DANE Sweetman was a smalltime criminal and fulltime loser when he embraced the ultra-right, racist world of the neo-Nazis while serving a two-year term for armed robbery.
His love or violence was already ingrained. The skinhead bower boy who had left school in year eight had been found guilty of attempted murder by the time he was 16 years old.
While in jail in the late 1980s Sweetman found a violent cause to match his vicious nature. In his eyes, he was no longer just another violent head case, but a political freedom fighter.
He covered himself in tattoos which included swastikas and the words ‘Nazi Skinheads’, ‘KKK’ and ‘Native White Protestants Supreme’. From inside jail, Sweetman wrote to colleagues, urging them to violence and providing plans on how to build bombs.
In one letter, Sweetman told a Nazi sympathiser how a group of right-wing fanatics formed a secret organisation called ‘The Guard’ in Pentridge Prison in 1987. ‘Give the dogs what they deserve, full on racial warfare. There is no stopping us when we’ve started,’ he warned.
Sweetman provided detailed plans of a car bomb and how to build it. He instructed an associate that the device was ‘very effective and causes major damages to the car and (could) blow it and its miserable contents to Hell!’
‘I’ve seen them blow the entire back end off a Commodore,’ he wrote.
In his rambling jail diary, Dance of the Skin, Reflections of a Neo-Nazi Skinhead, Sweetman gives an insight into the mind of a dangerously disturbed racist.
Sweetman said that while in prison in the 1980s he developed his ‘Manifesto for Racial Warfare.’ He declared he wanted to kill drug users, pushers, homosexuals, doctors, teachers, police, child molesters, priests and pornographers.
‘All would and will one day face the rope,’ he frothed, sounding like a talk-back radio host. We recruited men within the jail and even some in blue for the purpose of information. There are many screws (prison officers) who espouse our Guard philosophy, some are Klan (Ku Klux Klan),’ he wrote.
In his diary Sweetman claims to have been responsible for a secret race war carried out in the streets of Melbourne. He admitted to a series of violent crimes, including murder, arson, stabbings, bashings and street assaults. ‘The day after my release (in December, 1989) we set about and thus firebombed the St Kilda Road Synagogue. The Yids were furious,’ he gloated. His group returned the following day and daubed the synagogue with racist taunts and Nazi slogans before throwing more firebombs. ‘We then made our petrol bombs right there on the street. It was a job well done.’
He described the people he saw around the city in these terms: ‘The place was awash with yellow, black and mongrel brown faces.’ He gave brutal details of his gang attacking two Asian men in the city, in which one had his throat slashed with a razor.
He wrote about attacking another man because he suspected he was a homosexual. Sweetman said he brought gloves and balaclavas at an army disposals shop in the city just for the job.
His gang wrapped the man’s head in a sheet and beat his genitals with a baton. ‘Before leaving, I leaped off the couch and landed my full weight on … ribs, crushing five of them, as I later found.’ (Sweetman was later convicted of the assault.)
As a payback against the man who informed police of the assault, Sweetman wrote, he built another bomb. ‘I sat the bomb at the base of the front door, I lit the fuse and ran.
‘Later that night we drove back to the scene. The house was a scene of utter destruction. The front door was nowhere to be seen, the veranda had a huge gaping whole in it and the brickwork surrounding the door was blackened and ruined. The paper said no-one was hurt, which was unfortunate as we wanted to see as many hurt and maimed as possible.’
He wrote proudly of attacking and kicking a young woman in the street in Fitzroy because she had an Asian boyfriend. ‘Her faced washed in gore, I delivered this … a kicking she would never forget. I would take her to the very brink of death. A few more decent kicks to the gooks and their dog of a woman race traitor and we were on our way.’
Sweetman’s criminal record shows that by the time he was 22 he had been charged with sexual penetration of a male under 16, attempted murder, malicious wounding, intentionally causing serious injury, possession of a pistol, assault with a weapon, armed robbery, assault by kicking and murder.
When police arrested him as a teenager, they found the walls of his bedroom covered with posters from horror movies, and kit ‘creatures’ from horror movies and violent films. These alone were not a problem. The two sawn-off shotguns and the canister of cyanide were.
A policeman who wrote a report on Sweetman in the early days, noted with typical bureaucratic understatement: ‘The defendant appears to be pre-occupied with violence’.
Sweetman readily admitted trying to kill another man. ‘He was a race traitor and a traitor to his people,’ he boasted. He said he put a gun to the victim’s head, then ‘pulled the trigger but it jammed. I cocked it and reloaded, pulled the trigger, but it misfired. We belted him.’
On his birthday, on 19 December, 1991, he was sentenced to 20 years with a minimum of 15 for the murder of David Noble. He expected a longer sentence. Sweetman murdered Noble with an axe at a party to celebrate Hitler’s birthday on 20 April, 1990, and then cut the legs off the body before dumping the remains in Kew Boulevard.
‘I took him into the darker area of the yard nearer the shed. I saw tools lying around the table near the shed. I did not need a weapon to take this drunk, but I could not let the opportunity pass without grasping it and harnessing it fully. Dave’s last ever words were: “I’ve got a hammer in my head you bastard.” I’d picked up a pick axe and swung it arch ways. It entered his head at the cerebellum. He staggered back and pulled the tool from his head. Dave lay on the ground I gave him several more smashes to the head with the blade edge of the axe. He was gargling, blood bubbles of gore erupting from his wounds. He was not yet dead so I picked up a garden edger. I stood over him, I could not turn back now. Dave was mine for the taking. I embedded the edger in his back, the second time it got stuck. I had to lever it out. White Power was in existence and we were its accelerant, its maker!’
He stunned the court when he produced a prison shiv and slammed it into the bench in front of him. ‘I had a home-made knife given to me by one of my compatriots in blue for the sole purpose of murdering Sean Shilling (a police witness),’ he boasted. He said he was unable to carry out the crime because Shilling did not attend. ‘It was my chance to take another bastard and it slipped though my fingers.’
Sweetman is due out of jail on 8 November, 2005. He has a written hit list of eleven witnesses and police he intends to attack. ‘Your day is coming,’ he wrote.
But while Sweetman has vowed war against the world, mainstream prisoners have tired of his activities. For a man who says he despises homosexuality, Sweetman’s predatory sexual behaviour in jail has made him an outcast. On 30 December, 1994, five of Australia’s toughest prisoners went to see Sweetman. The informal committee was made up of a murderer, a major drug dealer, an armed robber and two brothers with violent criminal records.
‘They told Sweetman that he was a boy raper and a dog. They said they knew he was providing sweets and canteen goods to a group of younger prisoners in return for sexual favours,’ a prison source said.
‘He was told he was to be put off (murdered).’
The following day he put himself into protection in Barwon prison, but seven times notes were shoved under his cell door telling him he would be killed.
In March 1995, Sweetman was moved to the protection unit in K Division in Pentridge. His fellow inmates included Paul Denyer, the Frankston triple murderer, the multiple rapist and double killer Raymond ‘Mr Stinky’ Edmunds, and Hoddle street mass murderer Julian Knight. He has become particularly close to Knight.
Sweetman wrote in his diary about Nazi band No Remorse, and of listening to the band before bashing a man with a bottle. He has the name of another hate band, Screwdriver, tattooed on his neck.
The federal race discrimination commissioner, Zita Antonios, warned that people possessing imported neo-Nazi rock music could be prosecuted under racial hatred laws.
