In the previous sections, you learned about the attitude that all great GMAT test takers share: that there must be a straightforward way to solve and there’s no need to panic if you don’t find it right away. And even if you don’t use the algebra-based approach that your high school math teacher would have preferred, you will get the right answer and you will raise your score.
Identifying a more efficient alternative approach involves staying open to possibilities that might not occur to you immediately. Two such approaches—picking numbers and backsolving—are so straightforward, can eliminate so much math, and can be used so often that they deserve special mention.
Picking numbers is a powerful alternative to solving problems by brute force. Rather than trying to work with unknown variables, you pick concrete values for the variables. In essence, you’re transforming algebra or abstract math rules into basic arithmetic, giving yourself a much simpler task. Pick numbers to stand in for the variables or unknowns.
How does picking numbers work?
Note that it’s just fine to pick the numbers 0 or 1 for most questions. The GMAT sometimes writes questions based on the special properties of 0 and 1, so if you aren’t considering these numbers, you won’t get the right answer to those questions. Furthermore, they are the most manageable numbers in all of math. Imagine picking numbers for the following problem with anything other than b = 0 or b = 1:
Picking b = 1 makes short work of this exponents question:
Plugging b = 1 into the answer choices yields:
(A) 7b = 71 = 7
(B) 7b+1 = 71+1 = 72 = 49
(C) 77b = 77 Whatever that is, it’s a lot bigger than 49.
(D) 8b = 81 = 8
(E) 49b = 491 = 49
Two answer choices match the desired result of 49, so you need to pick a new number. Try b = 0. First, plug it into the expression in the question stem.
Now you only need to plug b = 0 into (B) and (E), the only two answer choices that worked when b = 1. Doing so yields:
(A) 7b+1 = 70+1 = 71 = 7
(B) 49b = 490 = 1
The answer is (B).
These aren’t in any particular order. You’ll see many instances of each case on Test Day. We’ll start with the first.
If you see a question that has variables in the question stem or asks about a fraction of an unknown whole, pick numbers to represent the unknown(s) in the question stem and walk through the arithmetic of the problem. Look in the question stem and the answer choices for clues about what the most manageable numbers might be.
Example:
Lowest common denominators of fractions in the question stem are good choices for numbers to pick. So are numbers that appear frequently as denominators in the answer choices. In this case, the common denominator of the fractions in the stem is 12, so let the number 12 represent Carol’s total savings (12 dollars).
That means she spends dollars, or 3 dollars, on her stereo and dollars, or 2 dollars, on her television. That comes out to be 3 + 2 = 5 dollars; that’s how much she spent on the stereo and television combined. You’re asked what fraction of her savings she spent. Because her total savings was 12 dollars, she spent of her savings; (C) is correct. Notice how picking a common denominator for the variable (Carol’s savings) made it easy to convert each of the fractions to a simple integer.
A tricky part of this question is understanding how to determine the price of the television. The television does not cost of her savings. It costs less than the stereo; that is, it costs as much as the stereo.
By the way, some of these answers could have been eliminated quickly using basic logic. (A) is too small; the stereo alone costs of her savings. (D) and (E) are too large. The television costs less than the stereo, so the two together must cost less than , or half, of Carol’s savings. We’ll look more at using logic to eliminate answers later in this chapter.
Now let’s use the Kaplan Method on a Problem Solving question that involves picking numbers with variables in the question stem:
This question presents a very complicated relationship among four variables. Since there are multiple variables in the problem, picking numbers is a possible approach. The answer choices are all numbers, so you won’t have to test each answer choice—you’d just plug numbers into the question. Since the phrase number line appears, you may want to consider drawing a number line to help visualize the situation:
The question asks you to evaluate a rather complicated fraction: . The question stem gives you no actual values for the variables, but the answer choices are numbers. This means that the value of the fractional expression must always be the same, as long as the values of the variables follow the rules described in the question stem.
The math seems like it would be difficult and time-consuming. You’d have to translate each rule that states a relationship between variables into a separate algebraic equation and then somehow combine them to solve for the fraction in the stem. Picking numbers, on the other hand, will be much more straightforward.
The rules are pretty complicated, so pick numbers one at a time, making sure the numbers you pick are permissible (follow the rules in the stem) and manageable (easy to work with). x and z each appear twice in the rules, so starting with those two numbers would seem to make sense.
Let’s go with z = 1 and x = 3 to leave room for y.
y is halfway between 3 and 1, so y = 2.
x, or 3, is halfway between w and 1, so w = 5.
