father if it would be okay for me to take the tapes and try to finish his O’Hara book. I said that it would keep his research, vital to literary history, from rotting, unheard, in an East Village basement. And it would bring us together in a common purpose. The book would be good for him, good for me, and it would almost write itself.
He said I was welcome to try. He also said, “I didn’t know you were a Frank O’Hara fan.”
That stopped me dead in my tracks.
To me this seemed a little like not knowing your child was a vegan or a Theosophist or allergic to bees. Then again, for a few months in ninth grade I was a full-blown witch. Wearing thrift-store slips as dresses, my pentacle-clad friends and I dripped so much wax from our candles that we used it to build a scale model of the town of Twin Peaks. He never noticed that either.
As we finished our omelets, I showed him a book I’d found that collected stories about O’Hara told by his friends. My father opened it and read aloud from writer Patsy Southgate’s account of the time she and O’Hara tried to sleep together.
“It occurred in August, a hot night in the early sixties,” the story began. “In bed at night, one felt as if one were lying on a sale table in Klein’s basement during a failure of air-conditioning.” Southgate, who grew up in Washington, DC, a beautiful WASP, was surprised she had a night alone with O’Hara in the Hamptons, but “fate occasionally does throw one a fish.”
They wound up driving drunk at dawn after a party to Larry Rivers’s house, where they turned up Erik Satie as loud as they wanted (very loud). As they drank on the white sofa, they decided to go to bed together.
Southgate was “madly in love with him in a way, and afflicted with one of those simple cases of hot pants that love, in all its innocence and wisdom, brings on.” They got naked under the covers and made out, admiring each other’s bodies (his large penis seemed perfect, Southgate said, as it went “with his flamboyance”), until finally he told her that he couldn’t go through with it because of her husband, the painter Mike Goldberg: “Mike’s too good a friend of mine,” he said. Rats, she thought, and yet she said lying there with him was “pure heaven.” She’d never felt closer to anyone than she had to him that night.
My father concluded his dramatic reading. Then he did what he often did in those days—segued into talking about his friend Spencer.
Spencer is a young artist, poet, and critic in New York City. My father had spent a lot of time with him in the prior couple of years. I’d met him once or twice and found him to be engaging, handsome, and bright. And yet, my father’s enthusiasm for the relationship at times struck me as over-the-top.
“Spencer is the best interviewer I’ve ever seen,” my father said. “He’s really terrific. It comes out of total research. I mean, he will have read every word you wrote before he talks to you. And you believe he really wants to know. He asked me: ‘When did you start regarding language as material?’”
I said that sounded like a clever question, but I must not have been sufficiently effusive because then my father said, in what sounded like a reprimand: “Spencer thinks that in general you don’t take to friends of mine.”
I was quiet for a second, trying to remember if I’d ever been rude to Spencer.
“What did he base that on?” I asked. “One of your former best friends was the man of honor in my wedding.” I mentally tallied a list of his closest friends over the years, many of whom I’d thought of as family. I realized that my father hadn’t spoken to most of them in a long time.
“Who are your other good friends besides Spencer these days?” I said.
“That’s all,” he said. “I sit at my desk and smoke and play hearts online and when I’ve got a deadline I write. Otherwise, it’s just my thoughts, which are self-consuming.”
My father has always loved me. I know it for a fact. He’s told me. He’s told other people. But he’s never seemed particularly interested in me. I’ve never commanded the attention and enthusiasm of a Spencer.
As a little girl, I had nightmares. Once, I woke up in the middle of the night and went into the living room to find my father there playing solitaire. I was sure he would be annoyed by the interruption and send me back to bed, but instead he invited me to play cards with him. We played by the light of a table lamp until I grew sleepy again. When I mentioned later how nice that had been, maybe the nicest memory I have of him from my childhood, he said he didn’t remember it; he told me he might have been in a blackout.
More than once, he’s said that before he got sober when I was sixteen, the worst hours of his day were between 3:00 p.m., when he stopped writing, and 5:00 p.m., when he let himself start drinking. For a dozen of those years, I arrived home from school around three. In those hours, I can’t remember him once asking about my day, making me a snack, or helping me with my homework.
Most men of that generation didn’t do such things, of course, whether they were in the East Village or the suburbs. And why would he? The world has rewarded his single-minded focus on work. When I say his name to people in the art world, their eyes grow soft with admiration.
“Oh, I love your father’s writing,” they say.
I say, “He will be happy to hear that. I’ll tell him.”
But if they keep talking about how great he is, I start to squirm.
“There’s something to this Frank O’Hara book idea, right?” I asked my therapist when I saw her a few days after the Odessa lunch. She says things like “complexifying the narrative,” and I love her very much.
“It is a good idea,” she said cautiously. “Just make sure you get it in writing from your father that you can do this, or he might forget you’re doing it and give the tapes to someone else. He might be giving them to you because he doesn’t think they have any value.”
“It’s not like that,” I said. “This is really good for both of us! It’s not like he’s going to give these tapes to Spencer or something. He wants me to have them.”
Then, walking away from her office down Broadway, I had a visceral memory of being a kid and longing to know what it would be like to sit in the front seat of the car. I asked my parents for weeks if I could. Finally, one evening my mother was driving and my father said the passenger seat was mine. I was overjoyed. I bounded into the front and put on the seat belt, then looked out the coveted windshield—and was blasted in the face by the sun, which was setting right in my eyes. The whole ride I struggled to see out the window, but it was too bright. I realized then that my father had given me the seat because, for the moment, he didn’t want to be in it.
In an episode of the TV show Mad Men, Don Draper recites O’Hara’s poem “Mayakovsky.” In the TV adaptation of Sally Rooney’s Normal People, one character gives another an O’Hara collection. These are two of the poet’s only appearances in the cultural mainstream of the past fifty years if you don’t count a line of his that pops up now and then on Instagram:
Now I am quietly waiting for
the catastrophe of my personality
to seem beautiful again,
and interesting, and modern.
I think about that line so often. Maybe writing this book would make my father’s messiness, his catastrophic personality, seem beautiful to me. And if I pulled it off, maybe for the first time in my life I would seem interesting and modern to him.