‘In my view it incites violence and hatred and could incite murder,’ she said. Anyone singing the lyrics or selling compact discs could be dealt with by the commission.
The warning was made after information from a Melbourne Jewish group that ultra-right organisations were promoting racist rock bands to encourage young people to embrace their philosophies.
The executive director of the B’nai B’rith Anti Defamation Commission, Danny Ben-Moshe, said a group of Australians was involved in forming the neo-Nazi band No Remorse in Britain. He said there was a trend in Europe to use music to recruit new members to Nazi groups. ‘We believe the same methods will be used here,’ he said. ‘It is seen to attract disaffiliated youth to the extreme groups.’
Some of the music, which is illegal in Britain, is available in Australia through a post office box in Ashburton and through imports at some music shops.
Ben-Moshe said public anti-Semitic attacks continued to worry the Jewish community. An elderly woman out for a Sunday walk in Kew had recently accepted a newsletter thrust towards her by a young couple, he said. The Holocaust survivor looked down and read the same hate propaganda she had seen in Germany 60 years ago.
‘It deeply distressed her. This is Melbourne, Australia, not Nazi Germany.’ He said a hard-core minority of right-wing fanatics persisted with a terror campaign against Jews in Melbourne. ‘There is an incident at least once a week, sometimes more.’
In 1996, the Jewish community organised a golf competition. When the competitors arrived at the course, they found a gang had broken in and mowed swastikas into the fairways.
OF the hundreds of prisoners in Victoria’s jails, Gregory John ‘Bluey’ Brazel is considered the worst. The convicted double murderer was sentenced in effect to an extra three years in the County Court in 1994 on charges of holding a prison officer hostage.
This means that Brazel will serve at least 28 years, taking into account his murder sentences. Brazel is considered by the Office of Corrections the most dangerous man in the prison system. The court was told that Brazel held a Melbourne Remand Centre staff member hostage with a knife to his throat in November 1991.
Brazel held Gunther Krohn hostage and threatened to kill him because of a decision to transfer the prisoner from the Remand Centre to Pentridge. He surrendered after a three-hour seige.
A prisoner with 78 previous convictions, he has proved to be virtually uncontrollable in custody. He has a history of appearing to reform and returning to the mainstream prison population, only to attack staff or fellow inmates.
His prison record shows he has been involved in at least 25 violent incidents, including stabbing three prisoners in separate attacks, breaking the noses of two prison officers, assaulting police, setting fire to his cell, cutting off the tip of his left ear, going on a hunger strike, threatening to kill staff, pushing a governor’s head through a plate-glass window and using jail phones to intimidate witnesses.
He has often stabbed inmates who then refuse to give evidence against him. In one of his brief periods of freedom he killed two woman near Colac.
Police believe he knew he was under investigation for the first murder and killed his second victim purely to taunt them. He was found guilty of murdering Sharon Taylor and Roslyn Hayward, whose bodies were found in shallow graves in 1990.
In his trial over the Remand Centre kidnap, Brazel handled his own defence. His legal tactics were unorthodox. In his final submission he read the jury a poem, then told them the story of Jack and the Beanstalk, and referred to the appearance of Judge Lewis in his wig and gown. ‘I must say His Honor looks magnificent.’
The flattery didn’t help. He was still found guilty.
Medical tests showed that Brazel had brain damage that affected his self-control. Brazel can be charming and friendly, but when he turns nasty he plays for keeps. One of his best friends in jail was standover man Mark ‘Chopper’ Read. In 1979 he attacked Read with a knife, stabbing him repeatedly.
Read, who complimented Brazel for the sneak attack, was taken to hospital for emergency surgery involving dozens of stitches. The next day he was found doing push-ups in the hospital with his stitches split and his intestines hanging out. He explained he was trying to get fit, ready to get his revenge against Brazel.
Brazel had a habit of ringing police in their offices for a chat and then dropping private details about the detective’s family as a subtle form of intimidation.
He has a history of setting fire to his cells. Once he set his mattress on fire, but prison officers kept him in the cell until he gave in to their demands to stand away from the door. Only then did an emergency crew with breathing apparatus storm in to grab him and put out the fire.
In another incident police had to immobilise Brazel when he tried to fight them in a cell. He was overpowered but lay on the floor laughing as he was manhandled, exhorting the group to do their worst.
Brazel was born in Blacktown, a western suburb of Sydney, the son of a New South Wales detective. In 1976, while in the army medical corps, he took five privates hostage during an exercise in Healesville. He fired shots during the siege before a captain persuaded him to give up. He was dishonorably discharged.
A confidential police report on Brazel said: ‘He is cunning and sly and could never be trusted.’ Detective Senior Sergeant Graeme Collins, who arrested Brazel for the Taylor murder, said Brazel simply smiled and said: ‘I look forward to doing battle with the Homicide Squad.’
BALDING, slight, with a sharp wit and an engaging personality, Alistair Farquhar MacRae hardly fits the image of a cold-blooded, multiple murderer.
But, according to police, he is probably Australia’s most prolific killer, having been implicated in at least 20 suspicious deaths and disappearances and convicted of four murders in two states.
He was convicted in the Supreme Court of the murder of Albert Edwin Gerald O’Hara, shot during a drug sting in Mildura. Police are convinced MacRae has killed nine people, and suspect that he could have been involved in up to 15 more deaths.
‘I would have to say that he would be Australia’s worst known multiple murderer and perhaps we will never know how many people he has killed,’ says Detective Senior Sergeant Paul Hollowood, of the homicide squad.
‘Sandy’ MacRae made his name as a massage parlour standover man, a briber of police, an informer and, last of all, a killer who thought of murder as a legitimate tool of his business.
But MacRae is no crazed killer. He didn’t kill for pleasure, or out of anger, or because of some deep-seated psychological problem. He killed to maintain his position in the underworld, or for cash.
Police still don’t know how many bodies are buried at his 10-hectare property at Merbein, near Mildura, but he joked with friends that the small vineyard would never need fertiliser ‘because there’s plenty of blood and bone out there.’
Detectives have exhumed two bodies, and believe at least one other is buried there. The property is too big to dig up without knowing exactly where the bodies were allegedly buried.
Police found the body of Domenic Marafiote buried under the chicken coop in 1987. Police alleged MacRae shot and killed Marafiote on 18 July, 1985. He lured the man to the property to buy marijuana, but had already dug the grave.
A Supreme Court jury was told that MacRae then drove to Adelaide where he killed Marafiote’s parents, Carmelo, 69, and Rosa, 70. He was allegedly desperate to find the money that Marafiote was to use for the marijuana deal. It is believed a large amount of cash was found sewn into Rosa’s clothing.
Detectives say MacRae was so cold-blooded that before he buried Domenic Marafiote he repeatedly stabbed the body ‘for practice’. He was sentenced to a minimum of 18 years for the killing, and pleaded guilty to the Adelaide double murder.
MacRae told friends he had killed a woman and buried her on the property, only to later exhume the remains, pulverise the bones in a concrete mixer and then pour the mix into a concrete garden roller, which has never been found.
MacRae moved to Mildura from Melbourne in 1983. He had been the second in charge to the massage parlour boss Geoffrey Lamb, who allegedly controlled a large slice of the illegal vice industry with the help of a group of corrupt police. But MacRae moved on after Lamb became addicted to heroin and began to lose control. Police say MacRae later chained the hopelessly addicted Lamb to a bungalow on the Mildura property in a bid to help his former boss beat the heroin problem.