Once you’ve picked a set of permissible numbers, it’s time to plug these numbers into the expression in the stem:
The answer is (B). Picking numbers can often take you to the correct answer much more directly than algebra.
Look back at the question stem and make sure you understood all the rules and picked permissible numbers. “y is halfway between x and z.” Check. “x is halfway between w and z.” Check. Another potential error would have been to make w the smallest variable instead of the largest. (Did you notice how the question stem puts w on the left of the inequality statement, even though it belongs on the right-hand side of the number line?) That’s another potential mistake you could catch in this step.
Picking numbers also works well on Problem Solving questions for which the answer choices are given in percents. When the answers are in percents, 100 will almost always be the most manageable number to pick. Using 100 not only makes your calculations easier, but it also simplifies the task of expressing the final value as a percent of the original.
Example:
Since the answers are in percents, pick $100 as the original price of the mattress. (Remember, realism is irrelevant—only permissibility and manageability matter.) The manufacturer offers a 10% discount: 10% of $100 is $10. So now the mattress costs $90.
Then the retailer offers an additional 20% discount. Since the price has fallen to $90, that 20% is taken off the $90 price. A 20% discount is now a reduction of $18. The final price of the mattress is $90 − $18, or $72.
The mattress has been reduced to $72 from an original price of $100. That’s a $28 reduction. Since you started with $100, you can easily calculate that $28 is 28% of the original price. Choice (C) is correct.
Notice that choice (D) commits the error of simply adding the two percents given in the question stem. An answer choice like (D) will never be correct on a question that gives you information about multiple percent changes.
Now let’s use the Kaplan Method on a Problem Solving question that involves picking numbers with percents in the answer choices:
Profits and revenues are both changing over time. Since the answer choices are percents, picking 100 is a good idea.
The profits in 1999 were what percent of the profits in 1998?
You’ll have to compare the profits of the two years. The year 1998 is the basis of the comparison. You’re not solving for the increase or decrease, just the relative amount.
In other words, you want this fraction, , expressed as a percent.
You should start with the original profits, since the question presents its 1999 information as a change from the 1998 information. You read this about 1998 profits: “In 1998, the profits of Company N were 10 percent of revenues.” So you’ll know profits if you know revenues. You’re given no information about revenue at all, so just pick a number. Given the percents in the answer choices, pick $100. That makes profits in 1998 equal to $10.
Now, what about 1999 profits? You read, “In 1999 . . . profits were 15 percent of revenues.” So you have to know revenues in 1999 to know profits. What does the question say about 1999’s revenues? “In 1999, the revenues of Company N fell by 20 percent.” Revenues were $100, so they fell $20 to $80. Profits, then, were 15% of $80, or 0.15($80) = $12.
By the way, you don’t have to calculate that directly. You can use Critical Thinking and say:
Plugging your results back into the question yields .
Just multiply by 100% to convert the decimal to a percent: 1.2 × 100% = 120%. Choice (C) is correct.
Make sure to reread the question stem to confirm that you interpreted the relationships correctly.
Whenever the answer choices contain variables, you should consider picking numbers. The correct answer choice is the one that yields the result that you got when you plugged the same number(s) into the question stem. Make sure that you test each answer choice, just in case more than one answer choice produces the desired result. In such a case, you will need to pick a new set of numbers and repeat the process only for the answer choices that worked out the first time.
Example:
The question says that a > 1, so the most manageable permissible number will probably be 2. Then .
Now substitute 2 for a in each answer choice, looking for choices that equal 2 when a = 2. Eliminate choices that do not equal 2 when a = 2.
Choice (A): a = 2. Choice (A) is possibly correct.
Choice (B): a + 3 = 2 + 3 = 5. This is not 2. Discard.
Choice (C): . Possibly correct.
Choice (D): . This is not 2. Discard.
Choice (E): . This is not 2. Discard.
You’re down to (A) and (C). When more than one answer choice remains, you must pick another number. Try a = 3. Then .
Now work with the remaining answer choices.
Choice (A): a = 3. This is not 1. Discard.
Now that all four incorrect answer choices have been eliminated, you know that (C) must be correct. Check to see whether it equals 1 when a = 3.
Choice (C): . Choice (C) does equal 1 when a = 3.