In 1984 MacRae failed in a bid to establish a massage parlour in Mildura. He then met and befriended Albert O’Hara, who was planning to buy a houseboat-building business in the area. He convinced the 59-year-old O’Hara he could make a quick profit from buying and selling marijuana. On 21 December 1984, O’Hara came to MacRae’s property with $10,000 to buy drugs.
Police said MacRae shot him in the back of the head and buried him on the property. He then used oxy welding gear to cut up the dead man’s car so it could be dropped, piece by piece, at the Merbein tip.
‘He was like a scavenging vulture who made sure there was nothing left after a kill,’ Hollowood was to say.
After the success of the O’Hara killing, MacRae invited a massage parlour contact, Johnny Selim, to visit him at the property in early 1985. He put forward a proposition they form a local version of Murder Inc, luring people to the vineyard on the promise of buying marijuana, killing them and keeping the money.
‘He always said the people he killed didn’t matter as they were outside the law. To him it was all business, there was no hate involved,’ Hollowood notes.
Selim declined the offer and returned to Melbourne.
Police believe MacRae killed a rival underworld standover man, Michael Ebert, who was gunned down outside a Carlton brothel in April, 1980. Ebert had bashed MacRae two weeks earlier and the beaten man had vowed revenge. The murder remains unsolved.
Police also suspect he killed his drug-addicted girlfriend, Deborah Joy Faher, 22, who was found dead of a drug overdose in a St Kilda motel in August,1981. Police believe MacRae may have given her near-pure heroin. He is also suspected of killing a prostitute known only as ‘Little Lisa’, in 1984.
In July, 1990, police found the remains of a woman buried in the backyard of a Kensington home that had once been owned by the mother of an underworld figure. Police believe the woman may have been an unidentified South Australian prostitute killed by MacRae.
In the early 1980s police became concerned at the number of unexplained deaths of drug-addicted prostitutes who died from overdoses. A homicide group, led by then Detective Sergeant Gary Landy, investigated about 15 of the cases. He said one of the common denominators was that the victims all knew MacRae.
‘Certainly, some of them well could have been murders but there was not the evidence to justify charges,’ says Landy.
Hollowood had no doubt MacRae still knew more about killings than he would admit. ‘He is clever, articulate, and you would never know he was a killer by talking to him,’ he said. ‘He was a conman killer who talked his victims into a position where he could move on them. He was prepared to try and manipulate the system while he went on killing. He had no conscience at all.’
While MacRae was under investigation for murder he was also informing to the police anti-corruption investigation, Operation Cobra. He gave evidence that he helped in paying off police to protect Lamb’s massage parlour empire in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
One of the accused police, former Senior Sergeant Paul William Higgins, was sentenced to seven years’ jail last year. Higgins is bitter that a multiple murderer was largely responsible for his conviction.
While in witness protection MacRae made a bad blunder, confessing to another witness that he had killed the Marafiotes. He said that he had used a doona to try to muffle the noise. He complained that when he tried to fire one shot the hammer of the weapon caught the webbing between his thumb and forefinger.
When Victorian police checked with their Adelaide counterparts, they confirmed there was a small, unexplained, spider-web blood stain at the scene of the Marafiote murder. MacRae had unintentionally solved the mystery.
While MacRae was in Barwon prison his ex-wife was surprised when she received a phone-call from Barwon jail from him well after lock-up time.
He told her his cell had been left open and he feared he was being set up to be murdered by other inmates.
The prison governor was most surprised when he received a call from the former wife to inform him the cells were still open. It is believed prison officers found several inmates in the yard sunbaking, but no attempt was made on MacRae’s life.
He was later extradited to Adelaide to stand trial on the Marafiote double murder. Faced with overwhelming evidence, he pleaded guilty. The prosecutor, Paul Rofe, QC, said MacRae should die in jail, and asked for a non-parole period of 40 to 50 years.
‘This case comes into the worst category for several reasons,’ Rofe said. ‘On each occasion he has come before sentencing court, the words “cold-blooded”, “planned” and “execution” have been used. At the end of the day the public are certainly entitled to think this man should die in prison.’
When he was about to be sentenced MacRae addressed the judge, asking to be allowed to die in jail.
‘To allow me leniency is a luxury I did not extend to my victims. The only way to show my remorse is to ask the court to show the same leniency that I showed my victims — absolutely none. ‘I would ask the court to give me no possible chance of release before my death in custody.’
Justice Willams of the South Australian Supreme Court gave him two life sentences and extended his non-parole period to 36 years.
The earliest he could be released is in 2023, aged 74.
AN observant postal worker, an unexplained hand wound and a small crucifix combined to snare serial killer Paul Charles Denyer, who could spend the rest of his life in jail for the random killings of three women around the Melbourne bayside suburb of Frankston.
Early on Friday, 30 July, 1993, about ten key investigators met at the Frankston police station to review information they had gathered since the killings had begun seven weeks earlier. The murderer had struck twice and the nature of the wounds and the timing led police to conclude the killer would murder until he was caught.
Nothing affects a community like a serial killer. The random nature of the attacks and the lack of any logical reasons why victims are picked spawns fear, bordering on panic.
There is a psychological tendency for people to ‘blame’ murder victims. If a victim is a criminal, a prostitute or a brawler the public attitude is that they in some way contributed to the crime. This is a defensive mechanism, in that it moves it away from the general public. But when a serial killer is on the loose then ‘good’ people are at risk. The next victim could be anyone.
The nature of homicide investigations is that police must try to get a breakthrough early or the case gets harder. Police say the first 24 hours are crucial.
In this case the pressure was intense. It was not so much that a killer could get away with murder but that one mistake, an unnecessary delay, a wrong conclusion, a false lead, could cost lives.
The Chief Commissioner, Neil Comrie, made it clear. Everything takes a back seat to the investigation into a serial killer. The cases could not go unsolved.
Police had to go through thousands of pieces of information from the public. Well-meaning people provide little snippets of information which are nearly always rubbish. For the police it was like mining for gold. They had to be prepared to sift tonnes of slag to find a nugget.
Although more than 200 police had been involved in the seven week hunt, detectives knew they were no closer to finding the killer of Elizabeth Stevens, 18, a student, on 11 June, and Debra Fream, 22, a young mother, on 8 July.
They checked criminal profiles and detailed forensic evidence which was all logged on computer together with the tips and information provided by the community. They knew that the killer would strike again — soon. The head of the investigation, Detective Senior Sergeant Rod Wilson, then of the Homicide Squad, says: ‘In a case like that you are always aware that time is the enemy, but you have to try to remain objective and use the methods which have proven successful in the past.’
The detectives’ fear was well founded: the killer was meticulously preparing to kill again that very day. Around the time police were meeting, 21-year-old Denyer drove a short distance from his Frankston home to Skye Road and cut three holes in a cyclone fence near a bike track near John Paul College, a local secondary school. His aim was to ambush his victim and drag her into thick scrub away from potential witnesses.
Just after midday, he drove his yellow 1974 Toyota Corona to the Langwarrin Flora and Fauna Reserve. Police noticed the car in the reserve while they were on routine patrol at 12.10 pm. He later told detectives he had stopped to top up his leaking radiator but police had seen no signs of him near the vehicle.
They later established that Denyer had drawn detailed maps of tracks of the reserve, as part of his plan to abduct a young victim. They now believe he had been stalking a school group on an excursion in the park at the time, and would have abducted and killed one of the group if he’d had the opportunity. He waited for a straggler to drop behind, but the children stayed in a bunch. Denyer had to move on. After leaving the park, he drove back to Skye Road and sat in his car.
About 2.30 pm, Vikki Collins, a postie, drove past Denyer on her motorbike. She had almost completed her daily round, when she saw a car parked in front of her that had no rear number plate.
‘I went past it and, while I delivered the mail at a house, I adjusted my mirror and saw there was no front number-plate on the car,’ Collins recalled. The driver appeared to be deliberately slumped down, so that he was partly concealed by the steering wheel. Collins noticed a student walking near the car towards a bike track. It has now been established that the girl was Natalie Russell, a John Paul student.
For a moment Collins considered warning the teenager about the man in the car, but she worried that she would be told to mind her own business.
Instead, she decided to ring the police. She continued on her round until she found an occupied house, from where she phoned police and gave a detailed description of the car.
Seconds after the alert postal worker had noticed the car, Denyer got out, walked to the bike track, and ambushed and killed Natalie Russell.
Within 15 minutes, two police units responded to the call. It proved the vital break in the investigation, even though it came too late to save the teenager.
When Denyer saw the 17-year-old heading to the track, which separates the Long Island Country Club from the Peninsula Country Golf Club, he positioned himself in one of his hiding spots, armed with a kitchen knife and a leather strap. As the girl passed by, he began to stalk her, ensuring he kept his 120-kilogram frame on the wet grass so his victim would not hear his footsteps.
In the attack, he accidentally hacked his own hands, slicing flesh from one finger. As he left the scene he saw police checking his car, so he left it there and returned home, keeping his blood-soaked hands in the pockets of his jeans.
When Russell’s body was discovered, police computer checks showed that Denyer’s car had been parked at the scene of the murder.
For the first time, police knew they had a strong lead. Further checks revealed that Denyer had been seen at the Kananook railway station car park a week earlier and that he used to live in Long Street, the street from which Elizabeth Stevens had been abducted.
Police could now place Denyer in the area where all three girls had disappeared. Investigators later learnt that, before the Russell murder, Denyer had rung Cranbourne police station, claiming to have been harassed by the Homicide Squad and wanting to know whether he was still a suspect.
At that time he had not been approached by Homicide Squad and was not on any short list. Looking back, it was the call of a worried man. Or a grossly disturbed one.
When police picked him up, at 5.28 pm, he remained cool and denied any knowledge of the killings. He gave plausible reasons for being in the areas where he had been sighted.
As question followed question, he stonewalled. Then Senior Sergeant Wilson asked him about the cuts on his hands, and he said he had hurt himself fixing the engine of his car.
The cut on his right thumb came from sharpening a knife in a scabbard, he said. He then acted out how he claimed to have done it. Both the police and Denyer seemed to realise at the same moment that the suspect had made a telling mistake.
He held the imaginary knife in his injured hand when he tried to show police how he had cut himself. It would have been impossible for him to have injured himself in the manner he claimed. He then tried to change hands to illustrate another version of how he got the injury.
It still wasn’t possible.
It was then 10.19 pm. Denyer knew he had been caught. Police knew they had the right man, but they also needed more information to mount a case. Further questioning elicited further lies.
After 1511 questions, police called a halt to proceedings so they could get a pathologist to try linking Denyer’s hand wounds with evidence found at the scene.
During the break, Denyer was guarded by Senior Detective Darren O’Loughlin, of Frankston. The policeman, who wore a crucifix under his business shirt, escorted Denyer to the toilet just after 12.45 Sunday morning.
Denyer professed belief in God. He had decided to confess — not to his interrogators but to the quiet policeman wearing the crucifix.
Denyer said to him: ‘I see you are wearing a cross under your shirt. Are you a Christian?’ O’Loughlin said he was, and Denyer said: ‘Okay, I killed them, all three of them.’ He was ready to tell all.
At 3.45 am he began to make a videotaped confession to homicide squad detectives, answering their questions in a matter-of-fact way. He showed little emotion or remorse as he detailed how he had abducted and killed women who were strangers to him. He said he had wanted to kill since he was 14. He had been following women since he was 17. He said he struck when it had rained or was wet, in the hope that the water would wash away blood and other evidence.
The warning signs that Denyer was evil had been present for years. His little sister’s toy bear was found with its neck and torso repeatedly slashed, covered with cigarette burns and with the stuffing had been pulled out. Fangs had been scrawled on its face. At the time the little girl was five; Denyer was ten. It was just one of many examples of unexplained violence that always pointed to the overweight, brooding loner.
Two years later a little kitten was found, with its throat slashed, hanging in a tree. Again, the finger was pointed at Denyer. He denied any involvement, but a relative checked his pocket knife and found blood and flesh on the blade.
A local girl complained that she thought someone in the neighbourhood had been stalking her. Nothing came of that.
Denyer had few friends. He liked to frighten people. The psychologist would later say he had a personality disorder. In lay terms, he was a fat, apathetic, lazy bully — and increasingly weird.
He left school and had a series of jobs which he lost through disinterest or dishonesty. Being a lazy thief didn’t help his employment record.
His last job was at the aluminium boat builders, Pro Marine, where his bosses found the same problem every other employer had found: he couldn’t care less. He wouldn’t finish even the most basic task. Asked to sweep the floors, he would wander off, leaving the job half finished. The only time he used energy was when he fashioned scrap metal into daggers. One of those was later used as a murder weapon.
Denyer taught himself how to be a killer. He struck after rain in the hope that evidence would be washed away and used his bar radiator to change the pattern on the soles of his runners so they would not match imprints left at the crime scenes.
He had loved a horror movie called The Stepfather and delighted in turning up the volume to frighten his sister. He later copied the murder method used in the movie.
For years he had stalked women, looking for the chance to kill. In 1992 he decided to murder the sister of a neighbour. He went to the woman’s flat, but it was empty. He broke in and stabbed the woman’s cat and drowned three kittens in the bath. He smeared blood on the walls and wrote ‘Donna and Robin — You’re dead.’ The girls were shattered. A few days later Denyer turned up and commented that he would love the chance to deal with the intruder.
He told police he killed because he hated women. In his flat tones he explained how his last victim Natalie Stevens, obviously knowing from the moment she was grabbed that this man was the serial killer who had murdered two young woman, had begged and tried to negotiate for her life.
‘She said disgusting things,’ he told police. This from a man who delighted in humiliating, torturing and slaughtering young women.
The quirks of a random killer are hard to fathom. Denyer followed hundreds of girls for years, but left most untouched. On 8 July he attacked Roszsa Toth, 41, outside the Seaford railway station. He jumped out of the bushes and grabbed her, sticking a fake wooden gun into her side and warning her not to fight. He put his hand over her mouth and she responded by biting him and breaking free. She ran out onto the road and stopped a woman motorist for help. Denyer hid in a park, then boarded a train and returned to Kananook.
Denyer walked for hours looking for a victim. He saw Debbie Fream pull up at a Milk Bar to get some milk, eggs and a block of chocolate. She had given birth to her son, Jake, only twelve days earlier. She left the car unlocked and he slipped into the car and hid in the back seat, grabbing her she returned.
The day after his last murder police waited for him to return to his Dandenong-Frankston Road flat to question him, but at that moment he may have been preparing to grab another woman.
A group of four women had gone to the Langwarrin Shopping Centre but one, Vicki Cooper, was asleep in the car, so the other three left her snoozing in the car park. They left the car unlocked.