This approach to picking numbers also applies to many confusing word problems on the GMAT. Picking numbers can resolve a lot of that confusion. The key to picking numbers in word problems is to reread the question stem after you’ve picked numbers, substituting the numbers in place of the variables.
Example:
Suppose that you pick x = 4, n = 3, and d = 5. Now the problem would read like this:
A car rental company charges for mileage as follows: $4 per mile for each of the first 3 miles and $5 per mile for each mile over 3 miles. How much will the mileage charge be, in dollars, for a journey of 5 miles?
All of a sudden, the problem has gotten much more straightforward. The first 3 miles are charged at $4/mile. So that’s $4 + $4 + $4, or $12. There are 2 miles remaining, and each one costs $5. So that’s $5 + $5, for a total of $10. If the first 3 miles cost $12 and the next 2 cost $10, then the total charge is $12 + $10, which is $22.
Plugging x = 4, n = 3, and d = 5 into the answer choices, you get
(A) d(x + 1) − n = 5(4 + 1) − 3 = 22
(B) xn + d = 4 × 3 + 5 = 17
(C) xn + d(x + 1) = 4 × 3 + 5(4 + 1) = 37
(D) x(n + d) − d = 4(3 + 5) − 5 = 27
(E) (x + 1)(d − n) = (4 + 1)(5 − 3) = 10
Only (A) yields the same number you got when you plugged these numbers into the question stem, so (A) is the answer. No need for algebra at all.
Now let’s use the Kaplan Method on a Problem Solving question that involves picking numbers with variables in the answer choices:
Cindy is going upstream and then the same distance back downstream. Notice that the answer choices contain variables. Whenever the answer choices have variable(s), consider picking numbers as an approach.
The question asks, “How many kilometers upstream did she travel if she spent a total of p hours for the round trip?” You’re solving not for the total distance of her round trip, just one leg of it.
It will be hard to pick all the variables at once, so don’t try to do so. You can always go one variable at a time. It’s often easiest to start with the variable that appears most often, as that value often has the greatest influence over what numbers will be manageable. In this problem, that’s the distance upstream (it appears twice, since she goes the same distance downstream). So if you picked that distance to be, say, 6 kilometers, you could then easily pick manageable numbers for m and n.
But for the sake of argument, let’s say you didn’t see that you needed to pick distance. That’s OK. If you start by picking two manageable numbers for m and n—for example, m = 2 and n = 3—then the question becomes this:
Cindy paddles her kayak upstream at 2 kilometers per hour, and then returns downstream the same distance at 3 kilometers per hour. How many kilometers upstream did she travel if she spent a total of p hours for the round trip?
To figure out the time, you’d need the distance. As none is given, you can pick one. If the speeds are 2 kilometers per hour and 3 kilometers per hour, a distance of 6 kilometers works nicely. Now the question is this:
Cindy paddles her kayak 6 kilometers upstream at 2 kilometers per hour, and then returns downstream 6 kilometers at 3 kilometers per hour. How many kilometers upstream did she travel if she spent a total of p hours for the round trip?
Now the time is very straightforward to calculate. Six kilometers upstream at 2 kilometers per hour means a total of 3 hours. Six kilometers downstream at 3 kilometers per hour means a total of 2 hours. That’s 3 + 2 = 5 hours for the round trip.
Now plug m = 2, n = 3, and p = 5 into the answer choices to see which yields 6 for the number of kilometers traveled upstream.
(A) mnp = 2 × 3 × 5 = 30. Eliminate.
(B) . Eliminate.
(C) . Eliminate.
(D) . (D) could be right, but you need to test (E) to make sure.
(E) . Eliminate.
Only choice (D) remains, so it is correct.
Make sure to reread the question stem to confirm that you interpreted the information correctly.
Picking numbers can make word problems much easier to understand, so it’s important that you don’t hastily start writing down equations. Were you to immediately start writing down algebraic equations for this question, you’d wind up with six variables: speed upstream, speed downstream, time upstream, time downstream, distance for each leg of the trip, and total time. That’s a lot to deal with. See how picking numbers simplifies things.
This is a slightly different style of question that asks things like “Which of the following must be an even integer?” or “Which of the following CANNOT be true?” These questions are usually based not on algebra or arithmetic but rather on the properties of the numbers themselves. Some of these questions can be very abstract, so picking numbers really helps. Just as with word problems, making a number properties question concrete helps you to understand it.
Example:
You can run through the answer choices quite quickly using the picking numbers strategy. Try a = 1, b = 3. Only (D), 3 + 15 = 18, is even.