About 40 minutes later the group returned. Parked right next to their car was an unregistered yellow Toyota. It was Denyer’s. The car park was almost empty, yet the cars were side by side.
Denyer had the bonnet of his car raised and was looking at the motor. Police said he had used that tactic when stalking a victim.
One of the women, Wendy Halemba, said she saw a man between the two cars and recognised Denyer as a former neighbor. She greeted him, but noticed that he seemed to be behaving strangely.
One of the women on the shopping trip was Mrs Halemba’s daughter, Tamara. Denyer had once asked her out and she had refused. A short time later the family disturbed a prowler in the back yard, near the bungalow where Tamara slept. They found a screwdriver near the sleepout. Then the family’s chickens were found hacked to death.
Collins said that when she was dozing she felt there was someone else in the car, but assumed it was her friends returning from shopping.
Denyer, thwarted, drove home. The police were waiting. It was to be the beginning of the end.
After the long interview he was prepared to co-operate fully. He returned to the murder scenes and calmly acted out his crimes for the police video camera. He even tried to joke with stone faced detectives..
Later in a police cell he told his girlfriend, Sharon, that he was the killer. When she asked what evidence the police had to link him to the crimes, he replied: ‘My hands.’
‘I’m a serial killer, I’ve got a problem,’ he said.
He was sentenced to life with no minimum, but on appeal was given a minimum of 30 years.
Denyer, the sadist, the stalker, the peeping torn, the cat killer, the man who wanted to humiliate his victims, was put in jail with hardened criminals. He spends his days in protective custody.
LATE in the afternoon of 29 June 1991, Margaret Hobbs was turning her car into Springvale Road from Burwood Highway in Melbourne’s eastern suburbs when she heard the radio news: a little girl had been abducted at Rosebud.
She felt sick. ‘I thought, ‘It’s Robert Lowe’,’ she recalls. ‘I knew he had a unit at Rosebud. And I knew he’d been building up to it.’
Three-and-a-half years on, the shock of that moment still registered on her face as she talked about a crime that wrecked so many lives.
By the time Hobbs heard the news that day, Sheree Beasley, the six-year-old girl, was dead, her tiny body defiled and hidden in a concrete pipe. But Sheree Beasley, the case, was just beginning.
That case ended, legally, at the Supreme Court, when Robert Arthur Selby Lowe was sentenced to life in prison for kidnapping and murdering Sheree.
Margaret Hobbs had known killers, rapists and compulsive offenders of all sorts in the previous 25 years, first as a parole officer, later as a psychotherapist in private practice. But none affected her the same way as the mild-mannered, middle-aged, middle-class salesman who revealed himself to her as a secret monster.
The first time she saw Robert Lowe was in 1984, when he was 47. He had been referred by his lawyers, who wanted a report to present to Springvale Magistrate’s Court. He had been charged with exposing himself to schoolgirls at Glen Waverley shopping centre.
At first, Lowe appeared to be just another client undergoing therapy for compulsive behaviour — in his case, exhibitionism.
He was placed on a good-behaviour bond for a year on the obscene exposure charge. A condition was that he go to Margaret Hobbs for therapy for that period. He did. It became another habit he found hard to break.
Lowe was always punctual, always polite. But, as Hobbs sensed, never genuine. She realised she was dealing with more than just another ‘flasher’.
Lowe was, and is, a neat and well-spoken man. Tall, thin, with curling fair to grey hair (and, later, a beard), he wore fine-rimmed glasses that lent a prim, bookish look in keeping with his standing as a church elder and Sunday school teacher.
This mild exterior concealed a calculating, intelligent deviate who told Hobbs he often exposed himself to young girls, sometimes first placing pornography (invariably stolen) where they were likely to see it.
As she spoke, Hobbs sat uneasily in a blue easy chair in the pleasant room where she has heard so many unpleasant things.
‘He was the complete Jekyll and Hyde character,’ she begins. ‘I knew the bad one, the Mr Hyde bit, that was hidden from his wife, family and friends.
‘He would sit here very attentively and take copious notes but he wouldn’t enter into any sort of meaningful therapy. He pretended to be in therapy but he wasn’t trying. I told him it wasn’t any good, that he had to be completely honest or I couldn’t help him give up obsessive behaviours … but he enjoyed it too much to give it up.’
At first, Lowe admitted only one previous conviction for obscene exposure but later acknowledged being in trouble often. In fact, he had a record of sex offences spanning three decades but had dodged many convictions through his deceit. Hobbs describes him as a skilled and habitual liar who thought he could ‘run rings around police’. Which he often did — until he came up against the homicide squad.
‘He is clever and enjoys the excitement of jousting with police,’ she said. ‘He is a sophist — that is, he is a skilful arguer who will mount a clever but fallacious argument to rationalise his behaviour.
And he is a specific liar. If you ask him if he has a blue car he will say, “Certainly not”. If you change the question slightly and ask him if he drives a blue car, he will say, “Yes”, but point out that he doesn’t own it.’
Lowe saw Hobbs intermittently after his bond expired in 1985, and often called her. He was still offending, and appeared in court for wilful and obscene exposure, offensive behaviour and theft.
It was a disturbing pattern, although not yet sinister. According to Hobbs, that changed in April, 1990, when Lowe complained to her that police had spoken to his then employer after questioning him about approaching a girl in Yarraville. Although nothing came of the incident, it rang warning bells for Hobbs because it meant he was willing to accost a child rather than just expose himself.
‘When he told me he’d been spoken to by the police about the incident with the young girl at Yarraville, I got very worried,’ she was to recall. ‘It was an escalation. He was getting bolder and the targets were getting younger.’
Soon afterwards, he approached some girls on Flinders Street station. ‘They were holding some balloons. He said something like one of the balloons looked like ‘a big dick’ and made a sexual suggestion.
‘The girls were frightened and ran out and spoke to a traffic policeman, who tackled him. He got charged and pleaded not guilty.’
By this time, Lowe had upset Hobbs’ professional detachment. ‘He came and told me all this very blandly, as if it was the most natural thing in the world. I told him to leave my rooms. I opened my door and ordered him out. I refused to support a not-guilty plea.
‘He said, “You can’t do this to me.” But he went. I was worried about this escalation.’
Lowe brought his wife Lorraine with him to see Hobbs soon after the Flinders Street incident. Lorraine Lowe was distraught and at one point demanded of her husband, ‘Why don’t you just stop it?’ To which he had replied coolly, ‘Because it gives me too much pleasure.’
At that moment, Hobbs judged, he unmasked himself. ‘Lorraine went pale. She realised her husband had built a cardboard cutout life for her.’
Lowe’s solicitor asked Hobbs to write a court report to verify that he had been seeking therapy. She felt the first pangs of a looming crisis. Trapped between professional obligations to a client and personal feelings about his actions, she feared what he might do.
She wrote a court report which, she says, was a warning. ‘I said this man had to be shown he couldn’t do this sort of thing without being punished. I meant that he should be locked up.’
But the court judged otherwise. ‘He was only fined $750,’ Hobbs said bleakly. ‘Six months later, Sheree Beasley disappears.’
On 25 July, 26 days after Sheree’s abduction, Lowe came to Hobbs’s office in Fitzroy. He was, ostensibly, querying an account but was agitated and refused to leave for hours. Hobbs said: ‘At 5 pm I walked downstairs to my (barrister) son-in-law’s office and said, “I reckon Robert Lowe took Sheree Beasley. I wonder what sort of car he’s driving.” There’d been publicity about the suspect driving a blue hatchback.
‘I asked the office girls if they’d noticed his car. None of them had. But next day one of them told me she’d seen him drive past later … in a blue hatchback.’
Meanwhile, the police had reached the same conclusion. The same week, Detective Senior Constable Andrew Gustke, of the Zenith taskforce set up to investigate the abduction, identified Lowe as the driver of a blue Corolla similar to the car at the crime scene. He made a routine call to Lowe — and was immediately suspicious because Lowe conjured up an instant alibi and vehemently denied being near Rosebud on 29 June.
The hunt was on. The police brought Lowe in for questioning on 13 August, and did their homework, discovering his long history of sex offences.
On 26 September, Sheree’s remains were found in a pipe near the Mornington-Flinders Road at Red Hill. Soon afterwards, the homicide squad secretly approached Hobbs and placed intercepts in her rooms without her knowledge to tape Lowe’s conversations with her.
It was then that a homicide sergeant, Alex Bartsch, struck up a rapport with Hobbs vital to the ultimate success of the case.
In the following months, she was to have more than 100 contacts with Lowe, in person or on the telephone. Each word was taped and transcribed into thousands of pages of what became known as the ‘Fitzroy tapes’.
It was a cruel experience for the psychotherapist. A mother and grandmother herself, she had to make the crucial decision that her commitment to the community was more important than confidentiality to a client.
Lowe, by this time rejected by his wife and two sons, used his interviews with her to start a bizarre ritual of dropping clues that he was the killer. It was an extension, she said, of his exhibitionism.
‘He would come in here and say, “Margaret, would you tell my wife that I didn’t put this girl in the car for sexual purposes”. He was an arch-teaser. A shocker. He has absolutely no remorse, no sense of culpability. It was like Silence of the Lambs.’ The reference to the film is not fanciful. Hobbs shuddered as she relived a scene she could never blot from her mind.
‘One day, after the body was found, he brought in a rucksack and a plastic bag and put them down each side of his chair. He looked at me and said, “Margaret, do you really think I could bury a child in a drain to be eaten by maggots?”
‘His face was chilling. He was enjoying every minute of it. As he was speaking, I noticed something white on the back of his chair. I thought it was a piece of cotton. Then I saw it was crawling. I thought it was a caterpillar. I took a piece of paper and walked over It was a maggot. There were hundreds of them, crawling over the chair, across the floor, up the wall.
‘I screamed at him, told him to get out, and to take his filthy bag with him. He took the rucksack but left the plastic bag, and that’s where the maggots were coming from. I wrapped it up and ran downstairs and threw it in the bin. I didn’t want to know what was in it.’
Other scenes from those nightmare months were branded into her memory. Once she steeled herself to drive around Red Hill (where Sheree’s body was found) with Lowe on the pretext it would help him build a case for manslaughter rather than murder.
‘As we drove, he’s telling me this dreadful story of putting her in the drain face up … I had to turn my face away so he couldn’t see the tears on my cheeks.’
Then, in early May, 1992, Lowe handed Hobbs a written ‘confession’ admitting Sheree had died after he had abducted her, but claiming that she had accidentally choked. Shaken, she managed to copy the document and hand it to police a few days later — the same day Lowe was picked up shoplifting with the original confession in his bag.
He was finally arrested in March 1993, when police decided they had overwhelming evidence.
Afterwards, Margaret Hobbs stripped her consulting rooms to exorcise every trace of Robert Arthur Selby Lowe. She threw out the desk, couch and easy chairs, the carpet, even the pictures on the walls.
Everything but the clock. But could never rid herself of the memories. She took them to her grave. She died in a car accident in January 1996. POLICE interest in Lowe didn’t finish with his conviction. An unsolved murder, which had played on detectives’ minds since 1984, had many disturbing similarities with the Beasley case.
Kylie Maybury was six when she was abducted, sexually assaulted and murdered on Melbourne Cup day, 1984. Like Sheree, Kylie was grabbed on her way to a shop. Her body was dumped in a drain in Preston.
Old murder cases are never closed, although the reality is that they are rarely solved. The Maybury case was destined to remain a tragic mystery. But during the investigation into Lowe over the Beasley case, police were able to track him back to Preston in 1984.
Shortly before Kylie Maybury was murdered, Lowe was interviewed by police over offensive behaviour involving three young girls in Preston, only one kilometre from where Kylie would later be kidnapped. He was a travelling salesman whose work often took him to the area.
He had made sexual suggestions to the girls, and a neighbour took the registration number of his car. Police did not prosecute him because of lack of corroboration. His name was not passed on to detectives working on the Maybury case.
Significantly, perhaps, Lowe first went to Margaret Hobbs weeks after the Maybury murder. Privately, she always suspected he could have been the killer of the young Preston girl. After some years he drifted away — but returned to therapy two weeks after the Beasley killing.
There were many similarities between the cases. The girls were the same age and were abducted while on errands for their mothers on a day when Lowe was not working.
Hobbs said Lowe was fascinated by pink. Kylie carried a pink strawberry shortcake bag and Sheree was dressed in pink. The bag was later recovered near Ferntree Gully Road. Lowe lived off the same main road.
More in hope than expectation, one of the original investigators, Glenn Woolfe, now a detective inspector, ordered that Kylie’s clothes, which had been kept as a possible court exhibit since the murder, be tested to see if modern DNA technology could help identify the killer.
The answer came back. It could be done.
The Victorian Government had passed legislation to demand blood samples for a DNA bank from convicted sex criminals and murderers where the crime had a sexual motive. Lowe was an ideal example of the need for such legislation. This would prove, one way or the other, whether the former church elder was a double killer.
Lowe decided to fight the order. The man who said he would take a lie detector test to prove he was not a murderer became surprisingly coy about the DNA test. The Office of Public Prosecutions found a possible loophole in the law through which Lowe could wriggle. Lawyers withdrew the case.
So determined were the authorities to test Lowe’s blood that the Government reworded the Act in late 1997, putting a retrospective clause in the legislation in the hope of getting the convicted killer to provide a sample.
THE best welder in Pentridge’s J-Division blotted his copybook in 1992. After six years of faultless behavior, Raymond ‘Mr Stinky’ Edmunds — rapist, murderer and model prisoner — made a break for it.
And the quiet man with the loud nickname came within a sniff of getting away. The official line was that he was foiled only by the keen nose of a prison dog which led officers to find him hidden in a metal cabinet on a truck moving goods from the prison industries yard where he voluntarily worked seven days a week. There were persistent rumours, however, that the authorities had information and knew exactly when and where to have a dog when Edmunds made his move.
After his attempted jailbreak Edmunds, then 48, was moved to maximum security to spend his days with a neo-Nazi, a mass killer and serial murderer. He fitted in well.
Unlike many notorious inmates, Edmunds was prepared to bide his time and wait, until his carefully-planned bid for freedom. But his aborted escape has added more headlines to one of Australia’s most notorious and long-running crime stories, one that has inspired extraordinary public fascination, a best-selling book and film negotiations. For all his infamy, Edmunds is a nobody: an introspective, hard working man whose very ‘ordinariness’ let him get away with murder and serial rape for nearly twenty years. Profoundly average — although far from normal — the adopted farmer’s son who became a peeping torn, child molester, killer and rapist is in himself of little more interest than the dingo in the Azaria Chamberlain saga.