Another approach that works well for many “must be/could be/cannot be” problems is to pick different numbers for each answer choice, looking to eliminate the wrong answers. The principle of focusing on what’s asked is particularly important here, as you need a clear idea of what you’re looking for in a wrong answer. Always characterize what you’re looking for among the answer choices before you dive in and start testing them. For instance, in the example you just saw, any expression that comes back even may be the correct answer, but any expression that comes back odd must certainly be incorrect and should be eliminated.
Knowing how to test the answer choices on “must be/could be/cannot be” questions is essential to your success on these questions. As you just saw, on a “must be” question, it’s not enough to stop when you reach the first answer choice that works with the numbers you picked. If an answer choice works, that only proves that it could be true, not that it must be true every time. To be sure you’re choosing the right answer to a “must be” or “cannot be” question, pick numbers to eliminate all four incorrect answers. However, for a “could be” question (e.g., “Which of the following could be odd?”), you can safely choose the first answer choice that works. If none of the answer choices work using the numbers you picked, you will need to pick another set of numbers and test the choices again. Always think critically about what the question stem is asking and how to pick numbers to find the answer most efficiently.
Roman numeral questions often feature must be/could be/cannot be language in their question stems. Let’s look at how to handle one of these questions.
Example:
Roman numeral questions are rare but can be big time wasters if you don’t work strategically. Evaluate statements one at a time, eliminating answer choices as you go. Usually you should start with the statement that appears most frequently in the answer choices.
This question asks you to figure out which statement or statements can never be a factor of 24. That means you can eliminate a statement if it could ever possibly equal a factor of 24. If you pick some numbers that don’t yield a factor of 24, all that means is that the statement might be part of the right answer. But if you pick numbers that do yield a factor of 24, you know that any answer choice that includes that statement can be eliminated. It’s much more straightforward, therefore, to prove answers wrong rather than to prove them right.
Since the question involves factors of 24, it’s a good idea to list these factors out. Anytime a question deals with a small set of specific numbers, write them down. You’ll find keeping track of the options to be much easier:
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24
Statement II appears three times among the answer choices, so if you can eliminate it, you’ll be down to two choices right away. Squaring something large like 24 or 12 is going to produce a large number, which wouldn’t be a factor of 24. So choose smaller numbers instead: x = 4 and y = 2, perhaps. Then x2 − y2 would equal 16 − 4, or 12. Because 12 is a factor of 24, you can eliminate any answer choice containing Statement II. That leaves only (A) and (E).
Look at Statement III next. Not only are you squaring and multiplying, but you’re also adding, so this number is going to get big fast. To keep it in your target range, pick the smallest numbers on your list, x = 1 and y = 2. Then xy + y2 would equal 1(2) + 4, or 6. That’s a factor of 24, so (E) is eliminated. You know that (A) is the right answer without ever having to evaluate Statement I.
Now let’s use the Kaplan Method on a Problem Solving question that involves picking numbers with “must be/could be/cannot be” questions:
You’re given the equation 2j + k = 15 and told that j and k are integers. Those two variables also show up in the answer choices. Whenever the answer choices contain variables, consider picking numbers.
You’re looking for an answer that MUST be true. Since you know to characterize the answer choices on “must be/could be/cannot be” problems, you know to remind yourself that if an answer choice could be false, even in one case, it can be eliminated.
Pretend for a moment that you weren’t able to confidently pick different numbers, trying to see whether each answer could be false and thus eliminated. You’d have to pick one set of numbers and plug them into all the choices.
Let’s say that you start with j = 4 and k = 7.
(A) 4 + 7 is odd. True. Can’t be eliminated.
(B) 4 + 7 is even. False. Eliminate.
(C) 4 is odd. False. Eliminate.
(D) 7 is odd. True. Can’t be eliminated.
(E) 7 > 4. True. Can’t be eliminated.
Now you’d have to try a different set of numbers, hoping to eliminate some more. (E) looks like the easiest one to target, as you just have to think of a j that’s greater than or equal to k. You could choose j = 5 and k = 5. There’s no need to test (C) or (B), as they’ve already been eliminated.
(A) 5 + 5 is odd. False. Eliminate.
(D) 5 is odd. True. Can’t be eliminated.
(E) 5 > 5. False. Eliminate.
Only (D) wasn’t eliminated, so it must be the correct answer.
Make sure to reread the question stem to confirm that you interpreted the stem correctly.