But as with the dingo, Edmunds’ acts of random violence have had a seismic effect: ruining many lives, affecting scores of others. To those people belongs the real story.
That story begins in February, 1966: the week decimal currency was introduced, Sir Robert Menzies announced his retirement from Parliament and a young batsman called Doug Walters was picked to play Test cricket.
Australia, already shocked by the Beaumont children’s disappearance in Adelaide a few weeks before, was confronted by another chilling crime.
On Thursday, 10 February, two teenagers disappeared from a pop concert at Shepparton’s new Civic Centre: Garry Heywood, 18, a gangly apprentice panel beater with a touch of the lair about him, and Abina Madill, 16, extroverted and only a few weeks out of school.
At first the police assumed the pair had run away, but when Garry’s immaculate, dark green, FJ Holden was found in Shepparton’s main street next morning, his family and friends feared the worst. They knew what the detectives didn’t, that young Heywood would never willingly abandon his car. Later, police accounted for every fingerprint found on the vehicle except one found on the driver’s door, a fact they kept secret for 16 years.
The Homicide Squad was called in, and the town turned out to search, but nothing was found until 16 days later, when two youths stumbled on the missing girl’s half-naked body in a paddock at Murchison East, 37 kilometres south of Shepparton. Heywood’s body was nearby, a bullet hole through his skull.
In the months that followed, Shepparton became a town of stares, whispers and ugly rumor. Hub of a giant orchard area, the district population swelled each summer with the annual invasion of itinerant fruit pickers.
Young, and free with their money and their fists, they flocked into town at night; looking for a good time, often finding trouble. Trouble, after the bodies were found, meant being questioned about the murders. But there were too many potential suspects, and so the investigation narrowed to a few — to Abina’s former boyfriend, a young mechanic called Ian Urquhart, and his friends. Urquhart’s movements on the night of the murder didn’t really tally with his being the killer, but he was the only person with a motive, that of jealousy.
The investigation wrecked Urquhart’s life. Bashed and hounded by a couple of rogue police, he left Shepparton and, eventually, Australia, only to be killed in a speeding sports car in Singapore on the sixth anniversary of the murders, a haunting postscript to the murder story.
Urquhart’s best friend, Peter Hazelman, also left town, eventually moving to Darwin to escape gossip and unhappy memories.
Abina’s friend Jan Frost and her boyfriend (later husband) Max Hart were questioned repeatedly and roughly because they had been among the last to see Abina and Garry alive. They, too, left Australia for several years and even now choose not to live in their hometown.
Inevitably, given the profusion of potential leads, police made other mistakes. Forensic experts quickly determined that a relatively rare Mossberg .22 rifle was the murder weapon. But despite a nationwide ‘search’, detectives failed to check all available gunshop records, which was why they did not find that a Myrtleford sports store had sold a Mossberg years before to a farmer called Edmunds, Raymond Edmunds’ adoptive father.
A few months after the murder a policeman came to the Gawne family’s dairy farm at Ardmona, near Shepparton. He asked to speak to a ‘Raymond Edmunds’. Edmunds, who had been on the farm for two years had moved a few weeks earlier to Finley, near NSW. The policeman said he would follow it up.
He didn’t. If he had, it would have saved a lot more suffering.
Meanwhile, the two faint prints from Garry Heywood’s car were to sit in a drawer of the fingerprint bureau in Melbourne for 16 years.
For nearly a decade in the 1970s and early 1980s, Melbourne’s eastern suburbs were terrorised by a callous attacker known to police as ‘the Donvale rapist’. The man — pudgy but strong, with sandy hair, a pot belly and soft hands — preyed on shiftworkers’ wives at home alone with small children. He often raped women with their children present. The most chilling thing about the rapist was that it was obvious he watched families for weeks before striking, once even hiding under the floor of a house so that he could hear their conversations.
He carried a knife, was usually barefoot and, according to a handful of his many victims, had a peculiar body odor, a fact which lead a Sunday Press sub-editor to dub him ‘Mr Stinky’.
As in the Heywood-Madill case of the 1960s, police investigating the rapes got nowhere. The only clues were prints from some of the rape scenes, but these did not seem to match anything held on record … until the day in June, 1982, that a young fingerprint expert called Andy Wall recognised that the rapist’s prints resembled the mystery print taken from Garry Heywood’s car 16 years before.
It was a marvellous feat of forensic work. Police now knew that the Melbourne rapist was almost certainly the Shepparton killer of 1966, but they still had no idea who he was.
A taskforce was set up. Two years of painstaking detective work followed. Thousands of hours and millions of dollars later, hundreds of men had been eliminated from suspicion, but little else was achieved.
Eventually, in early 1985, the taskforce was wound up. Only then, after 19 years of evading detection, did the wanted man blunder into police hands. He was picked up for indecently exposing himself in Albury on 16 March, 1985.
Because of tougher fingerprint laws in NSW, Edmunds was routinely fingerprinted. From that moment it was only a matter of time.
When the fingerprint reached the central bureau in Sydney five days later it was instantly matched with the ‘Mr Stinky’ print at the top of the wanted list of unidentified prints. The case was all over bar a small formality: the arrest.
Shepparton detectives did that next day, 22 March, at the factory where Edmunds worked in the Melbourne suburb of Highett.
Edmunds was subsequently convicted of the Madill-Heywood-murders and five sex attacks, but because of limits to questioning under the since-abandoned six-hour rule he was not interviewed about dozens more rapes. Tracing Edmunds’s life, detectives uncovered the story of an outwardly ordinary working man who was a secret monster — a violent sexual deviant who had beaten and raped his first wife, molested his daughters, and once beat a cow with a shovel for minutes on end.
Some police still want to talk to Edmunds about unsolved crimes, but cannot while he is in jail unless he invites them to. At least, they believe, he owes it to his victims to confirm exactly which rapes he is responsible for.
It is true that Edmunds pleaded guilty to the crimes for which he was convicted. But the belief that he ever truly repented seems hollow after his escape attempt six year later.
Has the last chapter of the ‘Mr Stinky’ story been written?
Who knows? Edmunds has half a lifetime left to wait and watch for his next chance. Some day, when the events of 1992 are just a hazy memory and he returns to the mainstream prison on a lower security rating, he will make another move.
Never trust a caged dingo.
NOBODY who knew Reuben Lew was surprised that when he went to jail he spent the bare minimum term there. Nor that Lew —jailed for his commanding role in the Estate Mortgage scandal — somehow inveigled his way into leaving Morwell River Prison several times in 1994 to visit relatives, a privilege that led to a prison governor being suspended.
The governor probably suffered more over the incident than Lew, which would be par for the course. For most of his 62 years, Reuben Albert Lew has left behind a trail of people who suffered because they trusted him. The list includes, by some accounts, family and friends.
Even in jail, Lew manipulated the system to suit himself, despite an incident when another prisoner hit him with an electric kettle, reputedly because Lew tried to borrow it without permission. But according to prison sources, he also put his fund-raising skills to work for a charity run by inmates for disadvantaged children.
One pleasure he missed while behind bars was seeing the Melbourne performance of Jackie Mason, the New York comedian whose appearance at the Arts Centre in 1994 pulled a capacity crowd.
The audience loved Mason’s line of humour. Especially the joke where he insists that the Israeli Prime Minister really wants to give back the West Bank to the Palestinians, then shrugs and explains ‘but right now he can’t — it’s in his wife’s name.’
Had he been there that night, Reuben Lew might well have laughed long and loudly. But more than 50,000 investors — mostly retirees of modest means — who lost their money and their peace of mind in the Estate Mortgage disaster of 1990 might not see the joke.
And if they could see Reuben Lew now, they might be even less amused. Because while they got left with the mortgages, Reuben seems to have got the estate.
In his wife’s name, of course. And a few others.
THE six Estate Mortgage trusts were said to have assets in 1990 worth $1 billion and its 52,400 investors, many of them elderly and using their retirement packages had deposited $640 million in the group.
Bricks and mortar has always been considered a sensible and conservative investment strategy and the Lew-controlled Estate Mortgage seemed to be the top of the pack during a booming property market.
But as the boom started to run out of steam, the repeated assurance from Estate Mortgages that was all was well began to sound a little shallow.
Over the next seven years, a story of greed, corruption and mismanagement emerged as wounded investors and angry regulators took their grievances to the courts. Reuben Lew and his son Richard were jailed in late 1993 and Burns Philp was forced to offer investors $116 million in settlement for what one legal counsel claimed was like sentries falling ‘asleep while trust funds … were spent on speculative, hazardous and imprudent property investments.’ Lew was later to admit doing deals with developers that would net him a percentage of their projected profit in return for providing finance. It was discovered that a cash-strapped developer had received loans from one Estate Mortgage company to repay loans to other parts of the group.
Seven years after the funds were frozen, investors are still out of pocket and almost 1000 have died. Managers have recouped about $340 million for investors through property sales and damages claims but have had to pay $30 million in legal costs. Of the initial $640 million frozen in 1990, $300 million plus interest is still unrecovered.
A CYNIC might say Estate Mortgage’s walking wounded are lucky compared with some victims of the 1980s financial orgy. At least they don’t have to go to Majorca to see where the entrepreneur they trusted with their money washed up.
Reuben and Sandra Lew moved out of their luxury apartment in Maple Grove, Toorak (later occupied by Robert Sangster’s son Adam), soon after the Estate Mortgage balloon went up in 1990.
After an eight-week trial in 1993, Reuben Lew and his son, Richard, were found guilty of using their positions as company officers to gain financial advantage.
After two years at Morwell River and Pentridge, Lew saw no need to do a Skase, and seek refuge overseas. He rejoined his wife at the country retreat bought partly in her name in 1989.
The Lew estate is secluded — but little more than an hour’s drive from Toorak. To get there, a group of disgruntled investors, for instance, could pool their pensions, hire a coach, and head east from Melbourne.
They would pass through a succession of semi-suburban hamlets — Seville, Launching Place, Wesburn — and, finally, reach Warburton, sleepy-hollow home of the old Weetbix factory and Seventh Day Adventists.
There, just east of town at Big Pat’s Creek, in a valley overshadowed by Mount Donna Buang, the small holdings give way to a neat boundary fence lined with hundreds of young oak trees.
An avenue of 80 mature oaks stands guard over a broad, well-gravelled lane running down to a tree-lined creek. On each side are picture-postcard paddocks fenced with post and rail, against a backdrop of hills snuggled against a blue mountain range.
Hereford cattle graze in one paddock, a couple of thoroughbred weanlings in the other. It could be, bar the gum trees along the creek, a scene from a millionaire’s stud farm anywhere from Kentucky to Kent. Or, to be technical, a stud farm occupied by someone who still seems to live like a millionaire.
The view across the Lew estate is stunning. The place looks a million dollars, and no wonder: it’s cost that and more, so far. On a clear day you might imagine you can sue forever.
But anybody who did sue shouldn’t count on winning. When Reuben Lew declared himself bankrupt in 1994, he listed his worldly assets as a watch and cufflinks worth $150. Jackie Mason would love that.
Fortunately, Lew married well. Just as Alan Bond’s family has come into money just in time to succour him in troubled times, Lew has been blessed with a spouse and business associates who keep him in something like the style he became accustomed to as a high-flying financier.
Such as where he lives.
The house that Sandra Lew built can’t be seen from the main road. Nor from the tree-lined drive, even if a curious traveller follows it all the way to the creek, where ‘Private, keep out’ signs are posted on an electric fence.
The house can only be reached from a double-gated entrance opening off a dead-end road that most people would mistake as a private driveway. Intentionally or not, as hideaways go, it’s as shrewdly sited as any European hunting lodge for the seriously rich and famous, wary of the long lens and the possibility of assassination attempts.
But there’s more to the Lew house than the difficulty of seeing it. There are, according to locals, four generous bedrooms, the main with an en suite bathroom and walk-in wardrobes. It is solid brick, probably 50 squares in size, has expensive timber floors and open fireplaces and is reputed by local tradesmen to have cost more than $1 million to build.
But the most interesting thing about the house is when it was built. Wreckers demolished the perfectly-sound homestead that was on the site in 1990, and a small army of tradesmen started work on the new one immediately … just as the Estate Mortgage empire crashed, burning more than 50,000 investors and most of a billion dollars.
A title search reveals Sandra Lew’s name on only one small 18-hectare lot, which is one of the front paddocks. Another 98 hectares is registered in the name of Pindanon Pty Ltd. But it is well known in the district that there are several other titles that add up to more than twice that amount of land.
One well-placed source says the titles to the property are ‘like a doughnut’, with Sandra Lew’s small central holding surrounded by others, most of which are — or were — nominally owned by a Hong Kong-based accountant.
To this end, farm ‘reports’ have been regularly drafted by Lew’s staff to send to Hong Kong, and cheques for work done have at times been routed from Hong Kong.
Once, when he was flying high, Lew impressed people as charismatic, clever, charming, confident and cool. But that was $600 million and almost a decade ago. These days he is uncharacteristically shy.
He seems to have tried hard to vanish from view. Not only is his telephone number unlisted, but his address is not listed on the electoral roll.
The Lews drive a standard Ford sedan and a four-wheel-drive that show little sign of conspicuous consumption while they are in public. Once off the estate, they keep a very low profile, indeed.
At his trial, Reuben Lew’s lawyer told the court his client was deeply remorseful for his conduct. The son of a grocer, he had risen from being a dairy farmer to the heights of big business without the privileges of white-collar offenders who normally appeared before the court.
John Walker, QC, told the judge that Lew’s only remaining asset then was a mortgaged dairy farm and he and his wife were ‘virtually destitute’.
Four years later, behind the tall iron gates and stone fence surrounding their estate, life goes on, and in some style.
Last week, balloons were tied to the gatepost after a family party. This is one sign that a handful of friends and relatives are regular visitors. Some are known to share the Lews’s enthusiasm for breeding and racing thoroughbred horses, and several have been regular faces at yearling and broodmare sales.
But the inner circle is small, these days. Not everyone who knew the Lews still associates with them.
One former business associate says Estate Mortgage hurt more than the small unit-holders who invested with it. Reuben Lew persuaded several people who considered themselves to be his friends to invest heavily in his companies. More than one family lost millions, and they have not forgiven him. Apart from personal losses they are also angry that he has brought disrepute to the overwhelmingly law-abiding Jewish business community.
Another associate describes Lew as ‘the most charismatic person I ever met. I watched him dealing with (a bank) and it was mesmerising. He was a beautiful con man.’
These days, says the former associate bitterly, Lew’s closest friends are probably his guard dogs, a pair of savage german shepherds he calls Topaz and Brahms. ‘He calls them his children.’